Journal of the Korean Regional Science Association (지역연구)

Korean Regional Science Association (한국지역학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The effect of income - mix on place attachment as civic pride in Seoul - Using the Seoul Survey -

거주지역의 소득혼합수준이 시민 자부심으로서의 장소애착심에 미치는 영향 - 서울서베이를 활용하여 -

  • 조민지 (연세대학교 도시공학과) ;
  • 임업 (연세대학교 도시공학과)
  • Received : 2016.04.14
  • Accepted : 2016.07.05
  • Published : 2016.09.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to examine the effect of income-mix on place attachment as civic pride in Seoul. Place attachment and social mix are considered important in urban planning. However, place attachment is frequently thought to form more strongly in the homogeneous area. On the other hand, social mix policy is aimed to form more heterogenous area. So, the two concepts are thought to be incompatible. This paper focused on the income-mix which is kind of social mix, and used the 2013 "Seoul Survey" and 2010 "Household Travel Diary Survey" data. Based on the review of the literature, we used the civic pride in Seoul as the indicator of place attachment. The results of this paper indicate that the degree of income-mix increases, place attachment in Seoul also increases. Also, it appears that as regional income levels get higher, the effects of income-mix on place attachment decrease.

본 연구는 서울시를 대상으로 하여 거주지역의 소득혼합수준이 서울에 대한 장소애착심에 미치는 영향을 분석하는 것을 목적으로 한다. 장소애착심과 사회적 혼합은 도시 및 지역계획 분야에서 모두 중요하게 여겨지고 있으나, 사회적 혼합 정도가 높아질수록 사회적 응집력이 약화되어 장소애착심의 형성을 방해할 수도 있다는 점에서 이들은 긴장관계를 형성하고 있다. 이와 같은 맥락에서, 본 연구는 2013년 "서울서베이"와 2010년 "가구통행실태조사"를 활용하여 거주지역의 소득혼합수준과 장소애착심 사이의 관계에 대한 실증분석을 수행하였다. 특히 본 연구는 장소애착심이 가지고 있는 다양한 조작적 정의 가운데 '시민 자부심'을 통하여 장소애착심을 측정하였다. 분석 결과에 따르면, 소득혼합수준이 증가함에 따라 시민 자부심으로서 서울에 대한 장소애착심은 증가하는 것으로 나타났다. 다만, 지역소득수준이 조절변수로 기능하여, 지역소득수준이 높을수록 소득혼합수준이 장소애착심에 미치는 영향이 감소하는 것으로 나타났다. 이는 장소애착심 제고를 위해서는 지역의 소득수준에 따라 차별적인 사회적 혼합정책을 계획해야 함을 시사한다.

