Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture (한국조경학회지)

The Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture (한국조경학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Types of Concept Figuration in Landscape Design based on Memory

기억에 기반한 조경설계의 개념 형상화 유형

  • An, Seung-Hong (Dept. of Landscape Architecture, Hankyong National University)
  • Received : 2017.10.12
  • Accepted : 2017.11.29
  • Published : 2017.12.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The designers pursue the thoughtful and wide thinking through the accumulation of knowledge and cultivation of insights for making use of high-level design philosophy and language. The purpose of this study is to investigate characteristics of concept figuration types based on designer's 'memory' in landscape design. The results of this study are as follows. First, the design idea starts to be based on the language and image memory of the designer. The figuration types are composed of the verbal and visual view which are representative communication means. Second, the verbal concept figuration of landscape design consists of two types. The symbolic language of the title as a design theme can be a 'phrase', and it should have a hierarchial balance between the master and the sub. 'Descriptive shape of conceptual scenario' is a text that expresses the concept narratively in order that the reader virtually experiences designed landscapes. Third, visual concept figuration of landscape design is divided into three types. 'Simple visualization of a diagram' is easily embodied through a simple graphic using symbols, comments, images and key words. 'Concept sketch and shape of core idea' is useful to grasp the core of the idea such as physical element, form attribute of space and spatial relation at the initial phase of the concept. 'A collage and montage that create a new shape with a combination of images' are a collection of materials and images that provide a new perspective. These are tools to depict them in a compressed way after recording landscapes phenomenon.

설계가는 차원 높은 설계철학과 언어를 구사하기 위해 지식 축척과 통찰력 배양을 통해 사고의 폭과 깊이를 추구한다. 본 연구는 조경설계에서 설계가의 '기억'을 기반으로 한 개념 형상화 유형 특성을 구명하고자 하였다. 연구결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 설계 아이디어는 설계가의 언어와 이미지 기억을 바탕으로 발상을 시작하여 대표적 의사소통 수단인 언어적 관점과 시각적 관점으로 형상 유형이 구성된다. 둘째, 조경설계의 언어적 개념 형상화는 2가지로 구성된다. '설계주제로서 제목의 상징적 언어'는 하나의 '구(句)'일 수 있으며, 위계를 두어 주(主)와 부(副)의 균형을 갖추어야 한다. '개념적 시나리오의 서술적 형상'은 서술적으로 개념을 표현하여 독자가 설계된 경관을 가상으로 경험하는 글이다. 셋째, 조경설계의 시각적 개념 형상화는 3가지로 구성된다. '다이어그램의 시각적 단순 형상'은 단순한 그래픽으로 상징물, 주석과 이미지, 키워드를 사용하여 쉽게 형상화된다. '개념스케치와 핵심 아이디어의 형상'은 초기 개념단계에서 물리적 요소와 공간에 대한 형태 속성 및 공간관계와 같은 아이디어의 핵심을 파악하는데 유용하다. '이미지 조합으로 새로운 형상을 창조하는 콜라주와 몽타주'는 새로운 시각을 제공하는 재료와 이미지의 모음으로 경관 현상을 기록하여 아이디어를 압축적으로 묘사하는 도구이다.

