한국초등과학교육학회지:초등과학교육 (Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education)

  • 제36권4호
  • /
  • Pages.303-315
  • /
  • 2017
  • /
  • 1598-3099(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2733-8436(eISSN)
한국초등과학교육학회 (The Korean Elementary Science Education Society)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

이동형 시선추적기를 활용한 초등교사의 과학 수업 분석

Elementary Teacher's Science Class Analysis using Mobile Eye Tracker

  • 투고 : 2017.08.31
  • 심사 : 2017.11.15
  • 발행 : 2017.11.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

The purpose of this study is to analyze elementary teachers' science class objectively and quantitatively using Mobile Eye Tracker. The mobile eye tracker is easy to wear in eyeglasses form. And experiments are collected in video form, so it is very useful for realizing objective data of teacher's class situation in real time. Participants in the study were 2 elementary teachers, and they are teaching sixth grade science in Seoul. Participants took a 40-minute class wearing a mobile eye tracker. Eye movements of participants were collected at 60 Hz, and the collected eye movement data were analyzed using SMI BeGaze 3.7. In this study, the area related to the class was set as the area of interest, we analyzed the visual occupancy of teachers. In addition, we analyzed the linguistic interaction between teacher and students. The results of the study are as follows. First, we analyze the visual occupancy of meaningful areas in teaching-learning activities by class stage. Second, the analysis of eye movements when teachers interacted with students showed that teacher A had a high percentage of students' faces, while teacher B had a high visual occupation in areas not related to classes. Third, the linguistic interaction of the participants were analyzed. Analysis areas include questions, attention-focused language, elementary science teaching terminology, daily interaction, humor, and unnecessary words. This study shows that it is possible to analyze elementary science class objectively and quantitatively through analysis of visual occupancy using mobile eye tracking. In addition, it is expected that teachers' visual attention in teaching activities can be used as an index to analyze the form of language interaction.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Baek, Y. (2010). An analysis on the effectiveness of the instructional consulting - Focusing on the supervision-mentoring program of Daegu -. (Master's degree). Daegu National University of Education.
  2. Bercik, J., Horska, E., Nagyova, L., Rebicova, Z., Paluchova, J. & Bajus, J. (2016). Tracking position, visual attention and emotions of customers in retail store environment via position system, eye tracker, electroencephalograph and face reading technology. 2016 Global Marketing Conference at Hong Kong. pp. 494-510.
  3. Brophy, J. E. & Good, T. (1986). Teacher behavior and student achievement. In M. C. Wittrock(Ed), Handbook of research on teaching: third edition(pp. 328-375). New York : Macmillian.
  4. Byeon, J., Lee, I. & Kwon, Y. (2011). A study on consulting of teaching behavior patterns of Gaze fixation by using eye tracker: The case study. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 11(4), 173-199.
  5. Carmichael, A., Larson, A., Gire, E., Loschky, L. & Rebello, N. (2010). How does visual attention differ between experts and novices on physics problems? AIP Conference Proceedings, 1289(1), 93-96.
  6. Cho, K. & Yeo, S. (2013). A case study on effective teachers' discourse in science gifted class using flanders interaction analysis program. Journal of Gifted/Talented Education, 23(6), 1055-1076. https://doi.org/10.9722/JGTE.2013.23.6.1055
  7. Choi, M. (2003). A study on the method of eye tracking analysis based on the properties in visual perception of user - With emphasis on the development of analysisframework for product design -. Archives of Design Research, 197-206.
  8. Chung, D. (2015). Eye tracking to select optimal advertising spots In subway cars. The Korean Journal of Advertising and Public Relations, 17(4), 146-172. https://doi.org/10.16914/kjapr.2015.17.4.146
  9. Cortina, K. S., Miller, K. F., McKenzie, R. & Epstein, A. (2015). Where low and high inference data converge: Validation of class assessment of mathematics instruction using mobile eye tracking with expert and novice teachers. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 13(2), 389-403. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-014-9610-5
  10. Eom, G. & Lim, C. (1998). Extension of inquiry thinking ability through the application of questioning model. Daegu National University of Education, 3(2), 5-44.
