한국과학교육학회지 (Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education)

  • 제36권4호
  • /
  • Pages.693-704
  • /
  • 2016
  • /
  • 1226-5187(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2288-8489(eISSN)
한국과학교육학회 (The Korean Association for Science Education)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

과학영재학교 조기입학 학생들의 학교적응에 관한 연구

A Study on School Adjustment for Early Entrance Students of Science Academy for the Gifted

  • 투고 : 2016.07.25
  • 심사 : 2016.08.24
  • 발행 : 2016.08.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구는 과학영재학교 조기입학 학생들이 어떤 조건과 상호작용전략을 사용하여 학교적응을 하는지 알아보았다. 이를 위하여 조기입학생 6명과 조기입학 준비학생 2명을 대상으로 심층면담을 하였다. 반구조화 질문을 이용하여 개별심층면담을 실시하여, 과학영재학교에 진학하였을 때 어떠한 걱정과 우려를 가지고 진학하였는지 그리고 학교생활을 하면서 어떻게 적응해 가는지 그 과정을 분석하였다. 본 연구에서는 근거이론 방법을 이용하여, 개방 코딩, 축 코딩, 선택 코딩 과정을 통해 패러다임 모형을 구성하고 핵심범주를 추출하였다. 개방 코딩을 통해 75개의 개념과 21개의 하위범주, 10개의 범주를 추출하였고, 축 코딩 과정에서는 개방 코딩을 통해 추출한 10개의 범주간의 관계를 규명하여 패러다임 모형을 구성하였으며, 선택 코딩과정에서는 '학업적 사회적 정서적 적응 전략을 이용한 학교적응'이라는 핵심범주를 찾아냈다. 이를 통해 과학영재학교에 조기입학하는 학생들의 적응과정에 대해 보다 심층적으로 이해하였다.