Keywords

References

  1. Alexander, C.(1964) Notes on the Synthesis of Form. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  2. Amoroso, N.(2012) Representing Landscapes: A Visual Collection of Landscape Architectural Drawings. New York: Routledge.
  3. Amoroso, N.(2015) Representing Landscapes: Digital. New York: Routledge.
  4. An, S. H.(2009) Characteristics of plastic concept of minimalism in comtemporary landscape design. Journal of Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture 37(5): 64-77.
  5. Boehm, G.(1995) Bildbeschreibung: Uber die Grenzen von Bild und Sprache. In: Beschreibungskunst - Kunstbeschreibung: Ekphrasis von der Antike bis zur Gegenwart/Gottfried Boehm, Helmut Pfotenhauer (Hrsg.). Munchen: 23-40.
  6. Bono, E. de(1970) Lateral Thingking. Harper Colophon.
  7. Brynie, F. H.(2009) Brain Sense: The Science of the Senses and How We Process the World Around Us. New York: AMACOM.
  8. Ching, Francis D. K.(1989) Drawing: A Creative Process. New York: Wiley.
  9. Cohen, S.(2015) The Inspired Landscape: Twenty-One Leading Landscape Architects Explore the Creative Process. Portland: Timber Press.
  10. Dee, C.(2012) To Design Landscape: Art, Nature &Utility. Londom: Routledge.
  11. DESIGNWORKSHOP(2016) Landscape Architecture Documentation Standards. New Jersey: Wiley.
  12. Doosan Donga(1994) New Korean Language Dictionary. Seoul: Doosan Donga.
  13. EBS(2011) The secret of Memory. Seoul: Miraen.
  14. Encyclopedia Britannica(2008) The Britannica Guide to the Brain. London: Robinson Publishing.
  15. Entwistle, T. and E. Knighton(2013) Visual Communication for Landscape Architecture. London: Fairchild Books.
  16. Garnham, A. and J. Oakhill(1994) Thingking and Reasoning. Oxford: Blackwell.
  17. Greenfield, S.(2000) Brain Story. BBC World.
  18. Halprin, L.(1997) The Franklin Delano Roosevelt Memorial. San Francisco: Chronicle Books.
  19. Heo, S. J. and H. K. Park(1997) A study on types and solutions of value conflicts in the architectural design decisions -Focused on the theory of the axiological absolutism-. Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea 13(10): 91-102.
  20. Hockett, C. D.(1960) The origins of speech. Scientific American 203: 89-96.
  21. Hu, D. C.(1991) The Way of The Virtuous: The Influence of Art and Philosophy on Chinese Garden Design. Beijing: New World Press.
  22. Hunt, J. D.(2000) Greater Perfections: The Practice of Garden Theory. Philadelphia: University of Pennnsylvania Press.
  23. Hwang, J. S., Y. Y. Choi and S. Y. Chae(2015) Basic Writing for University Students. Paju: Taehagsa.
  24. Jeon, Y. I. and H. S. Lee(1997) Architectural Design Theory. Seoul: Gimundang.
  25. Kim, D. G. and U. Y. Choe(2003) A study on memorial park design method. Journal of Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture 31 (3): 17-33.
  26. Kim, G.(2005) Materialization of Modernist Art Language. Ko, Wigong. Text and Form: A Review for the Interdisciplinary Study of Art. Seoul: Art Culture.
  27. Kim, I. H.(1998) A study on design creativity and design process model. Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea 14(3): 125-132.
  28. Kim, Y. I.(1998) A study on the property and the role of information and values in the design. Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea: Planning & Design 14(5): 141-152.
  29. Kim, Y. A.(1998) A study on the concept based design solutions of students' works. Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea: Planning & Design 14(11): 135-143.
  30. Kim, Y. D.(1987) On the formation of concept in design process. Environmental Studies of Yeungnam University 6(2): 121-133.
  31. Kim, Y. D.(1998) My Design Note. Landscape and Culture LOCUS 1.
  32. Kim, Y. D.(1999) Understanding Landscape Design. Landscape Design Theory. Seoul: Munundang.
  33. Kim, Y. M.(2014) Studio 201, Re-thinking Design: Loss of Concept. Environment and Landscape 309.
  34. Kneller, G.(1965) Art and Science of Creativity. Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
  35. Ko, W. G.(2004) Meeting of Literature and Art. Seoul: Art Culture.
  36. Kolbanovsky and Smekhova(1934) Мышление и речь.
  37. Korean Psychological Association(1997) Understanding of Modern Psychology, Seoul: Hagmunsa.
  38. Ku, B. D.(1989) Study on the form-generating process and the relevant techniques from the viewpoint of architectural design methodology. Ph.D. Dissertation, Hanyang University. Korea.
  39. Ku, B. D.(1993) A case study on the architectural design concept. Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea 9(9): 103-108.
