Journal of the korean academy of Pediatric Dentistry (대한소아치과학회지)

Korean Academy of Pediatric Dentistry (대한소아치과학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Fluoride Release and Compressive Strength of Several Giomers

수종의 자이오머의 불소 유리량과 압축 강도 평가

  • Kang, Jieun (Department of Pediatric Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Dankook University) ;
  • Yoo, Seunghoon (Department of Pediatric Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Dankook University) ;
  • Kim, Jongbin (Department of Pediatric Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Dankook University) ;
  • Kim, Jongsoo (Department of Pediatric Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Dankook University)
  • 강지은 (단국대학교 치과대학 소아치과학교실) ;
  • 유승훈 (단국대학교 치과대학 소아치과학교실) ;
  • 김종빈 (단국대학교 치과대학 소아치과학교실) ;
  • 김종수 (단국대학교 치과대학 소아치과학교실)
  • Received : 2015.11.25
  • Accepted : 2015.12.11
  • Published : 2016.08.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare the compressive strength and amount of fluoride-release of recently developed giomers (Beautifil Flow Plus F00, Beautifil Flow Plus F03), conventional giomer, resin-modified glass ionomer and composite resin. Fifteen cylindrical specimens for each group were prepared to measure fluoride release. It was measured using pH/ISE meter and fluoride ion electrode every 24 hours for the first 7 days and every 72 hours until the 31st day. Also, fifteen cylindrical specimens for each group after thermocycling were prepared to measure compressive strength. The universal testing machine (Kyung-sung Testing Machine Co., Korea) was used and the crosshead speed was 1 mm/min. Recently developed giomers showed more fluoride release and higher compressive strength than conventional giomer. It would be a good alternative to composite resin.

본 연구의 목적은 최근 개발된 두 종류의 자이오머(Beautifil Flow Plus F00, Beautifil Flow Plus F03)의 불소유리량과 열순환 후 압축강도를 기존의 자이오머, 레진 강화형 글라스아이오노머, 복합 레진과 비교하여 평가하는 것이다. 불소 유리량 측정을 위해 군별로 15개씩의 시편을 제작하여 31일간 pH/ISE meter를 이용하여 불소 농도를 측정하였고 압축 강도 측정을 위해 군별로 15개씩의 시편을 제작하여 열 순환 후 만능 경성 시험기를 이용하여 시편이 파절된 시점의 최대강도를 측정하였다. 최근 개발되어 출시된 자이오머는 기존의 자이오머에 비해 불소 유리량은 유의하게 증가하였다. 압축 강도도 개선되었으며, 복합 레진과 비교하여 통계적 유의 차가 없는 것으로 나타나 임상적 가치가 높은 것으로 사료되었다.

