Journal of Korean Home Economics Education Association (한국가정과교육학회지)

Korea Home Economics Education Association (한국가정과교육학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Core Concepts of Home Economics: Management and Planning of Life-cycle

가정과교육과정에서의 핵심개념: 관리 및 생애설계

  • 남수정 (전주대학교 사범대학 가정교육과)
  • Received : 2016.04.20
  • Accepted : 2016.05.30
  • Published : 2016.06.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

In this study, we identified the theoretical basis of management and planning of life-cycle, the core concept of resource "Administration and Independence," of Home Economics curriculum according to "Notification of Education Ministry #2015-74." First in relation to "management", we identified the systematic theory, the theoretical basis of traditional home management, and diagnosed how this systematic theory is reflected on 2015' curriculum. As a result, the contents of actual curriculum's middle school contents does not include integrally the life related problems that middle students are facing in real life, and it is hard to be convinced what priority the element of selected contents have of several problems. Next, in case of planning of life-cycle that accentuates the importance of life plan corresponding to career orientation it mentions the contents including very comprehensive area such as value, profession, health as well as developmental task, but the fact leaves to be desired that 2015 curriculum is overlooking the importance of financial planning, the international trend.

본 연구에서는 교육부 고시 교육부 고시 '2015 개정 실과(기술 가정) 교육과정' 내용체계 중 "자원관리와 자립" 영역의 핵심개념인 "관리"와 "생애설계"에 대한 이론적 기초를 살펴보았다. 먼저 "관리"영역과 관련해서는 전통적인 가정관리의 이론적 토대인 체계이론에 대한 내용을 살펴보았으며 이러한 체계이론이 2015년 개정교육과정 내에서는 어떻게 반영되고 있는지를 진단한 결과 현 교육과정의 중학교 내용요소들은 중학생들의 실생활에서 직면하고 있는 생활관련 문제들을 통합적으로 포괄하고 있지 않으며 선별된 내용 요소들 또한 여러 가지 문제 상황 중에서 어느 정도 우선순위를 가지고 있는지 확신하기 어려운 부분이 있다. 다음으로 생애설계의 경우 진로지도에 부합하여 생애설계의 중요성을 강조하고 있기 때문에 발달과업을 비롯하여 가치관, 직업, 건강 등 매우 포괄적인 영역을 망라하여 생애설계의 대한 내용을 언급하고 있지만 2015 개정 교육과정에서는 국제적인 트렌드인 재무설계에 대한 중요성을 간과하고 있다는 사실은 다소 아쉬운 부분이다.

Keywords

References

  1. Ando, A. & Modiglinani, F. (1963). The life cycle hypothesis of saving: aggregate implications & test. The American Economic Review, 53(1), 55-84.
  2. Banks, J., Blundell, R. & Tanner, S, (1998). Is There a Retirement-Savings Puzzle? American Economic Review, 88(4), 769-788.
  3. Bausch., K. C. (2001). The Emerging Consensus in Social Systems Theory. NewYork: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.
  4. Bernheim, B. D., Skinner, J. & Weinberg, S. (2001). What Account for the Variation in Retirement Wealth Among US Households? American Economic Review, 91(4), 832-857. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.91.4.832
  5. Bertalanffy, L.V. (1976). General System Theory: Foundations, Development, Applications. New York: George Braziller, Inc.
  6. Cho, H-J & Im J-B (1994). The effects of family life events and the orientation of Home Economics behavior on the satisfaction of family life. Journal of the Korean Home Economics Association 32(5), 15-27.
  7. Deacon, R. E. & Firebaugh, F. M. (1966). Home Management Context And Concepts (1st ED.), Bosteon: Houghton Miffin, Inc.
  8. Deacon, R. E. & Firebaugh, F. M. (1975). Familty Resource Management: Principles and Applications. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
  9. Fisher, K. (1965). Exploration in saving behavior. Oxford Institute of Economical and Statistical Bulletin, 18, 201-277.
  10. Gross, I. H., Crandall, E. & Knoll, M. (1980). Management for Modern Families, 4th edition, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.
  11. Gudagno, M. A. N. (1981). A system approach to family financial management: implication for family research. Pater presented at the National Councile on Family Relations, Milwaukee.
  12. Heckm, R. K. S. (1983). A Preliminary Test of a Management Research Model, Cornell university, N.Y.: Ithaca, Inc.
  13. Hook, N. C. & Paolucci, B. (1970). The family as ecosystem. Journal of Home Economics 62(5), 315-318.
  14. Hubbard, R. G., Skinner, J. & Zeldes, S. (1994). Precautionary saving and social insurance. Journal of Political Economy, 103, 360-399.
  15. Kantor, D. & Lehr, W. (1975). Housing, Society, and Consumer, st. Paul: West Publishing co.
  16. Lee, Y-S, Too, K-J (1992). The impact of managerial behavior on the satisfaction with management, Journal of The Korean Home Management Association, 10(1), 43-51.
  17. Lim, J-B, Gee, Y-S, Moon, S-J, Lee, K-Y & Lee, Y-S. (2003). Home Mangement, Seoul: Shinjeong, Inc.
  18. Maloch, F. & Deacon, R. E. (1970). Proposed frame work for home management. Journal of Home Economics, 58, 31-35.
  19. Melson, G. F. (1980). Family and Environment-As Ecosystem Perspective. Mineapolish: Burgess Publishing Co.
  20. Moon, S. J. (1981). Eine anthropoloische begrundung fur das haushakterische handken. Journal of the Korean Home Economics Association, 19(4), 65-71.
  21. Mundy, S. (2009). Financial Education Program in Schools. OECD Journal: General Papers.
  22. Newton, D. I. (1979). Managerial behavior, goal achievement satisfaction with managerial behavior and life satisfaction. Unpulished master thesis, Iowa State University.
  23. Palolucci, B., Hall, O. & Axinn N. W. (1977). Family Decision Making: As Ecosystem Approch. New York: Jhon Wiley & Sone.
  24. Shefrin, H. & Thaler, R. (1988). The behavioral life-cycle hypothesis, Economic Inquiry, 26, 609-643. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-7295.1988.tb01520.x
  25. Thurow, L. (1969). The optimum lifetime distribution of consumption expenditures. American Economic Review, 59, 324-330.
  26. 문부과학성(2010) 고등학교 학습지도요령 해설 가정편참고문헌.

Cited by

  1. A Study of Experts’ Recognition Weight on Subject-Specific Competency and Content System’s Sub-Elements of the 2015 Revised Technology·Home Economics Curriculum Using Fuzzy Decision vol.26, pp.5, 2016, https://doi.org/10.5934/kjhe.2017.26.5.495
  2. 텍스트 마이닝 기법을 활용한 중학교 가정과 교육과정 분석 vol.30, pp.3, 2018, https://doi.org/10.19031/jkheea.2018.09.30.3.111
  3. 윤리적 소비실천을 위한 가정과 '소비생활' 영역 교육과정 제안 vol.30, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.19031/jkheea.2018.12.30.4.57
  4. 과정 중심 평가를 위한 중학교 가정과 교수·학습과정안 개발: 생애설계 단원을 중심으로 vol.33, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.19031/jkheea.2021.3.33.1.101