Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education (한국초등과학교육학회지:초등과학교육)

The Korean Elementary Science Education Society (한국초등과학교육학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Review of Eye-tracking Method in Elementary Science Education Research

초등과학 교육연구에서 시선추적 연구방법의 고찰

  • Received : 2016.05.01
  • Accepted : 2016.08.26
  • Published : 2016.08.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this study is a review of previous studies and principles of eye-tracking techniques that are actively applied in recent elementary science education. Also it proposes to utilize the direction of eye tracking techniques in elementary science education research. Recent eye-tracking technology was developed, using the infrared pupil and the corneal reflection can be safely and accurately track the eye movements of the participants. Eye tracking has the advantage of higher temporal resolution, accessibility, convenience, objectivity, stability and safety. Analysis of the previous studies, there was a difference in the study design and analysis. The workshops and seminars are needed for accurate understanding of eye-tracking method in elementary science education research. In conclusion, the eye-tracking can be utilized such as effectiveness analysis of teaching materials and media, behaviors analysis of teachers and students in a real class, cognitive strategies and attention analysis of the student, discriminating tool of various education evaluation, etc.

Keywords

References

  1. Adesope, O. O., Cavagnetto, A., Hunsu, N. J., Anguiano, C. & Lloyd, J. (2016). Comparative effects of computer-based concept maps, refutational texts, and expository texts on science learning. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 1(1), 1-24.
  2. Andrew, D. (2007). Eye tracking methodology: theory and practice. New York: Springer-Verlag.
  3. Ansari, D. & Coch, D. (2006). Bridges over troubled waters: education and cognitive neuroscience. Trends in Cognition Science, 10(4), 146-151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2006.02.007
  4. Ariasi, N., Hyona, J., Kaakinen, J. K. & Mason, L. (2016). An eye‐movement analysis of the refutation effect in reading science text. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 24, 1-20.
  5. Balchin, T. (2007). Teacher nominations of giftedness: Investigating the beliefs of British G&T coordinators. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 32(1), 34-45.
  6. Basaraba, D., Zannou, Y., Woods, D. & Ketterlin-Geller, L. (2013). Exploring the utility of student-think alouds for providing insights into students' metacognitive and problem-solving processes during assessment development. SREE Fall 2013 Conference.
  7. Berg, J., Jakel, L. & Penzes, A. (2016). Digital and conventional microscopy-Learning effects detected through eye tracking and the use of interactive whiteboards. Universal Journal of Education Research, 4(6), 1319-1331. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2016.040609
  8. Berliner, D. C. (1991). Educational psychology and pedagogical expertise: New findings and new opportunities for thinking about training. Educational Psychologist, 26(2), 145-155. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep2602_6
  9. Bermudez, J. L. (2010). Cognitive science: An introduction to the science of the mind. Cambridge University Press.
  10. Bojko, A. (2013). Eye tracking the user experience - A practical guide to research. New York: Rosenfeld Media Brooklyn.
  11. Byeon, J., Lee, I. & Kwon, Y. (2011). A study on consulting of teaching behavior patterns of gaze fixation by using eye tracker: The case study. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 11(4), 173-199.
  12. Byeon, J., Lee, I. & Kwon, Y. (2011). A study on consulting of teaching behavior patterns of gaze fixation by using eye tracker: The case study. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 11(4), 173-199.
  13. Choi, H. & Shin, D. (2012). Eye-tracking on inservice elementary teachers' interpreting of science textbook tables. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 31(3), 358-371.
  14. Choi, H., Shin, W. & Shin, D. (2014). The comparison of eye movement in measuring tasks between the underachievers and the overachievers. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 33(1), 181-194. https://doi.org/10.15267/keses.2014.33.1.181
  15. Choi, H., Shin, W. & Shin, D.(2012). Differences in eye movement pattern during the classification between the gifted and general students in elementary schools. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 31(4), 501-512.
