복식문화연구 (The Research Journal of the Costume Culture)

  • 제24권4호
  • /
  • Pages.417-430
  • /
  • 2016
  • /
  • 1226-0401(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2383-6334(eISSN)
복식문화학회 (The Costume Culture Association)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

제품편익과 제품동일시가 구매의도에 미치는 영향 - 미추구성향의 조절효과를 중심으로 -

The effect of product benefits and product identification on purchase intention - Focused on the moderating effect of aesthetic seeking tendency -

  • 최선형 (가톨릭대학교 의류학과) ;
  • 홍지현 (가톨릭대학교 의류학과)
  • Choi, Sun-Hyung (Dept. of Clothing & Textiles, The Catholic University of Korea) ;
  • Hong, Ji-Hyun (Dept. of Clothing & Textiles, The Catholic University of Korea)
  • 투고 : 2016.06.08
  • 심사 : 2016.08.08
  • 발행 : 2016.08.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

This study had two aims. First, the study intended to identify the influences of product benefits and product identification on consumers' purchase intention, Second, it wanted to assess the moderating effects of consumers' aesthetic seeking tendency on their decision-making process. Based on the stimulus-organism-response (S-O-R) paradigm and the product personality-brand identification-purchase intention model, this study proposed a research model, the benefits-product identification-purchase intention model. To test the model, a survey was conducted of female college students; a total of 298 questionnaires were analyzed. The stimulus used was a popular model of Nike running footwear: the Luna Eclipse+2. Factor analysis and structural equation analysis were conducted to analyze the research model. The results indicate : (1) The aesthetic benefit influenced product identification positively. The aesthetic benefit, functional benefit and product identification were all positively related to purchase intention. (2) The aesthetic seeking tendency mediated the influences of product benefits on consumers' purchase intention in the decision-making process. For consumers in the 'high' level group of aesthetic seeking tendency, aesthetic benefit and social benefit affected purchase intention and for consumers in the 'low' level group of aesthetic seeking tendency, the functional benefit only affected purchase intention. Based on this study, we find evidence that product benefits and aesthetic seeking tendency play important roles in consumers' decision-making process in product purchase.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Aaker, J. L. (1997). Dimensions of brand personality. Journal of Marketing Research, 34(3), 347-356. doi:10.2307/3151897
  2. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderatormediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173
  3. Berlyne, D. E. (1971). Aesthetics and psychobiology. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
  4. Berlyne, D. E. (1974). Studies in the new experimental aesthetics: Steps toward and objective psychology of aesthetic appreciation. Washington, D.C.: Hemisphere.
  5. Bloch, P. H., Brunel, F. F., & Arnold, T. J. (2003). Individual differences in the centrality of visual product aesthetics: Concept and measurement. Journal of Consumer Research, 29(4), 551-565. doi:10.1086/346250
  6. Cho, Y. (2011). The influence of male consumers' clothing benefits sought on purchase intention of functional clothing: Focused on well-being health consciousness and age. Fashion & Textile Research Journal, 13(6), 900-908. https://doi.org/10.5805/KSCI.2011.13.6.900
  7. Choi, M. (2011). The effect of new luxury fashion brand's product benefit on brand loyalty and brand commitment: Focused on dual path model by brand attitude and brand attachment. Fashion & Textile Research Journal, 13(5), 717-727. doi:10.5805/KSCI.2011.13.5.717
  8. Choi, Y.-J. (2010). The effect of self-congruity on participant's loyalty in convention destination: Focused on functional-congruity, trust and emotion. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Pukyong National University, Busan, Korea.
  9. Chun, H. J. (2003). The effect of consumers' selfimage on brand preference according to the product usage goal and the sensitivity to interpersonal influence. Unpublished master's thesis, Sogang University, Seoul, Korea.
  10. Combs, A. W., & Snygg, D. (1959). Individual behavior: A perceptual Approach to behavior (Rev. ed.). New York: Harper & Row.
  11. Dion, K., Berscheid, E., & Walster, E. (1972). What is beautiful is good. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 24(3), 285-290. doi:10.1037/h0033731
