Impacts of Social Media (Facebook) on Human Communication and Relationships: A View on Behavioral Change and Social Unity

  • Received : 2017.05.03
  • Accepted : 2017.12.03
  • Published : 2017.12.31


The impact of social networking is varied from good to bad. Online activities have also been categorized into pros and cons of social networking, either as reported as hiding Internet activities among teenagers or killing loneliness among elderly. In terms of relationships, there have been argument over its closeness and quality of an online relationship in Internet settings. Looking at the contradiction in an innovative interaction between classic community communication and social media, there is an unknown scent of the future struggling and challenging both human communication and relationships in the presence of digital culture. This research uses Diffusion of Innovation to study the wide and continuous spread of digital culture in human communication; and, Media Dependency in learning and structuring the cognitive, affective and behavioral effects of social media on each person uses the media in different ways. This research will be using online survey to gain opinions from a social network site as an update of views and reflection of self-awareness to all levels of people. Social media like Facebook (FB) is perceived as a good tool of communication that it is able to bring closeness among the family members. The results show that social media like FB brings positive impact towards family members; it would help to build a better and harmonic society; and, relationships among family members and communication shall be improved and enhanced to the level of a united society.



  1. AARP. (2010). Social media and technology use among adults 50+. Retrieved from
  2. Baran, S. J., & Davis, D. K. (2005). Mass communication theory: foundations, ferment and future. Beijing: Tsinghua University Press.
  3. Baran, S. J., & Davis, D. K. (2006). Mass communication theory - foundations, ferment, and future. Singapore: Thomson Wadsworth.
  4. Baym, N. K., Zhang, Y. B., Kunkel, A., Ledbetter, A., & Lin, M. C. (2007). Relational quality and media use in interpersonal relationships. New Media & Society, 9(5), 735-752.
  5. Bee, S. A., Beebe, S. J., & Redmond, M. V. (2005). Interpersonal communication-relating to others. New York: Pearson.
  6. Boyd, D. (2008). Facebook's privacy trainwreck: Exposure, invasion, and social convergence. Convergence, 14(1), 13-20.
  7. Boyd, D., & Hargittai, E. (2010). Facebook privacy settings: who cares?. First Monday, 15(8).
  8. Brody, E. W. (1990). Communication tomorrow: new audiences, new technologies, new media. New York: Praeger.
  9. Burke, M., Kraut, R., & Marlow, C. (2011, May). Social capital on Facebook: Differentiating uses and users. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 571-580). ACM.
  10. Burrus, L. (2010). Let's talk about social media dependency. Retrieved from
  11. Cheng, A. (2011). Choosing channels. Retrieved from
  12. Chou, H. T. G., & Edge, N. (2012). "They are happier and having better lives than I am": the impact of using Facebook on perceptions of others' lives. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 15(2), 117-121.
  13. Christofides, E., Muise, A., & Desmarais, S. (2012). Risky disclosures on Facebook: The effect of having a bad experience on online behavior. Journal of adolescent research, 27(6), 714-731.
  14. Communication and Multimedia Consumer Forum of Malaysia. (2012). Are children spending too much screen time? Shout, Q2/2012, 14-17.
  15. Cragan, J. F., & Shields, D. C. (1998). Understanding Communication Theory the Communicative Forces for Human Action.
  16. DANIEL. (2011). Understanding society: social media and social cohesion. Retrieved from
  17. DeAndrea, D. C. (2012). Participatory social media and the evaluation of online behavior. Human Communication Research, 38(2012), 510-528.
  18. DeFleur, M. L. (1989). Theories of Mass Communication. New York: Longman.
  19. Devito, J. A. (2005). Essentials of Human Communication. New York: Person.
  20. Devito, J. A. (2008). Essentials of Human Communication. New York: Person.
  21. Dhavale, G. (2011). Lack of Communication in Relationships. Retrieved from
  22. Diaz, Y., Evans, L., & Gallagher, R. (2011). Anti Social Networking: how do texting social media affect our children. A panel discussion by CSC clinicians at the Nightingale-Bamford School. Retrieved from
  23. Family Dynamics Institute. (2013). Is Your Marriage in Crisis?. Retrieved from
  24. Gross, R., & Acquisti, A. (2005, November). Information revelation and privacy in online social networks. In Proceedings of the 2005 ACM workshop on Privacy in the electronic society (pp. 71-80). ACM.
  25. Haralambos, M., Holborn, M., & Heald, R. (2000). Sociology: Themes and Perspectives. London: HarperCollins.
  26. Hsu, C. W., Wang, C. C., & Tai, Y. T. (2011). The closer the relationship, the more the interaction on Facebook? Investigating the case of Taiwan users. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 14(7-8), 473-476.
