The Journal of Korean Academy of Prosthodontics (대한치과보철학회지)

The Korean Academy of Prosthodonitics (대한치과보철학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Implant supported prosthetic rehabilitation of severely atrophic mandible with fixed detachable prosthesis

심하게 흡수된 하악골에서 fixed detachable prosthesis를 이용한 임플란트 지지 보철 수복증례

  • Lee, Hak-Joo (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University) ;
  • Lim, Young-Jun (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University) ;
  • Kwon, Ho-Beom (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University) ;
  • Kim, Myung-Joo (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University)
  • 이학주 (서울대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실) ;
  • 임영준 (서울대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실) ;
  • 권호범 (서울대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실) ;
  • 김명주 (서울대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실)
  • Received : 2016.08.25
  • Accepted : 2016.09.21
  • Published : 2017.04.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Implant supported prostheses have improved the quality of lives of totally edentulous patients. However, there are some limitations on the number of implants related to the residual bone level or the economic concern and so on. In this situation, applying fixed detachable prosthesis with bilateral cantilevers can be considered. This clinical report describes implant supported prosthetic rehabilitation of a patient with severe bone resorption. The patient was satisfied and felt comfortable with upper complete denture and lower fixed detachable prosthesis.

완전 무치악 환자에서 임플란트를 이용한 치료 방법은 환자의 삶의 질 개선에 크게 기여하였으나, 잔존골 상태나 경제력 등에 의해 임플란트의 식립 개수에 제한을 받는 상황이 종종 나타난다. 이러한 경우 일반적으로 임플란트 피개의치나 임플란트 융합 국소의치 형태로 치료계획을 세울 수 있지만, 정확한 설계를 바탕으로 양측성 캔틸레버 형태의 고정성 보철물 역시 고려해 볼 수 있다. 본 증례에서는 심한 치조골 흡수를 보이는 완전 무치악 환자에서 상악 총의치 및 하악 임플란트 지지 고정성 캔틸레버 보철물 제작을 통해 기능적, 심미적으로 양호한 결과를 얻었기에 보고하고자 한다.

Keywords

References

  1. Allen PF, McMillan AS. A longitudinal study of quality of life outcomes in older adults requesting implant prostheses and complete removable dentures. Clin Oral Implants Res 2003;14:173-9. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2003.140206.x
  2. Heydecke G, Boudrias P, Awad MA, De Albuquerque RF, Lund JP, Feine JS. Within-subject comparisons of maxillary fixed and removable implant prostheses: Patient satisfaction and choice of prosthesis. Clin Oral Implants Res 2003;14:125-30. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2003.140117.x
  3. Jemt T, Linden B. Fixed implant-supported prostheses with welded titanium frameworks. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1992;12:177-84.
  4. Rangert B, Jemt T, Jorneus L. Forces and moments on Branemark implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1989;4:241-7.
  5. Zitzmann NU, Marinello CP. A review of clinical and technical considerations for fixed and removable implant prostheses in the edentulous mandible. Int J Prosthodont 2002;15:65-72.
  6. Zitzmann NU, Marinello CP. Treatment plan for restoring the edentulous maxilla with implant-supported restorations: removable overdenture versus fixed partial denture design. J Prosthet Dent 1999;82:188-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(99)70155-1
  7. Gallucci GO, Doughtie CB, Hwang JW, Fiorellini JP, Weber HP. Five-year results of fixed implant-supported rehabilitations with distal cantilevers for the edentulous mandible. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009;20:601-7.
  8. Ekelund JA, Lindquist LW, Carlsson GE, Jemt T. Implant treatment in the edentulous mandible: a prospective study on Branemark system implants over more than 20 years. Int J Prosthodont 2003;16:602-8.
  9. Kwon T, Bain PA, Levin L. Systematic review of short- (5-10 years) and long-term (10 years or more) survival and success of full-arch fixed dental hybrid prostheses and supporting implants. J Dent 2014;42:1228-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2014.05.016
  10. Shackleton JL, Carr L, Slabbert JC, Becker PJ. Survival of fixed implant-supported prostheses related to cantilever lengths. J Prosthet Dent 1994;71:23-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(94)90250-X
  11. English CE. Critical A-P spread. Implant Soc 1990;1:2-3.
  12. Jemt T. Three-dimensional distortion of gold alloy castings and welded titanium frameworks. Measurements of the precision of fit between completed implant prostheses and the master casts in routine edentulous situations. J Oral Rehabil 1995;22:557-64. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.1995.tb01049.x
  13. Abduo J. Fit of CAD/CAM implant frameworks: a comprehensive review. J Oral Implantol 2014;40:758-66. https://doi.org/10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-12-00117
  14. Ortorp A, Jemt T. CNC-milled titanium frameworks supported by implants in the edentulous jaw: a 10-year comparative clinical study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2012;14:88-99. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2009.00232.x
  15. Salvi GE, Zitzmann NU. The effects of anti-infective preventive measures on the occurrence of biologic implant complications and implant loss: a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2014;29:292-307. https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.2014suppl.g5.1
  16. White SN, Lewis SG. Framework design for bone-anchored fixed prostheses. J Prosthet Dent 1992;67:264-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(92)90465-M