DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Smart syringe pumps for drug infusion during dental intravenous sedation

  • Seo, Kwang-Suk (Department of Dental Anesthesiology, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University) ;
  • Lee, Kiyoung (R&D Center, Bionet Co., Ltd.)
  • Received : 2016.09.17
  • Accepted : 2016.09.30
  • Published : 2016.09.30

Abstract

Dentists often sedate patients in order to reduce their dental phobia and stress during dental treatment. Sedatives are administered through various routes such as oral, inhalation, and intravenous routes. Intravenous administration has the advantage of rapid onset of action, predictable duration of action, and easy titration. Typically, midazolam, propofol or dexmedetomidine are used as intravenous sedatives. Administration of these sedatives via infusion by using a syringe pump is more effective and successful than infusing them as a bolus. However, during intravenous infusion of sedatives or opioids using a syringe pump, fatal accidents may occur due to the clinician's carelessness. To prevent such risks, smart syringe pumps have been introduced clinically. They allow clinicians to perform effective sedation by using a computer to control the dose of the drug being infused. To ensure patient safety, various alarm features along with a drug library, which provides drug information and prevents excessive infusion by limiting the dose, have been added to smart pumps. In addition, programmed infusion systems and target-controlled infusion systems have also been developed to enable effective administration of sedatives. Patient-controlled infusion, which allows a patient to control his/her level of sedation through self-infusion, has also been developed. Safer and more successful sedation may be achieved by fully utilizing these new features of the smart pump.

