DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Physical Modeling of Chemical Exchange Saturation Transfer Imaging

  • Jahng, Geon-Ho (Department of Radiology, Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong, College of Medicine, Kyung Hee University) ;
  • Oh, Jang-Hoon (Department of Radiology, Kyung Hee University Hospital, Kyung Hee University)
  • Received : 2017.11.13
  • Accepted : 2017.12.19
  • Published : 2017.12.31

Abstract

Chemical Exchange Saturation Transfer (CEST) imaging is a method to detect solutes based on the chemical exchange of mobile protons with water. The solute protons exchange with three different patterns, which are fast, slow, and intermediate rates. The CEST contrast can be obtained from the exchangeable protons, which are hydroxyl protons, amine protons, and amide protons. The CEST MR imaging is useful to evaluate tumors, strokes, and other diseases. The purpose of this study is to review the mathematical model for CEST imaging and for measurement of the chemical exchange rate, and to measure the chemical exchange rate using a 3T MRI system on several amino acids. We reviewed the mathematical models for the proton exchange. Several physical models are proposed to demonstrate a two-pool, three-pool, and four-pool models. The CEST signals are also evaluated by taking account of the exchange rate, pH and the saturation efficiency. Although researchers have used most commonly in the calculation of CEST asymmetry, a quantitative analysis is also developed by using Lorentzian fitting. The chemical exchange rate was measured in the phantoms made of asparagine (Asn), glutamate (Glu), ${\gamma}-aminobutyric$ acid (GABA), glycine (Gly), and myoinositol (MI). The experiment was performed at a 3T human MRI system with three different acidity conditions (pH 5.6, 6.2, and 7.4) at a concentration of 50 mM. To identify the chemical exchange rate, the "lsqcurvefit" built-in function in MATLAB was used to fit the pseudo-first exchange rate model. The pseudo-first exchange rate of Asn and Gly was increased with decreasing acidity. In the case of GABA, the largest result was observed at pH 6.2. For Glu, the results at pH 5.6 and 6.2 did not show a significant difference, and the results at pH 7.4 were almost zero. For MI, there was no significant difference at pH 5.6 or 7.4, however, the results at pH 6.2 were smaller than at the other pH values. For the experiment at 3T, we were only able to apply 1 s as the maximum saturation duration due to the limitations of the MRI system. The measurement of the chemical exchange rate was limited in a clinical 3T MRI system because of a hardware limitation.