  12. Dolich, I. J. (1969). Congruence relationships between self images and product brands. Journal of Marketing Research, 6(1), 80-84. doi:10.2307/3150001
  13. Fournier, S. (1998). Consumers and their brands: Developing relationship theory in consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 24(4), 343-373. doi:10.1086/209515
  14. Goetz, K. O., Borisy, A. R., Lynn, R., & Eysenck, H. J. (1979). A new visual aesthetic sensitivity test: I. Construction and psychometric properties. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 49(3), 795-802. doi:10.2466/pms.1979.49.3.795
  15. Graves, M. E. (1946). Design judgement test. New York: Psychological Corporation.
  16. Hirschman, E. C., & Holbrook, M. B. (1982). Hedonic consumption: Emerging concepts, methods and propositions. Journal of Marketing, 46(3), 92-101. doi:10.2307/1251707
  17. Hong, H., & Koh, A.-R. (2009). Well-being lifestyle measurement development. Journal of the Korean Society of Clothing and Textiles, 33(1), 55-67. https://doi.org/10.5850/JKSCT.2009.33.1.055
  18. Hooley, G. J., & Saunders, J. A. (1993). Competitive positioning: The key to marketing strategy. NJ: Prentice Hall.
  19. Hoyer, W. D., & Stokburger-Sauer, N. E. (2012). The role of aesthetic taste in consumer behavior. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 40(1), 167-180. doi:10.1007/s11747-011-0269-y
  20. Huh, J. (2013). (허준의 쉽게 따라하는) Amos 구조방정식모형 [Huh Jun's Amos Structural Equation Model]. Seoul: Hannarae.
  21. Hwang, J. (2008). The relationships among clothing benefits sought, brand attachment, and brand loyalty. Journal of the Korean Society of Clothing and Textiles, 32(11), 1704-1714. https://doi.org/10.5850/JKSCT.2008.32.11.1704
  22. Jung. S.-J., & Sung, Y.-S. (2011). The consumer's aesthetic seeking tendency scale: Development and validation. Korean Journal of Consumer and Advertising Psychology, 12(4), 659-682. https://doi.org/10.21074/kjlcap.2011.12.4.659
  23. Kates, S. M. (2001). Camp as cultural capital: Further elaboration of a consumption taste. Advances in Consumer Research, 28(1), 334-339.
  24. Keller, K. L. (1993). Conceptualizing, measuring, and managing customer-based brand equity. Journal of Marketing, 57(1), 1-22. doi:10.2307/1252054
  25. Kim, G. S., Seung, M. Y., & Park, Y. J. (2001, November). 2001 한국 대표세대들의 특징 [2001 the characteristics of Korean representative generation]. Cheil Communications, 310, 10-25.
  26. Kim, H. (2010). Effects of the centrality of visual product aesthetics and aesthetic experiences on impulse buying behavior for fashion products. Journal of the Korean Society of Clothing and Textiles, 34(12), 1947-1956. doi:10.5850/JKSCT.2010.34.12.1947
  27. Kim, R. D., Kwon, H. J., & Kim, H. J. (2008). Trend in Korea 2009. Seoul: Miraebook.
  28. Kotler, P. (1986). Principles of marketing (3rd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.
  29. Kwon, M. T., & Choi, N. H. (2009). The influence of brand-self image congruity determinants on brand loyalty: The role of self-motive. Journal of Consumer Studies, 20(2), 221-254.
  30. Lai, A. W. (1995). Consumer values, product benefits and customer value: A consumption behavior approach. Advanced in Consumer Research, 22(1), 381-388.
  31. Lee, H. S., & Lim, J. H. (2011). 구조방정식 모형분석과 AMOS 18.0/19.0 [Structural equation modeling with analysis & AMOS 18.0/19.0]. Seoul: Jyphyunjae.
  32. Lee, J.-H., & Suk, H.-J. (2008). The Influence of an aesthetically appealing product on the using time, flow, and recall memory. Korean Journal of the Science of Emotion & Sensibility, 11(2), 257-270.
  33. Lee, J.-H., Kim, M.-T., & Park, H. H. (2004). The study on relationship of structure among brand personality-identification-loyalty from a standpoint of process. Journal of Marketing Management Research, 9(3), 23-52.
  34. Macromill Embrain. (2013). 직장인들의 운동화 & 구두 착용 관련 조사 [A research on the office worker's wearing the athletic shoes and dress shoes]. Research Report, 2013(5), 464-495.
  35. Mowen, J. C., Fang, X., & Scott, K. (2010). Visual product aesthetics: A hierarchical analysis of its trait and value antecedents and its behavioral consequences. European Journal of Marketing, 44 (11/12), 1744-1762. doi:10.1108/03090561011079864
  36. Na, K. J., Lee, Y. G., & Yook, H. Y. (2010). The mediating effects of design values on the relationship between consumers' design evaluative elements and brand loyalty. Korean Journal of the Science of Emotion & Sensibility, 13(3), 511-522.
  37. nikecorresp. (2012, February 7). Nike lunar eclipse +2 dynamic fit. Retrieved March 11, 2016, from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VrG6C2p2OVQ
