Journal of Technologic Dentistry (대한치과기공학회지)

Korean Academy of Dental Technology (대한치과기공학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Evaluation of Flexural strength and surface porosity of three indirect composite resins

3종의 간접수복용 복합레진의 굴곡강도 비교 및 표면관찰

  • Kim, Jun-Tae (Department of Dental Laboratory Science & Engineering, College of Health Science, Korea University) ;
  • Park, Jin-Young (Institute for Health Science, College of Public Health Science, Korea University) ;
  • Kim, Woong-Chul (Department of Dental Laboratory Science & Engineering, College of Health Science, Korea University) ;
  • Kim, Ji-Hwan (Department of Dental Laboratory Science & Engineering, College of Health Science, Korea University)
  • 김준태 (고려대학교 대학원 보건과학과 치의기공전공) ;
  • 박진영 (고려대학교 보건과학연구소) ;
  • 김웅철 (고려대학교 대학원 보건과학과 치의기공전공) ;
  • 김지환 (고려대학교 대학원 보건과학과 치의기공전공)
  • Received : 2016.10.29
  • Accepted : 2017.03.17
  • Published : 2017.03.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate flexural strength, composite surface and fractured surface of three different indirect composite resins. Methods: Fifteen bar-shaped specimens ($25mm{\times}2mm{\times}2mm$) were fabricated for each FL group (Flow type and Light curing) and PLP group (Putty type and Light, Pressure curing) and PL group (Putty type and Light curing) according to manufacturer's instructions and ISO 10477. Fabricated specimens were stored in the distilled water for 24 hours at the temperature of $37^{\circ}C$. Three-point bending strength test was performed to measure flexural strength using universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 1mm/min (ISO 10477). Surface and fractured surface of specimens were observed by digital microscope. Results were analyzed with Kruskal-wallis tests (${\alpha}=0.05$). Results: Mean (SD) of three different indirect composite resins were 83.38 (6.67) MPa for FL group, 139.90(16.53) MPa for PLP group and 171.72(16.74) MPa for PL group. Flexural strength were statistically significant (p<0.05). Differences were not observed at fractured surface among three groups. However, many pores over $100{\mu}m$ were observed at PL group in observing surface of specimen. Conclusion: Flexural strength of composite resins was affected by second polymerization method and content of inorganic filler.

