Pediatric Infection and Vaccine

  • 제24권1호
  • /
  • Pages.31-36
  • /
  • 2017
  • /
  • 2384-1079(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2384-1087(eISSN)
대한소아감염학회 (The Korean Society of Pediatric Infectious Diseases)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

계절 인플루엔자 진단에서 신속항원검사의 유용성

The Efficacy of Rapid Antigen Tests for Detection of Seasonal Influenza Virus

  • 이준열 (한림대학교 의과대학 한림대학교 성심병원 소아청소년과) ;
  • 이솔 (한림대학교 의과대학 한림대학교 성심병원 소아청소년과) ;
  • 김한성 (한림대학교 의과대학 한림대학교 성심병원 진단검사의학과) ;
  • 김광남 (한림대학교 의과대학 한림대학교 성심병원 소아청소년과)
  • Lee, Jun Yeol (Department of Pediatrics, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine) ;
  • Lee, Sol (Department of Pediatrics, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine) ;
  • Kim, Han Sung (Department of Laboratory Medicine, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine) ;
  • Kim, Kwang Nam (Department of Pediatrics, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine)
  • 투고 : 2016.08.22
  • 심사 : 2016.10.25
  • 발행 : 2017.04.25
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

목적: 본 연구에서는 인플루엔자 신속항원검사의 유용성을 확인해보고, 결과의 정확도에 영향을 주는 인자를 알아보고자 한다. 방법: 2011년 6월 1일부터 2016년 5월 31일까지 5년간 한림대학교 성심병원의 소아청소년과 외래와 응급실을 통해 내원한 인플루엔자 의사환자를 대상으로 하였다. 이들 중 입원하여 PCR검사를 같이 진행한 798검체의 검사 결과를 비교하였다. 결과: PCR검사를 표준으로 신속항원검사의 양성 일치율은 A형 인플루엔자에서 75.7%, B형 인플루엔자에서 60.0%였다. 발열 시작일로부터 4일 이내에 내원하여 검사를 진행한 경우 양성 일치율은 A형 인플루엔자 77.6%, B형 인플루엔자 73.2%였으나, 5일 이상 경과 후 검사를 진행한 경우 양성 일치율은 A형 인플루엔자 66.7%, B형 인플루엔자 21.4%였다. 결론: 신속항원검사의 민감도는 상대적으로 낮으므로, 인플루엔자 진단에 적용하기 위해서 증상 발현 후 5일 이내 빠르게 채취한 검체에서 상대적으로 높은 민감도 해석이 가능하다.

Purpose: This study aimed to examine the accuracy of rapid influenza diagnostic tests (RIDT) in children with an influenza-like illness and to evaluate factors associated with greater accuracy. Methods: Pediatric patients, who visited Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital with an influenza-like illness between June 2011 and May 2016, were enrolled in this study. We tested 798 samples using a real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for respiratory viruses and compared the results with rapid influenza tests. Results: In comparison with the results of the multiplex PCR, the positive agreement rates of RIDT for influenza A and B virus were 75.7% and 60.0%, respectively. The performance of RIDT varied according to days after fever onset. The positive agreement rates of RIDT for influenza A and B tests, performed within 4 days of fever onset, were 77.6% and 73.2%, but the rates for tests performed more than 5 days after fever onset were 66.7% and 21.4%, respectively. Conclusions: The RIDT is a quick and simple aid to diagnosis, but is less sensitive than the labeled sensitivity. Moreover, test performance varied according to days after fever onset. Test specimens for RIDT should be collected as soon as possible after the onset of symptoms (less than 4 days).

