The Korean Journal of Archival Studies (기록학연구)

  • Issue 54
  • /
  • Pages.5-44
  • /
  • 2017
  • /
  • 1229-7941(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2671-7891(eISSN)
Korea Society of Archival Studies (한국기록학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Disorder as Original Order : Theoretical Discourses of the Principle of Original Order for Personal Records

무질서의 원질서 개인기록 정리에 있어 원질서 존중 원칙의 실효성 고찰

  • Received : 2017.10.10
  • Accepted : 2017.10.18
  • Published : 2017.10.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study investigates the theoretical discourses about the principle of original order. It reviews the literature about the theory in the context of personal and family papers. The authors examine the practical application of the principle of original order in the case of the No Gun Ri archives. No Gun Ri collections started with the records that the Chung family's have accumulated and created. Without an understanding of the Chung family papers, it is extremely difficult to identify a way to arrange No Gun Ri reords. This paper analyzes the meaning and interpretation of the principle of original order to find a way to apply it to the No Gun Ri records.

본 연구는 기록학 이론의 하나인 원질서 존중원칙에 대한 다양한 담론을 논하고 개인기록에 대한 적용의 실효성을 고찰하는 데 목적이 있다. 이를 위해, 연구는 적용과 실효성의 측면에서 개인, 가족 문서의 맥락성을 위한 이론과 관련된 문헌을 분석하며, 노근리 아카이브의 사례를 통해 원질서 존중 원칙의 실질적 적용을 고찰한다. 노근리 수집물은 정은용, 정구도 가족이 축적하고 생산해온 기록으로부터 시작된다. 본 논문에서는 개인 기록물에서 시작되는 노근리디지털아카이브의 정리를 위해 연구팀이 고민하고 탐구해온 내용을 소개한다. 이에 본 연구는 원질서 존중 원칙의 실질적 영향과 적용을 노근리 기록의 사례를 통해, 살펴보고 이론의 의미를 재구성해보고자 한다.

