DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Hierarchical Structure Analysis of Engineering Competitiveness in Overseas Construction

해외건설 엔지니어링 경쟁력 확보를 위한 역량 계층 구조 분석

  • 김도엽 (서울과학기술대학교 일반대학원 건축과) ;
  • 김화랑 (서울과학기술대학교 일반대학원 건축과) ;
  • 장현승 (서울과학 기술대학교 건축학부)
  • Received : 2016.05.19
  • Accepted : 2016.08.24
  • Published : 2016.08.30

Abstract

Construction companies in Korea had advanced actively in overseas construction market in 2014, and had an outstanding performance in 2014 by ranking 5th in the world for overseas construction sales. However, global competitiveness and market share for Korean construction engineering companies is relatively low. This research analyzed previous studies and performed expert interviews in order to identify the necessary capabilities in performing overseas construction projects for Korean construction engineering companies. Through the extracted capabilities, Interpretive Structural Modeling (ISM) method was utilized to analyze the hierarchy of the various factors. Then, the derived hierarchy was portrayed using a Diagraph (directed graph), and the correlation between the factors were analyzed utilizing MICMAC analysis. Korean construction engineering companies may utilize the hierarchy of the derived capabilities in order to enhance its global competitiveness.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

Supported by : 한국연구재단

References

  1. Asian Development Bank, (2012). Infrastructure for Asian Connectivity, 33
  2. Construction Economy Research Institute of Korea, (2012). An Analysis on the Business Strategies of Global Top Contractors in International Building and Civil Infrastructure
  3. Global Insight, (2015).
  4. Hong, S. (2000). Analysis of Technology Development Patterns in Technical Engineering Services Industry, Science and Technology Policy Institute, Research Report, 44-48
  5. International Contractors Association of Korea, (2006). Overseas contracts by small and medium construction firms and its implications. Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, and Transport Research Report, 87-101
  6. International Contractors Association of Korea, (2015). General Information Services Statistics, [http://www.icak.or.kr/]
  7. Jang, H., Choi S., Yi, J., & Kim, S. (2006). A Study of The Global Design Firm's Strategy for Strengthen Its Competitiveness, Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea, 22(7), 91-98
  8. Kannan, G., Haq, N., Sasikumar, P., & Arunachalam, S. (2008). Analysis and selection of green suppliers using in terpretative structural modeling and analytic hierarchy process, International Journal of Management and Decision Making, 9(2), 163-182 https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMDM.2008.017198
  9. Kim, S. & Kwak, H. (2013). A Study on International Engineering Market Focusing on Engineering/Consulting Delivery System, Korea Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 14(2), 171-183 https://doi.org/10.6106/KJCEM.2013.14.2.171
  10. Korea Engineering & Consulting Association, (2016). 2016 First Quarter Construction & Engineering Survey Index
  11. Korea Institute of Civil Engineering and Building Technology, (2015). Implementation strategy of Overseas regional construction engineering Information system(ISP)
  12. Korea Institute of Science Technology Evaluation and Planning, (2014). 2014 Specific Evaluation Report of National Research and Development Projects : Venture.Medium.Small Size Firms - Overseas Business
  13. Lee, M. (2014). A Legal Study on the Facilitation for Small and Medium sized Construction Companie' Entry in to Overseas Construction Market, Ph.D. Dissertation, Hoseo University, 185-188
  14. Lee, U. (2012). Overseas contracts by small and medium constrcution firms and its implications, Construction Economy Research Institute of Korea, Construction Issue Focus, 5-9
  15. Lyer, K. & Sagheer, M. (2010). Hierarchical Structuring of PPP Risks Using Interpretative Structural Modeling, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 136(2), 151-159 https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000127
  16. Mathiyazhagan, M., Govindan, K., Noorulhq, A., & Geng, Y. (2013). An ISM approach for the barrier analysis in implementing green supply chain management, Journal of Cleaner Production, 47, 283-297 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.10.042
  17. Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, and Transport, (2014). Study on expansion plan of overseas construction for establishing of the soft infrastructure in Developing countries
  18. Ministry of Strategy and Finance, (2015). 2015-2019 National Fiscal Management Plan
  19. Park, B., Jin, R., Han, S., & Hyun, C. (2013). A Study on Correlation Analysis of Risk Factors for Urban Regeneration Using ISM method, Journal of the Korea Institute of Building Construction, 13(1), 192-193
  20. Park, H. & Shin, E. (2006). Strategies for Domestic Construction Engineering Companies to go into the Vietnam, Korea Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 7(2), 98-108
  21. Park, H., Park, S., & Cho, M. (2004). Strategies going into other countries throughout analysis of factors which weakens competitiveness in domestic construction engineering companies, Korea Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 5(6), 101-109
  22. Raj, T., Shankar, R., & Suhaib, M. (2010). An ISM approach for modeling the enablers of flexible manufacturing system: the case for India, International Jouranl of P roduction Research, 46(24), 6883-6912
  23. Ravi, V. & Shankar, R. (2005). Analysis of interactions among the barriers of reverse logistics, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 72(8), 1011-1029 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2004.07.002
  24. Saxena, P. & Sushil P. (1990). The impact of indirect relationships in classification of variables - a MICMAC analysis for energy conservation, System Research, 7(4), 245-253 https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.3850070404
  25. Sharma, D., Gupta, D., & Sushil. (1995). The objectives of waste management in India: a futures inquiry, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 48(3), 285-309 https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-1625(94)00066-6
  26. Shin, H., Jung, S., & Choi, D. (2013). Actual Use of the FIDIC and Matters of Consideration, Korea forum on international trade and business law, 22(1), 65-95