한국수학교육학회지시리즈E:수학교육논문집 (Communications of Mathematical Education)

  • 제31권2호
  • /
  • Pages.187-201
  • /
  • 2017
  • /
  • 1226-6663(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2287-9935(eISSN)
한국수학교육학회 (Korean Society of Mathematical Education)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

수학학습 정의적 영역에 대한 인과 모형 분석

A Causal Model Analysis of Non-Cognitive Characteristics of Mathematics Learning

  • Lee, Hwan Chul (Korea Foundation for the Advancement of Science and Creativity) ;
  • Kim, Hyung Won (School of Mathematical and Statistical Sciences, University of Texas Rio Grande Valley) ;
  • Baeck, SeungGeun (Admission office of Ajou University, Ajou University) ;
  • Ko, Ho Kyoung (Graduate School of Education, Ajou University) ;
  • Yi, Hyun Sook (Department of Education, Konkuk University)
  • 투고 : 2017.04.21
  • 심사 : 2017.05.04
  • 발행 : 2017.05.15
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구는 우리나라 초 중 고 학생들의 수학학습 실태 조사 연구의 일환으로 시도되었다. 본 연구는 수학학습에 영향을 미칠 수 있는 가치, 흥미, 학습태도, 외적 동기, 내적 동기, 학습의지, 효능감 등 7개의 정의적 요인을 가지고 분석하였다. 로지스틱 회귀분석을 통해 추출한 결과 '효능감'이 초 중 고 학생 모두에게 가장 영향을 많이 미치는 요인으로 나타났다. 또한 인과 모형으로 분석한 결과에 따르면, 학생들이 수학에 대한 '가치'를 인식할 때 '외적/내적동기'가 발생하고, 두 동기는 수학에 대한 '흥미'와 '학습의지'를 높이며, 마지막으로 긍정적인 '학습태도'와 '효능감'을 발달시킨다는 사실을 확인할 수 있었다. 또한 학교급이 높아질수록 외적동기의 영향력이 강해지는 반면에 초등학생인 경우 외적 동기가 흥미로 이어지지 않았으며, 초등학생과 중학생의 경우 '흥미'가 수학 포기여부에 영향을 준 주요 매개 변인으로 나타났다. 본 연구에서 제시한 경로 분석 연구 결과는 정의적 영역의 각 요소가 어떤 경로로 수학포기에 이르는가를 분석한 것으로, 향후 학생들의 수학 학습 지도에 중점을 두어야 할 사항과 우선순위를 두고 접근해야하는 요소 등에 대한 시사점으로 활용할 수 있을 것으로 기대한다.

The study in this paper, which is part of a bigger study investigating non-cognitive characteristics of Korean students at the 4-12 grade levels, aims to identify the influential characteristics that explain students' decision to give up on mathematics learning. We consider seven non-cognitive student characteristics: value, interest, attitudes, external motivation, internal motivation, learning conation and efficacy. Data were collected from 21,485 Korean students, and were analyzed with a logistic regression method using SPSS. The findings show that efficacy was the most significant indicator of students' decision to give up on mathematics learning in all three grade level bands: elementary (4th-6th), middle (7th-9th) and high (10th-12th). In particular, the causal model analysis shows that students who highly value mathematics tend to have stronger internal and external motivation, which bring about stronger interest and learning conation, which in turn lead to positive attitudes and strong efficacy regarding the learning of mathematics. It was further found that while external motivation was a significant indicator of upper grade level students' decision to give up on mathematics learning, it was only a moderate indicator for lower grade level students. The findings of this study provide useful information about which non-cognitive areas need to be focused on, in what grade levels, to help students stay on track and not fall behind in learning mathematics.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. 고호경 외 (2017). 수학나눔지원단 운영. 한국과학창의재단 연구보고서, 2017-1. (Ko, H. K. et al. (2017). Managing the mathematics learning support group. The Korea Foundation for the Advancement of Science and Creativity. Research Report, 2017-1.)