Keywords

References

  1. V. Guivel-Scharen, T. Sinnwell, S.D. Wolff, R.S. Balaban, "Detect ion of proton chemical exchange between metabolites and water in biological tissues," J Magn Reson 133, 36-45 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1006/jmre.1998.1440
  2. K.M. Ward, A.H. Aletras, R.S. Balaban, "A new class of contrast agents for MRI based on proton chemical exchange dependent saturation transfer (CEST)," J Magn Reson 143, 79-87 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1006/jmre.1999.1956
  3. O. Millet, J.P. Loria, C.D. Kroenke, M. Pons, A.G. Palmer, "The Static Magnetic Field Dependence of Chemical Exchange Linebroadening Defines the NMR Chemical Shift Time Scale," Journal of the American Chemical Society 122, 2867-2877 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1021/ja993511y
  4. R.G. Spencer, K.W. Fishbein, "Measurement of spin-lattice relaxation times and concentrations in systems with chemical exchange using the one-pulse sequence: breakdown of the Ernst model for partial saturation in nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy," J Magn Reson 142, 120-135 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1006/jmre.1999.1925
  5. P.C. van Zijl, C.K. Jones, J. Ren, C.R. Malloy, A.D. Sherry, "MRI detection of glycogen in vivo by using chemical exchange saturation transfer imaging (glycoCEST)," Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104, 4359-4364 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0700281104
  6. W. Ling, R.R. Regatte, G. Navon, A. Jerschow, "Assessment of glycosaminoglycan concentration in vivo by chemical exchange-dependent saturation transfer (gagCEST)," Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105, 2266-2270 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0707666105
  7. S. Walker-Samuel, R. Ramasawmy, F. Torrealdea, M. Rega, V. Rajkumar, S.P. Johnson, S. Richardson, M. Goncalves, H.G. Parkes, E. Arstad, D.L. Thomas, R.B. Pedley, M.F. Lythgoe, X. Golay, "In vivo imaging of glucose uptake and metabolism in tumors," Nat Med 19, 1067-1072 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1038/nm.3252
  8. M. Haris, K. Cai, A. Singh, H. Hariharan, R. Reddy, "In vivo mapping of brain myo-inositol," Neuroimage 54, 2079-2085 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.10.017
  9. J.-H. Oh, H.-G. Kim, D.-C. Woo, H.-K. Jeong, S.Y. Lee, G.-H. Jahng, "Chemical-exchange-saturation-transfer magnetic resonance imaging to map gamma-aminobutyric acid, glutamate, myoinositol, glycine, and asparagine: Phantom experiments," Journal of the Korean Physical Society 70, 545-553 (2017). https://doi.org/10.3938/jkps.70.545
  10. M. Haris, K. Nath, K. Cai, A. Singh, R. Crescenzi, F. Kogan, G. Verma, S. Reddy, H. Hariharan, E.R. Melhem, R. Reddy, "Imaging of glutamate neurotransmitter alterations in Alzheimer's disease," NMR Biomed 26, 386-391 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1002/nbm.2875
  11. G. Yan, T. Zhang, Z. Dai, M. Yi, Y. Jia, T. Nie, H. Zhang, G. Xiao, R. Wu, "A Potential Magnetic Resonance Imaging Technique Based on Chemical Exchange Saturation Transfer for In Vivo gamma-Aminobutyric Acid Imaging," PLoS One 11, e0163765 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163765
  12. F. Kogan, M. Haris, A. Singh, K. Cai, C. Debrosse, R.P. Nanga, H. Hariharan, R. Reddy, "Method for high-resolution imaging of creatine in vivo using chemical exchange saturation transfer," Magn Reson Med 71, 164-172 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.24641
  13. P.C. van Zijl, J. Zhou, N. Mori, J.F. Payen, D. Wilson, S. Mori, "Mechanism of magnetization transfer during on-resonance water saturation. A new approach to detect mobile proteins, peptides, and lipids," Magn Reson Med 49, 440-449 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.10398
  14. J. Zhou, J.F. Payen, D.A. Wilson, R.J. Traystman, P.C. van Zijl, "Using the amide proton signals of intracellular proteins and peptides to detect pH effects in MRI," Nat Med 9, 1085-1090 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1038/nm907
  15. H.M. McConnell, "Reaction Rates by Nuclear Magnetic Resonance," The Journal of Chemical Physics 28, 430-431 (1958). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1744152
  16. J. Zhou, D.A. Wilson, P.Z. Sun, J.A. Klaus, P.C. Van Zijl, "Quantitative description of proton exchange processes between water and endogenous and exogenous agents for WEX, CEST, and APT experiments," Magn Reson Med 51, 945-952 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.20048
  17. J. Zhou, P. van zijl, Chemical exchange saturation transfer imaging and spectroscopy. (2006).
  18. E. Baguet, C. Roby, "Fast Inversion-Recovery Measurements in the Presence of a Saturating Field for a Two-Spin System in Chemical Exchange," Journal of Magnetic Resonance, Series A 108, 189-195 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1006/jmra.1994.1109
