DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Microstructure and Soft Magnetic Properties of Fe-6.5 wt.%Si Sheets Fabricated by Powder Hot Rolling

  • Kim, Myung Shin (Liquid Processing & Casting Technology R&D Department, Korea Institute of Industrial Technology) ;
  • Kwon, Do Hun (Liquid Processing & Casting Technology R&D Department, Korea Institute of Industrial Technology) ;
  • Hong, Won Sik (Electronic Convergence Materials & Device Research Center, Korea Electronics Technology Institute (KETI)) ;
  • Kim, Hwi Jun (Liquid Processing & Casting Technology R&D Department, Korea Institute of Industrial Technology)
  • Received : 2017.04.04
  • Accepted : 2017.04.20
  • Published : 2017.04.28

Abstract

Fe-6.5 wt.% Si alloys are widely known to have excellent soft magnetic properties such as high magnetic flux density, low coercivity, and low core loss at high frequency. In this work, disc-shaped preforms are prepared by spark plasma sintering at 1223 K after inert gas atomization of Fe-6.5 wt.% Si powders. Fe-6.5 wt.% Si sheets are rolled by a powder hot-rolling process without cracking, and their microstructure and soft magnetic properties are investigated. The microstructure and magnetic properties (saturation magnetization and core loss) of the hot-rolled Fe-6.5 wt.% Si sheets are examined by scanning electron microscopy, electron backscatter diffraction, vibration sample magnetometry, and AC B-H analysis. The Fe-6.5 wt.% Si sheet rolled at a total reduction ratio of 80% exhibits good soft magnetic properties such as a saturation magnetization of 1.74 T and core loss ($W_{5/1000}$) of 30.7 W/kg. This result is caused by an increase in the electrical resistivity resulting from an increased particle boundary density and the oxide layers between the primary particle boundaries.

Keywords

References

  1. R. M. Bozorth: Ferromagnetism, Van Nostrand, New York, 1951.
  2. B. D. Cullity and C. D. Graham: Introduction to Magnetic Materials, 2nd ed., John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New Jersey, 2009.
  3. Y. Sato, T. Sato and Y. Okazaki: Mater. Sci. Eng., A, 99 (1988) 73. https://doi.org/10.1016/0025-5416(88)90295-9
  4. B. Viala, J. Degauque, M. Baricco, E. Ferrara, M. Pasquale and F. Fiorillo: J. Magn. Magn. Mater., 160 (1996) 315. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-8853(96)00209-0
  5. Y. F. Liang, F. Ye, J. P. Lin, Y. L. Wang and G. L. Chen: J. Alloys. Compd., 491 (2010) 268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2009.10.118
  6. T. Yamaji, M. Abe, Y. Takada, K. Okada and T. Hiratani: J. Magn. Magn. Mater., 133 (1994) 187. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-8853(94)90521-5
  7. R. Li, Q. Shen, L. Zhang and T. Zhang: J. Magn. Magn. Mater., 281 (2004) 135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2004.04.098
  8. Jiten Das, K. Chandra, P. S. Misra and B. Sarma: J. Magn. Magn. Mater., 320 (2008) 906. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2007.09.013
  9. S. Nagarjuna, K. Balasubramanian and D. S. Sarma: Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 225 (1997) 118. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-5093(96)10578-5
  10. P. Jang and B. Lee: IEEE Trans. Magn., 45 (2009) 2781. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMAG.2009.2020560