DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

BIM 프로세스 성숙도 측정 모델의 평가항목에 대한 연구

A Study on the Evaluation Items of BIM Process Maturity Measurement Model

  • 이재성 (서울과학기술대학교 신에너지공학과) ;
  • 옥종호 (서울과학기술대학교 건축학부)
  • Lee, Jae-sung (Dept. of New Energy Engineering, Seoul National University of Science and Technology) ;
  • Ock, Jong-ho (Dept. of Architectural Engineering, Seoul National University of Science and Technology)
  • 투고 : 2016.07.05
  • 심사 : 2016.07.28
  • 발행 : 2016.09.01

초록

Lately, the management of domestic BIM performance is quite lacking, as the evaluation and management data from successful cases of BIM implementation both on projects and in companies, and related effects (time, cost and other physical gains) are not well kept for future use in BIM development. In order to overcome the above obstacles, a systematic approach to evaluating BIM adoption with focus on particular elements like BIM implementation environment and processes, and the physical factors yielded by BIM, is necessary. In this study, objective and detailed assessment indicators and weights that are appropriate for the domestic situation were derived through research for purposes of developing a web-based BIM maturity measurement program that is tailor-made for the Korean construction atmosphere. Through a company's self-maturity measurement, excellent quality of BIM deliverables and output can be achieved and managed. Furthermore, the domestic BIM capacity can gradually increase since design firms' BIM capability can be judged during procurement basing on measurement indicators.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Lee, J.S., Kim, M.W. and Ock, J.H., 2015, A Study on the Development of BIM Process Maturity Measurement Model, Proceedings of the Society for Computational Design and Engineering Conference, 611-617.
  2. Kang, T.W., 2013, A Study on the Development Direction of a BIM Performance Assessment Tool, Journal of Korea Spatial Information Society, 21(1), pp.55-56.
  3. Lee, J.H., 2011, A Study on BIM Capability Evaluation for Design Organizations, Journal of Architectural Institute of Korea, 27(6), pp.260.
  4. Kang, H.M., 2013, A Study on Evaluation of the BIM Capability Maturity and Recognition Comparison Analysis for Construction Organization, Master Thesis, Ewha Womans University, pp.34-35.
  5. Lee, S.K., 2014, BIM Acceptance Readiness Evaluation Model Considering Organizational Culture, KwangWoon University.
  6. Yang, B.H., 2013. A Study on the BIM Maturity Measurement of Domestic Field Based BIM Capability Maturity Model, Sungkyunkwan University.
  7. Shin, S.H., Ham, N.H. and Kim, J.J., 2010, Assessment of BIM-Based Government Funded Projects at the Design Phase, Journal of the Korea Institute of Building Construction.
  8. Carnegie Mellon University Software Engineering Institute, 2003, The Capability Maturity Model: Guidelines for Improving the Software Process, Pearson Education Korea.
  9. National Information Society Arency, 2007, 2007 Enterprise Informatization Level Evaluation Report.
  10. Public Procurement Service Press, 2015.
  11. BIM performance, www.buildingsmart.or.kr
  12. bimSCORE, www.sbi.international