Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education (한국과학교육학회지)

The Korean Association for Science Education (한국과학교육학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Perception of Science Educators about Invention Education in Science Education

과학교육에서 발명교육에 관한 과학교육자의 인식 조사

  • Received : 2016.12.06
  • Accepted : 2016.12.28
  • Published : 2017.02.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to examine the perception of science educators (science research experts and science teachers) about invention education in science education. The instrument in surveying their perception consisted of the necessity of invention education in science education, the connection between invention and science education, and the demand for in-service invention education for science teachers. Subjects were 119 science educators (67 science teachers and 52 science research experts). They perceived positively about including invention educational content in school science education. They perceived that invention education was highly related to science education. Even though science educators have almost average level of understanding invention education, they demand in-service invention education for science teachers. Most of them referred informal courses to formal ones for school science education. Considering real life, engineering design, creative thinking in science education, invention method, and educational strategies can be effective for science education.

본 연구에서는 과학교육 연구자와 과학교사를 비롯한 과학교육자들의 발명교육에 대한 인식을 조사하였다. 과학교육자들의 발명교육에 대한 인식 조사 도구는 과학교육에서 발명교육의 필요성, 과학교육과 발명교육의 관련성, 과학교사들을 위한 발명교육 연수 요구도 등으로 구성하였다. 연구 대상은 과학교육 연구자 52명과 과학교사 67명으로 총 119명이었다. 설문 조사 결과 과학교육자들은 과학교육에서 발명교육을 포함하는 것에 대해서 상당히 긍정적으로 인식하고 있었으며, 과학교육과 발명교육은 매우 관련성이 높게 인식하는 것으로 나타났다. 발명교육에 대한 현재 이해 수준이 평균을 약간 상회하여 그리 높지 않았으며, 과학교육에서 발명기법의 활용을 위해 과학교사들을 위한 발명교육 연수가 필요하다는 인식을 갖는 것으로 나타났다. 대부분 과학교육자들은 발명교육이 과학과 교육과정에 직접적으로 포함되기 보다는 비교과 활동에서 우선 시행하는 것을 선행할 필요가 있다는 의견을 제시하였다. 또한 실생활 연계, 공학적 설계 및 창의적 사고 등의 측면에서 발명기법이나 발명 교육전략을을 활용한다면 과학교육에도 도움이 되리라 생각된다.