The aim of this study was to investigate the conditions and strategies of interaction for the school adjustment for the early entrance students of science academy for the gifted. To know their concerns and process of school adjustment, we interviewed six early entrance gifted students of the science academy and two gifted students preparing for their early entrance with a semi-structured questions. Using the grounded theory, a paradigm model was organized and a core category was abstracted through the open, axial, and selective coding. Based on the open coding analysis, 75 concepts, 21 sub-categories, and 10 categories were derived. In the axial coding, the paradigm model was organized by the link between 10 categories derived from open coding. Through the selective coding, this study discovered the core category about early entrance student's school adjustment was overcoming difficulties by using academic, social, and emotional strategy for school adjustment. Through this, we understand the school adjustment process of the students of early entrance to science academy for the gifted.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.
  2. Bierman, K. L., Coie, J. D., Dodge, K. A., Foster, E. M., Greenberg, M. T., Lochman, J. E., Pinderhughes, E. E. (2004). The effects of the Fast Track program on serious problem outcomes at the end of elementary school. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 33(4), 650-661. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15374424jccp3304_1
  3. Bierman, K. L., Nix, R. L., Greenberg, M. T., Blair, C., & Domitrovich, C. E. (2008). Executive functions and school readiness intervention: Impact, moderation, and mediation in the Head Start REDI program. Development and psychopathology, 20(3), 821-843. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579408000394
  4. Brody, L. E. (2001). The talent search model for meeting the academic needs of gifted and talented students. Gifted and Talented International, 16, 99-102. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332276.2001.11672969
  5. Charmaz, K. (2016). Construction Grounded Theory: A practical Guide Through Qualitative Analysis. (Park. H., Lee, S., & Lee, C., Trans.). Seoul: Hakjisa. (Original work published in 2006)
  6. Caplan, S. M., Henderson, C. E., Henderson, J., & Fleming, D. L.(2002). Socioemotional factors contributing to adjustment among early-entrance college students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 46, 124-134. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698620204600205
  7. Choi, J. (2011). Qualitative research methodology. Seoul: Shin Jung.
  8. Chun, M. (2013). A phenomenological study on early entrance experiences of science gifted high school students. Journal of Gifted/Talented Education, 23(1), 25-47. https://doi.org/10.9722/JGTE.2013.23.1.25
  9. Colangelo, N., Assouline, S. G., & Gross, M. U. M. (2004). A nation deceived: How schools hold back America's brightest students. Iowa City: University of Iowa.
  10. Creswell, J. W. (2002). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
  11. Creswell, J. W (2015). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design. (Cho. H., Jung, S., Kim. J., & Kwon. J., Trans.). Seoul: Hakjisa. (Original work published in 2013)
  12. Denzin, N. K. (1978). The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  13. Glaser, B. G. & Strauss, A. L.(2011). The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies of Qualitative Research. (Lee, B., Park, S., & Kim, S., Trans.). Seoul: Hakjisa. (Original work published in 1967)
  14. Gross, M. U. M.(1992). The use of radical acceleration in case of extreme intellectual precocity. Gifted Child Quarterly, 36(2), 91-99. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698629203600207
  15. Hah, J., & Kim, M. S. (2010). The Development of Creative Problem Finding/Problem Solving Model for Scientific Gifted Students. The Journal of the Korean Society for the Gifted and Talented, 9(1), 141-172.
  16. Huh, M., & Chun, M. (2014). The Case Study of Science Gifted Students Who Dropped Out of School. Journal of Gifted/Talented Education, 24(5), 757-780. https://doi.org/10.9722/JGTE.2014.24.5.757
  17. Jang, S., Yoon, H., Kim, S., & Park, Y. (2010). Learning Motivation, Social Skills and Academic Self-Efficacy Scale as Predictors of Elementary School Adjustment. The Journal of Educational Research, 8(2), 140-157.
  18. Kim, I., & Heo, N. (2004). An Examination of the Relationship Among Learners' Nonacademic Self-Concept, Learning Motivation and School-Related Adjustment. The Journal of Yeolin Education, 12(1), 75-96.
  19. Kim, K. (2016, April). [2017 Academy competition] Korea Science Academy, the competition ratio 16.7:1. veritas-a, Retrieved April 21, 2016, from http://www.veritas-a.com/news/articleView.html?idxno=57578
  20. Kim, Y. (2000). An Analysis on the Validation of School Learning Motivation Scale(A) & School-Related Coping Scale(B) and Relations Between (A) & (B). Educational Research Journal, 17, 3-37.
  21. Korea Science and Engineering Foundation. (2007). A Career Guidance for the Prodigies in the Science Field. (2006-07). Seoul: Lee, K.
  22. Korean Educational Development Institute. (2006). Educational Policies for the Promotion of Grade Skipping and Early Graduation. (CR-2006-3). Seoul: Cho, S., Lee, M., Park, S., & Lee, H.
  23. Kulik, J., & Kulik, C. (1991). Research on acceleration. In N. Colangelo & G. A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
  24. Kwak, Y. (2009). Qualitative research: philosophy, arts and education. Paju: GyoYukgwahaksa.
  25. Lee, D., & Kim, Y. (2012). An Inquiry on the Philosophical Backgrounds and Methodological Characteristics of Grounded Theory as Qualitative Research Method. The Journal of Yeolin Education, 20(2), 1-26.
  26. Lee, W. E., & Kim, D. i. (2009). Facilitating Factors Classification for Successful School Adjustment. The Journal of Yeolin Education, 17(4), 89-118.
  27. Linda, E. B. (2008). Grouping and Acceleration Practices in Gifted Education. (Kang, H., Park, E., Park, C., & Choi, H., Trans.). Seoul: Hakjisa. (Original work published in 2004)
  28. Lupowski, A. E., Whitmore, M., & Ramsay, A. (1992). The impact of early entrance to college on self-esteem: A preliminary study. Gifted Child Quarterly, 36, 87-90. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698629203600206
  29. Lynch, M., & Cicchetti, D. (1997). Children's relationships with adults and peers: An examination of elementary and junior high school students. Journal of School Psychology, 35(1), 81-99. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-4405(96)00031-3
  30. Marsh, H. W., & Hau, K.-T. (2003). Big-fish-little pond effect on academic self concept: A cross-cultural (26-country) test of the negative effects of academically selective schools. American Psychologist, 58, 364-376. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.58.5.364
  31. Morse, J. M., Stern, P. N., Corbin, J. M., Bowers, B., Charmaz, K., Clarke, A. E., (2011). Developing grounded theory: The second generation. (Shin, K., Kim, M., Shin, S., & Kang, J., Trans.). Seoul: Ha Nuri. (Original work published in 2009)
  32. Park, E. Y. (2011). A Study on Factors of Children's Adaptation to School. Korean journal of youth studies, 18(6), 1-27.
  33. Park, H. (2016, April). The National Science Gifted, Daejeon Science High School to gather. Enewstoday, Retrieved April 15, 2016, from http://www.enewstoday.co.kr/news/articleView.html?idxno=513864
  34. Park, S., Cho, S., Kim, H., Lee, J., Yoon, Y., Jin, S., & Han, K. (2003). Gifted and Talented Education Principles. Seoul: GyoYukgwahaksa.
  35. Rogers, K. B. (2002). Re-forming gifted education: How parents and teachers can match the program to the child. Scottsdale, AZ: Great Potertial Press.
  36. Ryu, J. (2010). Self-efficacy and self-esteem on psychological types and temperament of early entrants to college. Korean journal of youth studies, 17(2), 59-18.
  37. Shepard, S. J., Nicpon, M. F., & Doobay, A. F (2009). Early Entrance to College and Self-Concept: Comparisons Across the First Semester of Enrollment. Journal of Advanced Academics, 21, 40-57. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932202X0902100103
  38. Shim, K. C., So, K. H., Kim, H. S., & Chang, N. K. (2001). Comparison between Gifted / Talented and General Students = Study on the Interest in Science of Science Gifted / Talented Middle School Students 1. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education), 21(1), 122-134.
  39. Silverman, L. K. (1997). The construct of asynchronous development. Peabody Journal of Education, 72(3&4), 36-58. https://doi.org/10.1080/0161956X.1997.9681865
  40. Sim, M., Lee, D., & Park, J. (2013). A Study of the Effect of Social Support on School Adaptation among Children from Multicultural Families: Focused on Mediating of Bicultural Adaptation. Journal of School Social Work, 25, 233-254.
  41. Song, K., & Han, K. (2011). A Case Study of an Elementary Gifted Student's Maladjusted Behaviors by Asynchronous Phenomenon. Journal of Gifted/Talented Education, 21(1), 209-230.
  42. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1996). Basics of qualitative research: grounded theory procedures and techniques. (Kim, S., & Shin, K., Trans.). Seoul: Hanul. (Original work published in 1990)
  43. Yoo, K., Jung, J., Kim, Y., & Kim, H. (2012). Understanding of qualitative research methods. Seoul: ParkYoungsa.
  44. Yuk, K. (1992). Study on the stress of high school science students. Journal of Gifted/Talented Education, 1(1), 93-109.
  45. Zeidner, M., & Schleyer, E. J. (1998). The big-fish-little-pond effect for academic self-concept, test anxiety, and school grades in gifted children. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 24, 305-329.
  46. Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Self-efficacy: An essential motive to learn. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 82-91. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1016