참고문헌
- I. Akkurt, Effective atomic and electron numbers of some steels at different energies, Ann. Nucl. Energy 36 (2009) 1702-1705. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2009.09.005
- I. Akkurt, A.M. El-Khayatt, Effective atomic number and electron density of marble concrete, J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 295 (2013) 633-638. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-012-2111-5
- I.M. Borchardtt, J.R. Pattersont, A.H. Beddoef, G.C. Sorellf, An investigation of photonuclear reactions in Cerrobend eutectic material with an 18 MV linac, Phys. Med. Biol. 36 (1991) 649-653. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/36/5/008
- I.A. Brezovich, K.S. Sparks, J. Duan, A self-correcting method for improving the precision of beam blocks, J. Appl. Clin. Med. Phys. 2 (2001) 106-113. https://doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v2i3.2603
- Y. Elmahroug, B. Tellili, C. Souga, Determination of total mass attenuation coefficients, effective atomic numbers and electron densities for different shielding materials, Ann. Nucl. Energy 75 (2015a) 268-274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2014.08.015
- Y. Elmahroug, B. Tellili, C. Souga, K. Manai, ParShield: a computer program for calculating attenuation parameters of the gamma rays and the fast neutrons, Ann. Nucl. Energy 76 (2015b) 94-99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2014.09.044
- Y. Elmahroug, B. Tellili, C. Souga, Determination of shielding parameters for different types of resins, Ann. Nucl. Energy 63 (2013) 619-623.
- S. Gowda, S. Krishnaveni, T. Yashoda, T.K. Umesh, R. Gowda, Photon mass attenuation coefficients, effective atomic numbers and electron densities of some thermoluminescent dosimetric compounds, Pramana J. Phys. 63 (2004) 529-541. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02704481
- G.J. Hine, The effective atomic numbers of materials for various gamma interactions, Phys. Rev. 85 (1952) 725-737.
- J.H. Hubbell, Review of photon interaction cross section data in the medical and biological context, Phys. Med. Biol. 44 (1999) R1. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/44/1/001
- J.H. Hubbell, Photon mass attenuation and energy-absorption coefficients, Int. J. Appl. Radiat. Isot. 33 (1982) 1269-1290. https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-708X(82)90248-4
- O. Icelli, Z. Yalcina, M. Okutana, R. Boncukcuoglub, A. Sen, The determination of the total mass attenuation coefficients and the effective atomic numbers for concentrated colemanite and Emet colemanite clay, Ann. Nucl. Energy 38 (2011) 2079-2085. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2011.06.003
- P. Limkitjaroenporn, J. Kaewkhao, S. Asavavisithchai, Determination of mass attenuation coefficients and effective atomic numbers for Inconel 738 alloy for different energies obtained from Compton scattering, Ann. Nucl. Energy 53 (2013) 64-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2012.08.020
- L. Ma, W. Chang, M. Lau-Chin, E.M. Tate, A.L. Boyer, Using static MLC fields to replace partial transmission cerrobend blocks in treatment planning of rectal carcinoma cases, Med. Dosim. 23 (1998) 264-266. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0958-3947(98)00034-X
- S.R. Manohara, S.M. Hanagodimath, K.S. Thind, L. Gerward, On the effective atomic number and electron density: a comprehensive set of formulas for all types of materials and energies above 1 keV, Nucl. Instrum. Methods B 266 (2008) 3906-3912. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nimb.2008.06.034
- Y. Mejaddem, I. Lax, A.K. Shamsuddin, Procedure for accurate fabrication of tissue compensators with high-density material, Phys. Med. Biol. 42 (1997) 415-421. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/42/2/013
- G. Neuner, M.M. Mohiuddin, W.N. Vander, O. Goloubeva, J. Ha, C.X. Yu, W.F. Regine, High-dose spatially fractionated GRID radiation therapy (SFGRT): a comparison of treatment outcomes with Cerrobend vs. MLC SFGRT, Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 82 (2012) 1642-1649. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.01.065
- J.B. Wojcick, R. Yankelevich, B.L. Werner, D.E. Lasher, Technical Note: on Cerrobend shielding for 18-22 MeV electron beams, Nonlinearity 35 (2008) 4625-4629.
피인용 문헌
- Investigation of radiation shielding properties for some ceramics vol.107, pp.2, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1515/ract-2018-3030
- Experimental investigation of photon attenuation parameters for different binary alloys vol.107, pp.4, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1515/ract-2018-3079
- The use of isophthalic-bismuth polymer composites as radiation shielding barriers in nuclear medicine vol.6, pp.5, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1088/2053-1591/ab0578
- Gamma ray shielding capabilities of rhenium-based superalloys vol.174, pp.5, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1080/10420150.2019.1596110
- A comprehensive study on radiation shielding characteristics of Tin-Silver, Manganin-R, Hastelloy-B, Hastelloy-X and Dilver-P alloys vol.126, pp.4, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00339-020-3442-7
- Tungsten carbide and LMPA electron cutouts: comparison and validation using Monte Carlo modelling and measurement of dose vol.7, pp.1, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1088/2057-1976/abcb13
- Trivalent Ions and Their Impacts on Effective Conductivity at 300 K and Radio-Protective Behaviors of Bismo-Borate Glasses: A Comparative Investigation for Al, Y, Nd, Sm, Eu vol.14, pp.19, 2017, https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14195894
- Neutron/gamma radiation shielding characteristics and physical properties of (97.3−x)Pb−xCd-2.7Ag alloys for nuclear radiation applications vol.96, pp.12, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1088/1402-4896/ac3d4a
- Synthesis of different (RE)BaCuO ceramics, study their structural properties, and tracking their radiation protection efficiency using Monte Carlo simulation vol.276, pp.None, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2021.125412
- Gamma radiation shielding performance of CuxAg(1-x)-alloys: Experimental, theoretical and simulation results vol.143, pp.None, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnucene.2021.104036