Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education (한국과학교육학회지)

The Korean Association for Science Education (한국과학교육학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Investigation of 'Group Scientific Creativity' Factors in Gifted Students' Creative Project Solving Context

영재학생들의 창의적 문제해결상황에서 집단 과학창의성 영향요인 탐색

  • Received : 2016.07.18
  • Accepted : 2016.07.28
  • Published : 2016.08.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to select the factors of 'Group scientific creativity' and to find out how 'Group scientific creativity' turns out in the creative problem-solving process of students. To select the factors that affect 'Group scientific creativity', this research extracted 27 influencing factors on the group creativity from the prior study and organized them according to opinions of education experts. To select factors that affect 'Group scientific creativity' in the creative problem-solving process of students, this research analyzed the group problem-solving process that has been done on 72 gifted students for two days. Main results of the study is as follows: First, nine elements such as scientific thinking, scientific knowledge, scientific information-processing capacity, motivation, challenge, age and gender, existence of diversity, creativity educational experience, and the group cohesiveness were selected as human factors. Four elements such as scientific communication skills, scientific inquiry process, autonomy, and leadership were selected as the combining factors. Also, three elements such as the learning environment, teacher types, and compensation were selected as the Environmental factors. Second, it was possible to find that the group scientific creativity influence factors affecting the creative process by analyzing the gifted students in creative-problem solving process. Based on these results, this study described additional points on the factors improving 'Group scientific-creativity.'