  27. Kelley, H. H., Berscheid, E., Christensen, A., Harvey, J. H., Huston, T. L., Levinger, G., ... Peterson, D. R. (Eds.) (1983). Close relationships. New York: Freeman.
  28. Kraut, R. E., Rice, R. E., Cool, C., & Fish, R. S. (1998). Varieties of social influence: The role of utility and norms in the success of a new communication medium. Organization Science, 9(4), 437-453.
  29. Krysan, M., Moore, K. A., & Zill, N. (1990). Identifying successful families: An overview of constructs and selected measures. Child Trends.
  30. Kwiatkowski, K. (1998). The Medium Is The Message--Marshall Mcluhan. Journal of Advertising Research, 38(6), 44-45.
  31. Leung, B. K., Ng, C. H., Wong, T. W., Chu, C. Y., & Chan, A. K. (2003). Social cohesion and the Hong Kong family. In Conference on Social Cohesion, co-organized by the Faculty of Social Sciences, the University of Hong Kong and the Hong Kong Council of Social Service. Retrieved August (Vol. 8, p. 2009).
  32. Livingstone, S. (2008). Taking risky opportunities in youthful content creation: teenagers' use of social networking sites for intimacy, privacy and self-expression. New media & society, 10(3), 393-411.
  33. Madianou, M., & Miller, D. (2013). Polymedia: Towards a new theory of digital media in interpersonal communication. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 16(2), 169-187.
  34. Malaysia Crunch. (2012). Malaysia's E-Commerce Statistics. Retrieved from
  35. Malaysian Communications and Multimedia Commission. (2010). The impact of social networking. Retrieved from
  36. Matthews, D. W. (1994). Strengthening Family Relationships. Retrieved from
  37. McLuhan, M. (1964). Understanding Media. London: MIT Press.
  38. McQuail, D. (1994). Mass communication theory. London: Sage.
  39. Miller, K. (2005). Communication Theories: perspectives, processes, and contexts. Singapore: McGraw-Hill.
  40. Miller, M. (2012). Normal and abnormal social network behavior. Retrieved from
  41. Miltenberger, R. G. (2012). Behavior Modification - Principles and Procedures. Australia: Cengage Learning.
  42. Miniwatts Marketing Group. (2013). Internet usage stats and population statistics. Retrieved from
  43. Mustafa, S. E., & Hamzah, A. (2011). Online social networking: A new form of social interaction. International Journal of Social Science and Humanity, 1(2), 96.
  44. Mustaffa, N., Ibrahim, F., Mahmud, W. A. W., Ahmad, F., Kee, C. P., & Mahbob, M. H. (2011). Diffusion of innovations: The adoption of Facebook among youth in Malaysia. The Public Sector Innovation Journal, 16(3), 1-15.
  45. New Straits Times. (2011). More Malaysians spend time in virtual world. Retrieved from
  46. NTC Hosting. (2012). Information about Internet - history, development, facts, role. Retrieved from:
  47. O'Keeffe, G. S., & Clarke-Pearson, K. (2011). The impact of social media on children, adolescents, and families. Pediatrics, 127(4), 800-804.
  48. Paysult. (2012). Retrieved from
  49. Peck, D. S. (2008). Hanging out and growing up with social media. Media Psychology Review, 1(1).
  50. Probono Australia. (2012). Social Media Use Impacts Families and Relationships. Retrieved from
  51. Raj, P. S. (2012). Sedentary lifestyle: It's time to unplug and play. New Straits Times. Retrieved from
  52. Rogers, E. M. (1983). Diffusion of innovations (4thed.). New York: The Free Press.
  53. Roslam, A. R. (2011). Facebook usage among Malaysian youth. Retrieved from
  54. Sorensen, B. (2010). How Does Technology Affect Family Communication? Retrieved from
  55. Sun, T., & Wu, G. (2012). Traits, predators, and consequences of Facebook self-penetration. Social science Computer Review, 30(4), 419-433.
  56. Talpos, M. (2011). Pros and cons of corporate social networking. Department of Management, 10(2), 83-91.
  57. Telegraph Media Group Limited. (2008). Facebook helps promote long-distance relationship. Retrieved from
  58. Telegraph Media Group Limited. (2012a). Four in five teenagers hide internet activity from parents. Retrieved from
  59. Telegraph Media Group Limited. (2012b). Getting pensioners online could solve elderly loneliness crisis. Retrieved from
  60. Trimpe, A. (2011). The world is obsessed by Facebook. Retrieved from
  61. Tubbs, S. (2010). Human communication: principles and contexts. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  62. Tyler, T. R. (2002). Is the Internet changing social life? It seems the more things change, the more they stay the same. Journal of Social Issues, 58(1), 195-205.
  63. Wang, B., Chen, L., Chen, X., Zhang, X., & Yang, D. (2011, May). Resource allocation optimization for device-to-device communication underlaying cellular networks. In Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC Spring), 2011 IEEE 73rd (pp. 1-6). IEEE.
  64. Wimmer, R. D., & Dominick, J. R. (2011). Mass media research - an introduction. Canada: Wadsworth.
  65. Wright, S., & Zdinak, J. (2012). New communication behaviours in a Web 2.0 world - Changes, challenges and opportunities in the era of the Information Revolution. Retrieved from