DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on the Estimation Measure of Delay Cost on Work Zone Using the Traffic Flow Model

교통류 모형을 이용한 도로 점용공사 구간의 지체비용 산정방안

  • Kim, Yunsik (Department of Civil Engineering, Chungnam National University) ;
  • Lee, Minjae (Department of Civil Engineering, Chungnam National University)
  • Received : 2016.04.17
  • Published : 2016.09.30

Abstract

The user cost is an important analysis item which should be considered together with life-cycle of facility, administrator cost and discount rate in LCCA for efficient asset management of SOC facilities. Especially, a significant delay cost occurs often for users in the road field due to a work zone for cleaning and maintenance, and in such case, the administrator should consider the administrator cost as well as the user cost for more rational decision making. However, the user cost has not been considered in most decision making steps until recently and relevant studies also have not been carried out actively. In this study, the methodology to estimate the user cost and delay cost required in the decision making step using the traffic flow model and the direct benefit estimation model in the traffic facility investment evaluation guideline is suggested. And, the traffic flow model was estimated on 4 national highway sections where maintenance was actually carried out in 2014 using VISSIM and, the user cost and the delay cost were estimated based on the suggested methodology. The analysis result showed that the average user cost of $17,569,000KRW/km{\times}day$ occurred on Section A with approximately 30,000 AADT before a work zone occurred, and in case the first lane was blocked for maintenance, the delay cost of $10,193,000KRW/km{\times}day$ (158%) on average occurred additionally. The delay cost of $1,507,000KRW/km{\times}day$ (115%) and $1,985,000KRW/km{\times}day$ (119%) occurred on Sections B and D with approximately 20,000 AADT respectively and the delay cost of $262,000KRW/km{\times}day$ (105%) occurred on Section C with approximately 10,000 AADT. This result of this study was estimated based on the simulation of traffic flow model so that there is a limitation in its actual application. A study ot develop a highly appropriate model using actual observation data and improve the possibility to apply it through the verification using the simulation will be necessary in future.

이용자 비용은 SOC 시설물의 효율적 자산관리를 위한 LCCA에서 시설물의 생애주기, 관리자 비용 그리고 할인율과 함께 반드시 고려되어야 하는 주요한 분석 항목이다. 특히, 도로분야에서는 청소 및 유지보수 등의 공사구간(Work zone)으로 인해 이용자들에게 막대한 지체비용이 발생되는 경우가 많으며, 이와 같은 경우 관리자는 보다 합리적인 의사결정을 위해 관리자비용 뿐만아니라 이용자비용까지도 고려해야만 한다. 그러나 최근까지도 대부분의 의사결정 단계에서 이용자 비용은 고려되지 않고 있으며, 이에 관한 연구들도 활발하지 못한 실정이다. 본 연구에서는 교통류 모형과 교통시설 투자 평가 지침의 직접편익 산정 모델을 이용하여 의사결정 단계에서 필요한 이용자 비용 및 지체비용을 산정 하는 방법론을 제안한다. 그리고 2014년 실제 유지보수가 시행되었던 국도 4개구간에 대해 VISSIM을 이용하여 교통류 모형을 추정하고 제안된 방법론을 토대로 이용자 비용 및 지체비용을 산정하였다. 분석결과, AADT 약 3만대의 A구간은 공사구간 발생 전 평균 17,569천원/$km{\times}day$의 이용자 비용이 발생하는 것으로 분석되었으며, 유지보수로 인해 1차로를 차단 할 경우 추가적으로 평균 10,193천원/$km{\times}day$(158%)의 지체비용이 발생하는 것으로 분석 되었다. AADT 약 2만대의 B구간과 D구간에서는 각각 1,507천원/$km{\times}day$(115%), 1,985천원/$km{\times}day$(119%)의 지체비용이 발생되는 것으로 분석되었으며, AADT 약 1만대의 C구간에서는 262천원/$km{\times}day$(105%)의 지체 비용이 발생하는 것으로 나타났다. 본 연구의 결과는 교통류 모형을 시뮬레이션 기반으로 추정함으로서 실제 적용에는 한계가 있다. 향후 실제 관측 자료를 이용한 적정성 높은 모형의 개발과 시뮬레이션 검증을 통해 적용 가능성을 높이는 연구가 필요할 것으로 판단된다.

