DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Implementation of Strength Pareto Evolutionary Algorithm II in the Multiobjective Burnable Poison Placement Optimization of KWU Pressurized Water Reactor

  • 투고 : 2016.01.10
  • 심사 : 2016.04.07
  • 발행 : 2016.10.25

초록

In this research, for the first time, a new optimization method, i.e., strength Pareto evolutionary algorithm II (SPEA-II), is developed for the burnable poison placement (BPP) optimization of a nuclear reactor core. In the BPP problem, an optimized placement map of fuel assemblies with burnable poison is searched for a given core loading pattern according to defined objectives. In this work, SPEA-II coupled with a nodal expansion code is used for solving the BPP problem of Kraftwerk Union AG (KWU) pressurized water reactor. Our optimization goal for the BPP is to achieve a greater multiplication factor ($K_{eff}$) for gaining possible longer operation cycles along with more flattening of fuel assembly relative power distribution, considering a safety constraint on the radial power peaking factor. For appraising the proposed methodology, the basic approach, i.e., SPEA, is also developed in order to compare obtained results. In general, results reveal the acceptance performance and high strength of SPEA, particularly its new version, i.e., SPEA-II, in achieving a semioptimized loading pattern for the BPP optimization of KWU pressurized water reactor.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. S. Kashi, A. Minuchehr, N. Poursalehi, A. Zolfaghari, Bat algorithm for the fuel arrangement optimization of reactor core, Ann. Nucl. Eng. 64 (2014) 144-151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2013.09.044
  2. T.J. Rogers, PWR Fuel Assembly Optimization Using Adaptive Simulated Annealing Coupled with TRANSLAT, a thesis submitted to the office of graduate studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science, 2008.
  3. S. Yilmaz, K. Ivanov, S. Levine, M. Mahgerefteh, Application of genetic algorithms to optimize burnable poison placement in pressurizedwater reactors,Ann.Nucl. Energy 33 (2006) 446-456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2005.11.012
  4. T. Rogers, J. Ragusa, S. Schultz, R. Clair, Optimization of PWR fuel assembly radial enrichment and burnable poison location based on adaptive simulated annealing, Nucl. Sci. Eng. 239 (2009) 1019-1029. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2009.02.005
  5. F. Alim, K. Ivanov, S.H. Levine, New genetic algorithms (GA) to optimize PWR reactors part I: loading pattern and burnable poison placement optimization techniques for PWRs, Ann. Nucl. Energy 35 (2008) 93-112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2007.05.007
  6. E. Zitzler, Evolutionary Algorithms for Multi-objective Optimization: Methods and Applications, a dissertation submitted to the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich for the degree of Doctor of Technical Sciences, 1999.
  7. D.W. Corne, J.D. Knowles, M.J. Oates, The Pareto Envelope-based Selection Algorithm for Multi-objective Optimization, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2000, pp. 839-848.
  8. A. Jaszkiewicz, On the performance of multiple objective genetic local search on the knapsack problem. A comparative experiment, Technical Report RA-002/2000, Institute of Computing Science, Pozna University of Technology, Pozna, 2000.
  9. E. Zitzler, K. Deb, L. Thiele, Comparison of multi-objective evolutionary algorithms: empirical results, Evol. Comput. 8 (2000) 173-195. https://doi.org/10.1162/106365600568202
  10. E. Zitzler, M. Laumanns, L. Thiele, SPEA2: Improving the strength Pareto evolutionary algorithm, TIK-Report 103, Computer Engineering and Networks Laboratory (TIK), Department of Electrical Engineering, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH), Zurich ETH Zentrum, Zurich, 2001.
  11. N. Poursalehi, A. Zolfaghari, A. Minuchehr, Performance comparison of zeroth order nodal expansion methods in 3D rectangular geometry, Nucl. Eng. Des. 252 (2012) 248-266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2012.04.026
  12. N. Poursalehi, A. Zolfaghari, A. Minuchehr, Development of a high order and multi-dimensional nodal code, ACNEC3D, for reactor core analysis, Ann. Nucl. Energy 55 (2013) 211-224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2012.10.022
  13. E. Zitzler, L. Thiele, Multi-objective evolutionary algorithms: a comparative case study and the strength Pareto approach, IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 3 (1999) 257-271. https://doi.org/10.1109/4235.797969
  14. S. Potti, C. Chinnasamy, Strength Pareto evolutionary algorithm based multi-objective optimization for shortest path routing problem in computer networks, J. Comput. Sci. 7 (2011) 17-26. https://doi.org/10.3844/jcssp.2011.17.26
  15. W. Sheng, Y. Liu, X. Meng, T. Zhang, An improved strength Pareto evolutionary algorithm 2 with application to the optimization of distributed generations, Comput. Math. Appl. 64 (2012) 944-955. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.camwa.2012.01.063
  16. C. Wang, Y. Huang, Self-adaptive harmony search algorithm for optimization, Exp. Sys. Appl. 37 (2010) 2826-2837. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2009.09.008
  17. N. Poursalehi, A. Zolfaghari, A. Minuchehr, Differential harmony search algorithm to optimize PWRs loading pattern, Nucl. Eng. Des. 257 (2013) 161-174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2013.01.020
  18. N. Poursalehi, A. Zolfaghari, A. Minuchehr, K. Valavi, Self-adaptive global best harmony search algorithm applied to reactor core fuel management optimization, Ann. Nucl. Energy 62 (2013) 86-102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2013.06.003

피인용 문헌

  1. Multi-Objective Optimization Algorithm Based on Sperm Fertilization Procedure (MOSFP) vol.9, pp.10, 2016, https://doi.org/10.3390/sym9100241
  2. Methodology for Energy Efficiency on Lighting and Air Conditioning Systems in Buildings Using a Multi-Objective Optimization Algorithm vol.13, pp.13, 2016, https://doi.org/10.3390/en13133303
  3. Multi-objective design optimization on building integrated photovoltaic with Trombe wall and phase change material based on life cycle cost and thermal comfort vol.46, pp.None, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seta.2021.101277