  16. Choi, M. (2003). A study on the method of eye tracking analysis based on the properties in visual perception of user -With emphasis on the development of analysis-framework for product design-. Journal of Korean Society of Design Science, 16(4), 197-206.
  17. Choi, S. (2014). Exploring gender difference in reading comprehension process using eye tracking technology. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 14(11), 573-597.
  18. Choi, S. (2015). The characteristics of eye movement in Korean elementary students: Landing position and word frequency effects. The Korean Journal of Learning Disabilities, 12(3), 1-18.
  19. Choi, S., Ban S. & Lee, M. (2004). Human-like selective attention model with reinforcement and inhibition mechanism. N.R. Pal et al. (Eds.): ICONIP 2004, LNCS 3316, 694-699.
  20. Chung, J. & Park, J. (2011). An analysis of the selection process of elementary science gifted students by teacher's recommendation focused on analysis of teacher's recommendation letters. Journal Teacher Education, 50(3), 1-12.
  21. Davey, B. (1983). Think aloud: Modeling the cognitive processes of reading comprehension. Journal of Reading, 27(1), 44-47.
  22. Davis, G. A. & Rimm, S. B. (2003). Education of the gifted and talented. Massachusetts: Allyn & Bacon. pp. 46-158.
  23. Duchowski, A. (2007). Eye tracking methodology: theory and practice. New York: Springer-Verlag.
  24. Guo, C. J. & Chiu, M. H. (2016). Opportunities and challenges for science education in Asia: Perspectives based on the Taiwan experience. In Science education research and practice in Asia, Springer Singapore, pp. 175-196.
  25. Ha, B. G., Kim, E. A., Kim, S. U. & Yang, I. H. (2016). An analysis of elementary school student's eye movement in solving process of light and shadow tasks. Advanced Science and Technology Letters, 122, 27-33.
  26. Han, M., Kwon, S. & Kwon, Y. (2015). Analysis of eye-tracking features during visual search task between the gifted and general students in elementary schools. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 15(8), 67-81.
  27. Herrlinger, S., Hoffler, T. N., Opfermann, M. & Leutner, D. (2016). When do pictures help learning from expository text? Multimedia and modality effects in primary schools. Research in Science Education, 26, 1-20.
  28. Holmqvist, K., NystrOm, M., Anderson, R., Dewhurst, R., Jarodzka, H. & Van de Weijer, J. (2011). Eye tracking: A comprehensive guide to methods and measures. New York: Oxford University Press.
  29. Itti, L., Koch, C. & Niebur, E. (1998). A model of saliency-based visual attention for rapid scene analysis. IEEE Trans. Patt. Anal. Mach. Intell. 20(11), 1254-1259. https://doi.org/10.1109/34.730558
  30. Jacob, R. J. & Karn, K. S. (2003). Eye tracking in human-computer interaction and usability research: Ready to deliver the promises. Mind, 2(3), 573-605
  31. Jang, K. & Shin, D. (2013). An analysis of understanding and eye movement of elementary school students according to the types of science textbook illustration. The Journal of Korea Elementary Education, 24(4), 127-146. https://doi.org/10.20972/kjee.24.4.201312.127
  32. Jeon, Y. & Shin, D. (2015). Comparative analysis of eye movement on performing biology classification task between the scientifically gifted and general elementary students. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 34(1), 142-152. https://doi.org/10.15267/keses.2015.34.1.142
  33. Jeong, A. & Lee, K. (2016). Analysis of processes in understanding about illustrated science text for high science achievers and low science achievers with types of biological knowledge using eye-tracking. Biology Education, 44(1), 155-166. https://doi.org/10.15717/bioedu.2016.44.1.155
  34. Jeong, S. & Kang, C. (2015). A study on textbook reading style of the first grade students in elementary school through the eye-tracking. Journal of Curriculum Integration, 9(1), 69-88.
  35. Jian, Y. C. (2016). Fourth graders' cognitive processes and learning strategies for reading illustrated biology texts: Eye movement measurements. Reading Research Quarterly, 51(1), 93-109.
