한국콘텐츠학회논문지 (The Journal of the Korea Contents Association)

  • 제16권8호
  • /
  • Pages.556-567
  • /
  • 2016
  • /
  • 1598-4877(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2508-6723(eISSN)
한국콘텐츠학회 (The Korea Contents Association)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

대학교육 만족도 측정도구 개발에 관한 연구

Study on Developing Inventory of Students Satisfaction in University

  • 투고 : 2016.05.09
  • 심사 : 2016.07.04
  • 발행 : 2016.08.28
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구의 목적은 고등교육의 교육서비스 개선을 위한 학생대상 대학교육 만족도 측정도구를 제작하는 것이다. 이를 위하여 관련 문헌연구, 전문가 자문, 연구원모임을 진행하고, 20명의 대학생을 대상으로 안면 타당도 검증을 마친 후 설문문항을 완성했다. 탐색적 요인분석을 위해 충청남도소재 K대학 학생들을 대상으로 예비조사를 하고, 결과를 활용 하였다. 요인분석결과를 통해 4개의 측정요인과 12개의 하위영역을 구성하였다. 측정요인은 교육방법, 교육내용, 교육환경, 교육성과이이다. 교육방법은 수업활동의 적절성 및 공정성, 교수-학생 상호작용, 교수의 열정으로 구성했고 교육내용은 교육내용의 체계성, 교육내용의 다양성과 질, 교육내용의 효과성으로 구성했다. 교육환경은 교육시설 및 환경, 교육지원 서비스, 행정서비스로 구성했고, 교육성과는 학교를 통한 다양한 자기개발, 교육적 자아성취감. 학교에 대한 자긍심으로 구성했다. 척도 수준 내용타당도의 평균값(Scale-level content validity index/averaging, [S-CVI/Ave])이 문제가 없는 기준인 .90 이상으로 채택하였다. 내용타당도와 신뢰도를 확보한 48개문항을 대상으로 적합도 검증을 실시했다. 검사결과 신뢰도 Crombach'${\alpha}$는 .984으로 높게 나왔다. 확인적 요인분석에서 GFI, CFL, TLI, RMSEA, NFI값의 지수가 모두 양호하여, 본 대학교육만족도 평가도구는 측정도구로 합당한 것으로 나타났다.

