벤처창업연구 (Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Venturing and Entrepreneurship)

  • 제11권4호
  • /
  • Pages.191-203
  • /
  • 2016
  • /
  • 1975-7557(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2671-9509(eISSN)
한국벤처창업학회 (The Korean Society of Business Venturing)
권호 표지

명품성의 결정요인에 관한 연구: 기업속성과 명품성을 중심으로

A Study on the Determinants of Luxuriousness: With Focus on Corporate Attributes and Luxuriousness

  • 투고 : 2016.05.17
  • 심사 : 2016.08.24
  • 발행 : 2016.08.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구의 목적은 소비자의 명품의 구매의도에 영향을 미치는 명품성의 결정요인에 대하여 기업속성과 인지 구조적 관계를 규명하는 것이다. 명품성은 소비자에게 핵심가치를 제공하는 기능적 혜택, 경험적 혜택, 상징적 혜택, 배타적 혜택을 유인하며 소비자의 심리적 만족에 영향을 미치는 요인이다. 기존의 연구들은 소비자가 지각하는 명품성에 기업의 특성이 미치는 영향에 대하여 충분히 설명하지 못하고 있다. 본 연구에서는 소비자가 지각하는 명품이 무엇이고, 명품성이 무엇인지를 마케팅관점에서 개념화하기 위하여 선행이론을 바탕으로 연구모형을 새롭게 제시하였다. 구체적으로는, 기업속성은 기업역량과 기업평판으로 구분하고, 명품성 요인은 우월성, 희소성, 차별성, 전통성으로 구분하여 기업속성과 명품성이 소비자의 구매의도에 미치는 영향 관계를 실증적으로 분석하고자, 총 282개의 표본을 대상으로 분석을 실시하였다. 조사대상제품은 명품 소비자를 대상으로 사전 조사된 B브랜드의 자동차로 하였다. 구조방정식 모형을 이용한 가설 검정결과, 기업속성과 명품성의 관계에서 기업속성 중 기업역량은 명품성의 차별성과 전통성에 유의한 영향을 미치며, 기업평판은 우월성과 희소성에 유의한 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 그리고 명품성의 우월성, 희소성은 구매의도에 통계적으로 유의한 긍정적 영향을 미쳤으나, 명품성의 차별성과 전통성은 구매의도에 부정적인 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 본 연구에서 제시된 명품과 명품성의 구조적 개념은 새로운 연구모형을 구축하는데 이론적 기반을 제공할 것이며, 명품성의 결정요인은 소비자의 심리적 내적동기 요인을 확인하는데 실무적으로 도움이 될 것이다.

This purpose of this study is to academically define what "luxury products" mean, and to clarify the cognitive structural relationship between corporate attributes and "luxuriousness" in relation to the determinant of luxuriousness that eventually affects the purchase intention of consumers. This study is also written under the theory that luxuriousness leads to benefits such as functional benefit, experiential benefit, symbolic benefit, and exclusive benefit; which all provide core values to consumers and serve as effect factors that influence the psychological satisfaction of consumers. The commonly discussed measure of the determinant of luxuriousness has often failed to adequately describe the reasons to why the consumers prefer luxury products. This study also aims to suggest a new path in how and what the consumers perceive as luxury products, and to conceptualize what luxuriousness means in the marketing perspectives on the background of a previous theory. The part of corporate attributes are divided in the following sections: corporate ability(CA) and corporate reputation(CR). The part of the determinant of luxuriousness is divided in sections of superiority, scarcity, differentiation, and traditionality. Therefore, this study used the theoretical concept used in such common measures as well as 282 examples to empirically analyze the relationship between corporate attributes and luxuriousness of luxury products, and how such affect the purchase intentions of consumers. The survey used to aid this study targeted luxury product consumers regarding "B" brand of automobiles. Using the analysis through a structural equation model, the study draws a conclusion that in a relationship between corporate attributes and luxuriousness, corporate ability(CA) of corporate attributes affects the facts of differentiation and traditionality in a significant way, and corporate reputation(CR) of corporate attributes affects the factors of superiority and scarcity in a significant way. Additionally, the superiority and scarcity of luxuriousness positive significantly affects purchase intention, and differentiation and traditionality of luxuriousness affects purchase intention in a negative significant way. The structural concept of luxury and luxuriousness suggested in the study will provide the theoretical basis for building a new case study, and the determinants of luxuriousness in the marketing perspective will be a practical help for checking the consumers' psychological reasons for purchase.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Aaker, D. A.(1991). Managing Brand Equity: Capitalizing on the Value of a Brand Name, New York: Free Press.