본 연구의 목적은 과학 분야에서의 집단의 창의적인 성취를 의미하는 '집단 과학창의성'에 영향을 주는 요인을 선정하고, 학생들의 창의적 문제해결 과정에서 집단 과학창의성이 어떻게 나타나는지 탐색하는 것이다. 집단 과학창의성 영향요인을 정하기 위해서 선행연구를 바탕으로 과학교육에서 집단 과학창의성 영향요인 27개를 추출하였고, 과학교육 및 영재교육 전문가들의 의견을 바탕으로 정리하였다. 학생들의 창의적 문제해결 과정에서의 집단 과학창의성 영향요인을 선정하기 위해서 72명의 영재학생들을 대상으로 1박 2일 동안 진행된 집단 문제해결과정을 분석하였다. 주요 연구 결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 집단 과학창의성 영향요인으로 인적요인의 9가지 요소(과학적 사고, 과학 지식, 과학 정보 처리 능력, 동기, 도전정신, 구성원의 나이 및 성별의 다양성, 구성원이 선호하는 과목의 다양성, 창의적 경험, 집단응집력), 결합요인으로 4가지 요소(과학적 의사소통능력, 집단의 창의적 과정(과학적 탐구과정), 자율성, 리더십), 환경요인으로 3가지 요소(학습 환경, 교사유형, 외적 보상)를 선정하였다. 둘째, 영재 학생들의 창의적 문제해결과정을 분석하여 집단 과학창의성 영향요인들이 창의적 문제해결에 영향을 미치는 것을 발견할 수 있었다. 이상의 결과를 바탕으로 집단으로서 요구되는 창의적 특성을 신장시키기 위한 요인에 대한 추가적인 시사점을 논의하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. Amabile, T. M. (1989). Growing up creative: Nurturing a lifetime of creativity. Crown House Publishing Limited.
  2. Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context: Update to the social psychology of creativity. Boulder, CO: Westview.
  3. Baek, Y. J., & Han, S. S. (2008). The Effects of Group Conflict on Group Creativity: Moderating Effects of Leadership Style and Communication. The Knowledge Management Society of Korea, 9(3), 1-19.
  4. Barron, F.(1963). The needs for order and for disorder as motives in creative activity. In Taylor, C. W., & Barron, F. E. (Eds.), Scientific creativity: Its recognition and development, 153-160. Oxford, England: John Wiley
  5. Barron, F., & Harrington, D. M. (1981). Creativity, intelligence, and Personality. Annual Review of Psychology, 32, 439-476. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ps.32.020181.002255
  6. Choi, J. I. (1995). The Study of determinants to enhance group creativity. Doctoral dessertation. Kerea University.
  7. Cranz, G. (1998). The Chair: Rethinking Culture. Body, and Design. New York:W.W. Norton.
  8. Csikszentmihaly, M. (1988). Motivation and creativity: Toward a synthesis of structural and energetic approaches to cognition. New Ideas in psychology, 6(2), 159-176. https://doi.org/10.1016/0732-118X(88)90001-3
  9. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). Creativity: Flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. New York: HarperCollins.
  10. Fisher, C. M., & Amabile, T. (2009). Creativity, improvisation and organizations. In M. A.
  11. Harrington, D. M. (1990). The ecology of human creativity : A psychological perspective. Sage Publications, Inc.
  12. Hollingsworth, J. R. (2006). A path-dependent perspective on institutional and organizational factors shaping major scientific discoveries. In Meeus, M., & Hage, J. (Eds.), Innovation, science, and institutional change, 423-442. Oxford University Press.
  13. Hong, S. C, & Sohn, W. S. (2014). Motivation, Divergent Thinking, Creative Climate, Group, Creative Ideas. Korean Journal of Educational Psychology, 28(1), 161-178
  14. Jeong, J. E. & Cho, Y. S. (2012). Analysis of the Studies of Creativity Education in Korea: Focusing on Approaches Toward Creativity Education. The Korean Journal of Educational Methodology Study, 24, 659-682.
  15. Kim, J. S. (2008). Recent Trends and Issues in Creativity Research in Korea, Korean Journal of Educational Psychology, 22(4), 939-960.
  16. Kim, M. J. (2013). The causal relationship among team learning behavior, diversity, psychological safety and creativity of project teams in large corporations. A Master's Thesis. Seoul National University
  17. Kim, Y. C. (2007). The Subject Area Teaching-Learning Process and the Education of Creativity. Korean Journal of Thinking Development, 3(2), 1-35.
  18. Kim, H. J. & Seol, H. D. (2014). Mediating Effects of Integrative Capability on the Relationship between Individual Creativity and Group Creativity. The Knowledge Management Society of Korea, 15(4), 223-247.
  19. King, N., & Anderson, N.(1990). Innovation in working groups. In West & Farr. (Eds.), Innovation and Creativity at Work, 15-59. Oxford, England: John Wiley & Sons.
  20. Larey, T. S., & Paulus, P. B. (1999). Group preference and convergent tendencies in small groups: A content analysis of group brainstorming performance. Creativity Research Journal, 12(3), 175-184. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326934crj1203_2
  21. Lee, H. R. (2011). An Analysis on the Behavioral Characteristics of the Scientifically Gifted Students. The Journal of The Korean Earth Science Society, 32(3), 294-305. https://doi.org/10.5467/JKESS.2011.32.3.294
  22. Lee, K. H. (1998). The Relations between Science Related Attitudes and Science Achievement of High School Students. Journal of the Korean Association for in Science Education, 18(3), 415-425.
  23. Lee, K. H. (2012). How to develop creativity 3-D. Seoul: bizmap.
  24. Lee, K. H. (2006). A Study on Korean 4 and 5 year-old Children's Developmental Traits in Creative Ability, Creative Personality and Domain Creativity. Korean Journal of Early Childhood Education, 26(5), 191-207.
  25. Lee, M. K., & Kim, K. H. (2004). Research Article : Relationship between Attitudes Toward Science and Science Achievement. Journal of the Korean Association for in Science Education, 24(2), 399-407.