The aim of this study is to make an education satisfaction assessment tool in university. For this, the related study, researchers meeting were conducted and 20 university students were involved in checking items, and then inventory items were completed. The pilot test was conducted at university in Choongnam Province for EFA(Exploratory Factor Analysis by using outcome data. From them, 4 sub-areas and 12 factors were consisted. The 4 sub-areas are education method, education contents, education environment, and education outputs. The education method is composed of appropriateness and fairness of classroom activities, the education contents are composed of systemization of education contents, the diversity and quality of education contents, and the effectiveness of education contents. The education environment is configured as educational facilities and environment, educational supporting service and administrative services. For content validity, items which adapted over 0.90 S-CVI : Standard Content Validity Index. To 48 inventory items obtained proper contents validity and reliability, measurement of suitability of verification was conducted. Cronbach's ${\alpha}$ of reliability test has emerged as highly 0.987. In CFA(Complimentary Factor Analysis), CFGFI, CFL, TLI, RMSEA, NFI indexes show a good value, therefore, this assessment tool for educational satisfaction in university is suitable for measuring tool.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. 권대봉, 오영재, 박행모, 손준종, 송선희, "대학생들의 교육만족도 결정요인에 관한 탐색적 농의," 교육학연구, 제40권, 제3호, pp.181-202, 2002.
  2. 김계수, 구조방정식 모형분석, 서울 : 한나라출판사, 2013.
  3. 김경희, "지방대학생들의 학업중단 영향요인과 대학생활 만족도 분석," 한국콘텐츠학회논문지, 제15권, 제9호, pp.621-630, 2015.
  4. 김의근, "한.중 관광전공 학생 교육만족도에 관한 연구," 아.태 관광연구, 제7권, pp.95-108, 2001.
  5. 신소영, 권성연, "대학 교육만족도 측정도구 개발 및 타당화 연구," 교육과학연구, 제44권, 제3호, pp.107-132, 2013.
  6. 신효정, 민혜리, "대학생의 학습인식과 교육만족도의 관계," 교육학연구, 제47권, 제3호, pp.49-72, 2009.
  7. 이기환, "한.일 관광전공 학생들의 교육만족도에 관한 연구," 아.태관광연구, 제7권, pp.109-124, 2001.
  8. 이상준, 윤관호, 김성윤, "교육서비스의 만족도지수 모형 개발 및 IPA를 통한 개선방안," 한국콘텐츠학회, 제13권, 제11호, pp.511-521, 2013.
  9. 정은이, "대학에서의 좋은 수업에 대한 교수자와 학습자의 의식," 교육방법연구, 제22권, 제3호, pp.25-44, 2010.
  10. 최영준, "대학생의 대학교육 만족도변인과 변인 영향력에 관한 연구," Interdisciplinary Journal of Adult & Continuing Education, 제16권, 제93호, pp.61-83, 2013.
  11. 한은숙, 김종두, "사범대학생의 교육만족도에 미치는 영향요인 분석," 한국교육연구, 제20권, 제3호, Vol.20, No.3, pp.313-335, 2003.
  12. 함영림, 오두남, 박미경, "전문대학 신입생의 의사결정역량, 대학생활적응, 대학생활 만족도 정도 및 상관적 연구," 한국콘텐츠학회논문지, 제12권, 제4호, pp.327-337, 2012. https://doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2012.12.04.327
  13. A. Gaskell, "Student satisfaction and retention: are they connected?," Open Learning, Vol.24, pp.193-196, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680510903201524
  14. C. Aldemir, "Student Satisfaction in Higher Education," Higher Education Management & Policy, Vol.16, pp.109-122, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1787/hemp-v16-art19-en
  15. D. D. Gremler and M. A. McCollough, "Student satisfaction guarantees: An empirical examination of attitudes, antecedents, and consequences," Journal of Marketing Education, Vol.24, pp.150-160, 2010.
  16. D. F. Beck and S. V. Owen, "Is The CVI an Acceptable Indicator of Content Validity? Appraisal and Recommendations," Research in Nursing & Health, Vol.30, pp.459-467, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.20199
  17. D. F. Polit and C. T. Beck, "The Content Validity Index: Are You Sure You Know What's Being Reported? Critique and Recommendations," Research in Nursing & Health, Vol.29, pp.489-497, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.20147
  18. E. C. Chumney and K. R. Ragucci, "Student Satisfaction and Academic Performance in a Dual Pharm D/MBA Degree Program," American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, Vol.70, pp.1-4, 2006. https://doi.org/10.5688/aj700101
  19. F. Abdullah, "The development of HEDPERF: A New Measuring Instrument of Service Quality for the Higher Education Sector," International Journal of Consumer Studies, Vol.30, No.6, pp.463-484, 2006.
  20. F. Astin, What Matters in College ? : Four Critical Years Revisited, SF: Jossey-Bass Publishers, 1993.
  21. H. Kanno and G. F. Koeske, "MSW Students' Satisfaction with their Field Placements; The Role of Preparedness and Supervision Quality," Journey of Society Work Education, Vol.46, pp.23-38, 2010. https://doi.org/10.5175/JSWE.2010.200800066
  22. J. A. Marin-Garcia, "Martinez-Gomez, M.. Enhancing Motivation and Satisfaction of Students: Analysis of Quantitative Data in Three Subjects of Industrial Engineering," WSEAS Transaction on Advances in Engineering Education, Vol.6, pp.11-21, 2009.
  23. J. Douglas, A. Douglas and B. Barnes," Measuring Student Satisfaction at a UK University," Quality Assurance in Dducaton, Vol.14, pp.251-267, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1108/09684880610678568
