한국초등과학교육학회지:초등과학교육 (Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education)

  • 제36권4호
  • /
  • Pages.331-345
  • /
  • 2017
  • /
  • 1598-3099(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2733-8436(eISSN)
한국초등과학교육학회 (The Korean Elementary Science Education Society)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

초등과학 학습내용과 관련된 학생의 사전질문 분석

The Analysis of Students' Pre-inquire related to Elementary Science Curriculum Contents

  • 투고 : 2017.09.29
  • 심사 : 2017.11.21
  • 발행 : 2017.11.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

The purpose of this study is to collect and analyze the student's pre-inquire and to obtain information on how to use the teaching-learning process. The specific research problem is to confirm the level of the student's pre-inquire, to identify the characteristics of each type, and to check what pre-inquire can be used in the teaching-learning process. The research was conducted on 149 children in the $3^{rd}$ and $4^{th}$ grade of elementary school, and collected a total of 2,034 inquires. As a result of analyzing three times, the students' pre-inquires accounted for 90% of Level 2 and Level 3, which are the inquires that give meaningful answers in the teaching-learning process. These results show that the pre-inquires presented before the students take up the new lesson are not low-level inquires and they can present meaningful inquires that can be used for teaching-learning. Next, as a result of analyzing the student's inquire by type, the factual question was the largest with 50%, followed by comprehension question, procedural question, application question, and prediction question. The factual and procedural questions showed that they could be used as learning activities during the teaching-learning process. Comprehension questions included in the wonderment question can be used as a learning question. And the application question is a question that can be applied to deepening activities, and the prediction question can be used in the inquiry and experiment process of learning activities.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. 교육부 (2014). 2009 개정 과학과 교사용 지도서 3-1. (주) 미래엔.
  2. 교육부 (2014). 2009 개정 과학과 교사용 지도서 4-1. (주) 미래엔.
  3. 김성근, 여상인, 우규환 (1999). 과학 수업에서의 학생 질문에 대한 연구(II). 한국과학교육학회지, 19(4), 560-569.
  4. 김혜경 (1994). 화학 지식의 교수를 위한 인지적 교수 모형의 개발과 적용. 서울대학교 박사학위논문.
  5. 박종윤, 정인화, 남정희, 최경희, 최병순 (2006). 중학교 과학 수업에서 질문과 피드백을 활용한 교사-학생 상호작용 강화 수업 전략의 개발 및 적용. 한국과학교육학회지, 26(2), 239-245.
  6. 배진호, 김정아 (2008). 고차적 질문 생성 전략이 초등과학 수업에 미치는 효과. 한국생물교육학회지, 36(4), 555-565.
  7. 양미경 (2002). 학생의 질문 행동 및 내용의 특성과 그에 따른 교육의 시사점 분석. 교육학연구, 40(1), 99-128.
  8. 이명숙, 조광희, 송진웅 (2004). 소집단 실험활동에서 나타난 중학생 질문 - 응답의 유형과 빈도. 한국과학교육학회지, 24(2), 277-286.
  9. 이명제 (2014). 초등 과학교과서 지구과학 지식에 대한 예비교사들의 질문 종류, 빈도 및 인지적 배경 출처 분석. 한국지구과학학회지, 35(4), 277-289.
  10. 이상균 (2012). 초등학교 과학수업에서 사용된 교사의 과학적 질문유형 분석. 대한지구과학교육학회지, 5(3), 287-296.
  11. 이윤경, 이태상, 임수민, 김영신 (2015). 과학 수업 상황에 따른 질문의 유형과 빈도에 대한 초, 중학생의 인식 분석. 과학교육연구지. 29(1), 59-79.
  12. 정영란, 배재희 (2002). 질문 강화 수업이 중학생들의 질문 수준과 학업 성취도에 미치는 영향. 한국과학교육학회지, 22(4), 872-881.
  13. 조인희, 손연아, 김동렬 (2012). 생물 예비교사의 과학수업모형을 적용한 수업 시연에 나타난 질문 유형 분석. 화학교육학회지, 36(2), 167-185.
  14. 최선미, 여상인 (2011). 초등 과학 수업에서의 학생 질문 유형 분석. 과학교육논총, 24(1), 137-146.
  15. Chin, C. & Brown, D. E. (2002). Student-generated question: A meaningful aspect of learning in science. International Journal of Science Education, 24(5), 521-549. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690110095249
  16. Cuccio-Schirripa, S. & Steiner, H. E. (2000). Enhancement and analysis of science question level for middle school students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(2), 210-224. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(200002)37:2<210::AID-TEA7>3.0.CO;2-I
  17. Donaldson, M. (1978). Children's minds. London: Fontana. Collins.
  18. Dillon, J. T. (1986). Student questions and Individual learning. Educational Theory, 36(4), 333-341. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-5446.1986.00333.x
  19. Dillon, J. T. (1988). The remedial status of student questioning. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 20, 197-210. https://doi.org/10.1080/0022027880200301
  20. Elstgeest, J. (1985). The right question at the right time. In W. Harlen (Ed.). Primary science: Taking the plunge (pp. 36-46).
  21. Finley, F. N. (1985). Variations in prior knowledge. Science Education, 69, 697-706. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730690511
  22. Good, T. L., Slavings, R. L., Harel, K. H. & Emerson, H. (1987). Student passivity: A study of question asking in K-12 classrooms. Sociology of Education, 60, 181-199. https://doi.org/10.2307/2112275
  23. Levitt, K. E. (2001). An analysis of elementary teachers' beliefs regarding the teaching and learning of science. Science Education, 86(1), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.1042
  24. Maskill, R. & de Jesus, H. P. (1997). Pupils' questions. Alternative frameworks and the design of science teaching. International Journal of Science Education, 19(7), 781-199. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069970190704
  25. Scott, P., Asoko, H., Driver, R. & Emberton, J. (1994) Working from children's ideas: An analysis of constructivist teaching in the context of a chemistry topic. In: P. Fensham R. Gunstone, & R. White (Eds.) The content of science. (pp. 201-220). London: Falmer.
  26. Watts, M., Gould, G. & Alsop, S. (1997). Questions of understanding: Categorizing pupils' questions in science. School Science Review, 79, 57-63.
  27. Woodward. (1992). Raising and answering questionsin primary science: Some considerations. Evaluation and Research in Education, 6, 12-13.