Keywords

References

  1. Al-Kaisy, A., and Hall, F. (2003). "Guidelines for Estimating Capacity at Freeway Reconstruction Zones." Journal of Transportation Engineering, 129(5), pp. 572-577. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2003)129:5(572)
  2. An, J. M., Park, J. B., Lee, D. Y., and Lee, M. J. (2012). "A Study on Asset Valuation Method for Road Facilities Maintenance." Korean Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, KICEM, 13(4), pp. 141-151. https://doi.org/10.6106/KJCEM.2012.13.4.141
  3. Do, M. S., Kwon, S. A., Lee, S. H, and Kim, Y. j. (2014 ). "Development of the Decision-Making System for National Highway Pavement Management." Journal of the Korean Society of Civil Engineers, 34(2), pp. 645-654. https://doi.org/10.12652/Ksce.2014.34.2.0645
  4. Dudek, C. L., and Richards, S. H. (1982). "Traffic capacity through urban freeway work zones in Texas." Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 869, pp. 14-18.
  5. Han, D. S., and Do, M. S. (2013). "Development of Korea n Life Cycle Cost Analysis Model for Road Pavement Asset Management." Journal of the Korean Society of Civil Engineers, 33(4), pp. 1639-1650. https://doi.org/10.12652/Ksce.2013.33.4.1639
  6. Han, D. S., Do, M. S., Kim, S. H., and Kim, J. H. (2007). "Life Cycle Cost Analysis of Pavement Maintenance Standard Considering User and Socio-Environmental." Journal of the Korean Society of Civil Engineers, 27(6), pp. 727-740.
  7. Hou, T., Mahmassani, H., Alfelor, R. M., Kim, J. W., and Saberi, M. (2013). "Calibration of traffic flow models under adverse weather and application in mesoscopic network simulation." Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2391(09), pp. 92-104. https://doi.org/10.3141/2391-09
  8. Jung, H. H., (2006). "Capacity drop on lane drop areas due to incidents: Focusing on seoul urban expressway." M.S. thesis, The Univ. of Seoul, Seoul, Korea.
  9. Kim, T. H., Lovell, D. J., and Paracha, J. (2001). "A New Methodology to Estimate Capacity for Freeway Work Zones." Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting, Washington D.C., U.S.A.
  10. Korea Institute of Construction Technology (2013). Final-Report of the National Highway Pavement Management System 2013, KICT (in Korean).
  11. Lee, M. R., Kim, D. G., Kim, H. S., and Lee, C. W. (2013). "Capacity of Urban Freeway Work Zones." Journal of the Korean Society of Civil Engineers, 33(3), pp. 1123-1130. https://doi.org/10.12652/Ksce.2013.33.3.1123
  12. Liu, C., (2010). "Temporal Stability of Macroscopic Traffic Stream Models." M.S. thesis, North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh, North Carolina, USA.
  13. Memmott, J. L., and Dudek, C. L. (1984). "Queue and user cost evaluation of work zone (QUEWZ)." Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 979, pp. 12-19.
  14. Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport (2013). A guidebook for investment of transportation facilities (5th edition), MOLIT (in Korean).
  15. Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport (2013). Korea Highway Capacity Manual 2013, MOLIT (in Korean).
  16. Munoz, L., Sun, X., Sun, D., Gomes, G., and Horowitz, R. (2004). "Methodological calibration of the cell transmission model." Proceedings of the 2004 American Control Conference, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
  17. Park, B. B., Pampati, D. M., and Balakrishna, R. (2006) . "Architecture for on-line deployment of DynaMIT in hampton roads, VA." Applications of Advanced Technology in Transportation. Proceedings of The Ninth International Conference, Chicago, Lllinois, USA.
  18. Park, K. H., Ryu, J. N., Chung, C. K., and Choung, Y. K. (2003). "Optimal Sewer Rehabilitation Planning Considering Transportation Disruption Cost." Journal of the Korean Society of Civil Engineers, 23(3), pp. 221-231.
  19. Park, K. H., Sun, J. W., Lee, S. Y., Lee, J. S., and Cho, H. N. (2007). "Practical Model to Estimate Road User Cost for Bridge Maintenance Strategy." Journal of the Korea Institute for Structural Maintenance and Inspection, 11(6), pp. 131-142.
  20. Sarasua, W., Davis, W., Clarke, D., Kottapally, j., and Mulukutla, P. (2004). "Evaluation of Interstate Highway Capacity for Short-Term Work Zone Lane Closures." Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1877(10), pp. 85-94. https://doi.org/10.3141/1877-10
  21. Sun, J. W., Park, K. H., Lee, M. j., and Park, C. W. (2011). "A Study on Development of Performance Measures for Level of Service(LOS) of Bridge Asset Management." Korean Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, KICEM, 12(2), pp. 101-110.
  22. Sun, L., and Zhou, J. (2005). "Development of multiregime speed-density relationships by cluster analysis." Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1934(07), pp. 64-71. https://doi.org/10.3141/1934-07