  36. Jones, M. G., Childers, G., Emig, B., Chevrier, J., Stevens, V. & Tan, H. (2016). The efficacy of visuohaptic simulations in teaching concepts of thermal energy, pressure, and random motion. In Insights from research in science teaching and learning (pp 73-86). Springer International Publishing.
  37. Just, M. A. & Carpenter, P. A. (1976). Eye fixations and cognitive processes. Cognitive Psychology, 8, 441-480. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(76)90015-3
  38. Kastens, K. A., Shipley, T. F., Boone, A. P. & Straccia, F. (2016). What geoscience experts and novices look at, and what they see, when viewing data visualizations. Journal of Astronomy & Earth Sciences Education, 3(1), 27-58. https://doi.org/10.19030/jaese.v3i1.9689
  39. Kim, H. (2015). Research for analysis of Korean reading process using eye-tracking technology - For intermediate and advanced readers among foreign Korean learners. The International Association for Korean Language Education, 479-497.
  40. Kim, S. U., Lim, S. M., Kim, E. A. & Yang, I. H. (2016). An analysis of eye movement and cognitive load about the editorial design in elementary science textbook. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 4(3), 570-575. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2016.040314
  41. Kim, S., Byeon, J., Lee, I. & Kwon, Y. (2012). An eye tracking study on test-item solving of science scholastic achievement focused in elementary school students. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 12(1), 65-78.
  42. Kim, S., Byeon, J., Lee, I. & Kwon, Y. (2013). Development of an instrument to measure task commitment using eye-tracking for identifying science gifted student. Biology Education, 41(3), 421-434. https://doi.org/10.15717/bioedu.2013.41.3.421
  43. Kim, Y. & Shin, D. (2015). Development of observing and classifying process skill enhancement program using scientific thinking strategy model for elementary school students. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 26(2), 195-214. https://doi.org/10.20972/kjee.26.2.201506.195
  44. Kim, Y. & Shin, D. (2014). Analysis on cognitive strategies of scientific predicting according to 6th graders' predicting skills based on eye movement. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 33(4), 751-761. https://doi.org/10.15267/keses.2014.33.4.751
  45. Kim, Y., Kwon, S. & Kwom, Y. (2015) Analysis of high school students' visual attention at digital contents on biological science. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 15(12), 91-110.
  46. Kim, Y., Kwon, S. & Kwon, Y. (2015). Analysis of high school students' visual attention at digital contents on biological science. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 15(12), 91-110.
  47. Ko, M., Yang, I., Kim, O. & Lim, S. (2014). The differences in eye movement of pre-service teachers and elementary school students in SBF question about a visual material of the change on the lunar phases. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 33(2), 273-285. https://doi.org/10.15267/keses.2014.33.2.273
  48. Koh, S. & Yoon, N. (2007). The characteristics of eye-movement in Korean sentence reading: Cluster length, word frequency, and landing position effects. Korean Journal of Cognitive Science, 18(4), 325-350. https://doi.org/10.19066/cogsci.2007.18.4.001
  49. Koh, S., Yoon, S., Min, C., Choi, K., Ko, S. & Hwang, M. (2010). The characteristics of eye-movement during children read Korean texts. Korean Journal of Cognitive Science, 21(4), 481-503. https://doi.org/10.19066/cogsci.2010.21.4.003
  50. Kwon, S., Lee. Y., Kim, Y., Eom, J. & Kang, M. (2016). Visual attention of preschool children on popular characters in animation: An eye-tracking study. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 16(3), 105-124.
  51. Law, D. D., Meyer, S. & Fall, L. (2016). Using family science concept maps to gain higher order student learning outcomes. Family Science Review, 21(2), 116-134.
  52. Lee, D., Kim, S. & Jeong, M. (2014). Influence of perceptual information of previewing stimulus on the target search process -An eye-tracking study-. Korean Journal of Cognitive Science, 25(3), 211-232. https://doi.org/10.19066/cogsci.2014.25.3.002
  53. Lee, I. & Han, K. (2009). The analysis of teacher's recommendation usefulness in selecting scientific gifted students. Journal of Gifted and Talented Education, 19(2), 381-404.
