DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Finite element analysis on the stress of supporting bone by diameters and lengths of dental implant fixture

유한요소법을 이용한 치과 임플란트 고정체의 직경과 길이에 따른 지지골의 응력 분석

  • Lee, Myung-Kon (Department of Dental Laboratory Science, Catholic University of Pusan)
  • 이명곤 (부산가톨릭대학교 치기공학과)
  • Received : 2016.06.10
  • Accepted : 2016.09.12
  • Published : 2016.09.30

Abstract

Purpose: The dental implant should be enough to endure chewing load and it's required to have efficient design and use of implant to disperse the stress into bones properly. This study was to evaluate the stress distribution on a supporting bone by lengths and diameters of the implant fixture. Methods: The modeling and analysis of stress distribution was used for the simple molar porcelain crown model by Solidworks as FEM program. It was designed on applying with tightening torque of 20 Ncm of a abutment screw between a cement retained crown abutment and a fixture. The fixtures of experimental model used 10, 13mm by length and 4, 5mm by diameter. A external vertical loading on the two buccal cusps of crown and performed finite element analysis by 100 N. Results: The maximum von Mises stress(VMS) of all supporting bone models by fixture length and diameter were concentrated on the upper side of supporting compact bone. The maximum stress of each model under vertical load were 164.9 MPa of M410 model, and 141.2 MPa of M413 model, 54.3 MPa of M510 model, 53.6 MPa of M513 model. Conclusion: The stress reduction was increase of fixture's diameter than it's length. So it's effective to use the wider fixture as possible to the conditions of supporting bone.

Keywords

References

  1. Davarpanah M, Martinez H, Kebir M, Etienne D, Tecucianu JF. Wide-diameter implants: new concepts. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, 21(2), 149-159, 2001.
  2. Eckert SE, Meraw SJ, Weaver AL, Lohse CM. Early experience with Wide-Platform Mk II implants. Part I: Implant survival. Part II: Evaluation of risk factors involving implant survival. Int J Oral & Maxillofac Implants, 16 (2), 208-216, 2001.
  3. Holmgren EP, Seckinger RJ, Kilgren LM, Mante F. Evaluating parameters of osseointegrated dental implants using finite element analysis: A two-dimensional comparative study examining the effects of implant diameter, implant shape, and load direction. J Oral Implantol. 24(2), 80-88, 1998. https://doi.org/10.1563/1548-1336(1998)024<0080:EPOODI>2.3.CO;2
  4. Kim YS, Lee DK. Clinical study on success rate of osseointegrated dental implants. Journal of Wonkwang Dental Research Institute, 11(1), 163-180, 2002.
  5. Lee JB, Wang YS, Shin KH, Hwang BN. Retrospective multicenter study of AVANA endosseous dental implant. J Kor Aca Den Tec, 38(6), 558-566, 2000.
  6. Lee MK. A 3D-dimensional finite element analysis of stress distribution on supporting bone by lengths of dental implant fixture. Journal of Catholic University of Pusan, 3, 233-248, 2003.
  7. Lee MK. A 3-dimensional finite element analysis of stress distribution in the supporting bone by diameters of dental implant fixture. J Kor Aca Den Tec, 26(1), 69-76, 2004.
  8. Lee MK. Finite element analysis of stress distribution on supporting bone of cement retained implant by oblique loading. Review of Korea Contents Associatoion, 14(9), 343-349, 2014.
  9. Lee MK, Kim YJ, Kim CY. A comparative analysis of stress distribution in the implant supporting bone by occlusal loading location utilizing the finite element method. J Kor Aca Den Tec, 27(1), 105-113, 2005.
  10. Pjeturesson BE, Jung RE, Glauser R, Zembiv A, Zwahlen M, Lang NP. A systematic review of the 5-year survival and complication rates of implant-supported single crowns. Clin Oral Implants Res, 19(2), 119-130, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01453.x
  11. Son SS, Kim YJ, Lee MK. Finite element analysis of stress distribution on supporting bone of posterior implant partial dentures by loading location. J Kor Aca Den Tec, 29(1), 93-101, 2007.
  12. Son SS, Lee MK. Finite element stress analysis on supporting bone by tripodal placement of implant fixture. J Kor Aca Den Tec, 31(1), 7-15, 2009.
  13. Wallace SS, Froum SJ. Effect of maxillary sinus augmentation on the survival of endosseous dental implants. A systematic review. Ann Periodontol, 8(1), 328-343, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1902/annals.2003.8.1.328

Cited by

  1. 치과용 임플란트 지대주나사의 조임체결력에 따른 지지골과 지대주나사의 유한요소법 응력 분석 vol.42, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.14347/kadt.2020.42.2.99