DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Modelling Stem Diameter Variability in Pinus caribaea (Morelet) Plantations in South West Nigeria

  • Received : 2015.12.16
  • Accepted : 2016.03.14
  • Published : 2016.08.31

Abstract

Stem diameter variability is an essential inventory result that provides useful information in forest management decisions. Little has been done to explore the modelling potentials of standard deviation (SDD) and coefficient of variation (CVD) of diameter at breast height (dbh). This study, therefore, was aimed at developing and testing models for predicting SDD and CVD in stands of Pinus caribaea Morelet (pine) in south west Nigeria. Sixty temporary sample plots of size $20m{\times}20m$, ranging between 15 and 37 years were sampled, covering the entire range of pine in south west Nigeria. The dbh (cm), total and merchantable heights (m), number of stems and age of trees were measured within each plot. Basal area ($m^2$), site index (m), relative spacing and percentile positions of dbh at $24^{th}$, $63^{rd}$, $76^{th}$ and $93^{rd}$ (i.e. $P_{24}$, $P_{63}$, $P_{76}$ and $P_{93}$) were computed from measured variables for each plot. Linear mixed model (LMM) was used to test the effects of locations (fixed) and plots (random). Six candidate models (3 for SDD and 3 for CVD), using three categories of explanatory variables (i.e. (i) only stand size measures, (ii) distribution measures, and (iii) combination of i and ii). The best model was chosen based on smaller relative standard error (RSE), prediction residual sum of squares (PRESS), corrected Akaike Information Criterion ($AIC_c$) and larger coefficient of determination ($R^2$). The results of the LMM indicated that location and plot effects were not significant. The CVD and SDD models having only measures of percentiles (i.e. $P_{24}$ and $P_{93}$) as predictors produced better predictions than others. However, CVD model produced the overall best predictions, because of the lower RSE and stability in measuring variability across different stand developments. The results demonstrate the potentials of CVD in modelling stem diameter variability in relationship with percentiles variables.