  2. 공민숙.강윤수 (2014). GeoGebra를 활용한 극한 지도가 고등학생들의 수학 학습에 미치는 영향. 한국학교수학, 17(4), 697-716. (Gong. M. S. & Kang. Y. S. (2014). Effects of Teaching of Limit Using GeoGebra to High School Students' Mathematics Learning. The Korean School Mathematics Society, 17(4), 697-716.)
  3. 교육부 (2015). 수학과 교육과정. 교육부 고시 제2015-74호 [별책8번]. (Korea Ministry of Education (2015). Mathematics Curriculum, Bulletin, No. 2015-74. [Supplement No. 8])
  4. 남진영 (2014). 수학의 가치 교육: 폴라니의 인식론을 중심으로. 한국초등수학교육학회지, 18(1), 63-81. (Nam. J. Y. (2014). Teaching of the value of mathematics : in the perspective of Michael Polanyi's philosophy. Journal for Korea Society of Elementary Mathematics Education. 18(1), 63-81.)
  5. 김부미 (2016). 수학 학습 동기 증진 프로그램 개발 및 적용 효과 분석. 학교수학, 18(2), 397-423. (Kim. B. (2016). Development of Program for Enhancing Learners' Mathematics Learning Motivation and Analysis of Its' Effects. School Mathematics, 18(2), 397-423.)
  6. 김상화.방정숙 (2007). 수학을 왜 배우는가? : 초등학생들의 이해를 중심으로. 수학교육학연구, 17(4), 419-436. (Kim. S. H. & Pang. J. S. (2007). Why Study Mathematics? - Focused on the Elementary School Students' Conception -. The journal of educational research in mathematics, 17(4), 419-436.)
  7. 김수진.김경희.박지현 (2014). 중학생들의 수학에 대한 흥미와 가치 인식 변화가 수학 성취도에 미치는 영향 분석. 교과교육학연구, 18(3), 683-701. (Kim, S. J., Kim, K. H., & Park, J. H. (2014). The effect of mathematics achievement on changes in mathematics interest and values for middle school students. Journal of Research in Curriculum & Instruction, 8(3), 683-701.)
  8. 방정숙.조수윤 (2016). 한국 학생들의 수학과 수학 학습에 대한 가치 인식: 초등학교 6학년과 중학교 3학년을 중심으로. 한국수학교육 학회지 시리즈 A <수학교육>, 55(4), 467-484. (Pang. J. S. & Cho. S. (2016). An Investigation of What Korean Students Valued with regards to Mathematics and Mathematics Learning: A Study with Sixth and Ninth Graders. The Mathematical Education, 55(4), 467-484.)
  9. 송정범.이태욱 (2011). 교육용 로봇을 활용한 STEM 통합교육이 학업성취, 교과태도에 미치는 효과, 한국정보교육학회 논문지, 15(1), 11-22. (Song, J. B. & Lee, T. W. (2011). The Effect of STEM Integration Education Using Educational Robot on Academic Achievement and Subject Attitude. JOURNAL OF The Korean Association of information Education, 15(1), 11-22.)
  10. 우연경.김성경.최영인 (2016). 초등학생의 교과에 대한 가치 인식이 학습참여와 학업성취에 미치는 영향 : 국어와 수 학 비교를 중심으로. 학습자중심교과교육연구, 16(12), 457-474. (Woo. Y. K., Kim. S. K., & Choi, Y. (2016). Specificity of Task Value in Predicting Students' Cognitive Engagement and Achievement. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 16(12), 457-474.)
  11. 이광상.임해미.박인용.서민희.김부미(2016). 국가수준 학업성취도 평가의 수학과 정의적 영역 설문 문항 개발. 교육과정평가연구, 19(4), 45-70. (Lee, G., Rim, H., Park, I., Seo, M., & Kim. B. (2016). A Study on Development of the Survey Items for Affective Domain in Mathematics of NAEA The Journal of Curriculum and Evaluation, 19(4), 45-70.)