  54. Lee, J. & Shin, D. (2012b). The unit-introduction development of Korean textbook in the elementary school through the eye tracking method II: Focusing on the introductory question and speech-bubbles. The Journal of Korea Elementary Education, 23(3), 89-109.
  55. Lee, J. & Park, Y. (2015). Investigating rater's cognitive processes in the writing assessment. Korean Language Education Research, 50, 396-424.
  56. Lee, J. & Shin, D. (2012a). The unit-introduction development of Korean textbook in the elementary school through the yet tracking method. Journal of Elementary Korean Education, 49, 133-159.
  57. Lee, K. & Kang, D. (2015). A study on writing research method for analysis of writer's cognitive process. Journal of CheongRam Korean Language Education, 56, 173-199.
  58. Lee, M. (2009). Selective attention concentration artificial vision system. The Journal of Korea Institute of Electronics Engineers, 36(11), 52-65.
  59. Lee, M. & Lee, H. (2015). Elementary students' formation of relational thinking about equation - Centered for web-based balance. School Mathematics, 17(3), 391-405.
  60. Lee, M. & Yong, N. (2009). Processing of syntactic dependency in Korean relative clauses: Evidence from aneye-tracking study. Korean Journal of Cognitive Science, 20(4), 507-533. https://doi.org/10.19066/cogsci.2009.20.4.005
  61. Lee, S. (2014). A research on traits of adolescents' reading and eye movement in internet reading. Korean Language Education Research, 49, 417-444. https://doi.org/10.20880/kler.2014.49.2.417
  62. Lee, S. & Suh, H. (2013). The current status and perspectives of research on reading process using eye-tracker. Korean Language Education Research, 46, 479-503.
  63. Lee, Y. (2009). Understanding the syntactic ambiguity resolution processes of Korean garden-path sentences: An eye-tracking study. Journal of the Korean Data Analysis Society, 11(6), 3089-3104.
  64. Lim, S., Choi, H., Yang, I. & Jeong, M. (2013). An analysis of eye movement in observation according to university students' cognitive style. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 33(4), 778-793.
  65. Lim, S., Park, S. & Yang, I. (2013). Investigation of eye movement on the observation of elementary school students with different motivation system on science learning. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 33(6), 1154-1169. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2013.33.6.1154
  66. Lin, L., Lee, C. H., Kalyuga, S., Wang, Y., Guan, S. & Wu, H. (2016). The effect of learner-generated drawing and imagination in comprehending a science text. The Journal of Experimental Education, 1(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.1932.11009882
  67. Liu, C. J. & Shen, M. H. (2011). The influence of different representations on solving concentration problems at elementary school. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 20, 621-629. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-011-9293-4
  68. Lustigova, Z. & Novotna, V. (2016, June). Cognitive strategies of students in virtual laboratories (eye tracking based case study). In Conference proceedings. The future of education (pp. 131-136). libreriauniversitaria. it Edizioni.
  69. Milner, A. D. & Gooddale, M. A. (1995). The visual brain in action. Oxford; Oxford University Press.
  70. Muller, H. J. & Krummenacher, J. (2006). Visual search and selective attention. Visual Cognition, 14(4-8), 389-410. https://doi.org/10.1080/13506280500527676
  71. Navalpakkam, V. & Itti, L. (2002) A goal oriented attention guidance model. Biologically Motivated Computer Vision Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2525, 453-461.
  72. Park, H. & Shin, D. (2015). Analysis of processes in reading about 'science stories' in 6th grade science textbook using eye-tracking. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 35(3), 383-393. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2015.35.3.0383
  73. Park, Y., Kim, E. & Yang, I. (2016). Analysis of eye movements according to emotions during elementary students' observation activities. Advanced Science and Technology Letters, 127, 217-221.