  38. Nunnally, J. C. (1967). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw Hill.
  39. Onkvisit, S., & Shaw, J. J. (1994). Consumer behavior: Strategy and analysis. New York: Macmillan College Publishing.
  40. Park, H. H., & Sullivan, P. (2009). Market segmentation with respect to university students' clothing benefits sought: Shopping orientation, clothing attribute evaluation, and brand repatronage. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 37(2), 182-201. doi:10.1108/09590550910934308
  41. Park, H.-J. & Jeon, K. S.(2011). Centrality of visual product aesthetics: The relationships with innovativeness and consumer independent judgment making. Journal of the Korean Society of Clothing and Textiles, 35(10), 1139-1149. doi:10.5850/JKSCT.2011.35.10.1139
  42. Park, J. Y., Choi, I. H., & Jang, K. S. (2001). The influence of self-congruity between brand personality and self-image on attitude toward brand. Asia Marketing Journal, 3(2), 92-114.
  43. Peter, J. P., & Olson, J. C. (1987). Consumer behavior: Marketing strategy perspectives. Homewood, IL: Irwin.
  44. Radford, S. K., & Bloch, P. H. (2011). Linking innovation to design: Consumer responses to visual product newness. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 28(s1), 208-220. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5885.2011.00871.x
  45. Rosenberg, M. (1979). Conceiving the self. New York: Basic Books.
  46. Schmitt, B., & Simonson, A. (1997). Marketing aesthetics: The strategic management of brands, identity, and image. New York: Free Press.
  47. Sheth, J. N., Newman, B. I., & Gross, B. L. (1991). Why we buy what we buy: A theory of consumption values. Journal of Business Research, 22(2), 159-170. doi:10.1016/0148-2963(91)90050-8
  48. Shim, S., & Bickle, M. C. (1994). Benefit segments of the female apparel market: Psychographics, shopping orientations, and demographics. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 12(2), 1-12. doi:10.1177/0887302X9401200201
  49. Silverstein, M. J., & Fiske, N. (2003). Luxury for the masses. Harvard Business Review, 81(4), 48-57.
  50. Sirgy, M. J. (1982). Self-concept in consumer behavior: A critical review. Journal of Consumer Research, 9(3), 287-300. doi:10.1086/208924.
  51. taste. (n.d.). In Dictionary.com. Retrieved March 11, 2016, from http://www.dictionary.com/browse/taste
  52. Tractinsky, N., Katz, A. S. & Ikar, D. (2000). What is beautiful is usable. Interacting with Computers, 13(2), 127-145. doi:10.1016/S0953-5438(00)00031-X
  53. Venkatesh, A., & Meamber, L. A. (2008). The aesthetics of consumption and the consumer as an aesthetic subject. Consumption Markets & Culture, 11(1), 45-70. doi:10.1080/10253860701799983
  54. Wang, Y. J., Cruthirds, K. W., Axinn, C. N., & Guo, C. (2013). In search of aesthetics in consumer marketing: An examination of aesthetic stimuli from the philosophy of art and the psychology of art. Academy of Marketing Studies Journal, 17(2), 37-55.
  55. Workman, J. E., & Caldwell, L. F. (2007). Centrality of visual product aesthetics, tactile and uniqueness needs of fashion consumers. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 31(6), 589-596. doi:10.1111/j.1470-6431.2007.00613.x
  56. Wu, K.-W., & Wu, K.-C. (2008, July). The effect on purchase intention through the dimension of brand image and brand origin. Paper session presented at the International Conference on Business and Information, Seoul, Korea.
  57. Xu, W., Shin, Y.-A., & Lim, D.-H. (2015). The effects of Chinese consumers' self congruity and functional congruity on brand attitude, repurchase intention and recommendation intention of foreign-made cosmetics. Journal of Distribution and Management Research, 18(4), 93-108. doi:10.17961/jdmr.18.4.201508.93
  58. Yi, Y., & La, S. (2002). Brand personality-brand identification-brand equity model: An exploratory study on the difference between users vs. non-users. Korean Marketing Review, 17(3), 1-33.
  59. Yoon, M. H., & Park, E. C. (1998). A study on the rate of product value in relation to consumers' psychology. Journal of Korean Society of Design Science, 26, 50-51.

피인용 문헌

  1. A study on the effects of the smell and taste experience in fashion stores on the emotions and purchase intention vol.26, pp.6, 2018, https://doi.org/10.29049/rjcc.2018.26.6.1015
  2. User Evaluation, Usage Intention and Purchase Intention according to Recommendation Services in Online Fashion Shopping Mall vol.23, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.21326/ksdt.2018.23.4.012