DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Food Components and Antioxidant Activities of Dried Jerusalem Artichoke with White and Purple Colors

일반과 자색 건조 돼지감자의 식품 성분 및 항산화 활성

  • Jung, Bok-Mi (Division of Food and Nutrition, Chonnam National University) ;
  • Shin, Tai-Sun (Division of Food and Nutrition, Chonnam National University)
  • 정복미 (전남대학교 식품영양과학부) ;
  • 신태선 (전남대학교 식품영양과학부)
  • Received : 2016.04.08
  • Accepted : 2016.05.11
  • Published : 2016.08.31

Abstract

This study investigated the food components and antioxidant activities of dried Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus L.) with white and purple colors. For the proximate composition of dried Jerusalem artichoke, regardless of color, carbohydrate content was highest, followed by crude protein, ash, and moisture contents, and breed-specific differences were not detected. The highest mineral content of dried Jerusalem artichoke was potassium, followed by calcium, magnesium, sodium, and iron. The major minerals of white color sample were calcium, magnesium, and zinc, whereas those of the purple color sample were potassium, sodium, copper, and manganese, and no significant differences between the samples were detected. The main amino acid of dried Jerusalem artichoke was arginine, regardless of color, followed by asparagine, aspartic acid, and ${\gamma}-amino-n-butyric$ acid in order. Cysteine, leucine, and tyrosine were significantly (P<0.05) more abundant in the purple color sample than in the white color sample. In contrast, phosphoethanolamine was significantly (P<0.05) higher in the white color sample than in the purple color sample. Antioxidant activity was higher in the purple color sample than in the white color sample for all activities except the 2,2-azino-bis(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid) assay methodology. Ferric-reducing antioxidant power and oxygen radical absorbance capacity assays at low concentrations of extracts found no differences between the two samples, although the purple sample at high concentration showed relatively high antioxidant activities.

본 연구는 일반과 자색 건조 돼지감자의 일반성분, 무기질 함량, 유리아미노산 함량, 색도, 항산화 활성을 측정하였다. 돼지감자의 일반성분은 품종과 관계없이 탄수화물, 조단백, 회분, 수분 함량 순으로 높았으며, 색의 차이는 나타나지 않았다. 돼지감자의 품종과 관계없이 가장 높은 무기질은 칼륨이었고, 다음으로 칼슘, 마그네슘, 나트륨, 철분 순으로 나타났다. 일반시료가 자색시료보다 높은 무기질은 칼슘, 마그네슘, 철분, 아연이었고 자색이 일반보다 높은 것은 칼륨, 나트륨, 구리, 망간으로 나타났으나 품종 간의 유의적인 차이는 없었다. 돼지감자에 가장 많이 함유된 아미노산은 품종과 관계없이 arginine이었고, 다음으로 asparagine, aspartic acid, ${\gamma}-amino-n-butyric$ acid 순으로 나타났다. 또한, 일반시료보다 자색시료에서 유의적으로(P<0.05) 높게 나타난 아미노산은 cystine, leucine, tyrosine이었고, 일반시료가 자색시료보다 유의적으로(P<0.05) 높게 나타난 아미노산은 phosphoethanolamine으로 나타났다. 색도의 경우 L, a, b 모두 일반시료보다 자색시료에서 높게 나타났으나 유의적 차이는 없었다. 항산화 활성에서는 방법론 중 ABTS assay를 제외하고는 모든 활성에서 자색시료가 일반시료에 비해 항산화 활성이 높게 나타났다. 일부 FRAP와 ORAC assay의 경우 추출물의 낮은 농도에서는 일반시료와 자색시료 간 차이가 없는 것으로 나타났으며, 자색시료의 경우 높은 농도에서 항산화 활성이 있는 것으로 나타났다.