  19. E. Baguet, C. Roby, "Off-resonance irradiation effect in steady-state NMR saturation transfer," J Magn Reson 128, 149-160 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1006/jmre.1997.1230
  20. P.Z. Sun, P.C. van Zijl, J. Zhou, "Optimization of the irradiation power in chemical exchange dependent saturation transfer experiments," J Magn Reson 175, 193-200 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmr.2005.04.005
  21. D.E. Woessner, S. Zhang, M.E. Merritt, A.D. Sherry, "Numerical solution of the Bloch equations provides insights into the optimum design of PARACEST agents for MRI," Magn Reson Med 53, 790-799 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.20408
  22. K.L. Desmond, G.J. Stanisz, "Understanding quantitative pulsed CEST in the presence of MT," Magn Reson Med 67, 979-990 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.23074
  23. A.X. Li, R.H. Hudson, J.W. Barret t, C.K. Jones, S.H. Pasternak, R. Bartha, "Four-pool modeling of proton exchange processes in biological systems in the presence of MRI-paramagnetic chemical exchange saturation transfer (PARACEST) agents," Magn Reson Med 60, 1197-1206 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.21752
  24. M.T. McMahon, A.A. Gilad, J. Zhou, P.Z. Sun, J.W. Bulte, P.C. van Zijl, "Quantifying exchange rates in chemical exchange saturation transfer agents using the saturation t ime and saturat ion power dependencies of the magnetization transfer effect on the magnetic resonance imaging signal (QUEST and QUESP): Ph calibration for poly-L-lysine and a starburst dendrimer," Magn Reson Med 55, 836-847 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.20818
  25. P.C. van Zijl, N.N. Yadav, "Chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST): what is in a name and what isn't?," Magn Reson Med 65, 927-948 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.22761
  26. K.M. Ward, R.S. Balaban, "Determination of pH using water protons and chemical exchange dependent saturation transfer (CEST)," Magn Reson Med 44, 799-802 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1002/1522-2594(200011)44:5<799::AID-MRM18>3.0.CO;2-S
  27. X. Zong, P. Wang, S.G. Kim, T. Jin, "Sensitivity and source of amine-proton exchange and amide-proton transfer magnetic resonance imaging in cerebral ischemia," Magn Reson Med 71, 118-132 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.24639
  28. N. McVicar, A.X. Li, D.F. Goncalves, M. Bellyou, S.O. Meakin, M.A. Prado, R. Bartha, "Quantitative tissue pH measurement during cerebral ischemia using amine and amide concentration-independent detection (AACID) with MRI," J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 34, 690-698 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1038/jcbfm.2014.12
  29. M. Zaiss, B. Schmitt, P. Bachert, "Quantitative separation of CEST effect from magnetization transfer and spillover effects by Lorentzian-line-fit analysis of z-spectra," J Magn Reson 211, 149-155 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmr.2011.05.001
  30. S. Goerke, M. Zaiss, P. Kunz, K.D. Klika, J.D. Windschuh, A. Mogk, B. Bukau, M.E. Ladd, P. Bachert, "Signature of protein unfolding in chemical exchange saturation transfer imaging," NMR Biomed 28, 906-913 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1002/nbm.3317
  31. K.L. Desmond, F. Moosvi, G.J. Stanisz, "Mapping of amide, amine, and aliphatic peaks in the CEST spectra of murine xenografts at 7 T," Magn Reson Med 71, 1841-1853 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.24822
  32. D. L iu, J. Zhou, R. Xue, Z . Zuo, J. An, D.J. Wang, "Quantitative characterization of nuclear overhauser enhancement and amide proton transfer effects in the human brain at 7 tesla," Magn Reson Med 70, 1070-1081 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.24560
  33. R.G. Bryant, "The dynamics of water-protein interactions," Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct 25, 29-53 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.bb.25.060196.000333
  34. M. Zaiss, P. Bachert, "Chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) and MR Z-spectroscopy in vivo: a review of theoretical approaches and methods," Phys Med Biol 58, R221-269 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/58/22/R221

Cited by

  1. Preliminary Phantom Experiments to Map Amino Acids and Neurotransmitters Using MRI vol.29, pp.1, 2017, https://doi.org/10.14316/pmp.2018.29.1.29
  2. Comparative evaluation of the polynomial and spline fitting methods for the B0 correction of CEST MRI data acquired from human brains vol.29, pp.3, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1002/ima.22313
  3. Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Historical Overview, Technical Developments, and Clinical Applications vol.31, pp.3, 2017, https://doi.org/10.14316/pmp.2020.31.3.35