Keywords

References

  1. Shim YS, Kim AH, Jeon EY, An SY . Dental fear & anxiety and dental pain in children and adolescents; a systemic review. J Dent Anesth Pain Med 2015; 15: 53-61. https://doi.org/10.17245/jdapm.2015.15.2.53
  2. Bae CH, Kim H, Cho KA, Kim MS, Seo KS, Kim HJ. A survey of sedation practices in the korean dentistry. J Korean Dent Soc Anesthesiol 2014; 14: 29-39. https://doi.org/10.17245/jkdsa.2014.14.1.29
  3. Rodrigo C. Patient-controlled sedation. Anesth Prog 1998; 45: 117-26.
  4. Korean Society for Intravenous Anesthesia. Sedation. Seoul Eui-hak Publishing & Printing Co. 2004.
  5. Kaufman E, Davidson E, Sheinkman Z, Magora F. Comparison between intranasal and intravenous midazolam sedation (with or without patient control) in a dental phobia clinic. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1994; 52: 840-3. https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-2391(94)90232-1
  6. Wilson K, Sullivan M. Preventing medication errors with smart infusion technology. Am J Health Syst Pharm 2004; 61: 177-83. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajhp/61.2.177
  7. Larsen GY, Parker HB, Cash J, O'Connell M, Grant MC. Standard drug concentrations and smart-pump technology reduce continuous-medication-infusion errors in pediatric patients. Pediatrics 2005; 116: e21-5. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2004-2452
  8. Mandel JE, Lichtenstein GR, Metz DC, Ginsberg GG, Kochman ML. A prospective, randomized, comparative trial evaluating respiratory depression during patientcontrolled versus anesthesiologist-administered propofolremifentanil sedation for elective colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2010; 72: 112-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2010.01.031
  9. Dohgomori H, Arikawa K, Kubo H. The accuracy and reliability of an infusion pump (stc-3121; terumo inst., japan) during hyperbaric oxygenation. Anaesth Intensive Care 2000; 28: 68-71. https://doi.org/10.1177/0310057X0002800113
  10. Deckert D, Buerkle C, Neurauter A, Hamm P, Lindner KH, Wenzel V. The effects of multiple infusion line extensions on occlusion alarm function of an infusion pump. Anesth Analg 2009; 108: 518-20. https://doi.org/10.1213/ane.0b013e31819237ae
  11. Murdoch LJ, Cameron VL. Smart infusion technology: A minimum safety standard for intensive care? Br J Nurs 2008; 17: 630-6. https://doi.org/10.12968/bjon.2008.17.10.29476
  12. Husch M, Sullivan C, Rooney D, Barnard C, Fotis M, Clarke J, et al. Insights from the sharp end of intravenous medication errors: Implications for infusion pump technology. Qual Saf Health Care 2005; 14: 80-6.
  13. Goulding C, Bedard M. Safety implications of the dose change alert function in smart infusion pumps on the administration of high-alert medications. Can J Crit Care Nurs 2015; 26: 23-7.
  14. Rothschild JM, Keohane CA, Cook EF, Orav EJ, Burdick E, Thompson S, et al. A controlled trial of smart infusion pumps to improve medication safety in critically ill patients. Crit Care Med 2005; 33: 533-40. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.CCM.0000155912.73313.CD
  15. Wakita R, Kohase H, Fukayama H. A comparison of dexmedetomidine sedation with and without midazolam for dental implant surgery. Anesth Prog 2012; 59: 62-8. https://doi.org/10.2344/11-11.1
  16. Chaudhri S, White M, Kenny GN. Induction of anaesthesia with propofol using a target-controlled infusion system. Anaesthesia 1992; 47: 551-3. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2044.1992.tb02321.x
  17. Engbers HF. Target-controlled infusion in practice. Eur J Anaesthesiol Suppl 1995; 10: 88-90.
  18. Struys MM, De Smet T, Depoorter B, Versichelen LF, Mortier EP, Dumortier FJ, et al. Comparison of plasma compartment versus two methods for effect compartmentcontrolled target-controlled infusion for propofol. Anesthesiology 2000; 92: 399-406. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000542-200002000-00021
  19. Rudkin GE, Osborne GA, Curtis NJ. Intra-operative patient-controlled sedation. Anaesthesia 1991; 46: 90-2. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2044.1991.tb09345.x
  20. Osborne GA, Rudkin GE, Curtis NJ, Vickers D, Craker AJ. Intra-operative patient-controlled sedation. Comparison of patient-controlled propofol with anaesthetist- administered midazolam and fentanyl. Anaesthesia 1991; 46: 553-6. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2044.1991.tb09654.x
  21. Oei-Lim VL, Kalkman CJ, Makkes PC, Ooms WG. Patientcontrolled versus anesthesiologist-controlled conscious sedation with propofol for dental treatment in anxious patients. Anesth Analg 1998; 86: 967-72. https://doi.org/10.1213/00000539-199805000-00010
  22. Lok IH, Chan MT, Chan DL, Cheung LP, Haines CJ, Yuen PM. A prospective randomized trial comparing patient-controlled sedation using propofol and alfentanil and physician-administered sedation using diazepam and pethidine during transvaginal ultrasound-guided oocyte retrieval. Hum Reprod 2002; 17: 2101-6. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/17.8.2101
  23. Thorpe SJ, Balakrishnan VR, Cook LB. The safety of patient-controlled sedation. Anaesthesia 1997; 52: 1144-50. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2044.1997.247-az0395.x
  24. Rudkin GE, Osborne GA, Finn BP, Jarvis DA, Vickers D. Intra-operative patient-controlled sedation. Comparison of patient-controlled propofol with patient-controlled midazolam. Anaesthesia 1992; 47: 376-81. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2044.1992.tb02216.x
  25. Garip H, Gurkan Y, Toker K, Goker K. A comparison of midazolam and midazolam with remifentanil for patient-controlled sedation during operations on third molars. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2007; 45: 212-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjoms.2006.06.002
  26. Chlan LL, Weinert CR, Skaar DJ, Tracy MF. Patientcontrolled sedation: A novel approach to sedation management for mechanically ventilated patients. Chest 2010; 138: 1045-53. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.09-2615
  27. Chi SI, Kim HJ, Seo KS. Dexmedetomidine intravenous sedation using a patient-controlled sedation infusion pump: A case report. J Dent Anesth Pain Med 2016; 16: 55-9. https://doi.org/10.17245/jdapm.2016.16.1.55
  28. Hwang J, Jeon Y, Park HP, Lim YJ, Oh YS. Comparison of alfetanil and ketamine in combination with propofol for patient-controlled sedation during fiberoptic bronchoscopy. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2005; 49: 1334-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-6576.2005.00842.x

Cited by

  1. Efficacy evaluation of syringe pump developed for continuous drug infusion vol.16, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.17245/jdapm.2016.16.4.303