  11. Fisher, D. L. & Waldrip, B. G. (1997). Assessing culturally sensitive factors in the learning environment of science classrooms. Research in Science Education, 27(1), 41-49. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02463031
  12. Geddis, A. N., Onslow, B., Beynon, C. & Oesch, J. (1993). Transforming content knowledge: Learning to teach about isotopes. Science Education, 77(6), 575-591. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730770603
  13. Haider, H. & Frensch, P. A. (1999). Eye movement during skill acquisition: More evidence for the information-re-duction hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25, 172-190. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.25.1.172
  14. Kang, S., Han, S., Jeong, Y. & Noh, T. (2001). Comparison of verbal interaction patterns in small - Group discussion by learning strategies. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 21(2), 279-288.
  15. Kang, B., Jeong, K. & Shin, D. (2009), User's behavior of touchscreen mobile phone using eye tracker. Eromonomics Society of Korea Conference, 11, 403-407.
  16. Keller, J. (2006). What is the ARCS model. Retrieved February, 19, 2012.
  17. Kim, B. & Im, J. (2014). A study on the schemes for elevating instruction specialties through subject PCK. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 14(5), 1-23.
  18. Kim, C., Maeng, S., Cha, H., Park, Y. & Oh, P. (2006). A case study of the interaction between a novice science teacher and an experienced teacher: Priorities about science teaching and motivational ZPD. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 26(3), 425-439.
  19. Kim, J. (2014). A study on features of conscious observation of space and search activities for information. Korean Institute of Interior Design Journal, 23(3), 117-124. https://doi.org/10.14774/JKIID.2014.23.3.117
  20. Kim, W. J., Byeon, J. H., Lee, I. S. & Kwon, Y. J. (2012). Gaze differences between expert and novice teachers in science classes. Journal of Korea Association of Science Education, 32(9), 1443-1451.
  21. Ko, K., Kim, D., Lee, Y., Kwon, S. & Kwon, Y. (2017). A study on the characteristics of empathy through the Gaze of expert teachers and pre-service teachers in science experiment class. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 17(8), 1-19.
  22. Kwak, E., Joo, B. & Bae, K. (2017). An analysis on the verbal interaction of advanced physical education teachers in middle school. Korean Journal of Physical Eduaction, 56(2), 289-301. https://doi.org/10.23949/kjpe.2017.03.56.2.20
  23. Kwak, Y. (2009). Analysis of professional development in teaching practices of beginning secondary science teachers. Journal of the Korean Earth Science Society, 30(3), 354-365. https://doi.org/10.5467/JKESS.2009.30.3.354
  24. Kwon, C. & Lee, S. (2011). Science teaching professionalism changes of high-career elementary school teachers through instructional consulting. Journal of the Korean Society of Earth Science Education, 4(3), 278-296.
  25. Kwon, H., Kim, C. & Choe, S. (2006). Orientations and execution of beginning secondary science teachers' teaching practices: Motivating and understanding students. Journal of the Korean Earth Science Society, 27(3), 289-301.
  26. Kwon, Y. (2006). An analysis of factors of effective lecturing behaviors in university class. (Doctoral thesis). Yonsei University.
  27. Lee, H. (2006). Development of supporting programs for teaching consultation and pedagogical content knowledge by subjects. Korea Institution for Curriculum and Evaluation.
  28. Lee, Y., Kang, J., Oh, Y. & Lee, S. (2012). The directions of instructional consultation based on teachers' perceptions and needs of instructional consultation. Journal of Educational Technology, 28(4), 729-755. https://doi.org/10.17232/KSET.28.4.729
  29. Lim, J. & Yang, I. (2008). A study on the professional development process of elementary teacher. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 27(2), 93-101.
  30. Lin, S. & Yang, J. (1998). Biology teachers' knowledge base instructional representations. Proceedings of the National Science Council, Republic of China, Part D: Mathematics, Science, and Technology Education, 8(1), 22-32.
  31. Magnusson, S., Krajcik, J. & Borko, H. (1999). Nature, sources, and development of pedagogical content knowledge for science teaching. In Examining pedagogical content knowledge (pp. 95-132). Springer Netherlands.
  32. Mulholland, J. & Wallace, J. (2005). Growing the tree of teacher knowledge: Ten years of learning to teach elementary science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(7), 767-790. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20073
  33. Noh, T., Kim, Y., Yang, C. & Kang, H. (2011). A case study on beginning teachers' teaching professionalism based on pedagogical content knowledge in sciencegifted education. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 31(8), 1214-1228.
