DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

2014 한국의 보건의료의 상대적 위치와 추이: 경제협력개발기구 국가와 비교

Position Value for Relative Comparison of Healthcare Status of Korea in 2014

  • 이상아 (연세대학교 대학원 보건학과) ;
  • 박은철 (연세대학교 보건정책 및 관리연구소)
  • Lee, Sang Ah (Department of Public Health, Yonsei University Graduate School) ;
  • Park, Eun-Cheol (Institute of Health Services Research, Yonsei University)
  • 투고 : 2017.03.06
  • 심사 : 2017.03.15
  • 발행 : 2017.03.31

초록

The aim of this study was to investigate the current and trend of healthcare status of South Korea compared to Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) countries. We used the position value for relative comparison (PARC) method for measuring the healthcare status of South Korea by five parts of healthcare policy (demand, supply, accessibility, quality, and cost). Additionally, we conducted Mann-Kendall test for analyzing the trend of PARC from 2000 to the present. Demand, supply, accessibility, and quality of healthcare of Korea were located upon the average of OECD countries, and showed an increasing trend from 2000 to the present. However, primary care and screening for cervical cancer were placed at a lower level compared the OECD average. In conclusion, the current state of healthcare in Korea seems to be generally beyond the average among OECD countries. However, some parts, including primary care, need to be improved.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Park EC, Jang SI. The diagnosis of healthcare policy problems in Korea. J Korean Med Assoc 2012;55(10):932-939. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5124/jkma.2012.55.10.932.
  2. Woolf SH, Stange KC. A sense of priorities for the healthcare commons. Am J Prev Med 2006;31(1):99-102. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2006.03.010.
  3. Park EC. Cancer control policy, theory and reality. Goyang: National Cancer Center; 2010.
  4. The Korean Society for Preventive Medicine. Preventive medicine and public health. 3rd ed. Seoul: Kyechuk Munwhasa; 2017.
  5. Kissick WL. Medicine's dilemmas: infinite needs versus finite resources. New Haven (CT): Yale University Press; 1994.
  6. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. OECD health data [Internet]. Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development; 2017[cited 2017 Mar 2]. Available from: http://stats.oecd.org/index.aspx?DataSetCode=HEALTH_STAT, 2017.
  7. Jang SI, Nam JM, Choi J, Park EC. Disease management index of potential years of life lost as a tool for setting priorities in national disease control using OECD health data. Health Policy 2014;115(1):92-99. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2013.11.007.
  8. Winkler S. A user-written SAS program for estimating temporal trends and their magnitude. Palatka (FL): St. Johns River Water Management District; 2004.
  9. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. Health at a glance 2015: OECD indicators. Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development; 2015.
  10. Cho Y. The distribution of radiological technologists and high price medical equipments in Korea. J Korean Soc Radiol 2014;8(6):339-346. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7742/jksr.2014.8.6.339.
  11. Hwang JH. Shortage of public healthcare personnel, is it a problem of number of doctors? J Korean Med Assoc 2012;55(9):812-814. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5124/jkma.2012.55.9.812.
  12. Lee JS. Current status of quality management of medical imaging in Korea. J Korean Med Assoc 2015;58(12):1119-1124. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5124/jkma.2015.58.12.1119.
  13. Oh YH, Kim JH. The demand and supply of major medical equipments and policy recommendations. Health Soc Welf Rev 2007;27:96-121. https://doi.org/10.15709/hswr.2007.27.2.96
  14. Park HW. Improving quality of healthcare in Korea. J Korean Med Assoc 2012;55(10):969-977. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5124/jkma.2012.55.10.969.
  15. Kang HC. Restructuring of provider reimbursement methods for the value-based, patient-centered healthcare system. Health Welf Policy Forum 2015;(230):31-43.