  40. Ku, B. D.(1995) A study on the formulation of design concept and relevant methods in the architectural design process. Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea 11(4): 135-146.
  41. Ku, B. D.(2000) A study on the architectural form-generating process from the analysis of a student's design process. Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea: Planning & Design 16(5): 59-66.
  42. Ku, B. D. and H. J. Yu(1987) A study on the aspects of creativity and the relevant elements in architectural design. Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea 3(6): 103-112.
  43. LaGro, J. and A. James(2001) Site Analysis - Linking Program and Concept in Land Planning and Design. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
  44. Laseau, P.(1975) Graphic Problem Solving for Architects and Builders. Reed Business Information.
  45. Laseau, P.(1980) Graphic Thinking for Architects and Designers. New York: John Wiley.
  46. Lee, J. Y.(2012) State-diagram representation based on neuro linguistic programming for HCI. Journal of the Korea Entertainment Industry Association 157-163.
  47. Lee, J. M.(2006) A study on the definition and the roles of design theme and design concept through the stage of architectural concept design. Architectural Research 22(8): 3-10.
  48. Lee, S. K. and K. J. Zoh(2003) A study on environmental design method based on open narrative structure -A case of designing of Arirang Culture Park-. Journal of Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture 31(2): 12-27.
  49. Lund, N.(2003) Language and Thought. London: Routledge.
  50. McGinty, T.(1979) Concept in Architecture. Snyder, J. C., A. J. Catanese Introduction to Architecture. New York: McGrauw-Hill Book Company.
  51. Miyaudi, K.(2004) Open Design Brain : How to Create Architecture. Tokyo: Shokokusha.
  52. Nakayama, M.(1980) Rediscovery of Wisdom. Tokyo: Kodansha.
  53. Newquist, H. P.(2004) Great Brain Book: An Inside Look at the Inside of Your Head. Scholastic Reference.
  54. Oh, C. S. and K. J. Zoh(2002) Environmental design methods based on the idea of fold: The re-design proposal of Do-San Park. Journal of Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture 30(2): 50-62.
  55. Oh, S. W. and Y. S. Cho(2001) A thinking process of conceptualization architectural design based on architectural schema. Proceedings of the Architectural Institute of Korea 21(2): 665-668.
  56. Richardson, T.(2015) Landscape and Garden Design Sketchbooks. London: Thames & Hudson.
  57. Root, B., S. Robert and M. Michele(1999) Sparks of Genius: The Thirteen Thinking Tools of the World's Most Creative People. New York: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Books.
  58. Ryu, I. W. and M. H. Choi,(2004) Building design process based on weights of decision-making of design concept determinants. Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea: Planning & Design 20(12): 3-12.
  59. Monika, S. E.(1999) Das Visuelle Gedachtnis der Literatur: Allgemeine Uberlegungen zur Beziehung Zwischen Texten und Bildern. In: Manfred Schmeling, Monika S. E.(Hrsg.): Das visuelle Gedachtnis der Literatur - Wurzburg. 17-34.
  60. Snyder, J. C. and A. J. Catanese(1979) Introduction to Architecture.
  61. Song, I. S., H. S. Lee and Y. I. Jeon(1997) On the design values of the Korean architects in practice. Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea 13(12): 23-33.
  62. Sullivan, C.(2004) Drawing the Landscape. New Jersey: Wiley.
  63. Treib, M.(2008a) Drawing/Thinking Confronting an Electronic Age. New York: Taylor & Francis.
  64. Treib, M.(2008b) Representing Landscape Architecture. New York: Taylor & Francis.
  65. Vincent, J. D.(2007) Voyage Extraordinaire au Centre du Cerveau. Paris: Odile Jacob.
  66. Vygotsky, L(1972) Thought and language. In P. Adams(ed.) Language and Thingking. Harmondsworth: Penguin Education.
  67. Wu, H.(1995) Monumentality in Early Chinese Art and Architecture. Stanford: Stanford Univ Press.
  68. Yang, Y. G.(2003) Analysis of Architectural form. Seoul: Kimoondang.
  69. Yoo, B. R.(1998) Design note for Yeouido Park. Landscape and Culture LOCUS 1: 123-126.
  70. Yoo, B. R.(1996) Some issues on monumentality in park design -Two case of 4.19 memorial park of SNU and Soecho Sculpture Park-. Journal of Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture 23(4): 40-49.
  71. Yoon, H. S.(1994) Linguistic Psychology. Seoul : Park Young Sa.
  72. Zeki, S.(1998) Art and Brian. Daedalus 127: 71-103.
  73. Zhou, S.(2005) Yuan Fun. Shanghai: Xue, L. Publishing House.
  74. Zoh, K. J.(2000) Paranoia: Korean Comtemporary Landscape Architecture in Meaning Excess. Landscape and Culture LOCUS 2.