DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Sensor selection approach for damage identification based on response sensitivity

  • Wang, Juan (Beijing's Key Laboratory of Structural Wind Engineering and Urban Wind Environment, School of Civil Engineering, Beijing Jiaotong University) ;
  • Yang, Qing-Shan (Beijing's Key Laboratory of Structural Wind Engineering and Urban Wind Environment, School of Civil Engineering, Beijing Jiaotong University)
  • Received : 2017.01.21
  • Accepted : 2017.02.06
  • Published : 2017.03.25

Abstract

The response sensitivity method in time domain has been applied extensively for damage identification. In this paper, the relationship between the error of damage identification and the sensitivity matrix is investigated through perturbation analysis. An index is defined according to the perturbation amplify effect and an optimal sensor placement method is proposed based on the minimization of that index. A sequential sub-optimal algorithm is presented which results in consistently good location selection. Numerical simulations with a two-dimensional high truss structure are conducted to validate the proposed method. Results reveal that the damage identification using the optimal sensor placement determined by the proposed method can identify multiple damages of the structure more accurately.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

Supported by : National Natural Science Foundation of China, Beijing Jiaotong University

References

  1. Agbabian, M.S., Masri, S.F. and Caughey, T.K. (1991), "System identification approach to detection of structural changes", J. Eng. Mech., 117(2), 370-390. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1991)117:2(370)
  2. Cobb, R.G. and Liebst, B.S. (1997), "Sensor placement and structural damage identification from minimal sensor information", AIAA J., 35(2), 369-374. https://doi.org/10.2514/2.103
  3. Doebling, S.W., Farrar, C.R., Prime, M.B. and Shevitz, D.W. (1996), "Damage identification and health monitoring of structural and mechanical systems from changes in their vibration characteristics: a literature review", Report LA-13070-MS, Los Alamos National Laboratory.
  4. Golub, G.H. and Van Loan, C.F. (1996), Matrix Computation. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD, USA.
  5. Hansen, P.C. (1987), "The truncated SVD as a method for regularization", BIT. Num. Math., 27(4), 534-553. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01937276
  6. Hansen, P.C. (1992), "Analysis of discrete ill-posed problems by means of the L-curve", SIAM. Rew., 34(4), 561-580. https://doi.org/10.1137/1034115
  7. Heo, G., Wang, M.L. and Satpathi, D. (1997), "Optimal transducer placement for health monitoring of long span bridge", Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng., 16(7), 495-502. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0267-7261(97)00010-9
  8. Kammer, D.C. (1992), "Effects of noise on sensor placement for on-orbit modal identification of large space structures", J. Dyn. Syst.-T, ASME, 144(3), 436-443.
  9. Kripakaran, P. and Smith, L.F.C. (2009), "Configuring and enhancing measurement systems for damage identification", Adv. Eng. Inform., 23(4), 424-432. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2009.06.002
  10. Law, S.S. and Ding, Y. (2011), "Substructure methods for structural condition assessment", J. Sound Vib., 330(15), 3606-3619. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2011.03.003
  11. Li, X.Y. and Law, S.S. (2010), "Adaptive Tikhonov regularization for damage detection based on nonlinear model updating", Mech. Syst. Sign. Proc., 24(6), 1646-1664. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2010.02.006
  12. Lu, Z.R. and Law, S.S. (2007a), "Features of dynamic response sensitivity and its application in damage detection", J. Sound Vib., 303(1-2), 305-329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2007.01.021
  13. Lu, Z.R. and Law, S.S. (2007b), "Identification of system parameters and input force from output only", Mech. Syst. Sign. Proc., 21(5), 2099-2111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2006.11.004
  14. Meo, M. and Zumpano, G. (2005), "On the optimal sensor placement techniques for a bridge structure", Eng. Struct., 27(10), 1488-1497. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2005.03.015
  15. Nagarajaiah, S. and Basu, B. (2009), "Output only modal identification and structural damage detection using time frequency & wavelet techniques", Earthq. Eng. Eng. Vib., 8(4), 583-605. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-009-9120-6
  16. Padey, A.K., Biswas, M. and Samman, M.M. (1991), "Damage detection from changes in curvature shapes", J. Sound Vib., 145(2), 121-132.
  17. Padey, A.K. and Biswas, M. (1994), "Damage detection in structures using changes in flexibility", J. Sound Vib., 169(1), 3-17 https://doi.org/10.1006/jsvi.1994.1002
  18. Papadimitriou, C., Beck J.L. and Au S.K. (2000), "Entropy-based optimal sensor location for structural model updating", J. Vib. Control, 6(5), 781-800. https://doi.org/10.1177/107754630000600508
  19. Sanayei, M. and Salethik, M.J. (1996), "Parameter estimation of structures from static strain measurements Part II: error sensitivity analysis", J. Struct. Eng., ASCE, 122(5), 563-572. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1996)122:5(563)
  20. Shi, Z.Y., Law, S.S. and Zhang, L.M. (2000a), "Optimal sensor placement for structural damage detection", J. Eng. Mech., ASCE, 126(11), 1173-1179. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2000)126:11(1173)
  21. Shi, Z.Y., Law, S.S and Zhang, L.M. (2000b), "Structural damage detection from modal strain energy change", J. Eng. Mech., ASCE, 126(12), 1216-1223. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2000)126:12(1216)
  22. Tikhonov, A.N. (1995), Numerical Methods for the solution of Ill-posed problems, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, MA, USA.
  23. Udwadia, F.E. (1994), "Methodology for optimum sensor locations for parameter identification in dynamic systems", J. Eng. Mech., 120(2), 368-390. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1994)120:2(368)
  24. Wang, J. and Yang, Q.S. (2012), "Modified Tikhonov Regularization in model updating for damage identification", Struct. Eng. Mech., 44(5), 585-600. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2012.44.5.585
  25. Weber, B., Paultre, P. and Proulx, J. (2009), "Consistent regularization of nonlinear model updating for damage identification", Mech. Syst. Sign. Proc., 23(6), 1965-1985. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2008.04.011
  26. Xia, Y. and Hao, H. (2000), "Measurement selection for vibration-based structural damage identification", J. Sound Vib., 236(1), 89-104. https://doi.org/10.1006/jsvi.2000.2960
  27. Yuen, K.V., Katafygiotis, L.S., Papadimitriou, C. and Mickleborough, N.C. (2001), "Optimal Sensor Placement Methodology for Identification with Unmeasured Excitation", J. Dyn. Syst-T, 123(4), 677-686. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.1410929
  28. Yuen, K.V. and Kuok, S.C. (2015), "Efficient Bayesian sensor placement algorithm for structural identification: a general approach for multi-type sensory systems", Earthq. Eng. Struct. D., 44(5), 757-774. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2486