서비스연구 (Journal of Service Research and Studies)

  • 제7권1호
  • /
  • Pages.65-82
  • /
  • 2017
  • /
  • 2234-2850(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2466-1813(eISSN)
서비스사이언스학회 (The Society of service Science)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

고몰입 인적자원관리가 서비스성과에 미치는 영향과 내적혁신방향의 매개효과

The Effects of High Commitment HRM on the Service Performance: Mediating Effect of Internal Innovation Direction

  • 김진희 (대구가톨릭대학교 경영학부)
  • Kim, Jin-Hee (Business School, Catholic University of Daegu)
  • 투고 : 2017.01.20
  • 심사 : 2017.03.20
  • 발행 : 2017.03.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구는 국내 서비스산업의 기업체를 대상으로 고몰입 인적자원관리의 수준이 서비스성과에 미치는 효과와 조직의 내적인 혁신방향이 갖는 매개효과를 분석하였다. 구체적으로 내적인 혁신 방향은 기업의 인력과 서비스의 고부가가치화 방향과 비용절감 다운사이징 방향으로 구성되며, 인력과 서비스의 고부가가치화 방향은 긍정적인 매개효과를 가질 것으로, 비용절감 다운사이징 방향은 부정적인 매개효과를 가질 것으로 예측하였다. 분석을 위한 자료는 한국노동연구원(KLI)의 2013년도 사업체패널 조사자료(WPS)의 1,775개 업체 중 도소매, 운수, 전문과학서비스, 교육서비스, 보건사회복지서비스, 금융서비스, 기타(정보사회지원서비스 등)서비스로 분류되는 896개 사업체의 응답을 활용하였다. 가설검증을 위한 분석은 구조방정식 분석을 사용하였다. 분석 결과, 고몰입 인적자원관리는 고부가가치화 혁신방향에 긍정적인 영향을 미치며, 비용절감 다운사이징에는 부정적인 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 또한 고부가가치화 혁신방향은 서비스성과에 긍정적인 영향을 미쳤으며, 비용절감 다운사이징은 서비스성과에 부정적인 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 그리고 고몰입 인적자원관리의 서비스성과에 대한 직접효과를 확인하지 못하였으나, 고부가가치화 혁신 방향의 긍정적인 매개효과와 비용절감 다운사이징 혁신 방향의 부정적인 매개효과가 유의한 것으로 나타나 두 변수가 고몰입 인적자원관리와 서비스성과의 관계에 대해 완전매개효과를 가지는 것을 확인하였다.

