DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

경영성과지표(KPI)를 이용한 중소건설기업 경쟁력 실증분석

The Empirical Analysis for Competitiveness of Small & Medium Construction Companies using Key Performance Indicators(KPI)

  • Park, Hong-Jo (College of Economics & Business, Daegu University) ;
  • Ji, Hyun-Mi (College of Business Administration, Keimyung University)
  • 투고 : 2016.12.13
  • 심사 : 2017.02.02
  • 발행 : 2017.04.20

초록

본 연구는 선행연구들에서 주로 설문조사를 통해 선정된 건설기업의 KPI들이 실제로도 그 실효성이 있는 것인지를 확인하고, 이 과정에서 중소건설기업의 경쟁력을 높이기 위해 해결해야 할 문제점들이 무엇인지 파악하기 위해 실증자료를 이용하여 분석하였다. 그 결과, 중소건설기업은 미래성장을 위한 투자가 상대적으로 부족하며 경쟁력을 높이기 위해서는 이를 보완해야 하는 것으로 나타났다. 또한, 선행연구들에서 설문조사에 의한 문헌적인 방법을 통해 선정한 주요 KPI의 대부분이 실증적 자료를 이용한 분석을 통해서도 실효성이 있는 성과평가지표라는 점이 확인되었다. 본 연구는 중소건설기업의 경쟁력 강화 방안과 기존 선행연구들에서 설문조사를 통해 문헌적으로 도출된 건설기업 경영성과지표의 실효성에 대하여 실증분석을 통해 연구를 수행 했다는 점에서 그 의의가 있다.

The measurement of business performance is important to secure the competitiveness of construction companies. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to analyze what is needed to increase the competitiveness of small & medium construction companies. In order to analyze efficiently, this study reconfirms the effectiveness of Key Performance Indicators(KPI) of construction companies selected from previous studies. The empirical analysis to find differences of KPI between small & medium construction companies and big construction companies is performed using the 4,286 construction company samples extracted by 'KIS-Value Data Base'. The results of the empirical analysis show that there are significant differences in characteristics of KPI between small & medium construction companies and big construction companies. Particularly, small & medium construction companies are relatively insufficient to invest for the purpose of preparation for future and long-term growth. Additionally, empirical tests reconfirm that most of the KPIs from previous survey studies are suitable as a performance indicators. The contribution of this study is to analyze empirically small & medium construction company's strong & weak points and the effectiveness of KPIs derived from previous studies.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Kim YD. A study on development of new market for small and medium construction companies. Construction Trend Briefing of Construction & Economy Research Institute of Korea. 2016 Mar;551:4-5.
  2. Lee DH, Kim SH, Kwon GD, Kim MK, Kim SK. The management evaluation key performance indicators of korean construction firms. Journal of the Korea Institute of Building Construction. 2011 Feb;11(1):35-44. https://doi.org/10.5345/JKIC.2011.02.1.035
  3. Choi JH, Sohn HW, Kim SK. Key performance indicators of building project. Journal of the Korea Institute of Building Construction. 2011 Feb;11(1):61-72. https://doi.org/10.5345/JKIC.2011.02.1.061
  4. Ittner CD, Larcker DF. Innovations in performance measurement: Trends and research implications. Journal of Management Accounting Research. 1998 Sep;10(1): 205-38.
  5. Kaplan RS, Norton DP. The balanced scorecard -Measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review. 1992 Jan/Feb; 70(1):71-9.
  6. Cha HS, Kim TK. Developing measurement system for key performance indicators on building construction projects. Korean Journal of Construction Engineering and Management. 2008 Aug;9(4):120-30.
  7. Cha WC, Lee JS, Kwon W, Lee JS, Chun JY. Assessment model of a construction company's management performance. Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea. 2008 Oct;28(1):661-4.
  8. Yu IH, Kim KR, Jung YS, Chin SY. Key performance indicators for developing construction performance index. Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea. 2005 Feb;21(2):139-50.
  9. Jung WJ, Yu IH, Kim KR, Shin DW. Analysis of the weights of performance measurement index according to the size of construction companies. Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea. 2005 Aug;21(8):121-28.
  10. Kim YD. A study on development of the management diagnosis model for small and medium construction companies. Research Report of Construction & Economy Research Institute of Korea. 2014 Sep;7-12.