  2. Aaker, D. A.(1996). Building Strong Brands, New York: The Free Press.
  3. Aaker, D. A. & Biel, A. L.(1993). Brand Equity and Advertising: Advetising's Role in Building Strong Brand, Hillside, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  4. Aaker, D. A. & Jacobson, R.(1994). The Financial Information Content of Perceived Quality, Journal of Marketing Research, 31(2), 191-201. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224379403100204
  5. Anderson, J. C. & Gerbing, D. W.(1988). Structural Equation Modeling in Practice: A Review and Recommended Two-Step Approach, Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411-423. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.411
  6. Assael, H.(1998). Consumer Behavior and Marketing Action, 6th, Cincinnati, OH: South Western College Publishing.
  7. Belch, G. E. & Belch, M. A.(1987). The Application if an Expectancy Value Operationalization of Function Theory to Examine Attitudes of Boycotters and Nonboycotters of a Consumer Products, in Advances in NA-Advances in Consumer Research, vol. 14, eds. Melanie Wallendrof and Paul F. Anderson, Provo. UT: Association for Consumer Research, 232-236.
  8. Bentler, P. M.(1990). Comparative Fit Indexes in Structural Model, Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238-246. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238
  9. Berens, van Riel & van Bruggen(2005). Corporate Associations and Consumer Product Responses: The Marketing Role of Corporate Brand Dominance, Journal of Marketing, 69(3), 35-48. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.69.3.35.66357
  10. Bollen, K. A. & John, S. L.(1993). Testing Structural Equation Models, Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publication.
  11. Brown, T. J. & Dacin, P. A.(1997). The Company and the Product: Corporate Associations and Consumer Products Response, Journal of Marketing, 61(Jan.), 68-84. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224299706100205
  12. Cha, H. W.(2004). A Study on th Development of Korean Corporate Reputation Index, Journal of Advertising Research, 64(Autumn), 259-289.
  13. Cha, Y. R. & Lee, D. R.(2005). An Analysis of Relationship between Psychological Characteristics and Consuming Behavior of the Korean Affluent, Korea Advertising Society, 59, 185-212.
  14. Choi, E. J., Hong, K. H. & Lee, Y. J.(2010). Korean Consumers' Perceptions toward Luxury Products, Journal of Fashion Business, 14(5), 195-215.
  15. Choi, M. Y.(2014). A Study on the Luxury Attributes of New Luxury Fashion Brands and the Influence of Motivation for Luxury Consumption, Korean Society of Basic Design & Art, 15(1), 710-721.
  16. Choi, S. H.(2003). The Effects on the Perceived Product Characteristics and Conspicuous Consumption on the Fashion Luxury Involvement, Journal of the Korean Society of Clothing and Textiles, 27(2), 209-218.
  17. Choi, Y. J. & Rhee, E. Y.(2004). Dimensions of Brand Equity of Luxury Fashion Brands(Part 1), Journal of the Korean Society of Clothing and Textiles, 28(7), 1007-1018.
  18. Dodds, W. B. & Monroe, K. B.(1985). The Effect of Brand and Price Information on Subjective Product Evaluations, Advances in Consumer Research, 12(1), 85-90.
  19. Dubois, B. & Duquesne, P.(1993). The Market for Luxury Goods: Income versus Culture, European Journal of Marketing, 27(1), 35-44. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090569310024530
  20. Dubois, B. & Laurent, G.(1993). Is there a Euro-Consumer for Luxury Goods?, in Fred Van Raaij & Gary J. Bamossy(eds), European Advances in Consumer Research, vol.1, Provo, UT, Association for Consumer Research, 58-69.
  21. Dubois, B. & Laurent, G.(1994). Attitude Towards the Concept of Luxury: An Exploratory Analysis, Asia Pacific Advanced in Consumer Research, 1, 273-278 .
  22. Fishbein, M. & Ajzen, I.(1975). Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
  23. Fombrun, C. J. & van Riel C. B. M.(1997). The Reputation Landscape, Corporate Reputation Review, 1, 5-13. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.crr.1540008
  24. Fornell, Claes & Larcker, D. F.(1981). Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error, Journal of Marketing Research, 18(Feb.), 39-50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104
  25. Fromkin, H. L.(1968). Affective and Valuational Consequences of Self-perceived Uniqueness Deprivation, Doctoral Dissertation, The Ohio State University.
  26. Gosti, M. & Alan, M. W.(2001). Corporate Reputation: Seeking an Definition, Corporate Communication: An International Journal, 6(1), 24-30. https://doi.org/10.1108/13563280110381189
  27. Grossman, G. M. & Shapiro, C.(1988). Foreign Counterfeiting of Status Goods, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 103(1), 79-100. https://doi.org/10.2307/1882643
  28. Hair, J. Jr., Rolph E., Anderson, R. L. Tatham & William C. B.(1986). Multivariate Data Analysis, 5th ed., Prentice-Hall International.