Keywords

References

  1. Shin SH, Kwon SJ, Jo HJ, Go D, Han J. 2012. Extraction and analysis of inulin from Jerusalem artichoke. Food Science and Industy 45(4): 50-58.
  2. Kim SH. 2014. Jerusalem artichoke and inulin. J Korean Diabetes 15: 227-231. https://doi.org/10.4093/jkd.2014.15.4.227
  3. Jhon DY, Kim MH. 1988. Studies inulase from Jerusalem artichoke. J Korean Soc Food Nutr 17: 205-210.
  4. Chae EM, Chol EH. 1991. Optimization for alcohol fermentation by Kluyveromyces marxianus using Jerusalem artichoke powder. Kor J Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 19: 265-271.
  5. Rosengard BR, Cochrane DE. 1983. Complement-mediated cytolysis: a quick, simple method for determining levels of immunoglobulin E bound to mast cells. J Histochem Cytochem 31: 441-444. https://doi.org/10.1177/31.3.6827080
  6. Jeong HJ, Kim JS, Sa YJ, Kim MO, Yang J, Kim MJ. 2011. Antioxidant activity and $\alpha$-glucosidase inhibitory effect of Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus) methanol extracts by heat treatment conditions. Korean J Med Crop Sci 19: 257-263. https://doi.org/10.7783/KJMCS.2011.19.4.257
  7. Kang SI, Han JI, Kim KY, Oh SJ, Kim SI. 1993. Changes in soluble neutral carbohydrates composition of jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus L.) tubers according to harvest date and storage temperature. J Korean Agric Chem Soc 36: 304-309.
  8. Kim YS, Lee SJ, Hwang JW, Kim EH, Park PJ, Jeon BT. 2011. Antioxidant activity and protective effects of extracts from Helianthus tuberosus L. leaves on t-BHP induced oxidative stress in chang cells. J Korean Soc Food Sci Nutr 40: 1525-1531. https://doi.org/10.3746/jkfn.2011.40.11.1525
  9. Kim JW, Kim JK, Song IS, Kwon ES, Youn KS. 2013. Comparison of antioxidant and physiological properties of Jerusalem artichoke leaves with different extraction processes. J Korean Soc Food Sci Nutr 42: 68-75. https://doi.org/10.3746/jkfn.2013.42.1.068
  10. Park HS. 2010. Quality characteristics of Sulgidduk by the addition of Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus L.) powder. Korean J Culinary Res 16: 259-267.
  11. Park HY, An NY, Ryu HK. 2013. The quality characteristics and hypoglycemic effect cookies containing Helianthus tuberosus powder. Korean J Community Living Sci 24: 233-241. https://doi.org/10.7856/kjcls.2013.24.2.233
  12. Shin JY, Byun MW, Noh BS, Choi EH. 1991. Noodle characteristics of Jerusalem artichoke added wheat flour and improving effect of texture modifying agents. Korean J Food Sci Technol 23: 538-545.
  13. Park GS. 2014. Optimization of muffin preparation upon addition of jerusalem artichoke powder and oligosaccharide by response surface methodology. Korean J Food Cult 29: 101-110. https://doi.org/10.7318/KJFC/2014.29.1.101
  14. Cieslik E, Gebusia A, Florkiewicz A, Mickowska B. 2011. The content of protein and of amino acids in Jerusalem artichoke tubers (Helianthus tuberosus L.) of red variety Rote Zonenkugel. Acta Sci Pol Technol Aliment 10: 433-441.
  15. AOAC. 1990. Official methods of analysis. 15th ed. The Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Washington, DC, USA. p 31.
  16. Singleton VL, Orthofer R, Lamuela-Raventos RM. 1999. Analysis of total phenols and other oxidation substrates and antioxidants by means of Folin-Ciocalteu reagent. Methods Enzymol 299: 152-178. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0076-6879(99)99017-1
  17. Thaipong K, Boonprakob U, Crosby K, Cisneros-Zevallos L, Byrne DH. 2006. Comparison of ABTS, DPPH, FRAP, and ORAC assays for estimating antioxidant activity from guava fruit extracts. J Food Compos Anal 19: 669-675. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfca.2006.01.003
  18. The Korean Nutrition Society. 2000. Recommended dietary allowances for Koreans. 7th revision. Seoul, Korea.
  19. Jeon TW, Cho YS, Lee SH, Cho SM, Cho HM, Chang KS, Park HJ. 2005. Studies on the biological activities and physicochemical characteristics of pigments extracted from Korean purple-fleshed potato. Korean J Food Sci Technol 37: 247-254.
  20. Kim GC, Kim HS, Jo IH, Kim JS, Kim KM, Jang YE. 2013. Qualitative characteristics and antioxidant activities of Buchimgaru supplemented with Jerusalem artichoke powder. J Korean Soc Food Sci Nutr 42: 1065-1070. https://doi.org/10.3746/jkfn.2013.42.7.1065
  21. Tchone M, Barwald G, Annemuller G, Fleischer LG. 2006. Separation and identification of phenolic compounds in Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus L.). Sci Aliments 26: 394-408. https://doi.org/10.3166/sda.26.394-408
  22. Kim MK, Lee EJ, Kim KH. 2014. Effects of Helianthus tuberosus powder on the quality characteristics and antioxidant activity of rice sponge cakes. Korean J Food Cult 29: 195-204. https://doi.org/10.7318/KJFC/2014.29.2.195
  23. Jeong HJ, Kim JS, Sa YJ, Kim MO, Yang J, Kim MJ. 2011. Antioxidant activity and $\alpha$-glucosidase inhibitory effect of Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus) methanol extracts by heat treatment conditions. Korean J Med Crop Sci 19: 257-263. https://doi.org/10.7783/KJMCS.2011.19.4.257
  24. Jeon G, Han J, Choi Y, Lee SM, Kim HT, Lee J. 2008. Antioxidant and antiproliferative activity of pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) leaves. J Korean Soc Food Sci Nutr 37: 1079-1083. https://doi.org/10.3746/jkfn.2008.37.8.1079
  25. Yuan X, Gao M, Xiao H, Tan C, Du Y. 2012. Free radical scavenging activities and bioactive substances of Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus L.) leaves. Food Chem 133: 10-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2011.09.071
  26. Kwak JH, Choi GN, Park JH, Kim JH, Jeong HR, Jeong CH, Heo HJ. 2010. Antioxidant and neuronal cell protective effect of purple sweet potato extract. J Agric Life Sci 44: 57-66.
  27. Jang HY, Park HS, Kwon KR, Rhim TJ. 2008. A study on the comparison of antioxidant effects among wild ginseng, cultivated wild ginseng, and cultivated ginseng extracts. J Pharmacopuncture 11: 67-78. https://doi.org/10.3831/KPI.2008.11.3.067

Cited by

  1. COMPLEX PROCESSING OF JERUSALEM ARTICHOKE INTO FUNCTIONAL PRODUCTS vol.13, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.15673/fst.v13i4.1559
  2. Quality characteristics and antioxidant activities of ‘Sikhye’ containing different amounts of Jerusalem artichoke extract vol.28, pp.6, 2016, https://doi.org/10.11002/kjfp.2021.28.6.771