  12. 이미경 외 (2004). PISA 2003 결과 분석 연구-수학적 소양, 읽기 소양, 과학적 소양 수준 및 배경변인 분석. 연구보고 RRE 2004-2-1. 한국교육과정평가원. (Lee, M. K., et al. (2004). The PISA 2003 Results-An Analysis of performances and influences on Mathematical Literacy, Reading Proficiency, Scientific Literacy. Report, RRE 2004-2-1. Korea Institute for Curriculum and Education.)
  13. 이미경 외 (2007). OECD/PISA 평가틀 및 공개 문항 분석. 한국교육과정평가원. 연구자료 ORM 2007-24. (Lee, M. K., et al. (2007). An Analysis of the Assessment Rubric for and Released Items of OECD/PISA. Report, ORM 2007-24. Korea Institute for Curriculum and Education.)
  14. 이민희.임해미 (2013). 수학사를 활용한 융합적 프로젝트기반학습(STEAM PBL)의 설계 및 효과 분석, 학교수학, 15(1), 159-177. (Lee, M. & Rim, H. (2013). A Design and Effect of STEAM PBL based on the History of Mathematics. School Mathematics, 15(1), 159-177.)
  15. 이재학․정상권․김선희․최민식․원유미․김영진, 고호경 (2013). 스토리텔링을 활용한 중학교 기하영역 자료 개발 연구. 수학교육 논문집, 27(3), 341-356. (Lee, J. H., Chung, S. K., Kim, S. H., Choi, M. S., Won,, Y. M., Kim, Y. J., & Ko, H. K. (2013). Development of Meterial for Middle School Geometry using Storytelling. Communications of Mathematical Education. 27(3). 235-249.)
  16. 이종희.김부미 (2010). 수학 학습 동기와 귀인의 측정 도구 개발 및 분석. 수학교육학연구, 20(3), 413-444. (Lee, C. H., & Kim. B. (2010). Instrument Development and Analysis for Mathematical Learning Motivation and Causal Attribution. The journal of educational research in mathematics, 20(3), 413-444.)
  17. 이종희.김수진 (2010). PISA 2003 결과에서 수학의 정의적 영역에 영향을 주는 변인 분석. 학교수학, 12(2), 219-237. (Lee, C. H., & Kim. S. (2010). Analysis of Affective Factors on Mathematics Learning According to the Results of PISA2003. School Mathematics, 12(2), 219-237.)
  18. 이종희.김선희.김수진.김기연.김부미.윤수철.김윤민 (2011). 수학 학습에 대한 정의적 성취 검사 도구 개발 및 검증. 학교수학, 50(2), 247-261. (Lee, C. H., Kim, S. H.. Kim, S. J. Kim, K. Y., Kim, B. M Yun, S. C., & Kim, Y. M. (2011). Development and verification of an affective inventory in Mathematical Learning. The Mathematical Education, 50(2), 247-261.)
  19. 임해미 (2016). 부모의 수학에 대한 태도와 기대가 수학 학습 동기와 성취도에 미치는 영향. 수학교육학연구, 26(4). 701-714. (Rim, H. (2016). The Relationships Among Parental Attitudes, Parental Expectations, Motivation and Achievement Focusing on Mathematics. The journal of educational research in mathematics, 26(4). 701-714.)
  20. 조현철 (2011) 내외적 학습동기, 자기결정성, 목표지향, 자기지각, 지능관 및 자기조절학습전략 요인들의 학습태도, 학습 행동 및 학업성취에 대한 효과. 교육심리연구, 25(1), 33-60. (Cho, H. C. (2011). The effects of academic motivation, self-determination, goal orientation, self-perception, implicit theory of intelligence and self-regulated learning strategies on learning attitude, behavior and outcomes The Korean Journal of Educational Phycology. 25(1), 33-60.)
