한국건설순환자원학회논문집 (Journal of the Korean Recycled Construction Resources Institute)

한국건설순환자원학회 (Korean Recycled Construction Resources Institute)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

점토-골재 벽돌 경화에 있어 효소 사용의 효과

Effect of Enzyme Stabilization on Hardening of Clay-rock Brick

  • 투고 : 2017.08.17
  • 심사 : 2017.09.27
  • 발행 : 2017.12.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구는 점토와 골재로 구성된 벽돌을 경화하는데 있어 효소 첨가제의 효과를 재료시험과 이미지 프로세싱을 통해 분석하였다. 벽돌의 강도와 밀도 시험에 사용한 벽돌 샘플의 점토/골재 중량비는 70/30, 60/40, 50/50, 40/60, 30/70이였으며, 최대 압축강도와 휨강도는 각각 5MPa와 1.25MPa으로 중량비 60/40에서 발현되었다. 또한 최대 건조단위 중량은 $2.073g/cm^3$으로 중량비 50/50에서 발현되었다. 시험 결과 전반적으로 벽돌의 강도는 효소를 첨가함으로 약 27% 향상되었다. 강도 향상을 위해서는 점토/골재 중량비 60/40, 밀도 향상을 위해서는 점토/골재 중량비 50/50에 효소를 첨가하여 벽돌을 경화하는 것이 효과적인 것으로 확인되었다. 효소 첨가 시 점토-골재 벽돌의 결합구조가 더 치밀해짐을 SEM-EDX 분석과 Matlab을 이용한 이미지 프로세싱을 통해 확인하였으며, 이를 통해 효소가 점토와 골재 간 결합구조를 형성하여 벽돌의 강도와 밀도를 향상시키는 효과가 있는 것으로 판단된다.

