DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effect of mixed Cropping with Legume and using fermented Cattle Manure on Productivity of Whole Crop Barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) and Organic Hanwoo feeding Capacity in Gyeongbuk Region of Korea

경북지역에서 콩과 사료작물의 혼파 재배와 발효 우분의 시용이 청보리의 생산성과 유기 한우 사육능력에 미치는 영향

  • Received : 2016.05.12
  • Accepted : 2016.07.22
  • Published : 2016.08.31

Abstract

This study was aimed to grow organic forage as a prime requirement for organic Hanwoo cattle production over a period of 3 years (2012~2015) in Gyeongbuk region, Korea through mixed cropping of winter fodder barley with legume and application of fermented cattle manure. The effect of barley-legume mixed cropping and application of different levels of fermented cattle manure was studied on forage productivity of whole-crop barley (WCB) and evaluation of feeding capacity of Korean native cattle (Hanwoo) per unit area. The collected data was analyzed using SAS 9.3 software. Barley-legume mixed cropping increased (P<0.05) yields of dry matter (DM), crude protein (CP) and total digestible nutrients (TDN) as compared to those of sole WCB as monoculture. Similarly, acid detergent fiber (ADF) contents and relative feed value (RFV) were also higher (P<0.05) in barley-legume mixed sowing forage compared with those of sole WCB as monoculture. In case of manure application, yields of DM, CP and TDN were also found (P<0.05) highest in 100~150 kg N/ha. However, varying cattle manure levels did not influence (P>0.05) CP and neutral detergent fiber (NDF) contents. In response to increasing nitrogen application level, ADF content increased (P<0.05) but TDN content and RFV decreased (P<0.05). The Barley-legume mixed sowing and increasing application levels of fermented cattle manure also significantly enhanced (P<0.05) feeding capacity of organic Hanwoo (head/ha) having 450 kg body weight with 400 g of daily gain. Findings of present study indicated that barley-legume biculture not only cut nitrogen application level of fermented cattle manure by over 50 kg per ha but also increased their feed value and productivity of forage as compared to WCB monoculture. This would be contribution to the diversity of forage resources as well as production of organic animal product by creating low cost and high quality organic forage.

본 연구는 유기조사료를 효율적으로 생산하기 위해 대표적인 동계 사료작물인 청보리에 콩과 사료작물(헤어리베치와 사료용 완두)의 혼파와 발효우분을 시용하여 생산성과 사료가치를 평가하고, 토양의 지력 향상과 가축분뇨의 자원화를 위한 발효우분의 적정 시용수준을 구명하여 단위면적당 유기한우 사육능력을 추정하고자 2012~2015년에 실시하였다. 콩과 사료작물의 혼파에 따른 3년 평균 청보리의 건물, 조단백질 및 TDN 수량은 5.55~5.82, 0.49~0.52 및 3.51~3.72 톤/ha으로 단파로 재배했을 경우의 4.44, 0.36 및 2.92톤/ha 보다 유의하게 증가하였으나 혼파구 간에는 차이가 없었고, 발효우분의 질소시용량이 증가함에 따라 무비구에 비해 이들 생산량이 증가하였으며 평균 ha 당 100 kg/ha 이상의 질소시용 시에 무비구보다 유의한 증가를 나타내었다(p<0.05). 청보리의 3년 평균 조단백질 함량, ADF 함량 및 상대 조사료가치(RFV) 등은 단파구(각각 7.89%, 29.71% 및 104.89)보다 콩과 사료작물의 혼파구(각각 8.81~9.02%, 31.71~32.69% 및 105.44~108.83)에서 유의하게 높게 나타났고 NDF와 TDN 함량은 콩과 사료작물의 혼파구가 반대로 유의하게 낮았다(p<0.05). 콩과 사료작물의 혼파에 따른 청보리의 조단백질과 TDN 함량에 유기한우 사육능력(체중 450 kg, 400 g 일당증체 목표)은 2.15~3.66과 2.13~3.39두(평균 2.14~3.54두)로 단파구의 각각 1.93~2.79와 2.18~2.91두(평균 2.06~2.85두)보다 높은 사육능력을 보였으며 이러한 경향은 우분 질소 시용수준이 증가됨에 따라 더욱 뚜렷하였다. 이상의 결과를 종합해 볼 때, 청보리를 재배 시에 콩과 사료작물을 혼파함으로써 단파재배 보다 발효우분의 질소시용수준을 ha 당 50 kg 이상 줄이면서도 건물수량을 포함한 생산성과 유기한우 사육능력 증대는 물론 조단백질 함량 등 사료가치를 향상을 시켜 한우 사양시 조사료자원의 다양화뿐 아니라 저투입에 의한 양질의 유기조사료 생산으로 유기축산물 생산에도 크게 기여하리라 사료된다.