  21. 주영주.이종희.김선희 (2011). 수학교과에서 남녀 집단 간의 학업적 자기효능감, 흥미, 외적 동기 및 학업성취도의 영 향력 차이검증. 교과교육학연구, 15(4), 1019-1041. (Ju. Y., Lee, C. H., & Kim, S. H. (2011). A Comparison Study between Male and Female Students on Academic Self-efficacy, Interest, External Motivation, and Mathematics Achievement of High School Students. Journal of Research in Curriculum & Instruction, Curriculum, 15(4), 1019-1041.)
  22. 한국과학창의재단 (2015). 수학학습 실태조사 및 개선방안 연구. 한국과학창의재단 연구보고서. 2015-12. (The Korea Foundation for the Advancement of Science and Creativity (2015). A Research on the Actual Condition and Improvement of Mathematics Learning. Research Report, 2015-12.)
  23. Bandura, A. (1988). Self-regulation of motivation and action through goal systems. In V. Hamilton, G. H. Bower, & N. H. Frijda (Eds.), Cognitive perspectives on emotion and motivation (pp. 37-61). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  24. Bandura, A. (1993).Perceived Self-Efficacy in Cognitive Development and Functioning. Educational Psychologist, 28(2), 117-148 https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep2802_3
  25. Collins, J. L. (1982). Self-efficacy and ability in achievement behaviour. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York.
  26. DeBellis, V. A., & Goldin, G. A. (2006). Affect and meta-affect in mathematical problem solving: a representational perspective. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 63, 131-147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-006-9026-4
  27. Dubois, D. J. (1990). The relationship between selected student team learning strategies and student achievement and attitude in middle school mathematics. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Houston. Ed.
  28. Fennema, E., & Sherman, J., A. (1976). Fennema-Sherman mathematics attitude scales: Instruments designed to measure attitudes toward the learning of mathematics by females and males. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 7(5), 324-326. https://doi.org/10.2307/748467
  29. Haladyna. T., Shaughnessy. J., & Shaughnessy. J. M.(1983). A causal Analysis of attitude toward mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 14(1), 19-29. https://doi.org/10.2307/748794
  30. Hannula, M. S. (2006). Affect in Mathematical Thinking and learning. In J. Maass & W. Schloglmann (Eds.), New mathematics education research and practice (pp.209-232. Rotterdam: Sense
  31. Ko, H., & Yi, H. (2011). Development and Validation of Mathematics Anxiety Scale for Students. Asia Pacific Education Review, 12(6), 509-521. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-011-9150-4
  32. Locke, E.A., & Latham, G.P. (1990). A theory of goal setting and task performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  33. McLeod, D. B. (1992). Research on affect in mathematics education: a reconceptualization. In D. A. Gouwes(ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp.575-596), Macmillan, NY.
  34. Randhawa, B. S., Beamer, J. E., & Lundberg, I. (1991). Role of mathematics self-efficacy in the structural model of mathematics achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 41-48.
  35. Sandman, R. S. (1980). The mathematics attitude inventory: Instrument and User's manual. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 11(2), 148-149. https://doi.org/10.2307/748906
  36. Schunk, D. H. (1989). Self-efficacy and achievement behaviors. Educational Psychology Review, 1, 173-208. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01320134
  37. Schunk, D. H. (1991). Self-efficacy and academic motivation. Educational Psychologist, 26, 207-231. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.1991.9653133
  38. Sherer, M., & Maddux, J. E. (1982). The self-efficacy scale: construction and validation. Psychological Reports, 51, 663-671. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1982.51.2.663
  39. Wood, R. E., & Locke, E. A. (1987). The relationship of self-efficacy and grade goals to academic performance. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 47, 1013-1024. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164487474017
  40. Zarch, M. K., & Kadivar, P. (2006). The role of mathematics self-efficacy and mathematics ability in the structural model of mathematics performance. WSEAS Transactions on Mathematics, 6, 713-720.