  74. Posner, M. I., Snyder, C. R. R. & Davidson, B. J. (1980). Attention and the detection of signals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 109, 160-174. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.109.2.160
  75. Rayner, K. (1998). Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological Bulletin, 124(3), 372-422. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.124.3.372
  76. Roebers, C. M., Schmid, C. & Roderer, T. (2010). Encoding strategies in primary school children: Insights from an eye-tracking approach and the role of individual differences in attentional control. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 171(1), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221320903300361
  77. Ryu, J. & Moon, J. (2013). The effects of line length and information seeking in e-book for learning on eye-fixation time, cognitive load, and comprehension. The Korea Educational Review, 19(3), 293-313.
  78. Schroth, S. T. & Helfer, J. A. (2008). Identifying gifted students: Educator beliefs regarding various policies, processes, and procedures. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 32, 155-179. https://doi.org/10.4219/jeg-2008-850
  79. Shin, D. & Choi, H. (2013). Differences in eye movement between elementary school teachers and students during understanding textbook illustrations. Biology Education, 41(2), 198-210. https://doi.org/10.15717/bioedu.2013.41.2.198
  80. Shin, D. & Kwon, Y. (2007). A review on brain study methods in elementary science education -A focus on the fMRI method-. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 26(1), 49-62.
  81. Shin, W. (2016). The development of science knowledge generative learning WEDO model through cognitive-neuroscientific analysis on elementary science class. Graduate School of Education SNUE, Doctorate thesis.
  82. Shin, W. & Shin, D. (2012). Eye movement analysis on elementary teachers' understanding process of science textbook graphs. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 31(3), 386-397.
  83. Shin, W. & Shin, D. (2013a). Analysis of eye movement by the science achievement level of the elementary students on observation test. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 32(2), 185-197.
  84. Shin, W. & Shin, D. (2013b). Development of the heuristic attention model based on analysis of eye movement of elementary school students on discrimination task. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 33(7), 1471-1485. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2013.33.7.1471
  85. Shin, W. & Shin, D. (2014a). Analysis of eye movement of pre-service elementary teacher about "life cycle of plant" external representation in 2007, 2009 reform science textbook. Biology Education, 42(2), 115-131.
  86. Shin, W. & Shin, D. (2014b). The development of intervention program for enhancing elementary science-poor students' basic science process skills - Focus on eye movement analysis -. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 34(8), 797-808.
  87. Shin, W., Kim, M. & Shin, D. (2013a). Analysis of elementary students' eye movement in science problems solving process applying multiple representation. Biology Education, 41(4), 544-555. https://doi.org/10.15717/bioedu.2013.41.4.544
  88. Shin, W., Shin, D. & Jhun, Y. (2013b). The educational games' UI study from the point of view of UX by eye-tracking. Journal of the Korean Association of Information Education, 17(2), 211-224.
  89. Shon, Y. S., Lee, H. K., Ok, A. N. & Kim, M. S. (2003). The effect of selective attention and perspective changes on the recognition of meaningless figure. Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology, 15(2), 259-274.
  90. Siegle, D. & Powell, T. (2004). Exploring teacher biases when nominating students for gifted programs. Gigted Child Quarterly, 48, 21-29. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698620404800103
  91. Snowden, R., Tnompson, P. & Troscianko, T. (2012). Basic vision: An introduction to visual perception. New York: Oxford University Press.
  92. Tang, H., Day, E., Kendhammer, L., Moore, J. N., Brown, S. A. & Pienta, N. J. (2016). Eye movement patterns in solving science ordering problems. Journal of Eye Movement Research, 9(3), 1-13.
  93. Taricani, E. (2016). Collaborative knowledge in online learning environments. In EdMedia: World Conference on Educational Media and Technology, 1, 733-737.
