DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

2015년 12월 22일 발생한 익산지진의 단층면해와 진도 분석

An Analysis of the Fault Plane Solution and Intensity on the Iksan Earthquake of 22 December 2015

  • 김진미 (한국교원대학교 지구과학교육과) ;
  • 경재복 (한국교원대학교 지구과학교육과) ;
  • 김광희 (부산대학교 지질학과)
  • Kim, Jin-Mi (Department of Earth Science Education, Korea National University of Education) ;
  • Kyung, Jai Bok (Department of Earth Science Education, Korea National University of Education) ;
  • Kim, Kwang-Hee (Department of Geological Sciences, Pusan National University)
  • 투고 : 2017.11.09
  • 심사 : 2017.12.14
  • 발행 : 2017.12.31

초록

2015년 12월 22일 전북 익산시 북쪽 지역에서 발생한 익산지진($M_L=3.85$)의 본진 및 2개 여진에 대해 FOCMEC (FOCal MEChanism determination) 프로그램을 이용하여 단층면해를 구하였다. 본진의 단층면해는 북동-남서 또는 북서-남동 방향의 단층면을 가지는 역단층성 주향이동단층운동의 특성을 보이며, 이는 남한 내륙지진의 단층운동 특성과 거의 유사하다. 익산지진 전후 발생한 미소지진 이벤트를 검출하고자 2015년 12월 15일~2016년 01월 22일 진앙으로부터 반경 100 km 이내에 위치한 13개 관측소에 기록된 연속 지진파형 자료를 PQLII 프로그램(PASSCAL, 2017)으로 분석하고, 19개 지진의 진원지를 새로 결정하였다. 미소지진의 진앙 분포는 특정 단층 혹은 구조선에 집중되는 현상은 나타나지 않았으나, 익산지진과 3개의 여진은 한곳에 집중 분포한다. 익산지진의 진도 분포는 전화 문의 및 피해 접수 자료를 수집하여 구하였으며, 또한, 각 관측소에 기록된 PGA (Peak Ground Acceleration)를 이용하여 계기진도를 도출하였다. 그 결과 익산지진의 MMI 진도등급은 최대 V로 평가된다.

Fault plane solutions of the Iksan earthquake ($M_L=3.85$) and two aftershocks were obtained using the FOCMEC (FOCal MEChanism determination) program. The main event showed the characteristic of strike slip faulting with reverse component. It has the fault planes with NE-SW or NW-SE direction. This is similar to the fault characteristics of earthquake pattern in the inland area of the Korean Peninsula. In order to detect micro-earthquake events, continuous seismic waveform data of the thirteen seismic stations within a radius of 100km from epicenter were analyzed by PQLII program (PASSCAL, 2017) for the period from December 15, 2015 to January 22, 2016. The epicenters of nineteen micro-events were newly determined by Hypoinverse-2000 program. They are not concentrated along some lineaments or fault lines. The intensity of the Iksan earthquake was obtained by estimating the telephone inquiries, the degree of ground shaking or damage all around the southern peninsula. The instrumental intensity was also obtained using PGA (Peak Ground Acceleration) records. As a result, the maximum MM intensity was estimated to be V near the epicenter.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Chang, S.J. and Baag, C.E., 2006, Crustal structure in southern Korea from joint analysis of regional broadband waveforms and travel times, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 96, 856-870. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120040165
  2. Gama-Garcia, A. and Gomez-Bernal, A., 2008, Relationships between instrumental ground motion parameters, and modified mercalli intensity in guerrero, mexico, The 14th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, 1-8.
  3. Gutenberg, B. and Richter, C., 1956, Earthquake magnitude, intensity, energy and accelerations with intensity ratings, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 46, 317-320.
  4. Jun, M.S. and Jeon, J.S., 2010, Focal mechanism in and around the Korean peninsula, Jigu-Mulli-wa-Mulli-Tamsa, 13, 198-202.
  5. Kim, J.W., Lee, J.Y., and Kee, W.S., 1994, Structural evolution of the cretaceous Puyeo basin, Korea, Journal of Geological Society of Korea, 182-192.
  6. Kim, U.H., Kim, S.K., and Baag, C.E., 2006, Optimization plan research on network of accelerometer and instrumental intensity map, Earthquake Engineering Society of Korea, Korea Meteorological Agency Report, 3-107.
  7. Klein, F.W., 2002, User's Guide to HYPOINVERSE-2000, a Fortran program to solve for earthquake locations and magnitudes, U. S. Geological Survey, Open File Report 02-171, 123.
  8. Kyung, J.B., Cheong, T.W., Lee, J.G., Lee, D.K., and Lee, E.A., 2001, Analysis of fault plane solution and stress field using the micro-earthquskes in the central region of south Korea, Journal of Korean Earth Science Society, 22, 292-300.
  9. Linkimer, Lepolt, 2008, Relationship between peak ground acceleration and Modified Mercalli Intensity in Costa Rica, Revista Geologica de America Central, 38, 81-94.
  10. PASSCAL, 2017, PQL II-Program for viewing data, Retrieved from https://www.passcal.nmt.edu/content/pqlii-program-viewing-data.
  11. Richter, C.F., 1958, Elementary seismology, San Fransisco, W.H. Freeman and Company, 768 pp.
  12. Snoke, J.A., 2000, FOCMEC: focal mechanism determination, FOCMEC software manual (http://www.iris.edu/software/).
  13. USGS home page, (http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/shakemap/background.php#intmaps).
  14. Wald, David J., Vincent Quitoriano, Thomas H. Heato, and Hiroo Kanamori, 1999, Relationships between peak ground acceleration, peak ground velocity, and Modified Mercalli Intensity in California, Earthquake Specra, 15, 557-564. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1586058