Keywords

References

  1. Asmussen E. Restorative resins: hardness and strength vs. quantity of remaining double bonds. Eur J Oral Sci, 90(6), 484-489, 1982. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0722.1982.tb00766.x
  2. Bertolotti RL. A new polymer glass utilized for modification and repair of fixed partial dentures. Quintessence Int 28(7), 437-439, 1997.
  3. Callaghan DJ, Vaziri A, Nayeb-Hashemi H. Effect of fiber volume fraction and length on the wear characteristics of glass fiberreinforced dental composites. Dent Mater, 22(1), 84-93, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2005.02.011
  4. Chee WW, Donovan TE, Daftary F, Siu T. The effect of vacuum-mixed autopolymerizing acrylic resins on porosity and transverse strength. J Prosthet Dent, 60(4), 517-519, 1988. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(88)90261-2
  5. Condon JJ. Ferracane. In vitro wear of composite with varied cure, filler level, and filler treatment. J Dent Res, 76(7), 1405-1411, 1997. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345970760071101
  6. Cook WD, Johannson M. The influence of postcuring on the fracture properties of photo-cured dimethacrylate based dental composite resin. J Biomed Mater Res A, 21(8), 979-989, 1987. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.820210804
  7. DIN E. 1 0477, Dentistry-Polymer-based crown and bridge materials, Beuth Verlag, Berlin, 2004.
  8. Ferracane J, Condon J. Post-cure heat treatments for composites: properties and fractography. Dent Mater, 8(5), 290-295, 1992. https://doi.org/10.1016/0109-5641(92)90102-I
  9. Freiberg R, Ferracane J. Evaluation of cure, properties and wear resistance of Artglass dental composite. Am J Dent, 11(5), 214-218, 1998.
  10. Geum YH, Kim B. Flexural strength of indirect compositeresin wi th different polymerization conditions. J Kor Aca Dent Tec, 35(4), 333-341, 2013. https://doi.org/10.14347/kadt.2013.35.4.333
  11. Hasegawa E, Boyer D, Chan DC. Microleakage of indirect composite inlays. Dent Mater, 5(6), 388-391, 1989. https://doi.org/10.1016/0109-5641(89)90106-1
  12. Ho CT, Vijayaraghavan T, Lee SY, Tsai A, Huang HM, Pan LC. Flexural behaviour of post -cured composites at oral-simulating temperatures. J Oral Rehabil, 28(7), 658-667, 2001. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.2001.00734.x
  13. Ikejima I , Nomoto R, McCabe JF. Shear punch strength and flexural strength of model composites with varying filler volume fraction, particle size and silanation. Dent Mater, 19(3), 206-211, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(02)00031-3
  14. Inoue K, Terachi M, Utsumi S. A study on composite resin inlay. J Dent Res, 67, 222, 1988.
  15. ISO, E . 4049, Dentistry-Polymer-based filling, restorative and luting materials. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland, 1988.
  16. Jun SK , Kim DA, Goo HJ, Lee HH. Investigation of the correlation between the different mechanical properties of resin composites. Dent Mater J, 32(1), 48-57, 2013. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2012-178
  17. Junior SAR, Ferracane JL, Della Bona A. Flexural strength and Weibull analysis of a microhybrid and a nanofill composite evaluated by 3-and 4-point bending tests. Dent Mater, 24(3), 426-431, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2007.05.013
  18. Kim KS, Yoon TH, Song KY, Ahn SG. Comparison of mechanical properties in 4 indirect composite resin. J Korean Acad Prosthodont, 45(1), 21-33, 2007.
  19. Leinfel der KF. Posterior composite resins. J Am Dent Accoc, 117(4), 21E-26E, 1988. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1988.0039
  20. Shinkai MN, McGivney GP, Davis E, Bush PJ, Carter JM. A comparison of the wear resistance and hardness of indirect composite resins. J Prosthet Dent, 85(4), 386-395,2001. https://doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2001.114267
  21. Neves AD, Discacciati JAC, Orefice RL, Jansen WC. Correlation between degree of conversion, microhardness and inorganic content in composites. Braz Oral Res, 16(4): 349-354, 2002.
  22. Optec H. Laboratory techniques manual. Wallingford, Conn: Jeneric/Pentron, l-24.
  23. Reinhardt JW, Boyer D, Stephens N. Effects of secondary curing on indirect posterior composite resins. Oper Dent, 19, 217-217, 1994.
  24. Satsukawa H, Koizumi H, Tanoue N, Nemoto M, Ogino T, Matsumura H. Properties of an indirect composite material polymerized with two different laboratory polymerizing systems. Dent Mater J, 24(3), 377-381, 2005. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.24.377
  25. Shinka i K, Suzuki Sm, Leinfelder KF, Katoh Y. How heat treatment and thermal cycling affect wear of composite resin inlays. J Am Dent Assoc, 125(11), 1467-1472, 1994. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1994.0214
  26. Shinohara N, Minesaki Y, Mukoyoshi N, Moriyama H, Jimi T. The effect of the cementing material on the strength of the all ceramic crown. Nihon Hotetsu Shika Gakkai Zasshi, 33(2), 416-421, 1989. https://doi.org/10.2186/jjps.33.416
  27. Thordrup M, Isidor F, Horsted-Bindslev P. Comparison of marginal fit and microleakage of ceramic and composite inlays: an in vitro study. J Dent, 22(3), 147-153, 1994. https://doi.org/10.1016/0300-5712(94)90198-8
  28. Touati B, Aidan N. Second generation laboratory composite resins for indirect restorations. J Esthet Restor Dent, 9(3), 108-118, 1997. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8240.1997.tb00928.x
  29. Wendt JrS. The effect of heat used as a secondary cure upon the physical properties of three composite resins. I. Diametral tensile strength, compressive strength and marginal dimensional stability. Quintessence Int, 18, 265-271, 1987.
  30. Wendt S. Effect of heat on the physical-properties of composite resins. J Dent Res, 1986.
  31. 강현숙, 최호영. 와동 복합레진 인레이 충전 후 변연누출에관한 연구. 대한치과보존학회지 17, 191-205, 1992.
  32. 조성아, 조영곤, 문주훈. 중합방법에 따른 복합레진 인레이의 물리적 성질에 관한 연구. 구강생물학연구, 20(2), 73-87, 1996.