  94. Tippett, C. D. (2016). What recent research on diagrams suggests about learning with rather than learning from visual representations in science. International Journal of Science Education, 38(5), 725-746. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2016.1158435
  95. Treisman, A. M. & Gelade, G. (1980). A feature-integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 97-136. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(80)90005-5
  96. Tsuchida, S. & Matsuura, S. (2016, July). A role of augmented reality in educational contents: Intermediating between reality and virtual reality. In International conference on virtual, augmented and mixed reality (pp. 736-745). Springer International Publishing.
  97. Van Tassel-Baska, J., Johnson, D. & Avery, L. (2002). Using performance tasks in the identification of economically disadvantaged and minority gifted learners: Findings from Project STAR. Gifted Child Quarterly, 46, 110-123. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698620204600204
  98. Vaz-Rebelo, P., Fernandes, P., Morgado, J., Monteiro, A. & Otero, J. (2016). Students' conscious unknowns about artefacts and natural objects. Educational Psychology, 36(1), 176-190. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2014.916398
  99. Wolfe, J. M. & Horowitz, T. S. (2004). What attributes guide the deployment of visual attention and how do they do it? Nature Review: Neuroscience, 5(6), 495-501. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn1411
  100. Yang, F. Y., Chang, C. C., Chen, L. L. & Chen, Y. C. (2016). Exploring learners' beliefs about science reading and scientific epistemic beliefs, and their relations with science text understanding. International Journal of Science Education, 38(10), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2015.1115137
  101. Yang, F. Y., Huang, R. T. & Tsai, I. J. (2016). The effects of epistemic beliefs in science and gender difference on university students' science-text reading: An eye-tracking study. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 14(3), 473-498. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-014-9578-1
  102. Yoon, N. & Koh, S. (2009). Eye-movements in reading easy and difficult texts. Korean Journal of Cognitive Science, 20(3), 291-307. https://doi.org/10.19066/cogsci.2009.20.3.003
  103. You, M., Kang, Y. & Yeh, H. (2011). Analysis identification results of gifted students by class observations and nominations in the science-gifted education center at university. Journal of Science Education for the Gifted, 3(2), 27-38.
  104. Zheng, R. & Wang, Y. (2016). Optimizing students' information processing in science learning: A knowledge visualization approach. In Knowledge visualization and visual literacy in science education (pp 307-329). IGI Global.

Cited by

  1. 이동형 시선추적기를 활용한 초등교사의 과학 수업 분석 vol.36, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.15267/keses.2017.36.4.303
  2. 2007·2009 개정 초등 과학 교과서 '우리 몸의 구조와 기능' 단원의 편집디자인에 따른 초등학생들의 시각적 주의 분석 vol.36, pp.4, 2017, https://doi.org/10.15267/keses.2017.36.4.428
  3. Analysis of Visual Attention according to the Career of the Teachers in Elementary Science Lecture-centered Class - Focused on the 5th Grade Unit of the Function and Structure of Our Body - vol.46, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.15717/bioedu.2018.46.1.154
  4. 탐구형 초등과학수업 '호흡' 차시에서 교사의 경력에 따른 교수행동 및 시각적 주의 분석 vol.37, pp.2, 2018, https://doi.org/10.15267/keses.2018.37.2.206
  5. 초등과학 수업에서 경력교사와 초보교사의 제스처 특징 비교 - 우리 몸의 구조와 기능 단원을 중심으로 - vol.37, pp.3, 2018, https://doi.org/10.15267/keses.2018.37.3.296
  6. 수학영재 학생들의 분석적 증명 학습 효과 검증을 위한 시선추적기의 활용 vol.32, pp.3, 2018, https://doi.org/10.7468/jksmee.2018.32.3.275
  7. A Comparative Study on the Learning Time and Learning Order of Bookbook-type Textbooks and Digital Textbooks Using Eye Tracking vol.20, pp.12, 2019, https://doi.org/10.9728/dcs.2019.20.12.2383
  8. 교사 참여형 교육프로그램(TPEP)을 경험한 초등교사의 과학 수업 전문성 변화 사례 - 시각적 주의를 중심으로 - vol.39, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.15267/keses.2020.39.1.133