  24. J. E. Havranek and M. G. Brodwin, "Restructuring universities and colleges," The student-focused paradigm. Education, Vol.111, No.1, pp.115-119, 2000.
  25. J. H. Willson, "Instructor Attitudes Toward Students: Job Satisfaction and Student Outcomes," College Teaching, Vol.56, No.4, pp.225-229, 2008. https://doi.org/10.3200/CTCH.56.4.225-229
  26. J. J. Lawrence and M. A. McCollough, "Implementing Total Quality Management in the Classroom by Means of Student Satisfaction Quarantees," Total Quality Management, Vol.15, pp.235-254, 2003.
  27. J. T. Richardson, "Instruments for Obtaining Student Feedback: A Review of the Literature," Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, Vol.30, No.4, pp.387-415, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930500099193
  28. K. M. Elliott and D. Shin, "Student Satisfaction: A Alternative Approach to Assessing this important concept," Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, Vol.24, No.2, 197-2-9, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360080022000013518
  29. L. C. Duque and J. R. Weeks, "Towards a Model and Methodology for Assessing Student Learning Outcomes and Satisfaction," Quality Assurance in Education, Vol.18, pp.84-105, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1108/09684881011035321
  30. L. Harvey, L, Plimmer, S. Moon, and V. Geall, "Student satisfaction manual," Society for Research into Higher Education Management, Vol.21. No.2, pp.126-143, 2007.
  31. L. Harvey, UCE Student Satisfaction 2000, University of Central Birmingham, 2000.
  32. M. C. Hill and K. K. Epps, "The Impact of Physical Classroom Environment on Student Satisfaction and Student Evaluation of Teaching in the University Environment," Academy of Educational Leadership Journal, Vol.14, pp.65-79, 2010.
  33. M. Marozzi, "A Composite Indicator Dimension Reduction Procedure with Application to University Student Satisfaction," Statistical Neerlandica, Vol.63, pp.258-268, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9574.2009.00422.x
  34. M. L. Endres and S. Chowdhury, "The multifaceted nature of online MBA student satisfaction and impacts on behavioral intentions," Journal of Education for Business, Vol.84, pp.304-312, 2009. https://doi.org/10.3200/JOEB.84.5.304-312
  35. M. W. Browne and R. Cudeck, Alternative Ways of Assessing Model fit. IN: K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing Structural Equation Models, pp.136-162, Beverly Hills, CA:Sage, 1993.
  36. N. K. French and R. V. Chopra, "Teachers as executives," Theory into practice, Vol.45, pp.230-238, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4503_5
  37. O. W. DeShields, A. Kara, and E. Kaynak, "Determinants of Business Student Satisfaction and Retention in Higher Education," Applying Herzberg's Two-factor Theory, International, Vol.19, pp.128-139, 2005.
  38. P. Cooper, "Knowing Your Lemons' : Quality Uncertainty in UK Higher Education," Quality in Higher Education, Vol.13, No1. pp.19-29, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1080/13538320701272698
  39. P. Kotler and F. A. Fox, Strategic Marketing for Educational Institution 2nd Ed, NJ : Prentice Hall, Inc, 1995.
  40. R. Beecham, "Teaching Quality and Student Satisfaction: Nexus or Simulacrum?," London Review of Education, Vol.7, pp.135-146, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1080/14748460902990336
  41. R. L. Oliver, Satisfaction: A Behavioral Perspective on the Consumer, NY: McGraw-Hill, 1997.
  42. R. L. Oliver and W. S. DeSarbo, "Processing of the Satisfaction Response in Consumption: a Suggested Framework and Research Proposition," Journal of Consumer Satisfaction, Dissatisfaction and Complaining Behavior, Vol.2, pp.1-16, 2008.
  43. R. W. Adler and R. Stablein, "Situation Motivation: An Empirical test in an Accounting course," Canadian Journal of Administrative Science, Vol.18, pp.101-115, 2001.
  44. S. Babbar, "Applying Total Quality Management to Educational Instruction-A Case Study from a US Public University," Quality Press, Vol.29, No.1, pp.87-91, 1995.
  45. S. F. Tang and H. Sufean, "Quality in Higher Education. A Variety of Stakeholder Perspectives," International Journal of Social Science and Humanities, Vol.1, No.2, July, 2011.
  46. T. Gruber, E. Fuss, and R. Foss, "Examining student satisfaction with higher education service," Using a new measurement tool, International Journal of Public Sector Management, Vol.23, pp.105-123, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513551011022474
  47. U. Ahgren-Lang and M. Kogan, "Strategies for University Planning: Meeting the Needs of New Clientele," Higher Education Management, Vol.4, No.1, pp.7-27, 1992.
  48. V. A. Zeithml, "Service Quality, Profitability, and the Economic Worth of Customers: What We Know and What We Need to Learn," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Vol.28, No.1, pp.67-85, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1177/0092070300281007