Culinary science and hospitality research (한국조리학회지)

Culinary Society of Korean Academy (한국조리학회)
권호 표지

The Impact of Emotional Labor according to Rapport on Job Burnout, and Organizational Satisfaction as perceived by Five-Star Hotel Chefs in Seoul

서울 소재 특1급 호텔 조리사가 라포르(Rapport)에 따른 감정노동이 직무소진과 조직만족에 미치는 영향

  • Kim, Hee-Yeon (Dept. of Food Service Management and Nutrition, SangMyung University)
  • 김희연 (상명대학교 외식영양학과)
  • Received : 2016.06.29
  • Accepted : 2016.08.16
  • Published : 2016.08.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Current study conducted to verify the impact of emotional labor by Rapport on job burnout and organizational satisfaction from five-star hotel chefs located in Seoul. Survey distributed to employees who are working for department of foodservice from ten five-star hotels, and total 257 respondents were employed for data analysis. The Rapport was tested by using two sub-variables: enjoy relationship and personal bond, the emotional labor were measured by three sub-dimensions: surface behavior, emotional behavior, and inner behavior. Results found that enjoy relationships and personal bonds have significant influence on surface behavior, but the rapport have not significant impact on emotional behavior. In addition, only personal bond of rapport has significant influence on personal bon in present study. Furthermore, all elements of emotional behavior except surface behavior were significant predictors of job burnout, and organizational satisfaction. Hence, this study contributed to provide various practical implication as well as theoretical implications to managers or organizers of five-star hotels especially for foodservice employees.

본 연구에서는 2016년 3월 1일부터 3월 30일까지 시행하였으며, 설문 대상은 서울 소재 특1급 호텔 무작위 10곳을 선정하여 뷔페주방과 일식주방, 카페주방에 종사하는 조리사를 대상으로 257부를 자료 처리하였다. 호텔 조리사의 라포르의 하위변수인 즐거운 관계, 대인적유대감 2가지를 변수로 설정하였고, 종속변수는 감정노동을 표면행위, 감정행위, 내면행위로 3가지 변수로 설정하고, 회귀분석으로 실시하였다. 회귀분석의 즐거운 관계(${\beta}=.236$, p<.001), 대인적유대감(${\beta}=.553$, p<.001)으로 종속변수인 감정노동의 표면행위에 대하여 모두 유의한 정(+)의 영향관계가 있는 것으로 분석되었다. 둘째, 즐거운 관계 (${\beta}=-.020$, p<.001), 대인적유대감(${\beta}=.002$, p<.001)으로 종속변수인 감정노동의 감정행위에 대하여 모두 영향관계가 없는 것으로 분석되었다. 셋째, 즐거운 관계 (${\beta}=.075$)으로 영향관계가 없는 것으로 나타났으나, 대인적유대감(${\beta}=.730$, p<.001)으로 종속변수인 감정노동의 내면행위에 영향관계가 있는 것으로 분석되었다. 넷째, 표면행위(${\beta}=-.109$)로 영향관계가 없는 것으로 나타났으나, 감정행위(${\beta}=.289$, p<.001)는 종속변수인 직무소진에 정(+)의 영향관계가 있는 것으로 분석되었으나, 내면행위(${\beta}=-.306$, p<.001)로 부(-)의 영향관계가 있는 것으로 분석되었다. 다섯째, 표면행위(${\beta}=-.049$)로 영향관계가 없는 것으로 나타났으나, 감정행위(${\beta}=-.080$, p<.001)와 내면행위(${\beta}=.668$, p<.001)는 종속변수인 조직만족에 정(+)의 영향관계가 있는 것으로 분석되었다.

Keywords

References

  1. Kim HG (2010). Rapport's Research on the Impact of the Sales Staff Performance. Master's Thesis, Nam Seoul National University.
  2. Park JH (2014). Customer orientation impact of tourism on the hotel employees and customer satisfaction, customer confidence. Korea Tourism Research 39(2):41-64.
  3. Park JC, Choi HJ (2014). Rapport emotional impact of the work of the hotel employees on the job satisfaction, organizational commitment. Korea Tourism Association, Tourism Research 54(0):192-217.
  4. Seo GY, Kim SG (2006). Studies on the effectiveness of the organization's conflict management type of member hotels. Cultural Tourism Research 8(1):135-161.
  5. Shim GJ (2008). Be Happy NLP Set To Code. Publisher Haneon.
  6. Jang SJ (2009). Influence of leadership of the hotel kitchen department on organizational effectiveness. Tourism Research Journal 23(1):321-336.
  7. Ji SG, Yang BS, Kim SH (2010). Impact on job satisfaction organizational commitment: La FORT medical providers emotional labor. Korea Service Management Society 11(2):209-230.
  8. Ha JN, Lim SH (2013). The impact of the hotel employees called the fort emotional labor, on organizational citizenship behavior. Tourism Management Studies 17(1):275-298.
  9. Gremler DD, Kevin PG (2000). Customer-employee rapport in service relationships, Journal of Service Research 3(1):82-104. https://doi.org/10.1177/109467050031006
  10. Hochschild A. (1983). The Managed Heart. Berkeley & Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press.
  11. Likert R (1958). Measuring organizational performance. Harvard Business Review 36(2):41-50.
  12. Parasuraman AVA Zeithaml, Berry LL (1988). SERVQUAL: A multiple item scale for measuring consumer perception of service quality. Journal of Retailing 64(1):12-40.
  13. Price JL (1968). Organizational effectiveness: An inventory of propositions. Homewood, Ill:RD Irwin.
  14. Schein EH (1980). Career theory and research: some issues for the future. Work, Family, and the Career, S, 357-365.
  15. Tickle-Degnen L, Rosenthal R (1990). The nature of rapport and its nonverbal correlates. Psychological Inquiry 1(4):285-293. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327965pli0104_1