Industrial Engineering and Management Systems

Korean Institute of Industrial Engineers (대한산업공학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Decision Making Method to Select Team Members Applying Personnel Behavior Based Lean Model

  • Aviles-Gonzalez, Jonnatan (School of Engineering and Sciences, Tecnologico de Monterrey) ;
  • Smith, Neale R. (School of Engineering and Sciences, Tecnologico de Monterrey) ;
  • Sawhney, Rupy (Industrial and Systems Engineering Department, University of Tennessee)
  • Received : 2016.02.12
  • Accepted : 2016.08.19
  • Published : 2016.09.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Design of personnel teams has been studied from diverse perspectives; the most common are the people and systems requirements perspectives. All these point of view are linked, which is the reason why it is necessary to study them simultaneously. Considering this gap, a decision making model is developed based on factors, models, and requirements mentioned in the literature. The model is applied to a real case. The findings indicate that the Personnel Behavior Based Lean model (PBBL) can be converted into a decision making model for the selection of team members. The study is focused not only on the individual candidates' knowledge, skills, and aptitudes, but also on how the model considers the company requirements, conflicts, and the importance of each person to the project.

Keywords

References

  1. Abbott, J. B., Boyd, N. G., and Miles, G. (2006), Does type of team matter? An investigation of the relationships between job characteristics and outcomes within a team-based environment, The Journal of social psychology, 146, 485-507. https://doi.org/10.3200/SOCP.146.4.485-507
  2. Ammeter, A. P. and Dukerich, J. M. (2002), Leadership, team building, and team member characteristics in high performance project teams, Engineering Management Journal, 14, 3-10.
  3. Anderson, N. (2005), Handbook of industrial, work and organizational psychology, SAGE Publications Ltd., London.
  4. Barczak, G. and Wilemon, D. (2003), Team member experiences in new product development: views from the trenches, R and D Management, 33, 463-479.
  5. Bredereck, R., Köhler, T., Nichterlein, A., Niedermeier, R., and Philip, G. (2015), Using patterns to form homogeneous teams, Algorithmica, 71, 517-538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00453-013-9821-0
  6. Childs, M. and Wolfe, H. (1972), A decision and value approach to research personnel allocation, Management Science, 18, 269-278. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.18.6.B269
  7. D'Souza, G. C. and Colarelli, S. M. (2010), Team member selection decisions for virtual versus face-toface teams, Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 630-635. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2009.12.016
  8. De Dreu, C. K. W. and Weingart, L. R. (2003), Task versus relationship conflict, team performance, and team member satisfaction: a meta-analysis, The Journal of applied psychology, 88, 741-749. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.4.741
  9. De Korvin, A., Shipley, M., and Kleyle, R. (2002), Utilizing fuzzy compatibility of skill sets for team selection in multi-phase projects, Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 19, 307-319. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0923-4748(02)00023-1
  10. Eichinger, B. (2007), Point/counterpoint, Human Resource Planning, 30, 6-8.
  11. El Asmar, M., El, Lotfallah, W., Whited, G., M. Asce, Hanna, A., and Asce, F. (2010), Quantitative methods for design-build team selection, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 136, 904-912. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000194
  12. Forbes, L. H. (1994), What do you do when your organization is not ready for TQM?, National Productivity Review, 13, 467-478. https://doi.org/10.1002/npr.4040130403
  13. Gilbert, T. F. (1996), Human competence: Engineering worthy performance, McGraw-Hill, New York.
  14. Hackman, R. (1987), The design of work teams, Organizational Behavior, J. Lorsch, 315-342.
  15. Hayano, M., Hamada, D., and Sugawara, T. (2014), Role and member selection in team formation using resource estimation for large-scale multi-agent systems, Neurocomputing, 146, 164-172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2014.04.059
  16. Hinds, P., Carley, K., Krackhard, D., and Wholey, D. (2000), Choosing workgroup member balancing, similarity, competence and familiarity, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 81, 226-251. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1999.2875
  17. Honts, C., Prewett, M., and Rahael, J. (2012), The importance of team processes for different team types, Team Performance Management, 18, 312-327. https://doi.org/10.1108/13527591211251104
  18. Katzenbach, J. R. and Smith, D. (1993), The wisdom of teams: Creating the high-performance organization, Harvard Business Press.
  19. Lambert, A., McGinley, M., Chandan, C., Claudio, D., and Medina, L. (2010), Multi-criteria Selection of All-Star Pitching Staff for Fantasy Baseball, In IIE Annual Conference, Proceedings, Institute of Industrial Engineers-Publisher.
  20. Mannix, E. and Neale, M. (2005), What differences make a difference?, Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics CQ, 7, 1-6.
  21. Monden, Y. (1993), Toyota Production System, An integrated approach to just in time, CRC Press, Boca Raton.
  22. Pershing, J. (2006), Handbook of Human Performance Technology, Pfeitter, San Francisco.
  23. Ross, T. M., Jones, E. C., and Adams, S. G. (2008), Can team effectiveness be predicted?, Team Performance Management, 14, 248-268. https://doi.org/10.1108/13527590810898518
  24. Sawhney, R. and Chason, S. (2005), Human behavior based exploratory model for successful implementation of Lean enterprise in industry, Performance Improvement Quarterly, 18, 76-96.
  25. Sharma, V., Roychowdhury, I., and Verma, M. (2009), Why do willfully designed teams fail? Factors leading to team dysfunction, ICFAI Journal of Soft Skills, 3, 45-54.
  26. Stevens, M. J. and Campion, M. (2009), Staffing work teams: development and teamwork settings, Journal of Management, 25, 207-228.
  27. Wall, J. and Callister, R. (1995), Conflict and its management, Journal of Management, 21, 515-558.