DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Tests of the interface between structures and filling soil of mountain area airport

  • Wu, Xueyun (Department of Civil Engineering, Tsinghua University) ;
  • Yang, Jun (Department of Civil Engineering, Tsinghua University)
  • Received : 2016.06.29
  • Accepted : 2016.11.04
  • Published : 2017.03.30

Abstract

A series of direct shear tests were conducted to investigate the frictional properties of the interface between structures and the filling soil of Chongqing airport fourth stage expansion project. Two types of structures are investigated, one is low carbon steel and the other is the bedrock sampled from the site. The influence of soil water content, surface roughness and material types of structure were analyzed. The tests show that the interface friction and shear displacement curve has no softening stage and the curve shape is close to the Clough-Duncan hyperbola, while the soil is mainly shear contraction during testing. The interface frictional resistance and normal stress curve meets the Mohr-Coulomb criterion and the derived friction angle and frictional resistance of interface increase as surface roughness increases but is always lower than the internal friction angle and shear strength of soil respectively. When surface roughness is much larger than soil grain size, soil-structure interface is nearly shear surface in soil. In addition to the geometry of structural surface, the material types of structure also affects the performance of soil-structure interface. The wet interface frictional resistance will become lower than the natural one under specific conditions.

Keywords

References

  1. Basmenj, A.K., Ghafoori, M., Cheshomi, A. and Azandariani, Y.K. (2016), "Adhesion of clay to metal surface; Normal and tangential measurement", Geomech. Eng., Int. J., 10(2), 125-135. https://doi.org/10.12989/gae.2016.10.2.125
  2. Borana, L., Yin, J.H., Singh, D.N. and Shukla, S.K. (2015), "A modified suction-controlled direct shear device for testing unsaturated soil and steel plate interface", Marine Georesour. Geotechnol., 33(4), 289-298. https://doi.org/10.1080/1064119X.2013.843045
  3. Borana, L., Yin, J.H., Singh, D.N. and Shukla, S.K. (2016a), "Interface behavior from suction controlled direct shear test on completely decomposed granitic soil and steel surfaces", Int. J. Geomech., D4016008. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0000658
  4. Borana, L., Yin, J.H., Singh, D.N. and Shukla S.K. (2016b), "Influence of matric suction and counterface roughness on shearing behavior of completely decomposed granitic soil and steel interface", Indian Geotech. J. DOI: 10.1007/s40098-016-0205-7
  5. Cabalar, A.F. (2016), "Cyclic behavior of various sands and structural materials interfaces", Geomech. Eng., Int. J., 10(1), 1-19.
  6. Clough, G.W. and Duncan, J.M. (1971), "Finite element analyses of retaining wall behavior", J. Soil Mech. Found. Div., ASCE, 97(12), 1657-1673.
  7. Fakharian, K. and Evgin, E. (1996), "An automated apparatus for three-dimensional monotonic and cyclic testing of interfaces", Geotech. Test. J., 19(1), 22-31. https://doi.org/10.1520/GTJ11404J
  8. Gan, J.K.M. and Fredlund, D.G. (1994), "Direct shear and triaxial testing of a Hong Kong soil under saturated and unsaturated condition", In: GEO Rep. No. 46; Geotechnical Eng. Office, Hong Kong.
  9. Hossain, M.A. and Yin, J.H. (2014), "Dilatancy and strength of an unsaturated soil-cement interface in direct shear tests", Int. J. Geomech., ASCE, 15(5), 04014081. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0000428
  10. Kishida, H. and Uesugi, M. (1987), "Tests of the interface between sand and steel in the simple shear apparatus", Geotechnique, 37(1), 45-52. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1987.37.1.45
  11. Mortara, G., Ferrara, D. and Fotia, G. (2010), "Simple model for the cyclic behavior of smooth sand-steel interfaces", J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., ASCE, 136(7), 1004-1009. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000315
  12. Oberg, A.L. and Sallfors, G. (1997), "Determination of shear strength parameters of unsaturated silt and sands based on the water retention curve", Geotech. Test. J., 20(1), 40-48. https://doi.org/10.1520/GTJ11419J
  13. Potyondy, J.G. (1961), "Skin friction between various soils and construction material", Geotechnique, 11(4), 331-353.
  14. Shakir, R.R. and Zhu, J.G. (2009), "Behavior of compacted clay-concrete interface", Frontiers of Architecture and Civil Engineering in China, 3(1), 85-92. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-009-0013-6
  15. Tsubakihara, Y. and Kishida, H. (1993a), "Frictional behaviour between normally consolidated clay and steel by two direct shear type apparatuses", Soils Found., 33(2), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf1972.33.2_1
  16. Tsubakihara, Y., Kishida, H. and Nishiyama, T. (1993b), "Friction between cohesive soils and steel", Soils Found., 33(2), 145-156. https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf1972.33.2_145
  17. Tuncer, B.E., Peter, J.B. and Aaron, J.S. (2005), "Soil-structure interface shear transfer behavior", Geomechanics II: Testing, modeling, and simulation, pp. 528-543.
  18. Vanapalli, S.K., Fredlund, D.G., Pufahi, D.E. and Clifton, A.W. (1996), "Model for the prediction of shear strength with respect to soil suction", Can. Geotech. J., 33(3), 379-392. https://doi.org/10.1139/t96-060
  19. Zhang, G. and Zhang, J.M. (2006a), "Monotonic and cyclic tests of interface between structure and gravelly soil", Soils Found., 46(4), 505-518. https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf.46.505
  20. Zhang, G. and Zhang, J.M. (2006b), "Large-scale apparatus for monotonic and cyclic soil-structure interface test", Geotech. Test. J., 29(5), 1-8.

Cited by

  1. Shear coupling effect of monotonic and cyclic behavior of the interface between steel and gravel vol.56, pp.6, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2018-0262
  2. Effects of the soil water content and relative roughness on the shear strength of silt and steel plate interface vol.174, pp.None, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2021.109003
  3. Effects of water content and interface roughness on the shear strength of silt-cement mortar interface vol.61, pp.6, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sandf.2021.08.011