Journal of the Korean Society of Surveying, Geodesy, Photogrammetry and Cartography (한국측량학회지)

Korean Society of Surveying, Geodesy, Photogrammetry and Cartography (한국측량학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Analysis of the Adequacy Check Dam according to Soil Loss using RUSLE

RUSLE 모형으로 토사유실에 따른 사방댐 적정성 분석

  • Choi, Hyun (Dept. of Civil Engineering, Kyungnam University)
  • Received : 2016.09.23
  • Accepted : 2016.10.25
  • Published : 2016.10.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Damage such as landslides has been caused by natural phenomenon like a heavy rain. As appropriate countermeasures, rather than analysing the cause of the landslide, we used methods of check dam installation and maintenance mountain basin. A check dam is a small, sometimes temporary, dam constructed across a swale, drainage ditch, or waterway to counteract erosion by reducing water flow velocity. In this study, we analysed the adequacy of check dam built to prevent further damage after landslides through GIS and examined the sediment erosion in the existing check dams for an ideal location of check dam, considering the accessibility and size. As a result of reviewing soil loss in the study watershed according to RUSLE(Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation), the basin I had about 2% soil loss reduction, the basin II showed less than 1 % soul loss reduction, and basin III showed the reducing effect of 5 % soil erosion.

산사태와 같은 피해는 집중 호우 등의 자연현상에 원인이 있다. 적절한 대응책으로는 사방댐 설치와 계류보전 등의 방식을 사용한다. 사방댐은 산비탈 붕괴지의 골이나 이에 접속된 계류의 최상류부에 설치하는 소규모의 댐을 말한다. 본 연구에서는 산사태가 난 후에 추가피해를 방지하기 위한 사방댐이 설치된 지역의 적정성을 분석하였다. 사방댐 최적지 분석을 위한 기존에 설치된 사방댐을 중심으로 접근성과 규모 등을 고려하여 GIS로 토사유실량을 검토하였다. RUSLE 모형으로 연구대상유역의 토사유실량을 검토한 결과 유역 I에서는 약 2%정도의 토양유실 감소효과가 있었고, 유역 II에서는 1% 미만의 토양유실 감소가 있는 것으로 나타났으며, 유역 III에서는 5% 대의 토사유실감소효과가 있는 것으로 나타났다.

Keywords

References

  1. Desmet, P. J. and Govers, G., 1996, Comparison of Routing Algorithms for Digital Elevation Models and Their Implications for Predicting Ephemeral Gullies, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Syst., 10(3), 311-331. https://doi.org/10.1080/02693799608902081
  2. Erickson, A. J., 1997, Aids for Estimating Soil Erodibility-K Value Class and Soil Loss Tolerance, U.S. Department of Agriculture Soil Conservation Service Salt Lake City of Utah.
  3. Ferri, V. and Minacapilli M.(1995), Sediment delivery processes at the basin scale, Hydrological Science Journal, Vol. 40, pp. 703-717. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626669509491460
  4. Jetten, V., Henkens and Dejong S. M. (1988), The Universal Soil Loss Equation, Version 1.0, release 1.0, distributed, Department of Physical Geography, Ultrecht Univ., The Netherlands.
  5. Kang, Y. and Kang, J.(2006), The monitoring of sediments on the basin using LiDAR data, Journal of the Korean Society of Surveying, Geodesy, Photogrammetry and Cartography, Vol. 24, No.1, pp. 27-36.(in Korean with English abstract)
  6. KICT(2002), Enhancing the Usability of NGIS in the Water Resources Parts, KICT(Korea Institute of Civil Engineering and Building Technology).(in Korean)
  7. Kim, J., Kim, K., and Yeon, G.(2003), Analysis of soil erosion hazard zone using GIS, Journal of the Korean Association of Geographic Information Studies, Vol. 6, No. 2, pp.22-32.(in Korean with English abstract)
  8. Kim, K., Gyoo, G., Yoon, H., Lee, C., Won, M., Lee, B., Woo, C., Kim, S., and Lee, M. (2012), 2011 Forest Disaster White Paper, No. 11-140037-000524-01, Korea Forest Research Institute, Seoul, 29p.(in Korean)
  9. Kwon, W. (2007), Development of Reginol Climate Change Scenario for the National Climate Change(Ⅲ), MR040-C03, National Institute of Meteorologial Research, Jeju, 510p.(in Korean)
  10. Lee G., Lee M., Hong H., and Hwang E.(2007a), Efficiency of soil erosion to a debris barrier using GIS, Journal of the Korean Association of Geographic Information Studies, Vol. 10, No 1, 158-168.(in Korean with English abstract)
  11. Lee, S., Lee, B., Choi, H., and Kwak, Y.(2007b), Optimum scale evaluation of sediment basin design by soil erosion estimation at small basin, The Korean Society for GeoSpatial Information System, Vol. 15, No. 2, pp. 25-31.(in Korean with English abstract)
  12. Lee, K. and Jo, K.(2004), Evaluation of GIS-based soil erosion amount with turbid water data, Journal of the Korean Society for Geospatial Information System, Vol.12, No. 4, pp. 75-81.(in Korean with English abstract)
  13. Nearing, M. A.(1997), A single continuous function for slope steepness influence on soil loss, Soil Science Society of America Journal, Vol. 61, No. 3, pp.917-919 https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1997.03615995006100030029x
  14. Park, W., Hong, S., Ahn, C., and Choi, H.(2013), Assessment of soil loss in irrigation reservoir based on GIS, Journal of the Korean Society of Surveying, Geodesy, Photogrammetry and Cartography, Vol. 31, No. 6-1, pp. 439-446. https://doi.org/10.7848/ksgpc.2013.31.6-1.439
  15. Shin, K.J.(1999), The Soil Loss Analysis Using GSIS in Watershed, Ph. D. dissertation, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Kangwon National University(in Korean with English abstract)
  16. Wischmeier, W. and Smith, D.(1978), Predicting Rainfall Erosion Losses, USDA Agr, Handbook.
  17. Yang, I., Kim, D., and Chun, K.(2006), Analysis of accumulation/erosion in river using satellite image, Journal of the Korean Society of Surveying, Geodesy Photogrammetry and Cartography, Vol. 24, No. 1, pp. 37-45.(in Korean with English abstract)

Cited by

  1. Estimating Unsteady Soil Loss due to Rainfall Impact according to Rim Fire at California vol.35, pp.4, 2017, https://doi.org/10.7848/ksgpc.2017.35.4.269
  2. GIS Based Assessment and Design for Areas Vulnerable to Soil Disasters: Case Study of Namhyeun-dong, South Korea vol.12, pp.6, 2016, https://doi.org/10.3390/su12062516
  3. Revised SEDD (RSEDD) Model for Sediment Delivery Processes at the Basin Scale vol.12, pp.12, 2016, https://doi.org/10.3390/su12124928