Keywords

References

  1. Korean Academy of pediatric dentistry : Pediatric, adolescent dentistry. 5th ed. 278, 350-354, 2014.
  2. Valpio M : Clinical aspects of restorative treatment in the primary dentition. Swed Dent J Suppl, 96:1-47, 1993.
  3. Wiegand A, Buchalla W, Attin T : Review on fluoride- releasing restorative materials - fluoride release and uptake characteristics, antibacterial activity and influence on caries formation. Dent Mater, 23:343-362, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2006.01.022
  4. Park JY, Kim JS, Kim SO : Comparative study on the fluoride release and compressive strength of several F-containing restorative materials. J Korean Acad Pediatr Dent, 35:469-476, 2008.
  5. Yoon M, Kim JS, Yoo SH : Changes of compressive strength and microhardness of composite resin, giomer and compomer after thermocycling treatment. J Korean Acad Pediatr Dent, 37:438-444, 2010.
  6. Abdel-karim UM, El-Eraky M, Etman WM : Threeyear clinical evaluation of two nano-hybrid giomer restorative composites. Tanta Dental Journal, 11:213-222, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tdj.2014.10.004
  7. Um CM, Oilo G : The effect of early water contact on glass-ionomer cements. Quintessence Int, 23:209-214, 1992.
  8. Kim SM, Park HW, Lee JH, Seo HW : Fluoride release and microhardness of giomer according to time. J Korean Acad Pediatr Dent, 37:429-437, 2010.
  9. Gonulol N, Ozer S, Sen Tunc E : Water Sorption, Solubility, and Color Stability of Giomer Restoratives. J Esthet Restor Dent, doi: 10.1111/jerd.12119, 2014.
  10. Itota T, Carrick TE, Yoshiyama M, McCabe JF : Fluoride release and recharge in giomer, compomer and resin composite. Dent Mater, 20:789-795, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2003.11.009
  11. Roberts TA, Miyai K, Ikemura K, et al. : Fluoride ion sustained release preformed glass ionomer filler and dental compositions containing the same. Unitied States Patent No. 5,883,153;1999.
  12. Kim SY, Choi SC Park JH, et al. : In vitro study of demineralization inhibition effect and fluoride uptake into adjacent teeth of light-cured fluoride-releasing restoratives. J Korean Acad Pediatr Dent, 37:288-297, 2010.
  13. Tantbirojn D, Douglas WH, Versluis A : Inhibitive effect of a resin-modified glass ionomer cement on remote enamel artificial caries. Caries Res, 31:275-280, 1997. https://doi.org/10.1159/000262411
  14. Dijkman GE, de Vries J, Lodding A, Arends J : Long-term fluoride release of visible light-activated composites in vitro: a correlation with in situ demineralisation data. Caries Res, 27:117-123, 1993. https://doi.org/10.1159/000261528
  15. Ikemura K, Tay FR, Endo T, Pashley DH : A review of chemical-approach and ultramorphological studies on the development of fluoride-releasing dental adhesives comprising new pre-reacted glass ionomer (PRG) fillers. Dent Mater J, 27:315-339, 2008. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.27.315
  16. DeSchepper EJ, White RR, von der Lehr W : Antibacterial effects of glass ionomers. Am J Dent, 2:51-56, 1989.
  17. Xu X, Burgess JO : Compressive strength, fluoride release and recharge of fluoride-releasing materials. Biomaterials, 24:2451-2461, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(02)00638-5
  18. Kim JS : Comparison of compressive strength and surface microhardness between flowable composite resin and giomer. J Korean Acad Pediatr Dent, 39:383-388, 2012. https://doi.org/10.5933/JKAPD.2012.39.4.383
  19. Sideridou I, Tserki V, Papanastasiou G : Study of water sorption, solubility and modulus of elasticity of light-cured dimethacrylate-based dental resins. Biomaterials, 24:655-665, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(02)00380-0
  20. Williams JA, Billington RW : Increase in compressive strength of glass ionomer restorative materials with respect to time: a guide to their suitability for use in posterior primary dentition. J Oral Rehabil, 16:475-479, 1989. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.1989.tb01368.x
  21. Gordan VV, Blaser PK, Riley JL 3rd, et al. : A clinical evaluation of a giomer restorative system containing surface prereacted glass ionomer filler: results from a 13-year recall examination. J Am Dent Assoc, 145:1036-1043, 2014. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.2014.57
  22. Sunico MC, Shinkai K, Katoh Y : Two-year clinical performance of occlusal and cervical giomer restorations. Oper Dent, 30:282-289, 2005.
  23. Gale MS, Darvell BW : Thermal cycling procedures for laboratory testing of dental restorations. J Dent, 27:89-99, 1999. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(98)00037-2
  24. Ernst CP, Canbek K, Euler T, Willershausen B : In vivo validation of the historical in vitro thermocycling temperature range for dental materials testing. Clin Oral Investig, 8:130-138, 2004.
  25. Indrani DJ, Cook WD, Harcourt JK, et al. : Fracture toughness of water-aged resin composite restorative materials. Dent Mater, 11:201-207, 1995. https://doi.org/10.1016/0109-5641(95)80019-0
  26. Donly KJ, Segura A, Kanellis M, Erickson RL : Clinical performance and caries inhibition of resinmodified glass ionomer cement and amalgam restorations. J Am Dent Assoc, 130:1459-1466, 1999. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1999.0056
  27. TIAN F, Yap AU, Wang X, Gao X : Effect of staining solutions on color of pre-reacted glass-ionomer containing composites. Dent Mater J, 31:384-388, 2012. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2011-223

Cited by

  1. Fluoride Release of Giomer and Compomer Through the Dental Adhesive Layer vol.44, pp.2, 2017, https://doi.org/10.5933/JKAPD.2017.44.2.180