Keywords

References

  1. AOAC. 1995. Official Methods of Analysis (16th Ed.). Association of official analytical chemists. Washington D. C.
  2. Constantin, J., N. Beaudoin, F. Laurent, J.-P. Cohan, F. Duyme, B. Mary. 2011. Cumulative effects of catch crops on nitrogen uptake, leaching and net mineralization. Plant Soil 341: 137-154. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-010-0630-9
  3. Corre-Hellou, G., J. Fustec, and Y. Crozat. 2006. Interspecific competition for soil N and its interaction with N2 fixation, leaf expansion and crop growth in pea-barley intercrops. Plant Soil 282: 195-208. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-005-5777-4
  4. Drew, Elizabeth A. Vadakattu VSR. Gupta, and David K. Roget. 2005. Are legumes doing their job? The effect of herbicides on N2 fixation in Southern Australian agricultural system. Biological nitrogen fixation, sustainable agriculture and Environment. Proceedings of the 14th international nitrogen fixation congress. pp. 162-164.
  5. Goering, H. K. and P. J. Van Soest. 1970. Forage fiber analysis. Agriculture Handbook No. 379. ARS. USDA. Washington, D. C.
  6. Hwangbo, S. and I. H. Jo. 2013. Effects of applying cattle slurry and Mixed sowing with legumes on productivity, feed values and organic stock carrying capacity of winter forage crops in Gyeongbuk regions. Korean Journal of Organic Agriculture. 21(3): 451-465. https://doi.org/10.11625/KJOA.2013.21.3.451
  7. Hwangbo, S. and I. H. Jo. 2014. Effects of mixed sowing with legumes and applying cattle manure on productivity, feed Values and stock carrying capacity of whole crop wheat in Gyeongbuk regions. Journal of The Korean Society of Grassland and Forage Science. 34(1): 52-59. https://doi.org/10.5333/KGFS.2014.34.1.52
  8. Jo, I. H. 2003. A Study on area types of recycling agriculture. Korean Journal of Organic Agriculture. 11(3): 91-108.
  9. Jo. I. H. 2012. Evaluation of carrying capacity of Hanwoo heifers when fed whole crop barley and rye as influenced by organic fertilizer application and mixed sowing with legumes. Journal of The Korean Society of Grassland and Forage Science. 32(2): 117-124. https://doi.org/10.5333/KGFS.2012.32.2.117
  10. Jo, I. H., S. Hwangbo, and S. H. Lee. 2010. Effects of applying cattle slurry and mixed sowing with legumes on productivity, feed values and organic stock carrying capacity of whole crop barley and rye. Korean Journal of Organic Agriculture. 18(3): 419-432.
  11. Kim, J. D., S. G. Kim, and C. H. Kwon. 2004. Comparison of forage yield and quality of forage legume. Journal of Animal Science and Technology. 46(3): 437-442. https://doi.org/10.5187/JAST.2004.46.3.437
  12. Noh, J. H., H. C. Lee, Y. J. Kim, S. S. Park, and J. S. Lee. 2013. The effect of cattle manure application on dry matter yield, feed value and stock carrying capacity of forage crops in Gang-Wondo area. Korean Journal of Organic Agriculture. 21(2): 247-263. https://doi.org/10.11625/KJOA.2013.21.2.247
  13. Lee, B. O., J. H. Yang, S. H. Jung, B. Y. Kwon, D. W. Seo, J. S. Lee, and H. C. Lee. 2013. The design of optimal management model of selectional self-supply forage for competitiveness of Korean beef cattle. RDA