Keywords

References

  1. 김동근, 2008, 주거지역의 장소애착형성에 관한 연구: EM 및 HLM을 이용한 다수준 영향요인의 분석, 서울대학교 박사학위논문.
  2. 김동근, 2011, 단기 주거에서의 장소애착에 대한 연구: 대학교 기숙사생 및 자취생을 대상으로, 도시설계학회지, 12(5), pp.79-90.
  3. 박근석, 2010, 소셜 믹스의 문제와 향후 방향, 건축, 54(7), pp.18-20.
  4. 배만규.오순환, 2009, 축제의 장소 정체성, 관광학연구, 33(1), pp.31-51.
  5. 서울특별시, 2014, 2013 서울서베이(Seoul Survey), 서울.
  6. 안현영.서철현.조우용, 2013, 축제 관계자가 지각하는 지역 애착심이 축제 효과성에 미치는 영향, 관광연구, 28(1), pp.189-203.
  7. 오정학.윤유식, 2009, 지역애착심과 관광개발선호, 평가, 만족, 인구학적 특성과 관광개발 지지, 효과인식의 영향관계, 관광연구, 24(5), pp.275-295.
  8. 윤유식.곽용섭, 2005, 관광일반부문: 지역주민의 장소애착심에 따른 관광지 평가에 관한 연구, 호텔리조트연구, 4(2), pp.511-525.
  9. 이용진.한은경, 2010, 도시평판의 척도개발을 위한 탐색적 연구, 광고연구, (87), pp.392-415.
  10. 이혜진.이수진.이연숙, 2012, 사회적 혼합아파트에 대한 거주자 인식 연구, 한국주거학회논문집, 23(2), pp.1-14. https://doi.org/10.6107/JKHA.2012.23.2.001
  11. 임근식, 2012, 지역주민의 삶의 질 인식과 영향요인에 관한 연구, 한국행정과 정책연구, 10(1), pp.47-89.
  12. 임하나, 2015, 보행량에 영향을 미치는 토지이용 다양성 엔트로피 지수의 개발과 유용성 검증, 한양대학교 박사학위논문.
  13. 조위래, 2012, 주민참여형 소공원에서의 장소애착이 공원관리에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구, 서울대학교 석사학위논문
  14. 최열.임하경, 2005, 장소애착 인지 및 결정요인 분석, 국토계획, 40(2), pp.39-50.
  15. Bailey, N., Kearns, A., Livingston, M., 2012, Place attachment in deprived neighbourhoods: the impacts of population turnover and social mix, Housing Studies, 27(2), pp.208-231. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673037.2012.632620
  16. Baum, S., Arthurson, K., Rickson, K., 2010, Happy people in mixed-up places: The association between the degree and type of local socioeconomic mix and expressions of neighbourhood satisfaction, Urban Studies, 47(3), pp.467-485. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098009351941
  17. Bowlby, J., 1969, Attachment and loss: Attachment, NY: Basic Books.
  18. Brewer, M. B., 1991, The social self: On being the same and different at the same time, Personality and social psychology bulletin, 17(5), pp.475-482. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167291175001
  19. Brown, B., Perkins, D. D., Brown, G., 2003, Place attachment in a revitalizing neighborhood: Individual and block levels of analysis, Journal of environmental psychology, 23(3), pp.259-271. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-4944(02)00117-2
  20. Buck, N., 2001, Identifying neighbourhood effects on social exclusion, Urban studies, 38(12), pp.2251-2275. https://doi.org/10.1080/00420980120087153
  21. Case, A. C., Katz, L. F., 1991, The company you keep: The effects of family and neighborhood on disadvantaged youths (No. w3705), National Bureau of Economic Research,.
  22. Choi, Y., 1993, Residential housing satisfaction as a social indicator, Ph. D Dissertation, University of Southern California.
  23. Galster, G. C, Hesser, G. W., 1981, Residential satisfaction compositional and contextual correlates, Environment and behavior, 13(6), pp.735-758. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916581136006
  24. Galster, G., 2013, Neighborhood social mix: Theory, evidence, and implications for policy and planning, Policy, planning and people: Promoting justice in urban development, pp.307-336, Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
  25. Gans, H. J., 1962, The Urban Villagers: Group and Class in the Life of Italian-Americans, Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
  26. Ginther, D., Haveman, R., Wolfe, B., 2000, Neighborhood attributes as determinants of childrenʼs outcomes: how robust are the relationships?, Journal of Human Resources, pp.603-642.
  27. Giuliani, M. V., 2003, Theory of attachment and place attachment, Psychological theories for environmental issues, pp.137-170, Aldershot: Ashgate.
  28. Hannscott, L., 2015, Individual and contextual socioeconomic status and community satisfaction, Urban Studies, pp.1-18.
  29. Hay, R., 1998, Sense of Place in Developmental Context, Journal of Environmental Psychology, 18(1), pp.5-29. https://doi.org/10.1006/jevp.1997.0060
  30. Hidalgo, M. C., Hernandez, B., 2001, Place attachment: Conceptual and empirical questions, Journal of environmental psychology, 21(3), pp.273-281. https://doi.org/10.1006/jevp.2001.0221
  31. Kasarda, J. D., Janowitz, M., 1974, Community attachment in mass society, American Sociological Review, 39, pp.328-339. https://doi.org/10.2307/2094293
  32. Korpela, K. M., 1989, Place-identity as a product of environmental self-regulation, Journal of Environmental psychology, 9(3), pp.241-256. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-4944(89)80038-6
  33. Lalli, M., 1992, Urban-related Identity: Theory, Measurement, and Empirical Findings, Journal of Environmental Psychology, 12(4), pp.285-303. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-4944(05)80078-7
  34. Lees, L., 2008, Gentrification and social mixing: towards an inclusive urban renaissance?, Urban Studies, 45(12), pp.2449-2470. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098008097099
  35. Lewicka, M., 2011, Place attachment: How far have we come in the last 40 years?, Journal of environmental psychology, 31(3), pp.207-230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.10.001
  36. Livingston, M., Bailey, N., Kearns, A., 2008, People's attachment to place: The influence of neighbourhood deprivation, Charterd Institute of Housing, Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
  37. Mesch, G. S., Manor, O., 1998, Social Ties, Environmental Perception, and Local Attachment, Environment and Behavior, 30(4), pp.504-519. https://doi.org/10.1177/001391659803000405
  38. Oberwittler, D., 2007, The effects of neighbourhood poverty on adolescent problem behaviours: A multi-level analysis differentiated by gender and ethnicity, Housing Studies, 22(5), pp.781-803. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673030701474727
  39. Pinkster, F. M., 2009, Living in concentrated poverty, Ph. D Dissertation, University of Amsterdam.
  40. Riger, S. and Lavrakas, P. J., 1981, Community Ties: Attachment and Social Interaction in Urban Neighborhoods, American Journal of Community Psychology, 9(1), pp.55-66. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00896360
  41. Scannell, L., Gifford, R., 2010, Defining place attachment: A tripartite organizing framework, Journal of environmental Psychology, 30(1), pp.1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2009.09.006
  42. Scharf, T., Phillipson, C., Smith, A., 2003, Older people's perceptions of the neighbourhood: evidence from socially deprived urban areas, Sociological Research Online, 8(4), Available at http://www.socresonline.org.uk/8/4/scharf.html (acccesed 11 November 2011).
  43. Shamai, S., Ilatov, Z., 2005, Measuring sense of place: Methodological aspects, Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 96(5), pp.467-476. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9663.2005.00479.x
  44. Shannon, C. E., Weaver. W., 1949, The Mathematical Theory of Communication, Urbana: The University of Illinois Press.
  45. Shaw, C. R., McKay, H. D., 1942, Juvenile Delinquency and Urban Areas, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  46. Shumaker, S. A., Taylor, R. B., 1983, Toward a clarification of people-place relationships: A model of attachment to place, Environmental psychology: Directions and perspectives, pp.219-251.
  47. Stokols, D., Shumaker, S. A., 1981, People in places: A transactional view of settings, Cognition, social behavior, and the environment, pp.441-488.
  48. Stokols, D., Shumaker, S. A., Martinez, J., 1983, Residential Mobility and Personal Well-being, Journal of Environmental Psychology, 3(1), pp.5-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-4944(83)80018-8
  49. Twigger-Ross, C. L., Uzzell, D. L., 1996, Place and identity processes, Journal of environmental psychology, 16(3), pp.205-220. https://doi.org/10.1006/jevp.1996.0017
  50. Woolever, C., 1992, A contextual approach to neighbourhood attachment, Urban Studies, 29(1), pp. 99-116. https://doi.org/10.1080/00420989220080081