Keywords

References

  1. Ahn, J., & Kwon, N. (2012). The analysis on domestic research trends for convergence and integrated science education. Journal of Korean Association for Science Education, 32(2), 265-278. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2012.32.2.265
  2. Bang, D., Park, E., Yoon, H., Kim, J., Lee, Y., Park, J., Song, J., Dong, H., Shim, B., Lim, H., & Lee, H. (2013). The design of curricular framework for integrated science education based on big ideas. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 33(5), 1041-1054. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2013.33.5.1041
  3. BMBF(Federal Ministry of Education and Research) (2011). Germany - Israel Science and Technology, Education and Research. Division for Cooperation with European Countries, Israel 53170 Bonn, Germany
  4. Byun, M., & Cho, M. (2016). Examining ways to support engineering students for choosing a project topic in interdisciplinary collaboration. Journal of Engineering Education Research, 19(1), 37-46. https://doi.org/10.18108/jeer.2016.19.1.37
  5. Curriculum Standing Committee of National Education Professional Associations (CSCNEPA). (2007). Developing a 21st century school curriculum for all Australian students. Retrieved from http://www.acsa.edu.au/pages/images/CSCNEPA_paper_June087.pdf.
  6. DFE(Department for Education) (2014). The national curriculum in EnglandFramework document. Department for Education, UK.
  7. Kim, E. K. (2016). Inventive Problem Solving using IFR. Asia-pacific Journal of Multimedia Services Convergent with Art, Humanities, and Sociology, 6(9), 473-481.
  8. Kim, S., & Chung, U. (2007). Creative human capital as future growth engine and educational innovation. Korean Economic Journal, 46(4), 187-214.
  9. Kwon, H, Lee, E, & Lee, D. (2016). Meta-analysis on the Effectiveness ofInvention Education in SouthKorea: Creativity, Attitude, and Tendency for Problem Solving. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 15(1), 48-57.
  10. Lee, C. S. (2006). Interdisciplinary Connection of Content Standard of Invention Education. Proceeding of the Public hearing for establishing standard of contents of invention education contents and education contents system, pp. 53-81.
  11. Lee, H., Kwon, H., Park, K., Jung, C., Oh, H., & Nam, J. (2012). The effects of integrated science instruction : A Meta-analysis on scientific knowledge, scientific Inquiry ability, and science-related attitude. Korean Journal of Teacher Education, 28(2), 223-246.
  12. Lee, K., & Oh, E. (2012). A study on the perception of curriculum for cultivating students’ creativity in secondary school. Journal of Curriculum Integration, 6(1), 45-68.
  13. Lee, I. (2008). Convergence of knowledge. Seoul: Godswin.
  14. Maeng, H. J., & Seo, H. A. (2010). Characteristics of Learning Contents and Activities According to the Invention Education Managerial System for the Gifted at Elementary School Level. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 29(1), 1-12.
  15. MSIP(Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning) (2014). Endless imagining room operations manual. Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning, Korea. Retrieved from https://www.kofac.re.kr/?page_id=1677&uid=4277&mod=document.
  16. MOE(Ministry of Education) (2015). 2015 revised curriculum -Science-. Seoul: Ministry of Education.
  17. MOE(Ministry of Education and Science Technology) (2009). High school science curriculum manual. Ministry of Education and Science Technology.
  18. NRC(National Research Council) (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, D.C.: National Academy of Sciences.
  19. New Zealand Ministry of Education. (2007). The New Zealand curriculum. New Zealand: Ministry of Education.
  20. OECD (2007). PISA 2006: Science competencies for tomorrow's world. Volume I: Analysis. Paris: OECD.
  21. PCAST(The President's Council of Advisors on Science and Technology) (2010). Prepare and Inspire: K-12 Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math (STEM) Education for America's Future. Executive Report, President's Council of Advisors on Science and Technology, USA.
  22. Peppler, K., & Bender, S. (2013). Maker movement spreads innovation one project at a time. Phi Delta Kappan, 95(3), 22-27. https://doi.org/10.1177/003172171309500306
  23. Schweingruber, H. A., Quinn, H., Keller, T. E., & Pearson, G. (2013). A Framework for K-12 Science Education-Looking Toward the Future of Science Education. The Bridge, 43(1), 43-50.
  24. Seo, H., Jung, H., Son, J., Lee, B., & Maeng, H. (2006). Development of content standards for invention education. CR2006-57. Korean Educational Development Institute.
  25. Solomon, J., & Aikenhead, G. S. (Eds.). (1994). STS education: international perspectives on reform. New York: Teachers College Press.
  26. Son, J. (2014). The method of Invention educational approaches in science education curriculum dimension when developed integrated curriculum. Korea Association for Gifted Children Alliance Conference, 2014(1), 103-110.
  27. Son, Y, Pottenger III, F. M., King, A., Young, D., & Choi, D. (2001). Theory and practice of curriculum design for integrated science education. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 21(1), 231-254.
  28. UBS (2016). Extreme automation and connectivity: The global, regional, and investment implications of the Fourth Industrial Revolution. UBS White Paper for the World Economic Forum, Annual Meeting 2016.
  29. Yakman, G. (2007). STEAM education: an overview of creating a model of integrative education. Paper presented at the ITEEA annual conference.
  30. Zeidler, D. L., Sadler, T. D., Simmons, M. L., & Howes, E. V. (2005). Beyond STS: a research-based framework for socioscientific issues education. Science Education, 89(3), 357-377. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20048

Cited by

  1. 3D 프린터를 활용한 호흡계의 융합 수업이 초등학생의 과학 탐구 능력, 창의적 문제해결력, 과학 흥미도 및 STEAM 프로그램 만족도에 미치는 영향 vol.37, pp.3, 2017, https://doi.org/10.15267/keses.2018.37.3.323
  2. Analysis of the Characteristics of High School Student Research Activities - Focused on the Prize-Winning Works in the Life Science Field of National Science Fair - vol.46, pp.3, 2018, https://doi.org/10.15717/bioedu.2018.46.3.380