DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on Treatment of Asbestos Contaminated Soil with a Field Wind Power Purification Device

현장 풍력정화장치를 이용한 석면 오염토 처리에 관한 연구

  • Received : 2016.08.05
  • Accepted : 2016.09.06
  • Published : 2016.10.01

Abstract

Soil filling or replacement are routinely applied for soil restoration of domestic asbestos waste contaminated areas. However, since these soil recovery methods could not fundamentally solve the asbestos contamination, number of research on new alternative technologies have been carried. In this study, comprehensive laboratory test results utilizing wind power apparatus are used to design wind power purification device that can be applied in practice. Preliminary tests were carried out with wollastonite or actual asbestos waste contamination soils to study purification efficiency. Asbestos content measured immediately after in-situ test on asbestos-contaminated soil satisfying for purification standard showing less than 0.25% asbestos content from all tests, hence, analyzed to ensure over 90% of clean soil recovery rate and considered to be excellent applicability of future asbestos-contaminated soil purification.

국내 폐석면 오염지역의 복원공사는 대부분이 토양개량 공법인 복토와 환토 공법을 일률적으로 적용하고 있으나 토양개량 방법만으로는 석면오염을 근원적으로 해결할 수가 없어 새로운 대체기술에 대한 연구가 수행되어오고 있다. 본 연구에서는 풍력장치를 이용한 실내시험 결과를 종합하여 실제 현장에 적용할 수 있는 풍력정화장치를 설계 제작하였으며, 규회석을 이용한 예비시험 및 실제 석면오염토를 이용하여 농경지토양에 대한 정화효율에 대한 연구를 수행하였다. 석면오염토에 대한 현장시험결과 토출직후 석면함유량은 모두 0.25% 미만으로 정화기준을 만족하였으며, 청토회수율 90% 이상을 확보한 것으로 분석되어 향후 석면오염토양 정화분야의 적용성이 뛰어난 것으로 판단된다.

Keywords

References

  1. Bae, N. Y. (2014), Study of evaluation method of asbestos risk assessment in soil contaminated with asbestos, Master thesis, Donga University, pp. 1-63.
  2. Kim, I. J., Kim, J. W., Ryu, H. S. and Jung, M. C. (2012), Friable test and risk assessment for asbestos in soils using the releasable asbestos sampler, J. Soil & Ground Water Env. Vol. 17(5), pp. 68-74 (in Korean). https://doi.org/10.7857/JSGE.2012.17.5.068
  3. Kim, J. W., Park, C. K., Kwon, Y. S. and Jung, M. C. (2014), Assessment of releasable asbestos from soil to air by the releasable asbestos sampler (RAS) around abandoned asbestos mine in Korea, J of The Korean Society of Mineral and Energy Resources Engineers, Vol. 51, No. 1, pp. 1-8 (in Korean). https://doi.org/10.12972/ksmer.2014.51.1.1
  4. Kim, K. D. (2013), Risk assessment of asbestos in soil and ambient air for residents of abandoned asbestos mines, Masters thesis, Yonsei University, pp. 1-65.
  5. Kominsky, J. R. (2010), Development of the releasable asbestos field sampler, J of Air & Waste Management Association, Vol. 60, No. 3, pp. 294-301. https://doi.org/10.3155/1047-3289.60.3.294
  6. Kwon, Y. S. (2014), Evaluation on asbestos removal efficiency in soil using friability, Masters thesis, Sejong University, pp. 12-96.
  7. Lee, J. Y. and Lee, K. Y. (2010), Development and evaluation of a dust generator using soil samples, Journal of Korean Society of Environmental Health, Vol. 36, No. 5, pp. 383-390 (in Korean). https://doi.org/10.5668/JEHS.2010.36.5.383
  8. Lee, Y. H., Min, K. N. and Oa, S. W. (2014), Assessment of releasable characteristics of asbestos contaminated soil using wind power device, J of Korea Society of Waste Management, Vol. 31, No. 5, pp. 505-513 (in Korean). https://doi.org/10.9786/kswm.2014.31.5.505
  9. MOE (2010a), Guidance of soil environment on asbestos mines and occurring asbestos areas, Ministry of Environment, pp. 60 (in Korean).
  10. MOE (2010b), Investigation of asbestos contained soil and groundwater near at the abandoned asbestos mines, Ministry of Environment (in Korean).
  11. Ryu, H. S. (2013), Evaluation on friable asbestos in soil using the releasable asbestos sampler, Masters thesis, Sejong University, pp. 13-78.
  12. US EPA (2005), El dorado hills naturally occurring asbestos multimedia exposure assessment el dorado hills, California. Preliminary Assessment and Site Inspection Report Interim Final, US EPA Region 9, pp. 163.
  13. US EPA (2008), Clear creek management area asbestos exposure and human health risk assessment, US EPA Region 9, pp. 160.