  26. Lee, K. W. & Oh, E. S. (2012). Creativity, creative person, curriculum, integrated curriculum, Delphi Technique. Journal of Curriculum Integration, 6(1), 45-68.
  27. Lew, K. H. (2015). A comparative study on effects of home and classroom environment on individual creativity and group creativity. The journal of The Korean Society for the Gifted and Talented, 14(1), 201-222.
  28. Lovelace, R. F. (1986). Stimulating creativity through managerial intervention. R&D Management, 16(2), 161-174. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.1986.tb01169.x
  29. Min, J. Y. & Choi, I. S. (2008). Development of the Creative Classroom Climate Scale. Korean Journal of Child Studies, 29(4), 27-42.
  30. Ministry of Education. (2015). 2015 revised curriculum general remarks and particulars defined published. Ministry of Education.
  31. Nonaka, I. (1990). Redundant, overlapping organization: A Japanese approach to managing the innovation process. California Management Review, 32(3), 27-38. https://doi.org/10.2307/41166615
  32. Park, S. B. & Bak, B. G. (2007). creativity measurement, creative disposition, creative environment, creative process, 4P model. Korean Journal of Educational Psychology, 21(4), 905-922.
  33. Paulus, P. B. (2000). Groups, teams, and creativity: The creative potential of idea-generating groups. Applied psychology, 49(2), 237-262. https://doi.org/10.1111/1464-0597.00013
  34. Payne, R. (1990). The effectiveness of research teams: A review. John Wiley & Sons.
  35. Peters, T. (1991). Part two: Get innovative or get dead. California Management Review, 33(2), 9-23. https://doi.org/10.2307/41166647
  36. Pirola-Merlo, A., & Mann, L. (2004). The relationship between individual creativity and team creativity: Aggregating across people and time. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25(2), 235-257. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.240
  37. Reynolds, P. D. (1986). Organizational culture as related to industry, position and performance: a preliminary report. Journal of Management Studies, 23(3), 333-345. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.1986.tb00958.x
  38. Rhodes, M. (1961). An analysis of creativity. The Phi Delta Kappan, 42(7), 305-310.
  39. Roh, P. D., Cho, Y. G., & Cho, K. T. (2011). Developement of An Evaluation Index of Organizational Creativity Level. Journal of Korea technology innovation society, 14(1), 109-138.
  40. Rothwell, R., & Dodgson, M. (1991). External linkages and innovation in small and medium-sized enterprises. R&D Management, 21(2), 125-138. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.1991.tb00742.x
  41. Ryu, H. S. (2010). Study on the effects and influential factors of group creativity. Doctoral dessertation. Sungkyunkwan University.
  42. Shalley, C. E., & Gilson, L. L. (2004). What leaders need to know: A review of social and contextual factors that can foster or hinder creativity. The Leadership Quarterly, 15(1), 33-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2003.12.004
  43. Shin, J. Y. (2007). A study on the relation between group creativity and MBTI - focusing on problem solving process in creative industry. A Master's Thesis. Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology.
  44. Siau, K. L. (1995). Group creativity and technology. Journal of Creative Behavior, 29(3), 201-216. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.1995.tb00749.x
  45. Simonton, D. K. (1986). Biographical typicality, eminence and achievement styles. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 20(1), 14-22. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.1986.tb00413.x
  46. Singh, B. (1986). Role of Personality versus biographical factors in creativity. Psychological Studies, 31(2), 90-92.
  47. Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1991). Creating creative minds. The Phi Delta Kappan, 72(8), 608-614.
  48. Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1995). Defying the crowd : cultivating creativity in a culture of conformity. New York : Free Press.
  49. Taggar, S. (2002). Individual creativity and group ability to utilize individual creative resources: A multilevel model. Academy of Management Journal, 45(2), 315-330. https://doi.org/10.2307/3069349
  50. Ward, W. C. (1969). Creativity and environmental cues in nursery school children. Developmental Psychology, 1(5), 543-547. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0027977
  51. West, M. A. (1990). The social psychology of innovation in group. Oxford, England: John Wiley & Sons.
  52. Woodman, R. W., Sawyer, J. E., & Griifin, R. W.(1993). Toward a theory of organizational creativity. Academy of Management Review, 18(2), 293-321. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1993.3997517
  53. Yoo, K. S. (1999). Analysis of differences formed from playdough activities based on constructivism as a scientific concept, processing skills and attitudes of young children according to methods of construction. Doctoral dissertation. Chungang University.

Cited by

  1. 중학교 과학 영재들의 공학 설계 과정에 대한 인식 조사 연구 vol.37, pp.5, 2016, https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2017.37.5.835
  2. 중학교 과학영재들의 과학 창의성 평가 사례 연구 vol.45, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.15717/bioedu.2017.45.4.536