Keywords

References

  1. 국가기록원. 2007. 기록관리 전문과정 교육교재. 대전: 국가기록원.
  2. 김상호. 2007. 기록보존론(증보판). 서울: 아세아문화사.
  3. 노명환. 2006. 19세기 독일의 역사주의 실증사학과 기록관리제도의 정립: 랑케, 지벨 그리고 레만과 출처주의/ 원질서 원칙. 기록학연구, 14, 359-388.
  4. 설문원. 2003. 조선총독부 기록을 위한 기능분류체계 개발 연구. 정보관리학회지, 20(1), 457-488.
  5. 설문원. 2017. 기록관리 원칙의 해석과 적용에 관한 담론 분석: 출처주의를 중심으로. 기록학연구, 52, 59-117.
  6. 신동희, 김유승. 2016. 노근리 디지털 아카이브 수집정책 연구. 한국기록관리학회지, 16(3), 1-30.
  7. 이해영. 2013. 기록조직론. 서울: 선인출판사.
  8. 이호신. 2016. 공연예술기록의 정리와 기술에 관한 담론. 한국기록관리학회지, 16(1), 151-174.
  9. 최정태 외. 2005. 기록관리학사전. 파주: 한울.
  10. 한국기록관리학회. 2010. 기록관리론: 증거와 기억의 과학(개정판). 성남: 아세아문화사.
  11. 한국기록학회. 2008. 기록학 용어사전. 서울: 역사비평사.
  12. 한미경, 노영희. 2011. 기록 및 기록관리의 이해. 파주: 한국학술정보.
  13. Barr, D. 1989. Protecting provenance: response to the Report of the Working Group on Description at the Fonds Level. Archivaria, 28, 141-145.
  14. Bearman, D. 1995. Archival Strategies, The American Archivist, 58(4), 380-413. https://doi.org/10.17723/aarc.58.4.pq71240520j31798
  15. Boles, F. 1982. Disrespecting Original Order. American Archivist, 45(1), 26-32. https://doi.org/10.17723/aarc.45.1.94g0502t2g81053g
  16. Brothman, B. 1991. Orders of value: probing the theoretical terms of archival practice. Archivaria, 32. 78-100.
  17. Choi, S., Hanley, C. & Mendoza, M. 1999. War's Hidden Chapter: Ex-GIs tell of killing Korean refugees. The Associated Press.
  18. Cook, T. 1997. What is past is prologue: a history of archival ideas since 1898, and the future paradigm shift. Archivaria, 42. 18-63.
  19. Dollar, C. M. 1992. Archival theory and information technologies: the impact of information tehnologies on archival principles and methods. Macerata University.
  20. Dooley, J. 1992. Subject indexing in context. American Archivist, 55(2), 344-354. https://doi.org/10.17723/aarc.55.2.446n760w44x48447
  21. Douglas, J. & MacNeil, H. 2009. Arranging the self: literary and archival perspectives on writers' archives. Archivaria, 67, 25-39.
  22. Duchein, M. 1983. Theoretical principles and practical problems of respect des fonds in Archival Science. Archivaria, 16, 64-82.
  23. Duckett, K. W. 1975. Modern Manuscripts: A Practical Manual for Their Management, Care and Use. Nashvill: American Association for State and Local History.
  24. Duff, W. & Johnson, C. 2003. Where is the list with all the names? Information-seeking behavior of genealogists. American Archivist, 66(1), 79-95. https://doi.org/10.17723/aarc.66.1.l375uj047224737n
  25. Eastwood, T. 2000. Putting the parts of the whole together: systematic arrangement of archives. Archivaria, 50. 93-116.
  26. Galloway, P. n.d. Order as received: A foundational virtual order for digital records. Retrieved July 24, 2017 from https://www.ischool.utexas.edu/-galloway/spring2015/INF392K/OARArchivaria2012v4.doc
  27. Gracy II, D.B. 1977. Archives and Manuscripts: Arrangment and Description. Chicago: Society of American Archivists.
  28. Greene, M., & Meissner, D. 2005. More product, less process: Revamping traditional archival processing. American Archivist, 68(2), 208-263. https://doi.org/10.17723/aarc.68.2.c741823776k65863
  29. Holmes, O. 1964. Archival arrangement-Five different operations at five different levels. American Archivist, 27(1), 21-42. https://doi.org/10.17723/aarc.27.1.l721857l17617w15
  30. Horsman, P. 1999. Dirty hands: a new perspective on original order. Archives and Manuscripts, 27(1), 42-53.
  31. Horsman, P. 2002. The last dance of the phoenix or the de-discovery of the archival fonds. Archivaria, 54. 1-23.
  32. Hurley, C. 1995. Personal Papers and the Treatment of Archival Principles. In: Debates and Discourses: Selected Australian Writings on Archival Theory, 1951-1990. Peter Biskup. ed. Canberra: Australian Society of Archivists.
  33. Huth, G. 2016. Module 13: Appraising digital records. In: Appraisal and Acquisition Strategies. Michael Shallcross and Christopher Prom. ed. Chicago: Society of American Archivist.
  34. ISDF. 2007. The International Standard for Describing Functions. Dresden, Germany: International Council on Archives.
  35. Jenkinson, H. 1922. A Manual of Archive Administration. Oxford: The Clarendon Press.
  36. Kane, L. M. 1966. Guide to the Care and Administration of Manuscripts. 2nd ed. Nashville: American Association for State and Local History.
  37. MacNeil, H. 1994. Archival theory and practice: between two paradigms. Archivaria, 37, 6-20.
  38. MacNeil, H. 2008. Archivalterity: rethinking original order, Archivaria, 66, 1-24.
  39. Meehan, J. 2010. Rethinking Original Order and Personal Records, Archivaria, 70, 27-44.
  40. Michetti G. 2012. Archives Are Not Trees. In: The Memory of the World in the Digital Age: Digitization and Preservation. L. Duranti and E. Shaffer. ed. Vancouver: Unesco.
  41. Miller, F. 1990. Arranging and Describing Archives and Manuscripts. Chicago, IL: Society of American Archivists.
  42. Muller, S., Feith, J. A. & Fruin, R. 2003. Manual for the Arrangement and Description of Archives. Translated in 1968 by Leavitt, A.H. and reissued in 2003 by Society of American Archivists, IL.
  43. Muller, S., Feith, J. A. & Fruin, R. 2003. Manual for the Arrangement and Description of Archives: Drawn up by direction of the Netherlands Association of Archivists. Translation of the 2nd ed. Chicago, IL: Society of American Archivists.
  44. Nesmith, T. 2006. Reopening archives: bringing new contextualities into archival theory and practice. Archivaria, 60. 259-274.
  45. Pearce-Moses, R. 2005. A Glossary of Archival and Records Terminology. Chicago, IL: Society of American Archivists.
  46. Powell, G. T. 1995. Archival Principles and the Treatment of Personal Papers. In Debates and Discourses: Selected Australian Writings on Archival Theory, 1951-1990. Peter Biskup. ed. Canberra: Australian Society of Archivists.
  47. Powers, T. E. 1983. Processing as Reconstruction: The Philip A. Hart Senatorial Collection. American Archivist, 46(2), 183-185. https://doi.org/10.17723/aarc.46.2.k8u26q677m23523l
  48. Schaffner, J. 2015. The metadata is the interface: Better description for better discovery of archives and special collections, synthesized from user studies. Making archival and special collections more accessible, 85. Retrieved July 24, 2017 from http://www.wip.oclc.org/content/dam/research/publications/2015/oclcresearch-making-special-collections-accessible-2015-a4.pdf#page=92.
  49. Schellenberg, T. R. 1961. Archival Principles of Arrangement. American Archivist, 24(1), 11-24. https://doi.org/10.17723/aarc.24.1.l330351406231083
  50. Smith, C. 1986. A case for abandonment of respect. Archives and Manuscripts, 14(2), 154-168.
  51. Suderman, J. 2002. Defining Electronic Series: A Study. Archivaria, 53. 31-46.
  52. Turner, J. 1992. A Study of the Theory of Appraisal for Selection. MAS Thesis, University of British Columbia.
  53. Yeo, G. 2012. Bringing things together: aggregate records in a digital age. Archivaria, 74, 43-91.
  54. Yeo, G. 2014. Contexts, Original Orders, and Item-Level Orientation: Responding Creatively to Users' Needs and Tehnological Change, Journal of Archival Organization, 12(3/4), 170-185.
  55. Zhang, J. 2012. Original order in digital archives. Archivaria, 74, 167-193.