DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Two-stage Stochastic Programming Model for Optimal Reactive Power Dispatch with High Penetration Level of Wind Generation

  • Cui, Wei (Dept. of Electrical Engineering, Chongqing University) ;
  • Yan, Wei (Dept. of Electrical Engineering, Chongqing University) ;
  • Lee, Wei-Jen (Dept. of Electrical Engineering, The University of Texas at Arlington) ;
  • Zhao, Xia (Dept. of Electrical Engineering, Chongqing University) ;
  • Ren, Zhouyang (Dept. of Electrical Engineering, Chongqing University) ;
  • Wang, Cong (Dept. of Electrical Engineering, Chongqing University)
  • Received : 2015.12.11
  • Accepted : 2016.09.01
  • Published : 2017.01.02

Abstract

The increasing of wind power penetration level presents challenges in classical optimal reactive power dispatch (ORPD) which is usually formulated as a deterministic optimization problem. This paper proposes a two-stage stochastic programming model for ORPD by considering the uncertainties of wind speed and load in a specified time interval. To avoid the excessive operation, the schedule of compensators will be determined in the first-stage while accounting for the costs of adjusting the compensators (CACs). Under uncertainty effects, on-load tap changer (OLTC) and generator in the second-stage will compensate the mismatch caused by the first-stage decision. The objective of the proposed model is to minimize the sum of CACs and the expected energy loss. The stochastic behavior is formulated by three-point estimate method (TPEM) to convert the stochastic programming into equivalent deterministic problem. A hybrid Genetic Algorithm-Interior Point Method is utilized to solve this large-scale mixed-integer nonlinear stochastic problem. Two case studies on IEEE 14-bus and IEEE 118-bus system are provided to illustrate the effectiveness of the proposed method.

Keywords

References

  1. Y. Hsu and H. Kuo, "Dispatch of capacitors on distribution system using dynamic programming," Generation, Transmission and Distribution, IEE Proceedings C, vol. 140, no. 6, pp. 433-438, Nov. 1993.
  2. Y. Hsu and C. Yang, "A hybrid artificial neural network-dynamic programming approach for feeder capacitor scheduling," IEEE Trans. Power Systems, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 1069-1075, May 1994.
  3. F. Lu and Y. Hsu, "Fuzzy dynamic programming approach to reactive power voltage control in a distribution substation," IEEE Trans. Power Systems, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 681-688, May 1997.
  4. Y. Hsu and F. Lu, "A combined artificial neural network-fuzzy dynamic programming approach to reactive power voltage control in a distribution substation," IEEE Trans. Power Systems, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 1265-1271, Nov. 1998.
  5. M. B. Liu, C. A. Canizares and W. Huang, "Reactive Power and Voltage Control in Distribution Systems With Limited Switching Operations," IEEE Trans. Power Systems, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 889-899, May 2009. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPWRS.2009.2016362
  6. T. Malakar and S. K. Goswami, "Active and reactive dispatch with minimum control movements," International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 78-87, Jan. 2013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijepes.2012.07.014
  7. D. Youman, Z. Boming and T. Tian, "A Fictitious Load Algorithm and It's Applications to Distribution Network Dynamic Optimizations," Proceedings of the CSEE, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 241-244, Jul. 1996.
  8. Z. Hu, X. Wang, H. Chen, and G. A. Taylor, "Volt/VAr control in distribution systems using a timeinterval based approach," Generation Transmission and Distribution, IEE Proceedings-, vol. 150, no. 5, pp. 548-554, Sept. 2003.
  9. H. Luo, M. Chen and T. Cheng, "Adaptive Time- Intervalled Reactive Power Optimization for Distribution Network Containing Wind Power Generation," Power System Technology, vol. 38, no. 8, pp. 2207-2212, Aug. 2014.
  10. Y. J. Zhang and Z. Ren, "Optimal Reactive Power Dispatch Considering Costs of Adjusting the Control Devices," IEEE Trans. Power Systems, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 1349-1356, Aug. 2005.
  11. Z. Hu, X. Wang and G. Taylor, "Stochastic optimal reactive power dispatch: Formulation and solution method," International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, vol. 32, no. 6, pp. 615-621, Jul. 2010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijepes.2009.11.018
  12. S. M. Mohseni-Bonab, A. Rabiee, B. Mohammadi-Ivatloo, S. Jalilzadeh, and S. Nojavan, "A two-point estimate method for uncertainty modeling in multiobjective optimal reactive power dispatch problem," International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, vol. 75, pp. 194-204, Feb. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijepes.2015.08.009
  13. R. Liang, J. Wang, Y. Chen, and W. Tseng, "An enhanced firefly algorithm to multi-objective optimal active/reactive power dispatch with uncertainties consideration," International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, vol. 64, pp. 1088-1097, Jan. 2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijepes.2014.09.008
  14. A. T. Saric, F. H. Murphy, A. L. Soyster, and A. M. Stankovic, "Two-Stage Stochastic Programming Model for Market Clearing With Contingencies," IEEE Trans. Power Systems, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 1266-1278, Aug. 2009. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPWRS.2009.2023267
  15. P. Xiong and P. Jirutitijaroen, "Two-stage adjustable robust optimisation for unit commitment under uncertainty," IET Generation, Transmission & Distribution, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 573-582, Mar. 2013. https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-gtd.2012.0660
  16. E. M. Constantinescu, V. M. Zavala, M. Rocklin, S. Lee, and M. Anitescu, "A Computational Framework for Uncertainty Quantification and Stochastic Optimization in Unit Commitment with Wind Power Generation," IEEE Trans. Power Systems, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 431-441, Feb. 2011. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPWRS.2010.2048133
  17. J. R. Soto, C. Domellas and D. M. Falcao, "Optimal reactive power dispatch using a hybrid formulation: genetic algorithms and interior point," in Power Tech Proceedings, 2001 IEEE Porto, vol. 3, pp. 5, Sept. 2001.
  18. Birge, J. R. and Louveaux, F, Introduction to Stochastic Programming: Springer Science & Business Media, 2011.
  19. Y. Li, W. Li and W. Yan, "Probabilistic Optimal Power Flow Considering Correlations of Wind Speeds Following Different Distributions," IEEE Trans. Power Systems, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 1847-1854, Jul. 2014. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPWRS.2013.2296505
  20. Hong H P. "An efficient point estimate method for probabilistic analysis," Reliability Engineering & System Safety, vol. 59, no. 3, pp. 261-267, Jul. 1998. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0951-8320(97)00071-9
  21. Cant-Paz E. "A survey of parallel genetic algorithms," Calculateurs Paralleles, Reseaux Et Systems Repartis, vol. 10, pp. 141-171, May 1998.
  22. W. Yan, J. Yu, D. C. Yu, and K. Bhattarai, "A new optimal reactive power flow model in rectangular form and its solution by predictor corrector primal dual interior point method," IEEE Trans. Power Systems, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 61-67, Feb. 2006. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPWRS.2005.861978
  23. MATPOWER [Online]. Available: http://www.pserc.cornell.edu/matpower,
  24. H. Sun, Q. Guo, B. Zhang, W. Wu, and B. Wang, "An Adaptive Zone-Division-Based Automatic Voltage Control System With Applications in China," IEEE Trans. Power Systems, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 1816-1828, May 2013 https://doi.org/10.1109/TPWRS.2012.2228013

Cited by

  1. Volt/Var Control for Power Grids With Connections of Large-Scale Wind Farms: A Review vol.6, pp.2169-3536, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2832175