  34. Noh, T., Yoon, J., Kim, J. & Lim, H. (2010). Pedagogical content knowledge factors considered by pre-service elementary teachers in planning and implementing of science teaching demonstration. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 29(3), 350-363.
  35. Oh, P., Lee, S., Lee, K., Kim, C., Kim, H., Jeon, C. & Oh, S. (2008). Methodological review of research literature on the expertise of science teachers. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 28(1), 47-66.
  36. Park, J. & Kim, H. (2013). A study on driver's Gaze area in variable road characteristics using eye tracking system. The Korea Spatial Planning Review, 77, 83-101. https://doi.org/10.15793/kspr.2013.77..006
  37. Park, S. (2011). The reality of teaching consulting and its deconstruction. The Korean Journal of Philosophy of Education, 33(4), 87-105. https://doi.org/10.15754/jkpe.2011.33.4.005
  38. Seo, I. & Choi, M. (2014). A study on emotional touchpoint analysis by eye-tracking technology in dynamic environment -Focused on automotive interior space-. Journal of Digital Design, 14(2), 285-294.
  39. Seong, S. & Choi, B. (2007). Case study on verbal interactions of teacher-small group students in science experiments. Journal of the Korean Chemical Society, 51(4), 375-386. https://doi.org/10.5012/jkcs.2007.51.4.375
  40. Shin, J. (2013). Differences in the evaluation results of teaching behavior perceived by teachers and students. CNU Journal of Educational Studies, 34(2), 209-229.
  41. Shin, J. (2014). An analysis of differences between preservice teachers and career teachers of instructional form using flanders interaction analysis method. Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation, 17(3), 115-137.
  42. Shin, W. & Shin, D. (2012). Eye movement analysis on elementary teachers' understanding process of science textbook graphs. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 31(3), 386-397.
  43. Shin, W. & Shin, D. (2013a). Analysis of eye movement by the science achievement level of the elementary students on observation test. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 32(2), 185-197.
  44. Shin, W. & Shin, D. (2013b). Development of the heuristic attention model based on analysis of eye movement of elementary school students on discrimination task. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 33(7), 1471-1485. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2013.33.7.1471
  45. Shin, W. & Shin, D. (2016). An analysis of elementary students' attention characteristics through attention test and the eye tracking on real science classes. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 36(4), 705-715. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2016.36.4.0705
  46. Shin, W. (2016). A review of eye-tracking method in elementary science education research. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 35(3), 288-304. https://doi.org/10.15267/keses.2016.35.3.288
  47. Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-14. https://doi.org/10.2307/1175860
  48. Tobin, K. & McRobbie, C. (1999). Pedagogical content knowledge and co-participation in science classrooms. In J. Gess-Newsome & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge: The construct and its implications for science education, Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Klewer Academic Publishers, pp. 215-234.
  49. Tuan, H. & Kaou, R. (1997). Development of a grade eight Taiwanese physical science teacher's pedagogical content knowledge development. Proceedings of the National Science Council, Republic of China, Part D: Mathematics, Science, and Technology Education, 7(3), 135-154.
  50. Van den Bogert, N., Van Bruggen, J., Kostons, D. & Jochems, W. (2014). First steps into understanding teachers' visual perception of classroom events. Teaching & Teacher Education, 37, 208-216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2013.09.001
  51. Woo, D., Koo, Y., Han, S. & Choi, M. (2013). Eye-tracking experiments and development of analytical method for a dynamic environment - Focus on automotive interior -. Korea Digital Design Council Conference, 69-70.
  52. Wubbels, T. & Levy, J. (Ed.). (1993). Do you know what you look like?. Interpersonal relations in education. London : The Falmer Press.

피인용 문헌

  1. Analysis of Visual Attention according to the Career of the Teachers in Elementary Science Lecture-centered Class - Focused on the 5th Grade Unit of the Function and Structure of Our Body - vol.46, pp.1, 2017, https://doi.org/10.15717/bioedu.2018.46.1.154
  2. 초등과학 수업에서 경력교사와 초보교사의 제스처 특징 비교 - 우리 몸의 구조와 기능 단원을 중심으로 - vol.37, pp.3, 2018, https://doi.org/10.15267/keses.2018.37.3.296