This study is to examine the effects of high commitment HRM on service performance in the service industry, and to examine the mediating effect of the organizational internal innovation direction. Specifically, the direction of internal innovation consists of high-value-added HR and service and cost-reduction downsizing. We assumed that the high-value-added direction of HR and service will have a positive mediating effect. And assumed that cost-reduction downsizing direction has negative mediating effect. The data were collected from 2013 workplace panel survey(WPS) of the Korea Labor Institute(KLI). Among the 1,775 companies, 896 companies classified as wholesale and retail, transportation, professional scientific services, education services, health social services, financial services, and other services (such as information society support services) were extracted and used. In summary, high-commitment HRM has a positively significant effect on the direction of high value-added innovation of HR and services, and has a negatively significant effect on the cost-reduction downsizing direction. In addition, the direction of high value-added innovation of HR and service was positive effect on service performance, and cost-reduction downsizing innovation direction has a negative effect on service performance. And the direct effect of high commitment HRM on service performance has not been confirmed. However, we confirmed the positive mediating effect of high value-added innovation direction of HR and services, and confirmed that the negative mediating effect of cost-reduction downsizing. Therefore, it is confirmed that the two variables have a full mediating effect on the relationship between high commitment HRM and service performance.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Arbuckle, J. L. (1996), Full Information Estimation in the Presence of Incomplete Data. In G. A. Marcoulides & R. E. Schmaker(Eds), Advanced Structural Equation Modeling: Issues and Techniques(pp. 243-277). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  2. Anderson, J. C. (1987), An Approach for Confirmatory Measurement and Structural Equation Modeling of Organizational Properties. Management Science, 33(4), 525-541. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.33.4.525
  3. Bae, J. S. and Park, O. W. (2005). Strategic Human Resource Management and Organizational Innovative Performance: Comparative Analysis of Exploratory Versus Exploitative Performance, Korean Journal of Management, 13(2), 147-186(배종석, 박오원. (2005). 전략적 인적자원관리와 조직의 혁신성과 : 탐색적 혁신성과와 활용적 혁신성과의 비교 분석, 인사조직연구, 13(2)).
  4. Bae, J. S and Sa, J. H. (2003). The Effects of Human Resource Management System on Organizational Performance, Korean Journal of Management, 11(2), 133-169(배종석, 사정혜. (2003). 인적자원관리와 조직성과에 대한 실증연구, 인사조직연구, 11(2)).
  5. Batt, R. (2002). Managing Customer Services: Human Resource Practices, Quit Rates, and Sales Growth, Academy of Management Journal, 45(3), 587-797. https://doi.org/10.2307/3069383
  6. Becker, B. and B. Gerhart. (1996). The Impact of Human Resource Management on Organizational Performance: Progress and Prospects, Academy of Management Journal, 39(4), 777-801. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.1996.28115079
  7. Benner, M. J. and M. L. Tushman. (2003). Exploitation, Exploration, and Process Management: The Productivity Dilemma Revisited, Academy of Management Review, 28(2), 238-256. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2003.9416096
  8. Birdi, K., Clegg, C., Patterson, M., Robinson, A., Stride, C. B., Wall, T. D. and S. J. Wood. (2008). The Impact of Human Rresource and Operational Management Practices on Company Productivity: A Longitudinal Study. Personnel Psychology, 61, 467-501. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2008.00136.x
  9. Bowen, D. E. and C. Ostroff. (2004). Understanding HRM-Firm Performance Linkages: The Role of the "Strength" of the HRM System. Academy of Management Review, 29(2), 203-221. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2004.12736076
  10. Chadwick, C., Way, S. A., Kerr, G. and J. W. J. Thacker. (2013). Boundary Conditions of the High-Investment Human Resource Systems-Small-Firm Labor Productivity Relationship. Personnel Psychology, 66(2), 311-343. https://doi.org/10.1111/peps.12015
  11. Cohen, W. M. and D. A. Levinthal. (1990). Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation, Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 128-152. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393553
  12. Collins, C. J. and K. G. Smith. (2006). Knowledge Exchange and Combination: The Role of Human Resource Practices in the Performance of High-Technology Firms, Academy of Management Journal, 49(3), 544-560. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2006.21794671
  13. Datta, D. K., Guthrie, J. P. and P. M. Wright. (2005). Human Resource Management and Labor Productivity: Does Industry Matter? Academy of Management Journal, 48(1), 135-145. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2005.15993158
  14. Fornell, C. and D. F. Larcker. (1981). Evaluation Structural Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(February), 39-50. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151312
  15. Gelade, G. A. and M. Ivery. (2003). The Impact of Human Resource Management and Work Climate on Organizational Performance, Personnel Psychology, 56, 383-404. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2003.tb00155.x