This study investigates enzyme stabilization in clay-rock bricks through mechanical tests and image processing. Appropriate soil mixtures were designed using clay/crushed rock with ratios of 70/30, 60/40, 50/50, 40/60, and 30/70 by weight to verify the strength of the enzyme brick and soil compaction. The maximum compressive and flexural strengths in the 60/40 ratio mixture were found to be 5MPa and 1.25MPa, respectively; however, the maximum dry unit weight of $2.073g/cm^3$ was found in the 50/50 clay/gravel ratio mixture. Generally, the strength of the enzyme brick was improved by 27%. The paper concludes that in order to achieve optimal strength, soils should be mixed with the 60/40 clay/gravel ratio, which provides an adequate strength, while 50/50 ratio should be used for achieving more compaction. The SEM-EDX observation and Matlab image processing verified how the bond structure appeared after enzyme stabilization. It was found that enzymes created bond with the clay soil and the crushed rock for rendering strength and stability.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. ASTM, C. (1999). Standard Test Method for Flexural Strength of Concrete, Philadelphia, PA: American Society for Testing and Materials.
  2. Australian Standard, A. (1997). Methods of Testing Soils forEngineering Purposes-Soil Strength and Consolidation TestsDeterminationof the Penetration Resistance of a Soil-PerthSand Penetrometer Test.
  3. Basha, S.H., Kaushik, H.B. (2014). Evaluation of nonlinear materialproperties of fly ash brick masonry under compression andshear, Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 27(8), 04014227. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001188
  4. ASTM, C. (1999). Standard Test Method for Flexural Strengthof Concrete, Philadelphia, PA: American Society for Testingand Materials.
  5. Costigan, A., Pavia, S. (2009). Compressive, Flexural and Bond Strength of Brick/lime Morta Masonry, Proceedings, 9, 1609-1615.
  6. D'Orazio, M., Lenci, S., Graziani, L. (2014). Relationshi p between fracture toughness and porosity of clay brick panels used in ventilated fa ades: Initial investigation, Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 116, 108-121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2013.12.003
  7. Franke, W.A. (2009).The durability of rock developing a test of rock resistance to chemical weathering, American Journal of Science, 309(8), 711-730. https://doi.org/10.2475/08.2009.04
  8. Is1077. (1992). Common Burnt Clay Building Bricks Specifications, BIS, New Delhi, India.
  9. Junior, S.A., Ferracane, J.L., Della B.A. (2008). Flexural strength and weibull analysis of a micro hybrid and a nanofill composite evaluated by 3-and 4-point bending tests, Dental Materials, 24(3), 426-431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2007.05.013
  10. Kasperiunaitė, D., Navickas, J., Ziemelis, I. (2009). Thermal andAbsorption Properties of Unburnt Clay Samples, Paper Presentedat the Engineering for Rural Development: 8th InternationalScientific Conference: Proceedings.
  11. Kaushik, H.B., Rai, D.C., Jain, S.K. (2007). Uniaxial compressive stress-strain model for clay brick masonry, Current Science,92(4), 497-501.
  12. Lim, S.M., Wijeyesekera, D., Lim, A., Bakar, I. (2012). CriticalReview of Innovative Soil Road Stabilization Techniques.
  13. Lynch, G. (1994). Bricks: properties and classifications, StructuralSurvey, 12(4), 15-20. https://doi.org/10.1108/02630809410066447
  14. Mitikie, B.B., Lee, T.S., Chang, B.C., (2017). Application of enzyme to clay brick and its effect on mechanical properties, KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 1-10.
  15. Montgomery, M.D. (1998). Physical Characteristics of Soils that Encourage Ssb Breakdown During Moisture Attack, Stabilised Soil Research Progress Report, Development Technology Unit, Department of Engineering, University of Warwick.
  16. Morel, J.C., Pkla, A., Walker, P. (2007). Compressive strength testing of compressed earth blocks, Construction and Building Materials, 21(2), 303-309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2005.08.021
  17. Nawaz, M.F., Bourrie, G., Trolard, F. (2013). Soil compaction impact and modelling, A review. Agronomy for Sustainable, Development, 33(2), 291-309. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-011-0071-8
  18. Oti, J., Kinuthia, J. (2012). Stabilised unfired clay bricks for environmental and sustainable use, Applied Clay Science, 58, 52-59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clay.2012.01.011
  19. Phonphuak, N., Thiansem, S. (2012). Using charcoal to increase properties and durability of fired test briquettes, Construction and Building Materials, 29, 612-618. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.11.018
  20. Rajasekaran, G. (2005). Sulphate attack and ettringite formation in the lime and cement stabilized marine clays, Ocean Engineering, 32(8), 1133-1159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2004.08.012
  21. Rathore, K., Pinky, G. (2012). An overview on ion exchange chromatography, IJARPB, 1(1), 55-64.
  22. Raut, S., Ralegaonkar, R., Mandavgane, S. (2011). Development of sustainable construction materia using industrial and agricultural solid waste: A review of waste-create bricks, Construction and Building Materials, 25(10), 4037-4042. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.04.038
  23. Rekha, K., Potharaju, M. (2015). Residualcompressive strength of recycled brick aggregate concrete at high temperatures, International Journal of Emerging Technology and Advanced Engineering, 5(1), 159-164.
  24. Sayler, G.S., Nikbakht, K., Fleming, J.T., Packard, J. (1992). Applications of molecular techniques to soil biochemistry, Soil Biochemistry, 7, 131-172.
  25. Standard, A. (2007). D698, Standard Test Methods for Laboratory Compaction Characteristics of Soil Using Standard Effort, Philadelphia, PA. :American Society for Testing and Materials.
  26. Velasquez, R., Marasteanu, M.O., Hozalski, R., Clyne, T.R. (2005). Preliminary Laboratory Investigation of Enzyme Solutions as a Soil Stabilizer: Minnesota Department of Transportation, Research Services Section.
  27. Yusuf, H., Pallu, M.S., Samang, L., Tjaronge, M.W. (2012). Characteristical analysis of unconfined compressive strength and cbr laboratory on dredging sediment stabilized with portland cement, International Journal of Civil and Environmental Engineering, 12(4), 25-31.
  28. Zhang, L. (2013). Production of bricks from waste materials-a review, Construction and Building Materials, 47, 643-655. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.05.043