Journal of the Korean Society of Environmental Restoration Technology (한국환경복원기술학회지)

The Korea Society of Environmental Restoration Technology (한국환경복원기술학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on the Development of Eco-cultural City Evaluation Indicator Using AHP(Analytic Hierarchy Process)

AHP를 활용한 생태문화도시 평가지표 개발 연구

  • Received : 2017.08.11
  • Accepted : 2017.12.03
  • Published : 2017.12.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study was conducted to develop detailed evaluation indicator as a way for evaluating sustainable urban ecosystem health focused on ecological urban elements from an eco-cultural point of view after the appearance of Eco-cultural City to meet various needs. And this study was also conducted to search for ways to utilize the detailed evaluation indicator like institutionalization. Eco-cultural City was defined as a city where ecological environment and cultural environment coexist and was aimed to derive applicable planning indicators in Korea. For this, FGI was executed, planning indicators were derived, and suitability was examined. The weights were calculated based on the selected indicators through AHP expert survey. After getting the result of FGI, experts reviewed the adequacy of definition from Eco-cultural City and its necessity, and the applicability of planning indicators was examined with evaluation of suitability. As a result of evaluating suitability, it was judged that 41 indicators based on an overall average of 4 areas were relatively high on suitability and also important among sectors. As for the analysis result, the priority order in multistage classification was as followed : harmony between human and environment(B) 0.349, environmental resources(A) 0.266, city environment and quality of culture(C) 0.208, and role division and citizen participation(D) 0.177. In the second level of relative importance, environment protection and infra in the role and citizen participation section was the highest, 0.449, harmonization policy and system in calculating weights was the highest.

Keywords

References

  1. Cosgrove, D. 1984. Social Formation and Symbolic Landscape. Croom Helm, London.
  2. Department of Housing and Regional Development, 1995. The Australian Urban and Regional Development Review, Green Cities, Canberra, p.183.
  3. Development of local cultural indicators and pilot study. 2015. Ministry of Culture, Sports and Tourism.
  4. Grootaert, C. 1998. "Social Capital: the Missing Link?" Social Capital Initiative, Working Paper No3. World Bank.
  5. Han BH. 2000. A Study on Ecological Characteristics and Planting Model of Urban Green Spots.
  6. Hong Sung Tae. 2006a. Social Movement of Ecological Transition. Cultural Science.
  7. Kim GG. 1993. Ecological City Planning. Korean Textbook Co, Ltd.
  8. Koo BH and Kim KG. 2001. A Study on the Assessment for the Functions of Inland Wetlands Using RAM(Rapid Assessment Method). Journal of The Korea Society For Environmental Restoration And Revegetation Technology 4(3) : 38-48.
  9. Korea Environmental Policy Evaluation Institute. 2008. Establishing direction of sustainable eco-culture city and promotion plan.
  10. Lee, Chang-Woo, "Urban Agriculture and Sustainable Urban Development", The 83th Annual Conference of Korea Urban Planning Association, Aug. 18, 1995, pp55-74.
  11. Lee HK. 2000. Critique of the Concept of Sustainable Development: Indigenous and Closed Systems. Korean Sociology.
  12. Lee JJ.Choi SH. 2009. A study on the development of carbon mitigation plan elements in the level of the district unit plan to cope with climate change
  13. Lee JJ. 2005. A Study on the Development of Korean Eco-city Urban Planning Indicators. National plan.
  14. Lehtonen, M. 2004. "The Environmental-Social Interface of Sustainable Development: Capabilities, Social Capital, Institutions", Ecological Economics 49: 199-214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.03.019
  15. Ministry of Construction and Transportation. 2006. Urban Development Plan to Live.
  16. Park JG. 2005. A Study on the Promotion Plan of Urban Development. National Institute of Land Research
  17. Putnam, R. 2000. Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. Simon and Schuster. New York.
  18. Register, R. 1987. ECOCITY BERKELEY : Building Cities for a Healthy Future, North Atlantic Books, Berkeley, California, p.35.
  19. Sauer, C. Leighly, ed. 1925. The morphology of landscape. Reprinted in J. Leighly,ed., 1963, Land and life: selections from the writings of Carl Ortwin Sauer. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
  20. Sung HC et al. 1997. A Study on the Development of Comfortable Environment Evaluation and Indicators. Korean Landscape Architecture
  21. Saaty, T. 2008. Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. International Journal of Services Sciences. Vol 1, Issue 1.
  22. The governess. 2005. Local self-sustained cyclical economy
  23. Regulations on Promotion of Ecological City of Gwacheon City and Preservation of Natural Environment. 2012. http://www.elis.go.kr.
  24. Cheongju City Green City Basic Ordinance. 2015. http://www.elis.go.kr.