  16. Gilbert, C. G. (2005). Unbundling the Structure of Inertia: Resource Versus Routine Rigidity, Academy of Management Journal, 48(5), 741-763. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2005.18803920
  17. Hair, J. F., R. E. Anderson, R. L. Tatham and W. C. Black. (1998). Multivariate Data Analysis, Prentice-Hall Int.
  18. Hannan, M. T. and J. Freeman. (1984). Structural Inertia and Organizational Change, American Sociological Review, 49, 149-164. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095567
  19. Hitt, M. A., Bierman, L., Shimizu, K., and R. Kochhar. (2001). Direct and Moderating Effects of Human Capital on Strategy and Performance in Professional Service Firms: A Resource-Based Perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 44(1), 13-28. https://doi.org/10.2307/3069334
  20. Hong, Sehee. (2017). Latent Growth Curve Model for Quantitative Change Data Analysis, Pakyoungsa(홍세희. (2017). 양적변화 자료분석을 위한 잠재성 장모형. 박영사).
  21. Kim, J. (2007). The Effect of Internalization of Practice and Organizational Cynicism on Organizational Effectiveness, Korean Management Review, 36(4), 825-853(김진희. (2007). 제도내재화와 조직 냉소주의가 조직몰입과 혁신지향활동에 미치는 효과, 경영학연구).
  22. Kim, J. (2013). The Relationship between Introduction Type of HRM, Settlement of HRM and Organizational Effectiveness, Journal of Learning and Performance, 15(1), 27-50(김진희. (2013). 인사제도 도입 유형에 따른 제도정착 효과와 조직성과의 차이 분석, 기업교육연구).
  23. Kim, J. H. (2009). The Effects of High Commitment HRM on Employee Attitude and Quality Management Activity, Quarterly Journal of Labor Policy, 9(3), 1-31(김진희. (2009). 고몰입 인적자원관리가 종업원의 인사제도 내제화, 조직몰입 및 품질경영활동에 미치는 효과, 노동정책연구,).
  24. Kim, J. H. (2016). The Effect of Commitment-based HRM and Institutional Participation of Union on Organizational Effectiveness, Journal of Korean HRD Research, 11(4), 25-51(김진희. (2016). 기업의 몰입형인사제도와 노조의 제도참여가 조직효과성의 차이에 미치는 효과, 한국HRD연구).
  25. Kim, J, Hong, S. and B. Choo. (2007). Applications of Structural Equation Modeling in Management Studies: A Critical Review, Korean Management Review, 36(4), 897-923(김진호, 홍세희, 추병대. (2007). 경영학 연구에서의 구조방정식 모형의 적용: 문헌 연구와 비판, 경영학연구).
  26. Leonard, D. and S. Sensiper. (1998). The Role of Tacit Knowledge in Group Innovation, California Management Review, Spring, 40(3), 112-132. https://doi.org/10.2307/41165946
  27. Lepak, D. P. and K. G. Smith. (2007). Value Creation and Value Capture: A Multilevel Perspective, Academy of Management Review, 32(1), 180-194. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2007.23464011
  28. Lepak, D. P., M. S. Taylor, A. Tekleab, J. A. Marrone and D. J. Cohen. (2007). An Examination of the Use of High-Investment Human Resource Systems for Core and Support Employees, Human Resource Management, 46(2), 223-246. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.20158
  29. Mac Callum, R. C. and S. Hong. (1997). Power Analysis in Covariance Structure Modeling Using GFI and AGFI. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 32(2): 193-210. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr3202_5
  30. McGrath, T. G. (2001). Exploratory Learning, Innovative Capacity, and Managerial Oversight, Academy of Management Journal, 44(1), 118-131. https://doi.org/10.2307/3069340
  31. McMahan, G. C., M. Virick, and P. M. Wright. (1999). Alternative Theoretical Perspectives for Strategic Human Resource Management Revisited: Progress, Problems, and Prospects, Research in Personnel and Human Resource Management, 4, 99-122.
  32. Pearl, J. (2000). Causality: Models, Reasoning, and Inference, Cambridge University Press.
  33. Ployhart, R. E., Van Iddekinge, C. H. and W. I. Mackenzie JR. (2011). Acquiring and Developing Human Capital in Service Contexts: The Interconnectedness of Human Capital Resources. Academy of Management Journal, 54(2), 353-368. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2011.60263097
  34. Rogg, K. L., D. B. Schmidt, C. Shull and N. Schmitt (2001). Human Resource Practices, Organizational Climate, and Customer Satisfaction, Journal of Management, 27(4), 431-449. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920630102700403
  35. Sels, L., De Winne, S., Maes, J., Delmotte, J., Faems, D. and A. Forrier. (2006). Unraveling the HRM-Performance Link: Value-Creating and Cost-Increasing Effects of Small Business HRM. Journal of Management Studies, 43(2), 319-342. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00592.x
  36. Shrout, P. E. and N. Bolger. (2002). Mediation in Experimental and Nonexperimental Studies: New Procedures and Recommendations. Psychological Methods, 7(4), 422-445. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.7.4.422
  37. Sun, L., S. Aryee and K. S. Law. (2007). High-Performance Human Resource Practices, Citizenship Behavior, and Organizational Performance: A Relational Perspective, Academy of Management Journal, 50(3), 558-577. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2007.25525821
  38. Teece, D. J., G. Pisano and A. Shuen. (1997). Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management, Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509-533. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199708)18:7<509::AID-SMJ882>3.0.CO;2-Z
  39. Verburg, R. M., Den Hartog, D. N. and P. L. Koopman. (2007). Configurations of Human Resource Management Practices: A Model and Test of Internal Fit, International Journal of Human Resource Management, 18(2), 184-208. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585190601102349

피인용 문헌

  1. 항공객실승무원의 팔로워십, 리더십 유형이 직무만족 및 팀 몰입에 미치는 영향 vol.46, pp.4, 2017, https://doi.org/10.7469/jksqm.2018.46.4.939