  29. Holt, D. B.(1995). How Consumers Consume: A Typology Consumption Practices, Journal of Consumer Research, 22(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1086/209431
  30. Hong, S. H. & Kim, M. Y.(2007). The Analysis of Previous Luxury Brand Studies, The Research Journal of the Costume Culture, 15(1), 81-97. https://doi.org/10.29049/rjcc.2007.15.1.81
  31. Huh, N. I., Kim, S. B., Lee, S. H., Park, Y. S, & Jang, H. Y.(2011). New Consumer Behavior, MeongKung Publish co.
  32. Hwang, B. I.(2004). The Role of Corporate Associations in Attitude toward Brand and Customers Relationship Retention Intention, The Korean Journal of Advertising, 15(4), 297-322.
  33. Hwang, Y. K.(2013). The Effects of Luxury Brand Marketing Mix on the Formation of Consumer Equity: Focusing on Luxury Brand's Product Consumers in 20-40's, Fashion & Textile of Research Journal, 15(1), 103-115. https://doi.org/10.5805/SFTI.2013.15.1.103
  34. Hwang, Y. Y. & Choi, S. A.(2009). Scarcity Effect of Product Attitude: The Moderating Role of Uncertainty Avoidance and Conspicuous Consumption, Korean Marketing Management Association, 14(3), 1-21.
  35. Jeon, I. S. & Kim, E. W.(2005). A Three-Stage Model of Reputation Brand: PPCA Model, Korean Society of Consumer Studies, 16(1), 209-227.
  36. Keller, K.. L.(1993). Conceptualizing Measuring and Managing Customer-Based Brand Equity, Journal of Marketing, 57(Jan.), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224299305700401
  37. Keller, Kevin L. & Aaker, D. A.(1997), Managing the Corporate Brand: The Effects of Corporate Marketing Activity on Consumer Evaluations of Brand Extensions, Marketing of Science Institute, Working Paper No. 97-106, Cambridge, MA.
  38. Kim, D. K. & Koh, I. K.(2010). A Study on the Influence of Brand Image and Product Attributes up on Purchase Intention: Focusing on the Analysis of Full-size Sedan, The Korean Academic Association of Business Administration, 17(4), 215-231.
  39. Kim, D. T.(2009). The effects of Corporate Associations on Perceived Product Quality and Brand Attitude, Marketing Management Research, 14(3), 23-47.
  40. Kim, D. T. & Kim, J. I.(2008). Dual Path Model Between Corporate Associations and Brand Loyalty, Journal of Marketing Research, 23(3), 141-162.
  41. Kim, E. J.(2006). A Study of Effect Factors and Consumer Attitudes to Movement of Country Manufacture of Luxury Products, Doctoral Dissertation, Ewha Woman University.
  42. Kim, H. D.(2012). The Study on Purchase Intention of Luxury Brand about Price Raising: Focus on Difference according to Consumer Characteristics of Consumption Value, Prior Knowledge, and Perceived Risk, Journal of Digital Convergence, 10(11), 295-306 . https://doi.org/10.14400/JDPM.2012.10.11.295
  43. Kim, J. Y. & Whang, S. M.(2009). A Study on the Types and the Characteristics of Luxury Consumption in Korean Society, Korean Society for Scientific Study of Subjectivity, 19(Dec.), 43-59.
  44. Kim, M. S., & An, S. K.(2010). Brand Awareness, Attributes and Purchase Behaviors for Luxury Products in the Age of McLuxury, The Research Journal of the Costume Culture, 18(1), 133-149. https://doi.org/10.29049/rjcc.2010.18.1.133
  45. Kim, S. C.(2008). The Effects of Product Attributes, Brand and Corporate's Image on Consumer's Purchasing Intention, Doctoral Dissertation, Kangwon National University.
  46. Koh, I. K.(2013). A Study on Luxuries Possession Desires and Purchase Intention: A Comparative Study Between Luxuries and Imitations, Academy of Entrepreneurship Journal, 19(3), 63-78.
  47. Koh, I. K.(2015). An Exploratory Study on Korean 20's Consuming behaviors in Luxuries and Limitations, Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Venturing and Entrepreneurship, 10(2), 77-84. https://doi.org/10.16972/apjbve.10.2.201504.77
  48. Koh, I. K. & Hong, S. J.(2005). A Study on the Determinant of On-line Selling Alliance Performance in Consumers Perspective, Journal of Channel and Retailing, 10(3), 15-33.
  49. Kwak, M. J. & Cheon, H. S.(2009). The Effects of Scarcity Message on the Purchase Intention in the Framing of Transaction and Reference Price Range, Advertising Research, 82, 7-31.
  50. Lee, T. M. & Yang, H. R.(2010). Dimensionalizing and Measuring Messtige Brand Luxury, Korea Customer Satisfaction management Association, 12(3), 21-46.
  51. Lee, M. Y.(2003). Study on the Influence of Corporate Associations on Product Evaluations, Advertising Research, 7(2), 264-284.
