DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Subjective Symptoms of Peri-Implantitis and Satisfaction according to Prosthesis Methods

임플란트 보철방식에 따른 임플란트 주위염 자각증상 및 만족도

  • Cha, Ji-Ae (Department of Dental Hygiene, Graduate School of Public Health, Gachon University) ;
  • Han, Gyeong-Soon (Department of Dental Hygiene, Graduate School of Public Health, Gachon University)
  • 차지애 (가천대학교 보건대학원 치위생학전공) ;
  • 한경순 (가천대학교 보건대학원 치위생학전공)
  • Received : 2017.02.27
  • Accepted : 2017.03.28
  • Published : 2017.04.30

Abstract

From March 1, 2016 to August 31, 2016, 375 dental implant patients between the ages of 30 and 70 years to evaluate their subjective symptoms and satisfaction according to prosthesis methods. The collected data were analyzed using the chi-square distribution test, t-test, one-way analysis of variance, and multiple logistic regression. Of the patients with subjective symptoms of peri-implantitis, 40.5% reported food impaction, 49.1% reported bleeding, 61.1% reported pain, 61.9% reported halitosis, and the overall satisfaction level with the implants was 3.95 points. In the prosthesis methods, implant-teeth connective group showed the lowest level of the food impaction (21.3%), the pain (35.5%), and the halitosis (36.6%) (p<0.001), and the lowest bleeding was the implant single (33.8%) (p<0.05). Patient satisfaction was higher in the implant-teeth connective group (4.06 points) and the group without bone grafting (4.03 points) (p<0.01). Factor analysis showed that implant satisfaction was 0.43 times lower in the single implant group and 0.44 times lower in the implant-implant connective group than in the implant-teeth connective group. As a result of the study, it is expected that the method of extending the life of adjacent teeth and restoring the function of the tooth defect region is an implant-teeth connection method, so that it can be utilized positively through various clinical studies.

본 연구는 성인 375명을 대상으로 임플란트 주위염 자각증상과 만족도를 파악하여 다음과 같은 결과를 얻었다. 임플란트 주위염 자각자율은 식편압입이 40.5%, 출혈 49.1%, 통증 61.1%, 입냄새 61.9%였고, 만족도는 3.95점이었다. 보철방식에서 임플란트-자연치 연결군이 식편 압입(21.3%), 통증(35.5%), 입냄새(36.6%) 모두 가장 낮았고(p<0.001), 출혈은 임플란트 단일군(33.8%)이 가장 낮았다(p<0.05). 만족도는 임플란트-자연치 연결군(4.06점)과 골 이식을 하지 않은 군(4.03점)이 높았다(p<0.01). 요인분석 결과 임플란트 만족도는 임플란트-자연치 연결군에 비해 단일 임플란트군은 0.43배, 임플란트-임플란트 연결군은 0.44배 낮을 가능성을 나타냈다. 이상의 결과를 통해 인접한 자연치의 수명을 최대한 연장하면서 치아결손 부위의 기능을 회복할 수 있는 방법은 임플란트-자연치 연결방식이므로 다각적 검토를 통해 적극 활용할 수 있기를 기대한다.

Keywords

References

  1. Ministry of Health and Welfare, Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: Korean national health and nutrition examination survey. Ministry of Health and Welfare, Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2015.
  2. Branemark PI, Adell R, Breine U, Hansson BO, Lindstrom J, Ohlsson A: Intra-osseous anchorage of dental prostheses. I. Experimental studies. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg 3: 81-100, 1969. https://doi.org/10.3109/02844316909036699
  3. Rosenberg ES, Cho SC, Elian N, Jalbout ZN, Froum S, Evian CI: A comparison of characteristics of implant failure and survival in periodontally compromised and periodontally healthy patients: a clinical report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 19: 873-879, 2004.
  4. Henry PJ, Laney WR, Jemt T, et al.: Osseointegrated implants for single-tooth replacement: a prospective 5-year multicenter study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 11: 450-455, 1996.
  5. Shin DW, Lee JH, Kim SY, Dong JK: Clinical study on the food impaction between implant prostheses and adjacent teeth. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 52: 27-33, 2014. https://doi.org/10.4047/jkap.2014.52.1.27
  6. Takahashi T: Diagnosis of food impaction. Nihon Shika Ishikai Zasshi 33: 3-10, 1980.
  7. Finger IM, Guerra LR: Prosthetic considerations in reconstructive implantology. Dent Clin North Am 30: 69-83, 1986.
  8. Pjetursson BE, Karoussis I, Burgin W, Bragger U, Lang NP: Patients' satisfaction following implant therapy. A 10-year prospective cohort study. Clin Oral Implants Res 16: 185-193, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.01094.x
  9. Lee JH, Park CM: Influencing factors of satisfaction and revisiting intention of dental implant patients. J Korean Soc Dent Hyg 15: 983-990, 2015. https://doi.org/10.13065/jksdh.2015.15.06.983
  10. O'Leary TJ, Drake RB, Naylor JE: The plaque control record. J Periodontol 43: 38, 1972. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1972.43.1.38
  11. Park JE, Yun JH, Jung UW, et al.: The distribution of implant patients and the type of implant site. J Korean Acad Periodontal 34: 819-836, 2004. https://doi.org/10.5051/jkape.2004.34.4.819
  12. Park KH, Han GS: The effects of professional tooth cleaning and plaque control instruction on reduction of peri-implantitis. J Dent Hyg Sci 12: 163-170, 2012.
  13. Jung JH, Oh SC, Dong JK: A clinical study on the occurrence of food impaction. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 38: 50-58, 2000.
  14. Kim KW, Lee KS, Kang PS, Kim WS, Lee HK: Comparison of chewing ability and quality of life before and after the dental implantation. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 47: 215-221, 2009. https://doi.org/10.4047/jkap.2009.47.2.215
  15. Kim SK, Kim SY, Jeon HY, Lee KH: Awareness and satisfaction on dental implant treatment. J Korean Soc Dent Hyg 13: 395-401, 2013. https://doi.org/10.13065/jksdh.2013.13.3.395
  16. Ericsson I, Lekholm U, Branemark PI, Lindhe J, Glantz PO, Nyman S: A clinical evaluation of fixed-bridge restorations supported by the combination of teeth and osseointegrated titanium implants. J Clin Periodontol 13: 307-312, 1986. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.1986.tb02227.x
  17. Lindh T, Dahlgren S, Gunnarsson K, et al.: Tooth-implant supported fixed prostheses: a retrospective multicenter study. Int J Prosthodont 14: 321-328, 2001.
  18. Han JH, Kim KE: Comparison of expectation and satisfaction of implant patients in pre-post implant therapy. J Dent Hyg Sci 11: 121-127, 2011.
  19. Yang YS: The bone graft declined is there still a role for implant surgery? Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg 19: 362-366, 1997.
  20. Park KH, Kim YS, Lee SM, Han GS: Willingness to pay for professional tooth cleaning in implant patients. J Dent Hyg Sci 14: 176-182, 2014.

Cited by

  1. Biomechanical Effects of Retention Types (Cement and Screw-Cement Retained Prosthesis) in Implant Prosthesis vol.37, pp.3, 2017, https://doi.org/10.7736/jkspe.019.069