DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Optimising Workforce Structure in Public Sector : the System Dynamics of Employment Planning in Australia

공공부문에서 고용구조의 최적화 : 호주 고용계획을 위한 시스템 다이내믹스

  • 윤영곤 (가주글로벌비즈니스지원센터) ;
  • 윤경주 (글로벌사이버대학교 실용영어학과)
  • Received : 2017.11.02
  • Accepted : 2017.12.01
  • Published : 2017.12.31

Abstract

This paper illustrates key features of an enterprise employment simulation which integrates a system dynamic feedback model with a cost-effectiveness optimisation capability utilising genetic algorithms. Its core is a 3-dimensional array structure tracking staff numbers by rank, by time-in-rank, by years-of-service. The resultant model, which could readily be adapted to non-Defence use, can identify, given user specification of any mix of employment rules, the likely patterns of employment behaviour including: resultant time-in-rank and years-of-service profiles; ability of a Unit to fill all positions to target strength; ability to fill promotional positions within normal rules for substantive promotion; need to fill promotional positions using rules for temporary promotion or transfer from outside; necessary recruitment pattern to sustain target strength.

본 논문은 알고리즘을 활용한 최적화를 바탕으로 한 시스템 다이내믹스 피드백 모델을 통해 고용 시뮬레이션의 특징을 제시하는 목적을 가지고 있고 직위, 근무기간, 계급 등의 요소를 중심으로 적정한 고용 인원을 제시하는 3차원 논리적 판단구조를 제공한다. 호주 육군의 고용정책에 대해 보다 신축적인 고용시스템을 제시할 목적으로 시스템 다이내믹스 모델을 통해 국방부의 변화가 심한 정책에 대한 안정적 고용 적정선을 파악한다. 특히 생산성을 최대로 발휘할 수 있는 필요한 고용 패턴 및 외부 인력의 고용, 내부인력의 타 조직으로 이동 등 다양한 가능성을 분석한다.

Keywords

References

  1. Hillson, D., (2002). Extending the risk process to manage opportunities, International Journal of Project Management, 20(3), 235-240. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-7863(01)00074-6
  2. Sterman, J., (2000). Business Dynamics: Systems Thinking and Modelling for a Complex World. (No. HD30. 2 S7835 2000).Boston, MA, Irwin McGraw-Hill.
  3. McLucas, A.C. (2000). 'When to use qualitative or quantitative system dynamics techniques: guidelines derived from analysis of recent man-made catastrophes', in: Proceedings of System Dynamics 2000, International System Dynamics Conference, The System Dynamics Society, Bergen, Norway.
  4. McLucas, A.C. (2000). 'Rectifying the failure to learn in complex environments', in: Journal of Battlefield Technology, 3(3), 42-50.
  5. Coyle, R.G. (2015) The Use of Optimization Methods for Policy Design in a System Dynamics Model, System Dynamics Review, 1(1), 81-91. https://doi.org/10.1002/sdr.4260010107
  6. Sholtes, R. M. (1994). Optimising system behaviour using genetic algorithms. In International System Dynamics Conference, Methodological and Technical Issues (p. 246).
  7. Wolstenholme, E. F., & Al-Alusi, A. S. (1987). System dynamics and heuristic optimisation in defence analysis. System Dynamics Review, 3(2), 102-115. https://doi.org/10.1002/sdr.4260030203
  8. Billington, J. (1997). A few things every manager ought to know about risk. Harvard Management Update, 2(3), 1-12.
  9. Hunter, W. C., & Smith, S. D. (2002). Risk management in the global economy: A review essay. Journal of banking & finance, 26(2-3), 205-221. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4266(01)00219-9
  10. Stevenson, R. W., Wolstenholme, E. F., & North Yorkshire, H. L. (1999). Value Chain Dynamics-Applying System Dynamics to Support Value Thinking. In 17th International Conference of the System Dynamics Society and 5th Australian & New Zealand Systems Conference.