  52. Leibenstein, H.(1950). Bandwagon, Snob, and Veblen Effects in the Theory of Consumers' Demand, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 64(2), 183-207. https://doi.org/10.2307/1882692
  53. Lim, H. S. & Choi, D. M.(1990). The Development Strategy for Successful New Products, Seoul: ChungRim, 84.
  54. Lim, J. H., Kim, H. S. & Lee, H. S.(2006). Measuring Perceptions of Brand Luxury in Korea, Korea Advertising Society, 73, 185-216.
  55. Lim, J. S.(2015). A Study on the Determinants of Luxuriousness: with Focus on Product Attributes, Corporate Attributes, Consumer Motivation, and Luxuriousness, Doctoral Dissertation, Kangnam University.
  56. Lim, J. S. & Koh, I. K.(2015). A Study on the Determinants of Luxuriousness: with Focus on Product Attributes and Luxuriousness, Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Venturing and Entrepreneurship, 10(4), 95-111.
  57. Lynn, M.(1992). Scarcity Enhancement of Desirability: The Role of Naive Economic Theories, Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 13(1), 67-78. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15324834basp1301_6
  58. Millward Brown, http://millwardbrown.com.
  59. Nia, A. & Zaichkowsky, J. L.(2000). Do Counterfeits Devalue the Ownership of Luxury Brands?, Journal of Product & Brand Management, 9(7), 485-497. https://doi.org/10.1108/10610420010351402
  60. Oh, W. Y. & Koh, I. K.(2014). A Study of Founding on Marketing Mix for Luxury, 2014 Proceeding of Conference on Business Venturing, Spring, 174-177.
  61. Park, J. C.(2009). The Effect of the Scarcity Message Type on the Perceived Value: The Moderating Role of Regulatory Focus, Korean Business Review, 2(1), 75-88.
  62. Park, J. C. & Ryu, G. S.(2012). The Effects of Corporate Ability and Social Responsibility Associations on Customer Attitudes: The Moderating Role of Credibility and Benevolence Based Trust, Journal of Korean Marketing Association, 27(March), 1-25.
  63. Shah, D.(2000). A New Definition Luxury, Textile View, 52, 6-7.
  64. Shimp, T. A. & Bearden, W. O.(1982). Warranty and Other Extrinsic Cue Effects on Consumer's Risk Perceptions, Journal of Consumer Research, 9(June), 38-46. https://doi.org/10.1086/208894
  65. Shin, H. N., Lee, M. K. & Shin, S. H.(2011). Elements of Luxury Brands and Determinants of Brand Preferences: A Focus on the Fashion Luxury Brands, Journal of Commodity Science and Technology, 29(2), 13-28.
  66. Silverstein, M. J. & Fiske, N.(2003). Luxury for the Masses, Harvard Business Review, 81(4), 48-57.
  67. Smothers, N.(1993). Can Products and Brands Have Charisma? in David A. Aaker & Alexander L. Biel, Brand Equity and Advertising: Advertising's Role in Building Strong Brands, eds. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 97-112.
  68. Sung, Y. S., Lee, J. R., Shin, J. R. & Jung, Y. K.(2004). Consumer's Response to the Luxury and Non-Luxury Brand Logo: Perceptional, Recognitional, Emotional Response by fMRI, The Korean Journal Advertising, 15(4), 249-276.
  69. Snyder, C. R.(1992). Product Scarcity by Need for Uniqueness Interaction: A Consumer Catch-22 Carousel?, Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 13(1), 9-24. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15324834basp1301_3
  70. Veblen, T.(1899). The Theory of the Leisure Class, New York: Penguin Books.
  71. Vigneron, F. & Johnson, L. W.(2004). Measuring Perceptions of Brand Luxury, Journal of Brand Management, 11(6), 484-506. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.bm.2540194
  72. Walsh, G. & Bartikowski, B.(2013). Exploring Corporate Ability and Social Responsibility Association as Antecedent of Customer Satisfaction Cross-culturally, Journal of Business Research, 66(8), 989-995. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.12.022
  73. Yang, J. O.(2013). The Effects in Brand Attitude and Brand Historicity Perception on History Length and Brand Legitimacy Succession in Fashion Brand Stories and Consumer Orientation, Journal of the Korean Society of Clothing and Textiles, 37(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.5850/JKSCT.2013.37.1.1
  74. Yoo, K. W. & Sohn, Y. S.(2012). An Impact of Corporate Reputation on the Product Extension Evaluation: Virtue Products vs Vice Products, Journal of Korean Marketing Association, 27(Sept.), 73-95.
  75. Yu, S. Y. & Youm, D. S.(2012). On the Purchase of Luxury Motivation Factors and Use Benefits Causal Structure Model Analysis, Korean Society of Digital Policy & Management, 10(1), 281-287.