Educational Technology International

  • 제18권2호
  • /
  • Pages.159-191
  • /
  • 2017
  • /
  • 1598-5776(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2289-0300(eISSN)
한국교육공학회 (The Korean Society for Education Technology)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Comparisons on Clustering Methods: Use of LMS Log Variables on Academic Courses

  • 투고 : 2017.08.30
  • 심사 : 2017.09.22
  • 발행 : 2017.10.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Academic analytics guides university decision-makers to assign limited resources more effectively. Especially, diverse academic courses clustered by the usage patterns and levels on Learning Management System(LMS) help understanding instructors' pedagogical approach and the integration level of technologies. Further, the clustering results can contribute deciding proper range and levels of financial and technical supports. However, in spite of diverse analytic methodologies, clustering analysis methods often provide different results. The purpose of this study is to present implications by using three different clustering analysis including Gaussian Mixture Model, K-Means clustering, and Hierarchical clustering. As a case, we have clustered academic courses based on the usage levels and patterns of LMS in higher education using those three clustering techniques. In this study, 2,639 courses opened during 2013 fall semester in a large private university located in South Korea were analyzed with 13 observation variables that represent the characteristics of academic courses. The results of analysis show that the strengths and weakness of each clustering analysis and suggest that academic leaders and university staff should look into the usage levels and patterns of LMS with more elaborated view and take an integrated approach with different analytic methods for their strategic decision on development of LMS.

키워드

과제정보

This work was supported by the Ministry of Education of the Republic of Korea and the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF-2015S1A5B6036244).

참고문헌

  1. Arnold, K. E. (2010). Signals: Applying Academic Analytics. Educause Quarterly, 33(1), n1.
  2. Arnold, K. E., & Pistilli, M. D. (2012). Course signals at Purdue: Using learning analytics to increase student success. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge.
  3. Baepler, P., & Murdoch, C. J. (2010). Academic analytics and data mining in higher education. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 4(2), 17.
  4. Baer, L., & Campbell, J. (2011). Game changers: Education and information technologies. EDUCAUSE. Retrieved March 24, 2014.
  5. Brooks, C., Greer, J., & Gutwin, C. (2014). The data-assisted approach to building intelligent technology-enhanced learning environments Learning Analytics (pp. 123-156): Springer.
  6. Campbell, J. P., DeBlois, P. B., & Oblinger, D. G. (2007). Academic analytics: A new tool for a new era. Educause Review, 42(4), 40.
  7. Daniel, B. K. (2017). Overview of Big Data and Analytics in Higher Education Big Data and Learning Analytics in Higher Education (pp. 1-4): Springer.
  8. Essa, A., & Ayad, H. (2012). Student success system: risk analytics and data visualization using ensembles of predictive models. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge.
  9. Eynon, R. (2013). The rise of Big Data: what does it mean for education, technology, and media research? : Taylor & Francis.
  10. Ferguson, R. (2012). Learning analytics: drivers, developments and challenges. International Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning, 4(5-6), 304-317.
  11. Goldstein, P. J., & Katz, R. N. (2005). Academic analytics: The uses of management information and technology in higher education: Educause.
  12. Jo, I., Park, Y., Kim, J., & Song, J. (2014). Analysis of online behavior and prediction of learning performance in blended learning environments. Educational Technology International, 15(2), 137-153.
  13. Kim, D., Park, Y., Yoon, M., & Jo, I.-H. (2016). Toward evidence-based learning analytics: Using proxy variables to improve asynchronous online discussion environments. The Internet and Higher Education, 30, 30-43.
  14. Krumm, A. E., Waddington, R. J., Teasley, S. D., & Lonn, S. (2014). A learning management system-based early warning system for academic advising in undergraduate engineering Learning analytics (pp. 103-119): Springer.
  15. Kruse, A., & Pongsajapan, R. (2012). Student-centered learning analytics. CNDLS Thought Papers, 1(9).
  16. Michel, J.-B., Shen, Y. K., Aiden, A. P., Veres, A., Gray, M. K., Pickett, J. P., ... Orwant, J. (2011). Quantitative analysis of culture using millions of digitized books. science, 331(6014), 176-182.
  17. Park, Y., & Jo, I.-H. (2017). Using log variables in a learning management system to evaluate learning activity using the lens of activity theory. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 42(4), 531-547.
  18. Park, Y., Yu, J. H., & Jo, I.-H. (2016). Clustering blended learning courses by online behavior data: A case study in a Korean higher education institute. The Internet and Higher Education, 29, 1-11.
  19. Siemens, G., & Long, P. (2011). Penetrating the fog: Analytics in learning and education. Educause Review, 46(5), 30-32.