  14. Lee, I. D. and H. S. Lee. 2006. A Comparative study on the dry matter yield and nutritive value from rye and hairy vetch seeding typers in Daejeon area. Journal of The Korean Society of Grassland and Forage Science. 26(4): 207-214. https://doi.org/10.5333/KGFS.2006.26.4.207
  15. Lee, H. W., W. H. Kim, H. S. Park, H. J. Ko, and S. G. Kim. 2005. Effect of N application rate on fixation and transfer from vetch to barley in mixed stands. Journal of The Korean Society of Grassland and Forage Science. 25(1): 1-6. https://doi.org/10.5333/KGFS.2005.25.1.001
  16. Lee, H. W. and H. S. Park. 2002. Nitrogen fixation of legumes and cropping system for organic forage production. Korean Journal of Organic Agriculture. 10(1): 49-63.
  17. Linn, J. and N. Martin. 1989. Forage quality tests and interpretation. University of Minnesota Extended Service. AG-FO-2637.
  18. Lithourgidis, A. S., I. B. Vasilakoglou, K. V. Dhima, C. A. Dordas, and M. D. Yiakoulaki. 2006. Forage yield and quality of common vetch mixtures with oat and triticale in two seeding ratios. Field Crops Research. 99: 106-113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2006.03.008
  19. Nahm, K. H. 1992. Practical guide to feed, forage and water analysis. Yoohan Pub. 1-70.
  20. Oh, M. G., I. K. Jo, and S. Hwangbo. 2014. Effect of mixed sowing of legume and applying of cattle manure on the productivity, feed values and organic Hanwoo carrying capacity of rye (Secale cereale L.). Korean Journal of Organic Agriculture. 22(3): 457-468. https://doi.org/10.11625/KJOA.2014.22.3.457
  21. Osman, A. E. and A. M. Osman. 1982. Performance of mixture of cereal and legume forage under irrigation in the Sudan. The Journal of Agricultural Science. 98: 71-72. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859600041113
  22. Ramesh, P., P. K. Ghosh, K. S. Reddy, Ajay, S. Ramana and R. S. Choudhary. 2005. Assessment of biomass, productivity and sustainability of soybean based cropping systems at three levels of nitrogen in deep vertisols of semi-arid tropical India. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture. 26(2): 43-59. https://doi.org/10.1300/J064v26n02_05
  23. Ranells, N. N. and M. G. Wagger. 1997. Grass-legume bicultures as winter annual covercrops. Agronomy Journal. 89: 659-665. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1997.00021962008900040019x
  24. RDA National Institue of Animal Science. 2012. Korean feeding standard for Hanwoo.
  25. Ryu, D. K., S. I. Yun, J. S. Lee, I. H. Jo, and J. H Ahn. 2006. Standard model development of nature-circulating organic agriculture. Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry.
  26. SAS. 2013. Statistical Analysis System ver. 8.01. SAS Institute Inc. Cary, NC.
  27. Schechtner, G. 1978. Zuer Wirksamkeit des Guellestickstoffs auf dem Gruenland in Abhaengigkeit vom Duengungsregime. Die Bodenkultur. 29, 351-371.
  28. Tosi, G., P. Benincasa, M. Farneselli, F. Tei, and M. Guiducci, 2014. Barley-hairy vetch mixture as cover crop for green manuring and the mitigation of N leaching risk. European Journal of Agronomy. 54: 34-39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2013.11.012