DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Perturbation in the Earth's Pole due to the Recent 31 Large Earthquakes of Magnitude over 8.0

  • Na, Sung-Ho (Space Geodetic Observation Center) ;
  • Kyung, Jai-Bok (Department of Earth Science Education, Korea National University of Education)
  • Received : 2016.07.18
  • Accepted : 2016.09.22
  • Published : 2016.09.30

Abstract

We present our estimate of pole shift caused by the recent 31 largest earthquakes of magnitude over 8.0. After reviewing theory of perturbation in the Earth's rotation, each co-seismic as well as post-seismic pole shifts by the earthquakes are acquired and illustrated. A total co-seismic excitation due to these earthquakes is ($x_1$, $x_2$)=(-3.35, 5.89) milliarcsec, which increased about twice the initial estimation when the post-seismic deformation is considered. The single largest co-seismic excitation by 2011 Japan earthquake was ($x_1$, $x_2$)=(-2.06, 2.36) milliarcsec, which corresponds to 9.7 cm pole shift on the surface of the Earth.

Keywords

References

  1. Baek, J., Shin, Y.H., Na, S.H., Shestakov, N.V., Park, P.H., and Cho, S., 2012, Coseismic and postseismic crustal deformations of the Korean peninsula caused by the 2011 M 9.0 Tohoku earthquake, Japan from GPS data, Terra Nova, 24, 295-300, doi:10.1111/j.1365-3121.2012.01062.x.
  2. Bizouard, C. and Gambis, D, 2009, The combined solution C04 for Earth Orientation Parameters consistent with International Terrestrial Reference Frame 2005. IAG Symposium 134, 265-270, doi:10.1007/978-3-642-00860-3_41.
  3. Chao, B.F., 2016, Rotational normal modes in classical mechanics: resonance, excitation, convolution/deconvolution etc. Lecture of GAGER 2016, July 18-24, Wuhan, China.
  4. Chung, T.W. and Na, S.H., 2016, A least square fit analysis on the Earth's polar motion time series:implication against Smylie's conjecture. Jigu-Mulli-wa-Mulli-Tamsa, 19, 91-96, doi:10.7582/GGE.2016.19.2.091.
  5. Dahlen, F.A., 1971, The excitation of the Chandler wobble by earthquakes, Geophysical Journal Royal Astronomical Society, 25, 157-206. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.1971.tb02336.x
  6. Dahlen, F.A., 1973, A correction to the excitation of the Chandler wobble by earthquakes. Geophysical Journal Royal Astronomical Society, 32, 203-217. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.1973.tb06527.x
  7. Gross, R.S., 1986, The influence of earthquakes on the Chandler wobble during 1977-1983. Geophysical Journal Royal Astronomical Society, 85, 161-177. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.1986.tb05176.x
  8. Gross, R.S., 2000, The excitation of the Chandler wobble. Geophysical Research Letters, 27, 15, 2329-2332, doi:10.1029/2000GL011450.
  9. Gross, R.S., 2009, Earth rotation variation - long period. In Schubert, G. (ed.), Trietise of Geophysics vol. 3 Geodesy, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 239-294.
  10. Gross, R.S. and Chao, B.F., 2006, The rotational and gravitational signature of the December 26, 2004 Sumatran earthquake. Surveys in Geophysics, 27, 615-632. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10712-006-9008-1
  11. Hearn, E.H., 2003, What can GPS data tell us about the dynamics of post-seismic deformation? Geophysical Journal International, 155, 753-777. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2003.02030.x
  12. Lambeck, K., 1980, The Earth's variable rotation: geophysical causes and consequences. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 449 p.
  13. Plag, H.P., Chao, B., Gross, R, and van Dam T. (eds.), 2005, Proceedings of the workshop: forcing of polar motion in the Chandler frequency band: a contribution to understanding interannual climate variation. April 21-23, 2004, Luxemburg, European Centre for Geodynamics and Seismilogy, 165 p.
  14. Smylie, D.E. and Manshina, L., 1968, Earthquakes and observed motion of the rotation pole. Journal of Geophysical Research, 73, 7661-7673. https://doi.org/10.1029/JB073i024p07661
  15. Smylie, D.E. and Zuberi, M., 2009, Free and forced polar motion and modern observation of the Chandler wobble. Journal of Geodynamics, 48, 226-229, doi:10.1016/j.jog.2009.09.028.