키워드

참고문헌

  1. American Academy of Pediatrics. Pneumococcal infections. In: Committee on Infectious Diseases American Academy of Pediatrics, Pickering LK, Baker CJ, Kimberlin DW, Long SS, editors. Red book: 2009 report of the Committee on Infectious Diseases. 28th ed. Elk Grove Village: American Academy of Pediatrics, 2009:524-35.
  2. Poehling KA, Edwards KM, Weinberg GA, Szilagyi P, Staat MA, Iwane MK, et al. The underrecognized burden of influenza in young children. N Engl J Med 2006;355:31-40. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa054869
  3. Treanor JJ, Hayden FG, Vrooman PS, Barbarash R, Bettis R, Riff D, et al. Efficacy and safety of the oral neuraminidase inhibitor oseltamivir in treating acute influenza: a randomized controlled trial. US Oral Neuraminidase Study Group. JAMA 2000;283:1016-24. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.283.8.1016
  4. Seo ES, Park GH, Kim SM, Kim SW, Jung WS, Cho KS, et al. Oseltamivir efficacy, side effects, and safety in children with influenza. Korean J Pediatr 2010;53:56-66. https://doi.org/10.3345/kjp.2010.53.1.56
  5. Youn SE, Chun JH, Lee KS, Rha YH, Choi SH. Clinical characteristics of influenza B virus in children and the efficacy of oseltamivir: data from two university hospitals. Korean J Pediatr Infect Dis 2014;21:199-206. https://doi.org/10.14776/kjpid.2014.21.3.199
  6. Baas C, Barr IG, Fouchier RA, Kelso A, Hurt AC. A comparison of rapid point-of-care tests for the detection of avian influenza A(H7N9) virus, 2013. Euro Surveill 2013;18:20487.
  7. Chartrand C, Leeflang MM, Minion J, Brewer T, Pai M. Accuracy of rapid influenza diagnostic tests: a meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med 2012;156:500-11. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-156-7-201204030-00403
  8. Freymuth F, Vabret A, Cuvillon-Nimal D, Simon S, Dina J, Legrand L, et al. Comparison of multiplex PCR assays and conventional techniques for the diagnostic of respiratory virus infections in children admitted to hospital with an acute respiratory illness. J Med Virol 2006;78:1498-504. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmv.20725
  9. Kuypers J, Wright N, Ferrenberg J, Huang ML, Cent A, Corey L, et al. Comparison of real-time PCR assays with fluorescent-antibody assays for diagnosis of respiratory virus infections in children. J Clin Microbiol 2006;44:2382-8. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.00216-06
  10. Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Korean influenza surveillance report, 2012-2013 [Internet]. Cheongju: Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; c2012 [cited 2016 Dec 28]. Available from: http://www.cdc.go.kr/CDC/info/CdcKrInfo0301.jsp?menuIds=HOME001-MNU1154-MNU0005-MNU0037-MNU1380&cid=21953.
  11. Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Korean influenza surveillance report, 2013-2014 [Internet]. Cheongju: Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; c2012 [cited 2016 Dec 28]. Available from: http://www.cdc.go.kr/CDC/info/CdcKrInfo0301.jsp?menuIds=HOME001-MNU1154-MNU0005-MNU0037-MNU1380&cid=60812.
  12. Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Korean influenza surveillance report, 2014-2015 [Internet]. Cheongju: Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; c2012 [cited 2016 Dec 28]. Available from: http://www.cdc.go.kr/CDC/info/CdcKrInfo0301.jsp?menuIds=HOME001-MNU1154-MNU0005-MNU0037-MNU1380&cid=66230.
  13. Hwang Y, Kim K, Lee M. Evaluation of the efficacies of rapid antigen test, multiplex PCR, and real-time PCR for the detection of a novel influenza A (H1N1) virus. Korean J Lab Med 2010;30:147-52. https://doi.org/10.3343/kjlm.2010.30.2.147
  14. Gavin PJ, Thomson RB Jr. Review of rapid diagnostic tests for influenza. Clin Appl Immunol Rev 2003;4:151-72.
  15. Monto AS, Gravenstein S, Elliott M, Colopy M, Schweinle J. Clinical signs and symptoms predicting influenza infection. Arch Intern Med 2000;160:3243-7. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.160.21.3243
  16. Kwon D, Shin K, Kwon M, Oh HB, Kang C, Lee JY. Development and evaluation of a rapid influenza diagnostic test for the pandemic (H1N1) 2009 influenza virus. J Clin Microbiol 2011;49:437-8. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.01628-10
  17. Fiore AE, Fry A, Shay D, Gubareva L, Bresee JS, Uyeki TM, et al. Antiviral agents for the treatment and chemoprophylaxis of influenza: recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). MMWR Recomm Rep 2011;60:1-24.
  18. Carrat F, Vergu E, Ferguson NM, Lemaitre M, Cauchemez S, Leach S, et al. Time lines of infection and disease in human influenza: a review of volunteer challenge studies. Am J Epidemiol 2008;167:775-85. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwm375