The Journal of Small Business Innovation (기업가정신과 벤처연구)

The Korean Association of Small Business studies (한국중소기업학회)
권호 표지

An Examination of FIN 48 Disclosures: Evidence from Korean Companies

FIN 48 주석사항 검토: 한국기업을 중심으로

  • Song, Bomi (College of Business Administration, Seoul National University) ;
  • Jung, Woon-Oh (College of Business Administration, Seoul National University) ;
  • Roh, Hee Chun (College of Business Administration, Soongsil University)
  • Received : 2016.08.11
  • Accepted : 2016.09.13
  • Published : 2016.09.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Interpretation No. 48 (FIN 48), Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes: An interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109, requires firms to evaluate uncertain tax positions and disclose information on their liabilities for these positions, unrecognized tax benefits (UTBs). We analyze the FIN 48 disclosures for calendar-year-end Korean companies listed on NYSE and NASDAQ and examine the Korean firms' tax aggressiveness utilizing the UTBs. The results suggest that stock exchange and firm size do not play a role in the Korean firms' tax aggressiveness, contrary to the matched U.S. firms and that the Korean firm in the miscellaneous retail industry is more tax aggressive than the firms in the communications, depository institutions and business services. In addition, we find evidence that the Korean firms are less tax aggressive than the matched U.S. firms. We also examine the Korean firms' tax avoidance tendencies using other measures of avoidance, leading to mixed results. Finally, we examine the association between the UTBs and other measures of tax avoidance and find a significant and negative association between the UTBs and the long-run cash effective tax rate.

FIN 48은 기업들이 불확실한 조세 포지션을 평가하고 이와 관련된 부채인 미인식 세제혜택(UTB)에 대한 정보를 공시하여야 한다고 명시하고 있다. 본 연구는 12월 결산 뉴욕증권거래소 및 나스닥 상장 한국기업의 FIN 48 주석사항을 분석하였으며, 또한 FIN 48 하에 계상된 미인식 세제혜택(UTB)을 이용하여 동 기업의 과세공격적 행위에 대하여 검토하였다. 검토 결과 첫째, 대응되는 미국기업과 달리, 증권거래소와 기업규모가 동 한국기업의 과세공격적 행위에 중요한 역할을 하지 못하는 것으로 나타났다. 둘째, 소매 산업에 속한 한국기업이 통신, 금융 및 비즈니스 서비스 산업에 속한 한국기업보다 더욱 과세공격적인 성향을 보였다. 셋째, 동 한국기업은 대응되는 미국기업에 비하여 덜 과세공격적인 성향을 나타냈다. 본 연구는 또한 다른 조세회피 측정치들을 이용하여 동 한국기업의 조세회피성향을 검토하였으며, 이는 혼재된 결과를 보여주었다. 마지막으로 본 연구는 미인식 세제혜택(UTB)과 다른 조세회피 측정치들 간 상관관계를 분석하였으며, 그 결과 미인식 세제혜택(UTB)과 장기현금유효세율 간에 통계적으로 유의미한 음의 상관관계가 있는 것으로 나타났다.

Keywords

References

  1. Badertscher, B., J. Phillips, M. Pincus, and S. Rego (2009). "Evidence on motivations for downward earnings management," Working Paper, Indiana University.
  2. Balakrishnan, K., J. Blouin, and W. Guay (2011). "Does tax aggressiveness reduce financial reporting transparency?," Working paper, University of Pennsylvania.
  3. Blouin, J., C. Gleason, L. Mills, and S. Sikes (2007). "What can we learn about uncertain tax benefits from FIN 48?," National Tax Journal, 60(3), 521-535. https://doi.org/10.17310/ntj.2007.3.11
  4. Blouin, J. and I. Tuna (2007). "Tax contingencies: Cushioning the blow to earnings?," Working Paper, University of Pennsylvania.
  5. Blouin, J., C. Gleason, L. Mills, and S. Sikes (2010). "Pre-empting disclosure? Firms' decisions prior to FIN No. 48," The Accounting Review 85(3), 791-815. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2010.85.3.791
  6. Cazier, R., S. Rego, X. Tian, and R. Wilson (2009). "Early evidence on the determinants of unrecognized tax benefits," Working Paper, University of Iowa.
  7. Cazier, R., S. Rego, X. Tian, and R. Wilson (2011). "Did FIN 48 limit the use of tax reserves as a tool for earnings management?," Working Paper, University of Iowa.
  8. Chen, S., X. Chen, Q. Cheng, and T. Shevlin (2010). "Are family firms more tax aggressive than non-family firms?," Journal of Financial Economics 95(1), 41-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2009.02.003
  9. De Simone, L., J. Robinson, and B. Stomberg (2011). "Distilling the reserve for uncertain tax positions: The revealing case of black liquor," Working Paper, University of Texas.
  10. De Waegenaere, A., R. Sansing, and J. Wielhouwer (2010). "Financial accounting measures of tax reporting aggressiveness," Working Paper, Dartmouth College.
  11. Desai, M. and D. Dharmapala (2006). "Corporate tax avoidance and high-powered incentives," Journal of Financial Economics 79(1), 145-179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2005.02.002
  12. Dhaliwal, D., C. Gleason, and L. Mills (2004). "Last-chance earnings management: Using the tax expense to meet analysts' forecasts," Contemporary Accounting Research 21(2), 431-459. https://doi.org/10.1506/TFVV-UYT1-NNYT-1YFH
  13. Dunbar, A., L. Kolbasovsky, and J. Phillips (2007). "FIN 48 adoption disclosures," Working Paper, University of Connecticut.
  14. Dunbar, A., T. Omer, and T. Schultz (2010). "The informativeness of FIN 48 "lookforward" disclosures," Working Paper, University of Connecticut.
  15. Dyreng, S., M. Hanlon, and E. Maydew (2008). "Long-run corporate tax avoidance," The Accounting Review 83(1), 61-82. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2008.83.1.61
  16. Frank, M., L. Lynch, and S. Rego (2009). "Tax reporting aggressiveness and its relation to aggressive financial reporting," The Accounting Review 84(2), 467-496. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2009.84.2.467
  17. Frischmann, P., T. Shevlin, and R. Wilson (2008). "Economic consequences of increasing the conformity in accounting for uncertain tax benefits," Journal of Accounting and Economics 46(2-3), 261-278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2008.08.002
  18. Gleason, C. and L. Mills (2002). "Materiality and contingent tax liability reporting," The Accounting Review 77(2), 317-342. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2002.77.2.317
  19. Gupta, S., R. Laux, and D. Lynch (2011). "Do firms use tax cushion reversals to meet earnings targets? Evidence from the pre- and post-FIN 48 periods," Working Paper, Michigan State University.
  20. Gupta, S., L. Mills, and E. Towery (2012). "FIN 48 and multistate income tax avoidance," Working Paper, University of Texas.
  21. Hanlon, M. (2003). "What can we infer about a firm's taxable income from its financial statements?," National Tax Journal 56(4), 831-863. https://doi.org/10.17310/ntj.2003.4.07
  22. Hanlon, M. and S. Heitzman (2010). "A review of tax research," Journal of Accounting and Economics 50(2-3), 127-178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2010.09.002
  23. Hribar, P. and D. Collins (2002). "Errors in estimating accruals: Implications for empirical research," Journal of Accounting Research 40(1), 105-134. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-679X.00041
  24. Koester, A. (2011). "Investor valuation of tax avoidance through uncertain tax positions," Working Paper, Georgetown University
  25. Levitt, A. (1998). "The importance of high quality accounting standards," Accounting Horizons 12(1), 79-82.
  26. Lisowsky, P. (2010). "Seeking shelter: Empirically modeling tax shelters using financial statement information," The Accounting Review 85(5), 1693-1720. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2010.85.5.1693
  27. Lisowsky, P., L. Robinson, and A. Schmidt (2012). "Do publicly disclosed tax reserves tell us about privately disclosed tax shelter activity?," Working Paper, University of Illinois.
  28. Manzon, G., and G. Plesko (2002). "The relation between financial and tax reporting measures of income," Tax Law Review 55, 175-214.
  29. Mills, L., L. Robinson, and R. Sansing (2010). "FIN 48 and tax compliance," The Accounting Review 85(5), 1721-1742. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2010.85.5.1721
  30. Nichols, N., C. Baril, and J. Briggs (2007). "And the impact is...first quarter results from adopting FIN 48," Tax Notes 116(5).
  31. Nichols, N. (2008). "One Year Later: An analysis of FIN 48 disclosures in 2007 Forms 10-K," Tax Notes 121(5).
  32. Phillips, J., M. Pincus, and S. Rego (2003). "Earnings management: New evidence based on deferred tax expense," The Accounting Review 78(2), 491-521. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2003.78.2.491
  33. Robinson, L. and A. Schmidt (2012). "Firm and investor responses to uncertain tax benefit disclosure requirements," Working Paper, Dartmouth College.
  34. Song, W. and A. Tucker (2008). "Corporate tax reserves, firm value, and leverage," Working Paper, Louisiana State University.
  35. Watson, L. (2011). "Corporate social responsibility and tax aggressiveness: An examination of unrecognized tax benefits," Working Paper, Pennsylvania State University.
  36. Wilson, R. (2009). "An examination of corporate tax shelter participants," The Accounting Review 84(3), 969-999. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2009.84.3.969