Changes in China's Rare Earth Industry Policy and their Implications

중국 희토류산업정책의 변화와 정책적 함의

  • 박인섭 (경북대학교 경제통상학부) ;
  • 송재두 (중원대학교 국제통상학과)
  • Received : 2016.08.10
  • Accepted : 2016.08.26
  • Published : 2016.08.31

Abstract

China not only has the largest amount of rare earth reserves, but it also produces the most rare earth products. However, China lacks appropriate supervision and management systems of its rare earth industry. The Chinese government's inappropriate mechanisms have been cause for reckless development by national rare earth providers characterized by excessive competition, environmental pollution, and smuggling. In response to the problems, China implemented regulatory measures to restructure the rare earth industry. The Chinese central government intensifies its efforts to control the total quantity of rare earth products and tackle environmental pollution. Six leading conglomerates have been selected to promote the Chinese central government's policy. A new environmental guideline has been drawn up to reduce the discharging of wastewater and air pollution substance. Huge transition and a great influence of its policy changes are expected. These policy changes are bound to entail huge transitions, and the policy is expected to have a great influence in the future structure of the rare earth industry. In consideration of these changes, the Korean government, in collaboration with private enterprises needs to take appropriate measures, such as overseas resources development, R&D expansion, tactical stockpiling, professional manpower training and so on.

Keywords

References

  1. 김동환, 희토류 자원 전쟁, 미래의창, 2011.
  2. 김부용.오종혁, "중국의 희토류산업 규제 강화에 따른 영향과 시사점", KIEP 연구자료11-23, 대외경제정책연구원, 2011. 3.
  3. 남지은, "중국 희토류 생산동향 및 전망", KOTRA 해외비즈니스포털 해외시장정보, 2014. 5.
  4. 오종혁, "중국 희토류 자원보호전략의 내용과 시사점", 중국 성(省)별 동향 브리핑 10-28호, 대외경제정책연구원, 2010.
  5. 토이로비 무비나.박인섭, "중국의 희토류 산업정책과 글로벌 영향", 사회과학연구 52집 2호, 강원대학교 사회과학연구원, 2015. 12.
  6. 杜曉慧, "全球稀土礦産資源分布, 開發現狀以及未来發展格局", 資源与産業 第16卷 第6期, 2014.12.
  7. 潘悅, "中國稀土産業政策對稀土出口的影響", 中國管理信息化 第19卷第14期, 2016. 7.
  8. 國家稅務總局, "關于實施稀土, 鎢, 鉬資源稅從价計征改革的通知", 財稅[2015] 52号, 2015. 4.
  9. 華政, "組建大型稀土企業集團專題會議在京召開", 新華网, 2014. 1월 9일자.
  10. 环境保護部.國家質量監督檢驗檢疫總局, "稀土工業污染物排放標准", 2011.
  11. 姜辉, "中國稀土出口管制的國際傳導机制及效應硏究", 國際商務硏究 總第36卷第201期, 上海對外貿易學院, 2015. 1.
  12. 雷敏, "中國發布2012年第二批稀土出口配额 全年增2.7%", 新華网, 2012, 8월22일자.
  13. 牟小剛.牟小軍, "我國稀土産業'出口貧困化'增長困境及應對策略", 經濟硏究導刊 總第292期, 2016.
  14. 許志新, "中國取消稀土出口配额是妥協還是另有企圖", 前瞻网, 2015. 1월 7일자.
  15. 中華人民共和國國務院新聞辦公室, 中國的稀土狀况与政策, 2012. 6.
  16. 中華人民共和國商務部對外貿易司, "商務部關于公布2013年稀土出口企業名單幷下達第一批出口配额的通知", 2012. 12.
  17. 中華人民共和國商務部, "2015年出口許可証管理貨物分级發証目彔", 商務部公告2014年第97号公布, 2014.
  18. Appellate Body Report, China-Measures Related to the Exportation of Rare Earths, Tungsten and Molybdenum, WT/DS431/AB/R, WT/DS432/AB/R, WT/DS433/AB/R, 2014. 8. (Aug. 7, 2014).
  19. Eva Bartekova & Rene Kemp, "National strategies for securing a stable supply of rare earths in different world regions", Resources Policy 49, 2016. 9.
  20. Gordon B. Haxel, James B. Hedrick, and Greta J. Orris, Rare Earth Elements-Critical Resources for High Technology, U.S. Geological Survey Fact Sheet 087-02, 2002. 11.
  21. Jebe, R., Mayer, D. & Lee, Yong-Shik, "China's export Restrictions on Raw Materials and Rare Earths: a New Balance between Free Trade and Environmental Protection?", George Washington International Law Review 44, 2012.
  22. Kooroshy J, Tiess G, Tukker A, Walton A., Strengthening the European rare eatth supply chain: Challenges and policy options, European Rare Earths Competency Network, 2015. 6.
  23. Panel Report, China-Measures Related to the Exportation of Rare Earths, Tungsten and Molybdenum, WT/DS431/R, WT/DS432/R, WT/DS433/R, 2014. 3. (Mar. 26, 2014).
  24. Patrice Christmann, "A forward look into rare earth supply and demand: a role for sedimentary phosphate deposits?", Procedia Engineering 83, 2014.
  25. U.S. Department of the Interior & U.S. Geological Survey, Mineral Commodity Summaries 2016, U.S. Geological Survey, 2016. 1.
  26. Valerie Bailey Grasso, Rare Earth Elements in National Defense: Background, Oversight Issues, and Options for Congress, CRS Report, Congressional Research Service, 2013. 12.