Keywords

References

  1. Adedeji OH, Adeofun CO. 2014. Spatial Pattern of Land Cover Change using Remotely Sensed Imagery and GIS: A Case Study of Omo-Shasha-Oluwa Forest Reserve, SW Nigeria (1986-2002). Journal of Geographic Information System 6: 375-385. https://doi.org/10.4236/jgis.2014.64033
  2. Bailey RL, Dell TR. 1973. Quantifying Diameter Distributions with Weibull Function. Forest Science 19: 97-104.
  3. Baldwin VC Jr, Feduccia DP. 1987. Loblolly Pine Growth and Yield Prediction for Managed West Gulf Plantations. USDA Forest Service, New Orleans, Research Paper SO-236, 27 pp.
  4. Borders BE, Souter RA, Bailey RL, Ware KD. 1987. Percentile-Based Distributions Characterize Forest Stand Tables. Forest Science 33: 570-576.
  5. Burnham KK, Anderson DR. 2002. Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach. 2nd Edition. Springer, New York, 515 pp.
  6. Cao QV. 2004. Predicting Parameters of a Weibull Function for Modelling Diameter Distribution. Forest Science 50: 682-685.
  7. Cohen J, Cohen P, West SG, Aiken LS. 2003. Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Third Edition. New York, London, Routledge, 726 pp.
  8. Eerikainen K, Maltamo M. 2003. A percentile based basal area diameter distribution model for predicting the stand development of Pinus kesiya plantations in Zambia and Zimbabwe. Forest Ecology and Management 172: 109-124. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(02)00443-7
  9. Fries C, Johansson O, Pettersson B, Simonsson P. 1997. Silvicultural Models to Maintain and Restore Natural Stand Structures in Swedish Boreal Forest. Forest Ecology and Management 94: 89-103. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(97)00003-0
  10. Hafley WL, Schreuder HT. 1977. Statistical distributions for fitting diameter and height data in even-aged stands. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 7: 481-487. https://doi.org/10.1139/x77-062
  11. Hyink DM, Moser JW. 1983. A Generalized Framework for Projecting Forest Yield and Stand Structure using Diameter Distributions. Forest Science 29: 85-95.
  12. Kilkki P, Paivinen R. 1986. Weibull Function in the Estimation of Basal Area Dbh Distribution. Silva Fennica 20: 149-156. https://doi.org/10.14214/sf.a15449
  13. Knowe SA, Radosevich SR, Shula RG. 2005. Basal Area and Diameter Distribution Prediction Equations for Young Douglas-Fir Plantations with Hardwood Competition: Coast Ranges. Western Journal of Applied Forestry 20: 77-93.
  14. Koesmarno HK, Whyte AGD, Mason EG. 1995. Dynamics of Size-Class Distributions of Young Radiata Pine in Response to Vegetation Management Treatments. In: Recent Advances in Forest Mensuration and Growth and Yield Research (Skovsgaard JP, Burkhart HE, eds.) Ministry of Environment and Energy Danish Forest and Landscape Research Institute, Denmark, pp 45-61.
  15. Koesmarno HK. 1996. Class-Size Percentile Transformation for Reconstructing a Distribution Function. Journal of Applied Statistics 23: 423-434. https://doi.org/10.1080/02664769624161
  16. Lohrey RE, Bailey RL. 1977. Yield Tables and Stand Structure for Unthinned Long Leaf Pine Plantations in Louisiana and Texas. USDA Forest Service, Research Paper SO-133, 53 pp.
  17. Lumbres RIC, Lee YJ. 2014. Percentile-Based Weibull Diameter Distribution Model for Pinus kesiya Stands in Benguet Province, Philippines. Southern Forests: A Journal of Forest Science 76: 117-123. https://doi.org/10.2989/20702620.2014.918689
  18. Maltamo M, Kangas A, Uuttera J, Torniainen T, Saramaki J. 2000. Comparison of Percentile Based Prediction Method and the Weibull Distribution in Describing the Diameter Distribution of Heterogeneous Scots Pine Stands. Forest Ecology and Management 133: 263-274. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(99)00239-X
  19. Maltamo M. 1997. Comparing Basal Area Diameter Distributions Estimated by Tree Species and for the Entire Growing Stock in a Mixed Stand. Silva Fennica 31: 53-65. https://doi.org/10.14214/sf.a8510
  20. Mc Elhinny C, Gibbons P, Brack C, Bauhus J. 2005. Forest and Woodland Stand Structural Complexity: Its Definition and Measurement. Forest Ecology and Management 218: 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2005.08.034
  21. McDonald JH. 2014. Handbook of Biological Statistics. Third Edition. Sparky House Publishing, Baltimore, Maryland, USA. 305 pp.
  22. Mehtatalo L, Gregoire TG, Burkhart HE. 2008. Comparing Strategies for Modelling Tree Diameter Percentiles from Remeasured Plots. Environmetrics 19: 529-548. https://doi.org/10.1002/env.896
  23. Mehtatalo L., Maltamo M., Packalen P. 2007. Recovering Plot-Specific Diameter Distribution and Height-Diameter Curve using ALS Based Stand Characteristics. ISPRS Workshop on Laser Scanning and SilviLaser ESPOO; 2007 Sep 12-14, pp 288-293.
  24. Ola-Adams BA. 1999. Biodiversity Inventory of Omo Biosphere Reserve, Nigeria. Country Report on Biosphere Reserves for Biodiversity Conservation and Sustainable Development in Anglophone Africa (BRAAF) Project. 315p.
  25. Oyebade BA. 2014. Models for Growth Characteristics and their Applications in Yield Studies for Pins caribaea Morelet in 1851 in Southwestern Nigeria. Ph.D. Dissertation in the Department of Forest Resources Management, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria.
  26. Parresol BR. 2003. Recovering Parameters of Johnson's SB Distribution. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southern Research Station. Asheville, NC: U.S, Research Station Research Paper SRS-31, 9 pp.
  27. Poudel KP, Cao QV. 2013. Evaluation of Methods to Predict Weibull Parameters for Characterizing Diameter Distributions. Forest Science 59: 243-252. https://doi.org/10.5849/forsci.12-001
  28. Royall R. 1997. Statistical Evidence: A Likelihood Paradigm. Chapman and Hall, London.
  29. Siipilehto J, Mehtatalo L. 2013. Parameter Recovery vs. Parameter Prediction for the Weibull Distribution Validated for Scots Pine Stands in Finland. Silva Fennica doi: 10.14214/sf.1057
  30. Tewari VP, Gadow K. 1997. Fitting a Bivariate Distribution to Diameter-Height Data of Forest Trees. Indian Forester 123: 815-820.
  31. Yatich SK. 2009. Diameter Distribution Prediction Models for Thinned Slash and Loblolly Pine Plantations in the Southeast. Electronic Thesis & Dissertation Collection. Graduate Faculty of the University of Georgia. https://getd.libs.uga.edu/pdfs/yatich_sammy_k_2009 12_phd.pdf [Cited Feb, 2016]. 177 pp.
  32. Zeide B, Zhang Y. 2000. Diameter Variability in Loblolly Pine Plantations. Forest Ecology and Management 128: 139-143. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(99)00139-5